Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Teacher upset with my child questioning about trans child

1000 replies

sarahandsage · 09/10/2026 06:39

Was Called into school today.
My daughter has just started reception in September, it’s a lovely village school, and she’s made lots of friends and settled in really well.

Yesterday I was called into have chat with her teacher.
Was informed my child has a trans girl in her class, and that my child is questioning the teacher every day about this.
That all the other children accept this child was born in the wrong body, yet my daughter is questioning ‘too much’.

I said we encourage curiosity amongst our children, so am
not surprised.

The teacher then said that my child was taken to one side and read a couple of books :
My name is Jazz
and one about a crayon that feels like a different colour.
Which was astonishing to me, because really singling out a child to (as the teacher said ) “Get her on board”, feels very pushy.

My daughter is very kind, and plays with all the children in the class including the trans girl.
The teacher is not concerned with unkindness, but that my daughter is not accepting enough, and she has asked us to reiterate pronouns and that this child is a girl.

This is the first school experience for us, as previously my daughter was at a childminder

It feels very wrong to single out a child, and read books that introduce a concept that we haven’t broached with our children yet.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
11
SENsupportplease · 17/10/2026 17:01

I think it’s the same friend we just don’t know who it is.

I don’t really want to take WhatsApp away as she then can’t communicate with friends at all outside of school

She didn’t leave the classroom, she has never done that. she got in trouble for repeatedly asking to go to the loo when she felt her period leak. It was her first period so she was very anxious. I believe that is being reviewed as she should have been allowed to go.

other things she has done wrong is truanting - she missed 2 lessons due to being in medical.

so she really has made a name for herself.

…

Can this be classed as the equivalent of homophobia or racism ? Is it discriminatory of her / me?

…
im not going to force her to accept or use the pronouns, she needs to trust me and she spends enough of her life confused about adhering to social norms as it is.

OldCrone · 17/10/2026 17:10

Lacksie · 17/10/2026 16:41

You’re still misunderstanding. I’m not suggesting that personality traits, behaviours or stereotypes determine someone’s biological sex. I’ve never said anything of the sort.

I’m explaining that the body and the meanings we attach to it are not the same thing. Gender is precisely the social and psychological meaning we give to sex and perceived bodily differences — how we understand, interpret and organise those differences in society.

Having a particular reproductive anatomy is a biological fact. But the moment we see that body, recognise it as male or female, and understand what that means, we’re already interpreting it through the social and psychological knowledge we have about sex. That’s gender. We cannot simply look at human bodies without bringing that understanding to what we see. There is no entirely neutral, interpretation-free way of perceiving and categorising sex.

But words are not material facts. Words are how we recognise, categorise and give meaning to the world around us. And the meanings through which we understand sex and sexual differences are precisely what gender is.

Words aren’t chromosomes. They're part of how we construct meaning around sex — and that is gender.

Edited

Men still aren't women though.

MrsOvertonsWindow · 17/10/2026 17:12

SENsupportplease · 17/10/2026 17:01

I think it’s the same friend we just don’t know who it is.

I don’t really want to take WhatsApp away as she then can’t communicate with friends at all outside of school

She didn’t leave the classroom, she has never done that. she got in trouble for repeatedly asking to go to the loo when she felt her period leak. It was her first period so she was very anxious. I believe that is being reviewed as she should have been allowed to go.

other things she has done wrong is truanting - she missed 2 lessons due to being in medical.

so she really has made a name for herself.

…

Can this be classed as the equivalent of homophobia or racism ? Is it discriminatory of her / me?

…
im not going to force her to accept or use the pronouns, she needs to trust me and she spends enough of her life confused about adhering to social norms as it is.

Bless her. The start to Year 7 sounds a challenge.

I'd certainly ask for a meeting with her Head of Year? Get them to explain how she got the detentions and why they think it's proportionate? The school are legally obligated to make "reasonable adjustments" for her SEN yet it seems
the school are taking it on themselves to discipline children for accurately sexing this male teacher using tale telling from other children as their source .
As I said, I can't see anywhere in all the guidance where this is specifically addressed other than the general expectation about treating others with respect.

Lacksie · 17/10/2026 17:13

nutmeg7 · 17/10/2026 16:58

We don’t create reality by looking at it.

