People on here proclaiming that women are both pearl clutching prudes and and filthy minded, for disagreeing with DQST really are on a hiding to nothing.
No amount of but, but Dame Edna Everage or yay Lilly Savage is going to persuade anyone that drag queening is not a full on sexualised adult entertainment.
There can't be anyone, certain nobody on here, who doesn't know exactly what drag is. From RuPaul's drag race and their 'women are fish', to the old school drag clubs.
The sexualised and misogynistic play on names, all of it. It's blinding bloody obvious.
Then you've got all the new, extreme stuff like Desmond is Amazing, twerking with naked men and Lacatitia persuading kids they need new parents and, most recently, children should be opening their minds, along with their legs.
Lowering boundaries around children is allowing grown men to suggest children should open their legs, and getting minors on stage in gay clubs.
Trying to pretend it's like widow Twanky is desperate stuff indeed.
It's not about encouraging children into an understanding of the LGB community, because it's the drag part that is being centralised. And you've going to have a pretty hard time persuading anyone that drag is not an adult sexualised entertainment.
And we're also back to the whole ridiculous justification of having to say we don't think that drag queens are perverts, but any pervert can now avail himself of the opportunity that DQST provides.
If people want to advocate for DQST under those circumstances, then they are demonstrating a safeguarding failure in the way they think. Whether it's deliberate or not, it's very instantly recognised for what it is.