Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions
Thread gallery
26
CriticalCondition · 14/10/2026 12:39

He's getting tearful.

Boadicea2 · 14/10/2026 12:39

Shall I report mine? @fanOfBen

nauticant · 14/10/2026 12:35

It's not even legalese, it's pretendy nonsense. When it was challenged in the ET the CEO respondent dropped this ridiculous defence.

TheywontletmehavethenameIwant · 14/10/2026 12:32

Thanks for the reminder.
"Her legal claim is discrimination on the grounds of her employer’s perception that she had gender critical beliefs and on the grounds of her protected belief in evidence-based medicine. The respondent defends the latter claim by pleading that evidence-based medicine is just an opinion, not cogent or coherent and not relevant to a weighty or substantial aspect of human life and behaviour; does not meet the Grainger Criteria."

Evidence-based medicine is supposed to be a 'belief' now, and a Health Service is saying that evidence-based medicine is just an 'opinion', is that just legalese or am I missing something.