You have swallowed too much post-modernism.

eta: I don’t misunderstand you, I do not agree with you. We use words to refer to concrete material real facts about the world. “Cat” does not mean a dog.

Edited

I agree that reality exists independently of us. My point is that we can only perceive and understand it through our minds. We don’t create reality by looking at it, but we inevitably interpret what we see.

Gender is how our minds perceive and make sense of sex. That doesn’t mean gender creates sex. It means that when we perceive and give meaning to sex, we’re already engaging in the process of creating gender.

KilkennyCats · 17/10/2026 17:18

It means that when we perceive and give meaning to sex, we’re already engaging in the process of creating gender.
What in the name of all holy does that actually mean??

What is gender, in your view?

BruachAbhann · 17/10/2026 17:19

localnotail · 17/10/2026 15:35

Socially transitioned or was he mutilated, as well?

I have no idea how something so sexual can be imposed on a child that did not even reach puberty.

Socially transitioned- told he was actually a girl trapped in a boy's body, that some people had different brains and that he had a 'pink' brain, dressed in girl's clothing and female pronouns used.

Lacksie · 17/10/2026 17:20

KilkennyCats · 17/10/2026 17:18

It means that when we perceive and give meaning to sex, we’re already engaging in the process of creating gender.
What in the name of all holy does that actually mean??

What is gender, in your view?

Gender is the knowledge, recognition and meaning that we give to sexual differences

Lacksie · 17/10/2026 17:26

Lacksie · 17/10/2026 17:20

Gender is the knowledge, recognition and meaning that we give to sexual differences

Or to put it another way- gender is how the brain processes sex

OldCrone · 17/10/2026 17:26

Lacksie · 17/10/2026 17:20

Gender is the knowledge, recognition and meaning that we give to sexual differences

I see you're now creating your own meanings for words.

This makes communication with you very difficult, because your personal made up definitions of words are not the same as the dictionary definitions that the rest of us are using.

It's as though you're using your own personal language, using English words, but attaching different meanings to them. So this is why you don't understand what we're saying and your posts make no sense to anyone else.

KilkennyCats · 17/10/2026 17:27

Lacksie · 17/10/2026 17:20

Gender is the knowledge, recognition and meaning that we give to sexual differences

Well, that’s a load of hooey 🤔

Lacksie · 17/10/2026 17:34

OldCrone · 17/10/2026 17:26

I see you're now creating your own meanings for words.

This makes communication with you very difficult, because your personal made up definitions of words are not the same as the dictionary definitions that the rest of us are using.

It's as though you're using your own personal language, using English words, but attaching different meanings to them. So this is why you don't understand what we're saying and your posts make no sense to anyone else.

I’m not making up my own definitions of words. I’m explaining what gender is and how it relates to sex — a relationship that is fundamentally misunderstood in this discussion.

this misunderstanding is at the heart of why many people struggle to make sense of trans experiences.

MyAmpleSheep · 17/10/2026 17:38

Lacksie · 17/10/2026 17:34

I’m not making up my own definitions of words. I’m explaining what gender is and how it relates to sex — a relationship that is fundamentally misunderstood in this discussion.

this misunderstanding is at the heart of why many people struggle to make sense of trans experiences.

Can you give any external references to gender being "knowledge, recognition and meaning that we give to sexual differences" and/or "how the brain processes sex"?

If you didn't make it up, where did you get that definition from?

Lacksie · 17/10/2026 17:46

MyAmpleSheep · 17/10/2026 17:38

Can you give any external references to gender being "knowledge, recognition and meaning that we give to sexual differences" and/or "how the brain processes sex"?

If you didn't make it up, where did you get that definition from?

There are any number of academic books, articles, scientific textbooks and authoritative reference works discussing gender and its relationship to sex. You could start with these:

  1. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Mikkola, M. Feminist Perspectives on Sex and Gender. Stanford University.
  1. American Psychological Association (2018). Guidelines for Psychological Practice with Girls and Women.
  1. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (2022). Measuring Sex, Gender Identity, and Sexual Orientation.
  1. American Psychological Association. APA Dictionary of Psychology: Gender.
  1. World Health Organization. Gender and health
Heggettypeg · 17/10/2026 17:49

Lacksie · 17/10/2026 17:34

I’m not making up my own definitions of words. I’m explaining what gender is and how it relates to sex — a relationship that is fundamentally misunderstood in this discussion.

this misunderstanding is at the heart of why many people struggle to make sense of trans experiences.

