Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Teacher upset with my child questioning about trans child

1000 replies

sarahandsage · 09/10/2026 06:39

Was Called into school today.
My daughter has just started reception in September, it’s a lovely village school, and she’s made lots of friends and settled in really well.

Yesterday I was called into have chat with her teacher.
Was informed my child has a trans girl in her class, and that my child is questioning the teacher every day about this.
That all the other children accept this child was born in the wrong body, yet my daughter is questioning ‘too much’.

I said we encourage curiosity amongst our children, so am
not surprised.

The teacher then said that my child was taken to one side and read a couple of books :
My name is Jazz
and one about a crayon that feels like a different colour.
Which was astonishing to me, because really singling out a child to (as the teacher said ) “Get her on board”, feels very pushy.

My daughter is very kind, and plays with all the children in the class including the trans girl.
The teacher is not concerned with unkindness, but that my daughter is not accepting enough, and she has asked us to reiterate pronouns and that this child is a girl.

This is the first school experience for us, as previously my daughter was at a childminder

It feels very wrong to single out a child, and read books that introduce a concept that we haven’t broached with our children yet.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
11
SeasideWalkaroundStore · 17/10/2026 12:06

localnotail · 17/10/2026 11:21

Though I wonder why your daughter questioning this poor "trans" child every day. Children this young normally accept something new and move on, this sounds like some sort of obsession.

I would teach your daughter to accept that some children are different, in terms of race, culture and mental health. And would also ask the teacher to drop the propaganda.

Edited

OP said that her DD was questioning the teacher every day - not the other child. This might be because she has endless different questions; or it may be because she knows that what she's being told every time (a brush-off rather than an answer) doesn't make sense, hence her asking again repeatedly - I'm guessing (given her very young age) probably the same basic question of how a boy can possibly turn into a girl; and absolutely perplexed as to why she can see the obvious illogicality of it, but nobody else - including an adult - can.

Young children don't understand the concept of social lies, or avoiding the elephant in the room - which is why little ones will (genuinely, without any malice) ask e.g. "Mummy, why is that lady so fat?"... and then, when their mum desperately tries to silence or distract them, they come back with "But she IS a fat lady, Mummy - why is she so fat?"

SeasideWalkaroundStore · 17/10/2026 12:18

Thatcannotberight · 17/10/2026 11:58

The "trans " child speaks most days about having been born a boy but is now a girl. This is when OP's daughter is asking questions. This was confirmed by the teacher to OP at their meeting.

Yes, children of that age tend to be all-in when they have a keen interest in something, which can often become an obsession - especially if it's something that gets them attention and/or makes them feel special.

This is exactly why parents use sticker charts for little ones: to encourage them to see brushing their teeth or remembering to say Please and Thank you as positive things that put the focus on to them and earns them praise.

nutmeg7 · 17/10/2026 13:34

Lacksie · 17/10/2026 11:09

Ahh. I think there's a fairly common and understandable misunderstanding here about the relationship between sex and gender.

Sex and gender aren't separate phenomena. Gender is precisely the social and psychological meaning we attach to sex and perceived sexual differences — how we understand, interpret and organise those differences in society.

Words such as "man", "woman", "boy" and "girl" aren't simply neutral, scientific descriptions of the body. They're also social categories, carrying a huge weight of cultural, historical, psychological, political and legal meaning.

Children develop an understanding of these social meanings from an early age. Helping them recognise and understand that complexity isn't lying to them — it's giving them the tools to think about these categories more critically and comprehensively.

We can describe someone's biological characteristics accurately and honestly — their chromosomes, reproductive anatomy and so on — while recognising that calling someone a "girl" conveys more than a description of their biology.

Importantly, that doesn't mean the word "girl" must imply any particular set of gender stereotypes. But neither can we strip it of social meaning altogether. The idea that we could somehow eliminate all the social significance attached to sex categories is unrealistic. Rejecting stereotypes doesn't make gender meaningless.

