Active discussions

Please or to access all these features

Talk
Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Feminism: chat

Thread gallery
26
Thehorticulturalhussie · 15/10/2026 16:33

Justabaker · 15/10/2026 16:17

Don't get me started. Of course, they could find it or recover it.

I have chores to do.

I'm ending my terfing today with this comment from Naomi.

I know! Fabulous!! In the absence of a curious national press (yet more lack of curiosity or rather the fear of offending their own in-house gender fascists) thank goodness that NC is making this more public.

Boiledbeetle · 15/10/2026 16:33

Today afternoon part one:
https://archive.ph/LY1iD

Today Afternoon part two:

Still not appeared and I have things to do

TT substack:

https://substack.com/home/post/p-218906910

SlackJawedDisbeliefXY · 15/10/2026 16:30

MyThreeWords · 15/10/2026 15:24

Should be must not should? Not must be must not should? Shock

Show quote history

Shall not should

A fudge

BunfightBetty · 15/10/2026 16:27

How very convenient that Doyle's diary happens to be irretrievable. Can you believe it?

If I were the judge I'd hold that against them and just assume it was damning. IANAL though (probably a good thing).

FedUpFeminist · 15/10/2026 16:25

BlueLegume · 15/10/2026 13:28

Quite, but the reality is we know this is a national issue across all public services. If this was private sector this would be addressed more robustly and that is why the activists have infiltrated public sector not private sector because they are more protected by nonsensical thoughts than the need to make profits as private sector.

Show quote history

This is 100% true. The private sector would not put up with this .

CriticalCondition · 15/10/2026 16:21

I don't doubt it can be found. But if it has to be retrieved from a deleted folder then there are even more questions to be answered.

Justabaker · 15/10/2026 16:17

Don't get me started. Of course, they could find it or recover it.

I have chores to do.

I'm ending my terfing today with this comment from Naomi.

Redvers v NHS Sussex Integrated Care Board & Mr Adam Doyle Thread 2
CriticalCondition · 15/10/2026 16:17

Hedgehogforshort · 15/10/2026 16:02

Of course his solicitor could discuss the whereabouts of his diary for 2021. Not the barrister though.

Show quote history

Perhaps they were afraid he'd subsequently blurt out something he shouldn't while still on the stand. If it is found and the judge has questions presumably she can recall him? I think the possibility of that was contemplated in one of the other tribunals, Sandie Peggie?

rebax · 15/10/2026 16:15

CriticalCondition · 15/10/2026 16:04

One scenario could be that selected diary entries have been disclosed and then the whole thing subsequently wiped during the course of the litigation. Accidentally, negligently or deliberately.

Awks.

Unlikely, IT should still be able to find a copy.

It seems that they have not looked hard enough, or at all.

Boiledbeetle · 15/10/2026 16:13

CriticalCondition · 15/10/2026 16:11

And CM said 'You sound just like my wife!'.

Show quote history

I missed that!

CriticalCondition · 15/10/2026 16:11

Justabaker · 15/10/2026 16:05

Am I the only person who caught the Judge's remark about barristers existing in a different space time continuum?

And CM said 'You sound just like my wife!'.

Boiledbeetle · 15/10/2026 16:06

Justabaker · 15/10/2026 16:05

Am I the only person who caught the Judge's remark about barristers existing in a different space time continuum?

I heard it but couldn't write it down in time!

Justabaker · 15/10/2026 16:05

Am I the only person who caught the Judge's remark about barristers existing in a different space time continuum?

doctor who tardis GIF
CriticalCondition · 15/10/2026 16:04

One scenario could be that selected diary entries have been disclosed and then the whole thing subsequently wiped during the course of the litigation. Accidentally, negligently or deliberately.

Awks.

princessleah1 · 15/10/2026 16:03

The diary should be kept for things likes this. I thought seven years was usual. But can see that tech changes and restructure may have caused it to be lost.

Hedgehogforshort · 15/10/2026 16:02

CriticalCondition · 15/10/2026 15:58

I can understand that while AD was still under oath his lawyers were hampered in locating and accessing his 2021 diary because they couldn't discuss it with him. When the judge asked for it I thought his reaction indicated that he thought it was extant and accessible. But I might be wrong.

Of course his solicitor could discuss the whereabouts of his diary for 2021. Not the barrister though.

CriticalCondition · 15/10/2026 15:58

I can understand that while AD was still under oath his lawyers were hampered in locating and accessing his 2021 diary because they couldn't discuss it with him. When the judge asked for it I thought his reaction indicated that he thought it was extant and accessible. But I might be wrong.

Cailleach1 · 15/10/2026 15:56

Slippery, aren’t they?

‘BW Some diary entries are there in bundle
J Not for the relevant period’

Hedgehogforshort · 15/10/2026 15:56

So the judge has not received the diary yet

Boiledbeetle · 15/10/2026 15:55

Bet AD feels rough this evening!

Matt Leblanc Adam Burns GIF by CBS
TheywontletmehavethenameIwant · 15/10/2026 15:52

Is the Judge putting them on the clock for questions? 😂

And is the Judge asking for a Public Enquiry or was that someone else? (besides NC and NW)

Original poster
fanOfBen · 15/10/2026 15:50

From TT:

J I find this surprising to the point ... I don;t want to say unbelievable but I am very surprised they cannot be found. Inquiries with IT? BW When someone leaves organisation this can be a difficulty. Migration ... as when changing chambers. J All right. Can we be clear re witnesses for tomorrow BW Gwyneth Adam needs to be away in afternoon; Pennie Ford, and then [Hannah] Hamilton. Three witnesses averaging 90 minutes each. J Thanks counsel and Mr Doyle. [END]

OP posts:
Original poster
fanOfBen · 15/10/2026 15:48

From TT:

J Thank you. To you Mr Williams?
BW Re terms of reference and what ex between Mr Power and SH. 63 p [second] bundle, p4 there is an email to MP and DSH. It says in final para ToR for ix being drafted 9 July. I will share with you once I have approved. Did Dr Hall have any input after that?
AS no
BW A lot made of 29 June meeting with SH. First time C aware was claimed to have been last Monday. Can I take you to main bundle, what date do you put on that meeting
AD 29 June.
J Turing to the diary matter? I have had none anything yet.
BW I have not consulted with solicitors
J Seems to be that inquiries need to be made
BW Some diary entries are there in bundle
J Not for the relevant period
BW not for 2021, no

CM Just on that Cs case would be two points: Diary entries within scope of orders, and basis of evidence of meetings prior to 2021 with WellBN this would be disclosable

[BW and CM Argue re disclosure]

OP posts:
Original poster
fanOfBen · 15/10/2026 15:46

From TT:

J Next substantive paragraph refs further challenge to orgs, of the same nature?
AD yes

[please be aware there is some sound interference on line atm]
J Top of page 1650 second bullet anxiety of some individuals, Dr Hall again? As part of ix; when Mr Milson asked about this why you are meeting GMC?
AD In terms about approach, this is gx ... what we are doing?
J IT had been planned we [NHSE/GMC] re ix of two doctors. C and DSH? [yes] You would be investigating appropriate action? Does this indicate ix action at least likely?

AD As you see from CCD ... they had a view and I was not privy to that until they indicated and that was their choice to take.
J Did you say when planning took place?
AD There was I think discussion with Dr Gill and GMC at some point in the autumn, wintertime about going going forward but not sure what hat would have been . Final Q from me p1906, the 'apology letter'. You refer to Durant letter and recommendations. Was it your intention to indicate all would be actioned
AD yes and what was to be done re each of them

OP posts:
Boiledbeetle · 15/10/2026 15:45

And they are all off home