No. The " misunderstanding" arises because genderists expect us to pretend that "sparkle" can means "diamond" when it's not a diamond doing the sparkling.

nutmeg7 · 17/10/2026 17:50

Lacksie · 17/10/2026 17:13

I agree that reality exists independently of us. My point is that we can only perceive and understand it through our minds. We don’t create reality by looking at it, but we inevitably interpret what we see.

Gender is how our minds perceive and make sense of sex. That doesn’t mean gender creates sex. It means that when we perceive and give meaning to sex, we’re already engaging in the process of creating gender.

This is what you believe. Because you are fundamentally strongly invested in something you call “gender” being the means by which we decide access to male or female spaces.

You acknowledge sex is real but you don’t want to use sex as the means by which access to single sex spaces is controlled.

Because you believe that males who think they are female/want to be female should be allowed to use female spaces.

That belief is the starting point that necessitates the garbled nonsense about “gender” being different to sex and yet somehow also interchangeable with sex.

It is at the root of your strong desire to believe that our perceptions can somehow create reality.

You have to believe this so you can blur sex vs “gender” sufficiently to make it seem reasonable to allow males access to female spaces for their personal validation.

Sex is real. It renders the female more vulnerable. That’s the entire point of single sex spaces.

I do not agree that act of viewing something changes its fundamental underlying reality.

ScrollingLeaves · 17/10/2026 18:05

SENsupportplease · 17/10/2026 15:33

Slightly separate issue but the school are compelling my child to refer to a mtf trans teacher as she her.
my child is refusing and getting into trouble, one becuase the teacher is clearly male and child doesn’t believe they are she her, and two child is autistic and stubborn as fuck. She has had several detentions for slipping up and saying he instead of MX NAME, which is what we have taught her to use.

this is another child reporting her when it happens.

is there any defence I can make to the school? Chikd is not trying to offend or be disrespectful

I am so sorry for your child.
This should not happen.

TheKeatingFive · 17/10/2026 18:11

@Lacksie

I asked you this earlier, but you ignored it.

Could you please explain to me what you think I have in common with a so called ‘transwoman’ that would make that categorisation more important than what I have in common with members of my own sex?

Because I cannot think of a single thing

Thatcannotberight · 17/10/2026 18:20

localnotail · 17/10/2026 14:20

I'm still struggling to believe someone would "transition" a 4 year old.

A boy who was friends with my son in the school nursery had 'become a girl' by yr 1. It happens.

Lacksie · 17/10/2026 18:21

nutmeg7 · 17/10/2026 17:50

This is what you believe. Because you are fundamentally strongly invested in something you call “gender” being the means by which we decide access to male or female spaces.

You acknowledge sex is real but you don’t want to use sex as the means by which access to single sex spaces is controlled.

Because you believe that males who think they are female/want to be female should be allowed to use female spaces.

That belief is the starting point that necessitates the garbled nonsense about “gender” being different to sex and yet somehow also interchangeable with sex.

It is at the root of your strong desire to believe that our perceptions can somehow create reality.

You have to believe this so you can blur sex vs “gender” sufficiently to make it seem reasonable to allow males access to female spaces for their personal validation.

Sex is real. It renders the female more vulnerable. That’s the entire point of single sex spaces.

I do not agree that act of viewing something changes its fundamental underlying reality.

Which part are you finding to be garbled nonsense?

Do you acknowledge these two things , or are you disputing them? If the latter , can you explain how?

  • reality exists independently but we can only perceive and understand it through our minds.
  • We don’t create reality by looking at it, but we inevitably interpret what we see.
ScrollingLeaves · 17/10/2026 18:35

Thatcannotberight · 17/10/2026 18:20

A boy who was friends with my son in the school nursery had 'become a girl' by yr 1. It happens.

Likely creating lifetimes of mental and physical problems; and confusion in other children’s minds. It is child abuse.