And ironically, the gender-critical position itself illustrates this. It places enormous social, political and legal significance on sex categories, while insisting that these categories are simply neutral descriptions of biological reality. In doing so, it reinforces precisely the social meanings attached to sex — which is what gender is/ describes — that it claims to reject!

In sum, recognising that sex and gender are intertwined isn't denying biological reality. It's recognising that the language we use to describe human beings is never simply a neutral inventory of their biological characteristics.

Edited

I have no misunderstanding.

Men, women, boy and girl are sex words.

Certain social traits are more common in one sex or the other, the exact mix of nature or nurture is up for a long debate. It doesn’t really matter until you try and use personality traits to determine sex, or limit a person’s aspirations because of their sex.

But these sex words themselves DO NOT refer to collections of social traits, they refer to the male and female of our species. Male and female are clearly understood definitions across the animal and plant kingdoms.

Just because you want sex words to mean something social rather than physical and material, it does not mean this is how they are used by the vast majority of people in daily use. Your pronouncements do not have the power to redefine words.

You are mistaking the traits commonly (but not exclusively) exhibited by one sex or the other as being what actually determines someone’s sex.

Sex is not determined by collection of behavioural or social traits. Sex is a neutral physical fact like eye colour or height.

Gender identity is a nebulous concept arrived at in order to explain the feeling of gender dysphoria. It is a false explanation for which there is no evidence. It is a belief system that relies on an inner personhood that is separate from the body, and necessitates redefining common sex words to mean “inner sense of who a person is or fantasises that they are” rather than that person’s sex.

localnotail · 17/10/2026 14:16

Thatcannotberight · 17/10/2026 11:58

The "trans " child speaks most days about having been born a boy but is now a girl. This is when OP's daughter is asking questions. This was confirmed by the teacher to OP at their meeting.

So its the same conversation every day? For how many days?

This is what I mean, little kids would accept if someone told them they were brought up by wolves, have fairies in the garden or any other fantasy. Why OP's little girl cant get past it? I mean she should not accept it as a fact, just accept it as something about this boy that exists.

localnotail · 17/10/2026 14:19

SeasideWalkaroundStore · 17/10/2026 12:06

OP said that her DD was questioning the teacher every day - not the other child. This might be because she has endless different questions; or it may be because she knows that what she's being told every time (a brush-off rather than an answer) doesn't make sense, hence her asking again repeatedly - I'm guessing (given her very young age) probably the same basic question of how a boy can possibly turn into a girl; and absolutely perplexed as to why she can see the obvious illogicality of it, but nobody else - including an adult - can.

Young children don't understand the concept of social lies, or avoiding the elephant in the room - which is why little ones will (genuinely, without any malice) ask e.g. "Mummy, why is that lady so fat?"... and then, when their mum desperately tries to silence or distract them, they come back with "But she IS a fat lady, Mummy - why is she so fat?"

Well OP has every right to tell her daughter that this boy has not turned into a girl, he simply thinks he turned into a girl, so no need to ask any questions, its just a type of make belief. That's it! I think its allowed under the current legislation?

localnotail · 17/10/2026 14:20

I'm still struggling to believe someone would "transition" a 4 year old.

BruachAbhann · 17/10/2026 14:32

localnotail · 17/10/2026 14:20

I'm still struggling to believe someone would "transition" a 4 year old.

A boy in my son's class was transitioned at 4. I know it's shocking to hear but unfortunately it happens.

SENsupportplease · 17/10/2026 15:33

Slightly separate issue but the school are compelling my child to refer to a mtf trans teacher as she her.
my child is refusing and getting into trouble, one becuase the teacher is clearly male and child doesn’t believe they are she her, and two child is autistic and stubborn as fuck. She has had several detentions for slipping up and saying he instead of MX NAME, which is what we have taught her to use.

this is another child reporting her when it happens.

is there any defence I can make to the school? Chikd is not trying to offend or be disrespectful

localnotail · 17/10/2026 15:35

BruachAbhann · 17/10/2026 14:32

A boy in my son's class was transitioned at 4. I know it's shocking to hear but unfortunately it happens.

