Page 21 | Redvers v NHS Sussex Integrated Care Board & Mr Adam Doyle Thread 2

fanOfBen · 2026-10-14T11:21:34+00:00

Minimal thread-starting: TT: [[https://tribunaltweets.substack.com/p/redvers-v-nhs-sussex-integrated-care https://tribunaltweets.substack.com/p/redvers-v-nhs-sussex-integrated-care]] Thread 1: https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/5586672-wellbn-brighton-gp-practice-do-not-believe-in-evidence-based-medicine-tt-at-employment-tribunal-tomorrow

Boiledbeetle · 15/10/2026 13:10

Respondent counsel having a whinge

MrPrettyDamnCosmic · 15/10/2026 13:09

The appointment of disgraced Dr Sinha from the Tavistock as CMO was a big fuck off message & warning to all GC members of staff especially those in the safeguarding team to STFU.

Original poster

fanOfBen · 15/10/2026 13:06

From TT:

AD Role req s'one who cld respond to multiple areas. ALl the exec appts to ICB by myslef and the chair and others, dep on the req of the role. All panels had NHSE ppl on. Sussex didnt have a good reputation for innovation so we looked at this. NHSE wanted s'one form another EDI team

Was a broad panel
CM Did u have a candidate who hadnt had trib proceedings?
Another 2 but I cant remember details
CM W Dr Sinha u were painting in brushstrokes that dissent wldnt be tolerated in workforce
No. A big area not sorted in region was mental health so wanted strength here

OP posts:

KittyWilkinson · 15/10/2026 13:05

That's a cracking point that CM makes. A disciplinary warning has a finite shelf life of say 12 months or whatever the sanction is. Then it's taken off your file. A document however, follows Dr. R. around for the whole of her professional life and there's no way of appealing it. Horrible.

Boiledbeetle · 15/10/2026 13:04

I think we're about 3 qs away from lunch

Fingers crossed

Original poster

fanOfBen · 15/10/2026 13:04

From TT:

CM Sinha wasnt named in Appleby
J Not approp
CM p77 of WB, u say a full and robust process to get him.
Yes
CM Was not him as an org.
Yes
CM Not any other candidates looked at
No
CM Those refs drew yr attention to the ET proceedings against the Tavistock and Dr Sinha

CM He ref himself to the GMC who saw no concerns and closed the case
Yes
CM But the trib found serious concerns
Yes
CM You chose as yr CMO s'one w SG failures
No. The ICB l'ship role req u to work w yr counterparts and leading across multiple orgs

OP posts:

Boiledbeetle · 15/10/2026 13:02

.

KittyWilkinson · 15/10/2026 13:00

StSpiridian · 15/10/2026 12:58

And my goodness, what a heroine Dr Redvers is!

She really is. She's a tremendously courageous and principled woman who cares for vulnerable young people.

Original poster

fanOfBen · 15/10/2026 13:00

From TT:

CM which are protected disc and she was victimised for her SG WB concerns. We see trib findings on Sinha: any employee [reads fast and motorbike so ?] In some ways it was worse than a disciplinary as cldnt appeal and kept on file etc...

CM Status of doc which is worse than disc sanction has a long afterlife. Wld u agree DA report being shared w NHSE and GMC could be viewed as a similar situation?
AD It couldld be
CM [AD asked to read new page ending99]

OP posts:

Boiledbeetle · 15/10/2026 13:00

God I'm so pissed with this man.

rebax · 15/10/2026 12:59

StSpiridian · 15/10/2026 12:58

And my goodness, what a heroine Dr Redvers is!

It looks like she should get a public honour for services to medical safeguarding for refusing to let this drop.

SlackJawedDisbeliefXY · 15/10/2026 12:59

... as the Ix didnt align with its terms of ref. U considered asking for £ back. Did this happen
Idk, wld have to ask

Is this asking if he let his mate keep the money after their flawed investigation? Is there an implied, you let them keep the money because they delivered what you agreed on?

Boiledbeetle · 15/10/2026 12:58

StSpiridian · 15/10/2026 12:57

I am deeply shocked - and to be honest upset- senior staff were knowingly and deliberately refusing to safeguard children referred to the trans Dr. As the evidence has continued it has clarified their total dereliction of duty and contempt for children's safety and welfare in the name of 'trans'. To me, this should be a criminal case, but nothing ever happens to punish trans extremist NHS staff.

I am posting this info again in case anyone hasn't read the previous thread:

'No need to feel sorry for this witness. He knew what was happening and deliberately ignored the fact children were being harmed by a trans activist Dr.

And it's possibly a pattern.

He was also CEO in 2023 when it came to light one of his senior Trust Drs was supporting the use of infants who are children of transpeople as sexual props (by men/dads who Id as trans -with the sexual fetish 'lactophilia') - against all evidence based medicine and child safeguarding.

