Redvers v NHS Sussex Integrated Care Board & Mr Adam Doyle Thread 2

From TT:

AD The letters go out close to my leave
CM Para 86 of yr WS: u say yr role to ensure recs implemeted
Yes, letter was to me
CM Mr Smith says was told to do it
Yes, In disc w my new chair. Was recruiting new l'ship team to take actions forward
CM Yr letter p1906 to the C

CM U talk a good game AD - big assurances of action
AD I didnt see as a game. I talk about the plans I'm going to make
CM p43 supp2: email Sept 22, wld u agree that Sinha and Cannon and Mr Smith cc-ed. Shlf have been to CM?NO
All 3 shld have a role
CM U suggest no timeline for any of this

From TT:

CM Supp p250 after July mtg and SD: 15 Aug 2022 . What are u discussing w NHSE here?
AD I'd met w DSH, C and Gill. Recognising that until had spokent to all 3 I wasnt sure where it wld all land, the DA report wldnt be used and we shld try to move forward

CM This arrived in Sept 26 but y'd already signed to say y'd disclosed all - p249 in suppl 2. Why only rec this last Monday
AD As yday I asked for it to be checked again and this is what came up
CM What does finalise e'thing mean?
In terms of my recollection I had Sd report,
met the 3 docs, told AD nothing being done w it and then get into repair workshop after SD

From TT:

May be concerns re future and how to get right. Asked how to get it right in future
CM [reads email betwen C and AD incl transparency and honesty and thanking the C] Do u accept this is about Cs beliefs? It seems to have been only a failure to speak to DSH in advance

CM Is there anything separable from the referrals to NHSE and GMC. To the extent...
BW This is for subs
CM WR said is difficult to speak to each other ahead of referrals.
Yes
CM The SG team rebuffed by WB. U sit w C for an hour, invoke 2 of Nolan principles but dont tell her the GMC and NHSE has notice of DA

From TT:

AD As the Cx came into me from DSH. I dont regard the referrals as vexatious
CM Would u accept this trial is 1st time that's made clear
AD Idk
CM p74 of WS bundle: [reads re nor feeling able to raise concerns in this org again]
That's her statement
CM U cld have said, we got this wrong, carry on

CM U dont say anything like that
It was v clear and it felt w Anesh and Alsion. that how concerns were raised felt v confusing. Re raising SG concerns, it seemed we cld do better about how to raise concerns and how to get it right.

From TT:

And told DSH not taking it forward
CM The picture was mixed, reflected by Robsons own queries about where things had landed and the email.
J Let's go to the email
CM The one we've just looked at. If issues unclear to HR and the C they're not put to bed
I think they were

The workshop that all agreed to attend ??
CM The C was never told she'd acted in good faith
No
CM In fact u say to her, [reads re the complainant and the C cld change her practice]
No. I met w DSH, CMO and C each. I understood they had 5 days to appeal so I'll wait until that
has passed. Am trying to resolve where e'one is at

CM Y'd already met w DSH
Not sure, they were all close together
CM U discuss a vexatious referral
Yes, I used these words
CM Do u know access werent vexatious
AD I now see referrals to GMC and NHSE were appropraite

From TT:

CM Prospect of harm
AD Repeats above
CM Instead a biased flawed Ix into the C
Yes
Cm p1660: detr re failing to implement SD recommendations which is 12. In terms of yr engagement w SD u were asked to provide info by SD in March 22 or by ?. p1685

Cm p1741, email to u w notes of mtg. p1740 has notes w some ammendments. Where are they? [Mr Doyle and Mundy]
I'm not sure
CM No such docs have been found in searches. why have the email but not the attachments/ammendments?
Idk
CM Why not the notes Mundy mtg w DA
Idk

Cm p1789/90: email asking for assurance that C acted in good faith and ongoing risks to her be removed
J it's dr robson??
CM Forgive me. Do u accept she wants assurances at the mtg w you that there'll be no reprisals
Yes
CM And she doesnt get them does she
AD In the mtg,

AD I outlined how to appraoch the sitn and I say DA report and Cx put aside. To support her and move the org forward
CM p1862: ms robson forwarded to you, interim CPO, re no case to answer and u said y'd go back the the complainant

Yes [re no mixed msgs being given]
Yes
CM Mentions potential legal avenue in the future and fear of speaking up to prevent harm
Yes
CM The Robson email to u: that clarity was never provided
I think it was. Had a mtg w Robson, C and ? I frame thr possible options I had. Cx not looked at and DA not taken forward.