OldCrone · 17/10/2026 18:48

Lacksie · 17/10/2026 17:46

There are any number of academic books, articles, scientific textbooks and authoritative reference works discussing gender and its relationship to sex. You could start with these:

  1. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Mikkola, M. Feminist Perspectives on Sex and Gender. Stanford University.
  1. American Psychological Association (2018). Guidelines for Psychological Practice with Girls and Women.
  1. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (2022). Measuring Sex, Gender Identity, and Sexual Orientation.
  1. American Psychological Association. APA Dictionary of Psychology: Gender.
  1. World Health Organization. Gender and health

World Health Organization. Gender and health

Gender refers to the characteristics of women, men, girls and boys that are socially constructed. This includes norms, behaviours and roles associated with being a woman, man, girl or boy

Do you agree with this definition?

Lacksie · 17/10/2026 19:02

OldCrone · 17/10/2026 18:48

World Health Organization. Gender and health

Gender refers to the characteristics of women, men, girls and boys that are socially constructed. This includes norms, behaviours and roles associated with being a woman, man, girl or boy

Do you agree with this definition?

Yes, absolutely. That’s a more applied way of expressing the same idea. The WHO describes some of the forms that gender takes in society — the characteristics, norms, behaviours and roles associated with sex. I’m explaining the underlying process through which these meanings arise: how we perceive, understand and give meaning to sex and sexual differences.

In other words, they’re different ways of describing the same phenomenon. One focuses on how gender manifests in society, the other on what gender fundamentally is and how it arises

nutmeg7 · 17/10/2026 19:15

Lacksie · 17/10/2026 18:21

Which part are you finding to be garbled nonsense?

Do you acknowledge these two things , or are you disputing them? If the latter , can you explain how?

  • reality exists independently but we can only perceive and understand it through our minds.
  • We don’t create reality by looking at it, but we inevitably interpret what we see.

We interpret what we see.
This does not alter the underlying reality.

So please explain why some male people should be allowed into spaces and services legally reserved for female people by use of single sex exemptions.

Are you saying it is because these males perceive themselves as female?

Are you saying that, if every observer present at the time thinks this male person is female, then they have become female?

Are you saying that if only some of the observers think this male person is female then they have become female?

Are you saying that if some/all the observers think this male person is female, he hasn’t become female, but it is nevertheless OK for him to use female spaces?

Are you saying that a male person who thinks they pass well as female should be allowed to use female spaces, regardless of the feelings of the female people present at the time?

Or what?

Because I do not see what anyone’s perceptions of another person’s appearance have anything to do with it.

Sex is a fact, not in the eye of the beholder.

localnotail · 17/10/2026 19:15

BruachAbhann · 17/10/2026 17:19

Socially transitioned- told he was actually a girl trapped in a boy's body, that some people had different brains and that he had a 'pink' brain, dressed in girl's clothing and female pronouns used.

How this is not child abuse?...

drspouse · 17/10/2026 19:39

Lacksie · 17/10/2026 11:40

There’s absolutely nothing wrong with rejecting being put into stereotyped boxes — I certainly do! And I agree that gender can (and does!) operate as a system of oppression, particularly in a patriarchal society.

But this is where I think your logic loses its way. When you say gender has “no redeeming characteristics”, that doesn’t really make sense, because gender isn’t a "thing" that has inherently good or bad qualities. It’s the social and psychological meaning we attach to sex and bodily differences — how we understand those differences and what significance we give them.

We can absolutely reject particular meanings being imposed on us. For example, being female shouldn’t mean that someone is expected to be nurturing, feminine or submissive. But we can’t somehow strip sex categories of all social meaning. The moment we categorise people as men and women, those categories have some significance in how we understand and relate to one another.

The point is to challenge oppressive meanings and expectations, not to imagine that we can eliminate social meaning altogether.

What if I don't think it's valid to give any psychological meaning to the sex categories? If I don't want gender taking up any space in my head except to remind myself (when school mums say "oh that's such a boy thing" or women say "it just made sense for me to give up work, his job is more important") that it's a load of rubbish?

"How the brain processes sex" by the way is completely made up. The brain works out what sex someone is. Some people then go on and think "so that woman will be nurturing". That's called stereotyping. Aka oppression. It's not a characteristic that should be encouraged and it's also not different to stereotyping. You can't make it nice and fluffy by calling it gender. It's just prejudice. We don't like prejudice. We do use it as humans to categorise people but we need to be aware of that and resist it where it's harming people, not decide "because people categorise other people into skirt wearers and non skirt wearers this is a natural category we can use to divide people up". We also categorise people into drivers and non drivers but that doesn't mean this is a natural category.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.