Socially transitioned or was he mutilated, as well?

I have no idea how something so sexual can be imposed on a child that did not even reach puberty.

localnotail · 17/10/2026 15:40

SENsupportplease · 17/10/2026 15:33

Slightly separate issue but the school are compelling my child to refer to a mtf trans teacher as she her.
my child is refusing and getting into trouble, one becuase the teacher is clearly male and child doesn’t believe they are she her, and two child is autistic and stubborn as fuck. She has had several detentions for slipping up and saying he instead of MX NAME, which is what we have taught her to use.

this is another child reporting her when it happens.

is there any defence I can make to the school? Chikd is not trying to offend or be disrespectful

I would raise it with your local authority, as your child has SEN they should not be sanctioned for this.

What else this "female" teacher demands? Is "she" allowed unrestricted access to the girls in the school, as in changing rooms etc? Sounds well dodgy.

moto748e · 17/10/2026 15:53

There's a clear parallel here with the situation in courts/tribunals, where people are expected to basically lie to the court by calling a natal male 'she', or whatever. But kinda worse when its kids. Surely the principle should be that schools and teachers should never lie to kids, or encourage them to. That's why we give them a position of trust with our children. For children who are autistic, that seems even more important, but surely it applies to all children really.

MrsOvertonsWindow · 17/10/2026 16:00

SENsupportplease · 17/10/2026 15:33

Slightly separate issue but the school are compelling my child to refer to a mtf trans teacher as she her.
my child is refusing and getting into trouble, one becuase the teacher is clearly male and child doesn’t believe they are she her, and two child is autistic and stubborn as fuck. She has had several detentions for slipping up and saying he instead of MX NAME, which is what we have taught her to use.

this is another child reporting her when it happens.

is there any defence I can make to the school? Chikd is not trying to offend or be disrespectful

How old is your child? Is this a primary or secondary school?

MrsOvertonsWindow · 17/10/2026 16:11

Firstly the school does need to to make reasonable adjustments for your child's SEN. How on earth the issue of a male teacher claiming to be a woman should be navigated alongside your child's rights will no doubt be a challenging discussion. But punishing her with detentions is I suspect (IANAL) failing to acknowledge her rights in relation to religion or belief. Compelling her to say she instead of the biologically accurate he and then punishing her seems disproportionate and suggests the children are being used by an insecure adult determined on pushing gender identity at children.

The issue of adults imposing their belief in sex change isn't specifically addressed in any of the guidance that I've read, although the KCSIE guidance does state that "a school or college must also be conscious of the rights of pupils and staff in relation to their religion or belief".

Tbh, it raises a range of questions, many of which will depend on the age and context of what's happening. Competent women teachers don't mind when accidentally called Sir (or Mum) unless it's used deliberately and repeatedly to undermine authority. Which could be an issue here?

SENsupportplease · 17/10/2026 16:15

localnotail · 17/10/2026 15:40

I would raise it with your local authority, as your child has SEN they should not be sanctioned for this.

What else this "female" teacher demands? Is "she" allowed unrestricted access to the girls in the school, as in changing rooms etc? Sounds well dodgy.

I don’t know what if any demands have been made other than Mx and she/her. luckily my child is not in their class.

does that mean non SEN children can be compelled to use incorrect terminology?

SENsupportplease · 17/10/2026 16:18

MrsOvertonsWindow · 17/10/2026 16:00

How old is your child? Is this a primary or secondary school?

Year seven, age 12
DD has already really struggled with starting high school there is one problem after the other

this is the latest

DD was in detention for repeatedly asking to go to the loo during class (period) and this teacher was taking the detention, DD told her friends afterwards and accidentally said he instead of Mx. That was the first incident where she got a warning, she has since had detention.

im struggling as I would not be using she / her either, but don’t want to break any equality laws.