To get the babies protected, the Dr investigated and policy addressed, Children of Transitioners group had to go the the press, Heath Secretary and GMC, after which the NHS England CEO also intervened.

A lot of these people need to do jail time.

StSpiridian · 15/10/2026 12:58

And my goodness, what a heroine Dr Redvers is!

StSpiridian · 15/10/2026 12:57

I am deeply shocked - and to be honest upset- senior staff were knowingly and deliberately refusing to safeguard children referred to the trans Dr. As the evidence has continued it has clarified their total dereliction of duty and contempt for children's safety and welfare in the name of 'trans'. To me, this should be a criminal case, but nothing ever happens to punish trans extremist NHS staff.

I am posting this info again in case anyone hasn't read the previous thread:

'No need to feel sorry for this witness. He knew what was happening and deliberately ignored the fact children were being harmed by a trans activist Dr.

And it's possibly a pattern.

He was also CEO in 2023 when it came to light one of his senior Trust Drs was supporting the use of infants who are children of transpeople as sexual props (by men/dads who Id as trans -with the sexual fetish 'lactophilia') - against all evidence based medicine and child safeguarding.

To get the babies protected, the Dr investigated and policy addressed, Children of Transitioners group had to go the the press, Heath Secretary and GMC, after which the NHS England CEO also intervened.

Original poster

fanOfBen · 15/10/2026 12:56

From TT:

DAs report had had a profound effect on the C [v fast]
Yes
CM So shld have sent a msg to the SG team they shld feel comfy raising concerns
Yes
CM Esp w treatments like CSH
Yes
CM When did Sinha start?
Around May 2022

CM p167 of supp: Rs position re bundle contents [reads re docs provided with no relevance to the case eg relating to Tavistock] No criticism of MLF
Sinha was med director of the Tavistock
Yes
CM p1043: start of Appleby judgement. Wld u agree she raised GIDS SG concerns

OP posts:

Boiledbeetle · 15/10/2026 12:56

Surely in this tribunal the judge can't find the respondents did nothing wrong? Surely!!

They didn't do anything right so far!

Boiledbeetle · 15/10/2026 12:54

Mmmnotsure · 15/10/2026 12:52

Christmas present sorted? A monthly delivery arrangement, like flowers?

Show quote history

Or this...

Redvers v NHS Sussex Integrated Care Board & Mr Adam Doyle Thread 2

Original poster

fanOfBen · 15/10/2026 12:53

From TT:

as the Ix didnt align with its terms of ref. U considered asking for £ back. Did this happen
Idk, wld have to ask
CM U met SD in May 2022 p1746.
Yes
CM re emails btwn u and NHSE u were trying to get a sense w them
No, just of timescales

AD I think this came from my 1-2-1 w Galliano, and I said I'd not heard anything for a while. I was told it wld take longer than expected
CM p1679: SD concluded re impact on SG team - as a direct result of the Ix feel professionally vulnerable and unsupported by the ICB

OP posts:

rebax · 15/10/2026 12:52

Is the defence now roughly 'it could have been worse for the Claimant'????

Mmmnotsure · 15/10/2026 12:52

Justabaker · 15/10/2026 12:23

Can I claim 4 x 4 coloured pens for DH? He loves 'em but sadly cannot keep hold of them.

Christmas present sorted? A monthly delivery arrangement, like flowers?

maltravers · 15/10/2026 12:50

I passed it on, I was no longer involved (pass the hot potato, let someone else take the flack from the TRAs /the legal fall out down the line).

Original poster

fanOfBen · 15/10/2026 12:50

From TT:

CM Then u say u plan to be no longer involved and expect them to manage this
Yes
CM I've been asked if I'm micromanaging. The org was in a better state than earlier. All 8 CGCs had signif difficulties. I'd recruited new leaders and the role of leader of CGC and ICB different

CM I went thru the proper CEO interview process. My new chair wanted me to be more strategic. We'd been thru so much change process on all these orgs. My overall l'ship and my new leaders had delegated duties
CM The SD report into the Flynn Ix: the CGC reviewed contract w DA

OP posts:

Tallisker · 15/10/2026 12:48

This is giving me PTSD flashbacks of my grievance with the NHS. They just blatantly lied and lied and wouldn’t allow me to produce documents that would prove their lies.

I should have taken them to tribunal but I was too broken. The process is the punishment and I’m not very strong. Thank goodness for the Sandies, the Bethanys, the Sarahs, the Jennifers.

GailBlancheViola · 15/10/2026 12:47

I'm staggered at the level of incompetence and ignorance this man is showing and he gets paid ££££££££ for it. Little wonder the NHS is in the state it is in, and all other institutions funded by the public.