MrsOvertonsWindow · 17/10/2026 16:20

SENsupportplease · 17/10/2026 16:15

I don’t know what if any demands have been made other than Mx and she/her. luckily my child is not in their class.

does that mean non SEN children can be compelled to use incorrect terminology?

So hopefully your DD shouldn't need to have contact with him and can avoid. If she's not in his class then is she speaking to him / about him in earshot? On corridors?

While I'm fully aware of the potential issues, he like all staff, have the right to walk around the school without children making comments at him / about him within earshot. That's why I asked about the context.

SENsupportplease · 17/10/2026 16:20

MrsOvertonsWindow · 17/10/2026 16:11

Firstly the school does need to to make reasonable adjustments for your child's SEN. How on earth the issue of a male teacher claiming to be a woman should be navigated alongside your child's rights will no doubt be a challenging discussion. But punishing her with detentions is I suspect (IANAL) failing to acknowledge her rights in relation to religion or belief. Compelling her to say she instead of the biologically accurate he and then punishing her seems disproportionate and suggests the children are being used by an insecure adult determined on pushing gender identity at children.

The issue of adults imposing their belief in sex change isn't specifically addressed in any of the guidance that I've read, although the KCSIE guidance does state that "a school or college must also be conscious of the rights of pupils and staff in relation to their religion or belief".

Tbh, it raises a range of questions, many of which will depend on the age and context of what's happening. Competent women teachers don't mind when accidentally called Sir (or Mum) unless it's used deliberately and repeatedly to undermine authority. Which could be an issue here?

To my understanding the teacher may not even be aware, it’s not directed at them or in their presence.

one incident was to her ‘friends’, one of whom reported her resulting in a warning

one was on WhatsApp which again got reported , I’ve seen it, it wasn’t nasty it was statement of fact “he is dull af we did nothing in the detention” thereabouts

and one was to another teacher trying to explain the above and defending herself

SENsupportplease · 17/10/2026 16:21

MrsOvertonsWindow · 17/10/2026 16:20

So hopefully your DD shouldn't need to have contact with him and can avoid. If she's not in his class then is she speaking to him / about him in earshot? On corridors?

While I'm fully aware of the potential issues, he like all staff, have the right to walk around the school without children making comments at him / about him within earshot. That's why I asked about the context.

I hadn’t got to your reply at that point

moto748e · 17/10/2026 16:22

It's ridiculous. How are you supposed to pronounce Mx anyway? "Micks"? "Em-Ex"? Why should we expect children to jump through these hoops?

SENsupportplease · 17/10/2026 16:24

Mix I believe

I am very glad DD isn’t in their class only because she would constantly be in trouble and they would assume any poor behaviour is directed at the teacher when it’s sadly just her atm

Lacksie · 17/10/2026 16:41

nutmeg7 · 17/10/2026 13:34

I have no misunderstanding.

Men, women, boy and girl are sex words.

Certain social traits are more common in one sex or the other, the exact mix of nature or nurture is up for a long debate. It doesn’t really matter until you try and use personality traits to determine sex, or limit a person’s aspirations because of their sex.

But these sex words themselves DO NOT refer to collections of social traits, they refer to the male and female of our species. Male and female are clearly understood definitions across the animal and plant kingdoms.

Just because you want sex words to mean something social rather than physical and material, it does not mean this is how they are used by the vast majority of people in daily use. Your pronouncements do not have the power to redefine words.

You are mistaking the traits commonly (but not exclusively) exhibited by one sex or the other as being what actually determines someone’s sex.

Sex is not determined by collection of behavioural or social traits. Sex is a neutral physical fact like eye colour or height.

Gender identity is a nebulous concept arrived at in order to explain the feeling of gender dysphoria. It is a false explanation for which there is no evidence. It is a belief system that relies on an inner personhood that is separate from the body, and necessitates redefining common sex words to mean “inner sense of who a person is or fantasises that they are” rather than that person’s sex.

You’re still misunderstanding. I’m not suggesting that personality traits, behaviours or stereotypes determine someone’s biological sex. I’ve never said anything of the sort.

I’m explaining that the body and the meanings we attach to it are not the same thing. Gender is precisely the social and psychological meaning we give to sex and perceived bodily differences — how we understand, interpret and organise those differences in society.

Having a particular reproductive anatomy is a biological fact. But the moment we see that body, recognise it as male or female, and understand what that means, we’re already interpreting it through the social and psychological knowledge we have about sex. That’s gender. We cannot simply look at human bodies without bringing that understanding to what we see. There is no entirely neutral, interpretation-free way of perceiving and categorising sex.

But words are not material facts. Words are how we recognise, categorise and give meaning to the world around us. And the meanings through which we understand sex and sexual differences are precisely what gender is.

Words aren’t chromosomes. They're part of how we construct meaning around sex — and that is gender.

MrsOvertonsWindow · 17/10/2026 16:44

SENsupportplease · 17/10/2026 16:18

Year seven, age 12
DD has already really struggled with starting high school there is one problem after the other

this is the latest

DD was in detention for repeatedly asking to go to the loo during class (period) and this teacher was taking the detention, DD told her friends afterwards and accidentally said he instead of Mx. That was the first incident where she got a warning, she has since had detention.

im struggling as I would not be using she / her either, but don’t want to break any equality laws.

Thanks - we've cross posted! Lots of issues aren't there?

I would get her off whatsapp as it's evident that at least one other child is using it to get her into trouble. There also seems to be another "friend" setting her up by reporting her to staff which would suggest that they don't have her interests at heart. It sounds as if she's being "set up" over this and you don't want them to do that with her peer group as well. The school need to make reasonable adjustments for her SEN. Why is she being punished after being reported by other students for "misgendering"? The school seem to have handled this badly.

Think I'd be speaking to the school asap about how she's struggling to settle in. Struggling with periods, getting in trouble for leaving the classroom, friends who are "telling tales" to staff about her.

I'd be focussing on supporting her and ensuring that the school minimses any issues around this teacher. Along with supporting her to find different friends (easier said than done I know).

localnotail · 17/10/2026 16:44

SENsupportplease · 17/10/2026 16:15

I don’t know what if any demands have been made other than Mx and she/her. luckily my child is not in their class.

does that mean non SEN children can be compelled to use incorrect terminology?

I think she should still be corrected (if this is what school wants) but she should not be sanctioned for this. Unless they treat it in the same way they treat homophobia, racism etc - then having SEN would not be an excuse.

localnotail · 17/10/2026 16:46

The thing is even if you force the child to accept the pronouns etc it will not change their mind in the the slightest.

nutmeg7 · 17/10/2026 16:58

Lacksie · 17/10/2026 16:41

You’re still misunderstanding. I’m not suggesting that personality traits, behaviours or stereotypes determine someone’s biological sex. I’ve never said anything of the sort.

I’m explaining that the body and the meanings we attach to it are not the same thing. Gender is precisely the social and psychological meaning we give to sex and perceived bodily differences — how we understand, interpret and organise those differences in society.

Having a particular reproductive anatomy is a biological fact. But the moment we see that body, recognise it as male or female, and understand what that means, we’re already interpreting it through the social and psychological knowledge we have about sex. That’s gender. We cannot simply look at human bodies without bringing that understanding to what we see. There is no entirely neutral, interpretation-free way of perceiving and categorising sex.

But words are not material facts. Words are how we recognise, categorise and give meaning to the world around us. And the meanings through which we understand sex and sexual differences are precisely what gender is.

Words aren’t chromosomes. They're part of how we construct meaning around sex — and that is gender.

Edited

We don’t create reality by looking at it.

You have swallowed too much post-modernism.

eta: I don’t misunderstand you, I do not agree with you. We use words to refer to concrete material real facts about the world. “Cat” does not mean a dog.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.
Swipe left for the next trending thread