Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

My teen daughter has burst out crying and gone upstairs because we were discussing Maya Forstater

337 replies

Bryonyshcmyony · 11/06/2021 12:24

It came up on the news and I said something like surely its obvious that biological sex is real. Gender identity isn't the same as biological sex. She said people on tiktok say that there is a chromosomal spectrum. I said if someone has a chromosomal abnormality that's not proof that biological sex doesn't exist. Then she cried, said how frustrated I make her and just wants to live in a world where transpeople are accepted for who they are and its not her job to educate me as - and I quote - an ignorant old person.

I'm actually quite hurt. I don't want her to hate me! Obviously it's just a subject that is completely out of bounds. Anyone else faced similar?

OP posts:
New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Marylou2 · 15/06/2021 15:25

Just ignore it. They hear so much rubbish on social media and at school. It's our duty to bring a scientifically based opinion to the table.

AnnaMagnani · 15/06/2021 15:22

According to Liz Truss at the Women and Equalities Select Committee the Gender Pay Gap is made up of:

  1. Women and girls choosing less well paid jobs and careers than men and boys - so current big push to get girls into STEM which is generally a higher paid career choice
  1. The Maternity Penalty
  1. Sexism - however this was very much 3rd to the first 2.
QuentinBunbury · 15/06/2021 14:44

Not least as bringing in more money would seem to me to be a good reason, and a man might bring in more money because it suits them to get pissed with clients 4 nights a week, whereas the equivalent woman is rushing home because she cares about her kids!
Well this is the whole problem. If bringing in money is how success is measured, and its dependent on evening client entertaining, and society tolerates men being absent from family life more than women (by which I mean that more women than men take responsibility for care), then women can never be equal.

At least two of those barriers are structural and could be tackled by cultural change - less correlation between success and out of hours work; less tolerance of men being absent fathers.

RadandMad · 15/06/2021 14:32

@JediGnot The sad thing is that tackling the inequality in pay caused by women taken career breaks for kids is a much harder nut to crack than structural sexism in the workplace. Sweden has tried offering equal parental leave entitlement for women and men, but nevertheless most men do not take time off and so the pay and promotion differential remains. It's hard to know what the answer is. It is a burning question for more enlightened employers, who know they are losing or under utilising a great deal of female talent.

JediGnot · 15/06/2021 14:16

[quote RadandMad]@JediGnot Forgot to say most companies and organisations have to report their pay gap data and it is illegal under the Equal Pay Act to pay women less for doing the same job as a man without a good reason, such as more seniority/years in the job.[/quote]
Just googled Gender pay gap needs reporting by companies with over 250 staff.

also "There are 8,000 large businesses (defined as businesses with more than 250 employees), accounting for 0.1% of businesses but 39% of employment and 48% of turnover, as the following chart shows."

So, the vast majority of businesses DO NOT have to report the gender pay gap, and only 39% of staff are covered. Just fact checking you!

I'd also be suspicious that "doing the same job as a man without a good reason" means much in a lot of companies. Not least as bringing in more money would seem to me to be a good reason, and a man might bring in more money because it suits them to get pissed with clients 4 nights a week, whereas the equivalent woman is rushing home because she cares about her kids!

Pettiness aside, I take your point - you're up on this stuff more than I am.

RadandMad · 15/06/2021 13:47

@JediGnot Forgot to say most companies and organisations have to report their pay gap data and it is illegal under the Equal Pay Act to pay women less for doing the same job as a man without a good reason, such as more seniority/years in the job.

RadandMad · 15/06/2021 13:44

@JediGnot According to the ONS, the gender pay gap remained close to zero for full-time employees aged under 40 years but was over 10% for older age groups. Most of the time this is due to women taking time off to have children, thereby missing out on promotions, etc.

SnoopyLights · 15/06/2021 13:00

@Wrongsideofhistorymyarse

I sat through a training session for PREVENT and they talked about this inability to question the narrative and how people who have been targeted for radicalisation can't deal with questions they don't know how to answer because it doesn't fit the core belief. If it's off script, it's shut down.

Some TRAs could benefit from intervention as their belief in genderism has led them to terrorise women.

I agree, the methods behind the radicalisation and the way those further up the chain weaponise younger and vulnerable people was striking in similarity to me. I do think it might be a comparison worth examining from some of the organisations standing up for women and girls in all of this.
toffeebutterpopcorn · 15/06/2021 10:31

@Whatabouttery

The BBC is currently laughing and making fun of a bunch of guys dressed as old women to do a charity scooter ride.

Surely that's transphobic?

Seriously though, does this ridiculing of people crossing gender norms contribute to why people feel the need to be so 'one side or the other'?

There was a group of men who dressed up as female nurses and did a charity run (or bed push) and the charity declined their money because they were men dressed up as (of course) ‘sexy nurses’.
Wrongsideofhistorymyarse · 15/06/2021 09:26

I sat through a training session for PREVENT and they talked about this inability to question the narrative and how people who have been targeted for radicalisation can't deal with questions they don't know how to answer because it doesn't fit the core belief. If it's off script, it's shut down.

Some TRAs could benefit from intervention as their belief in genderism has led them to terrorise women.

Whatabouttery · 15/06/2021 09:16

The BBC is currently laughing and making fun of a bunch of guys dressed as old women to do a charity scooter ride.

Surely that's transphobic?

Seriously though, does this ridiculing of people crossing gender norms contribute to why people feel the need to be so 'one side or the other'?

FictionalCharacter · 15/06/2021 02:14

@ChattyLion
“ we don’t have equality yet for very very many groups in society, including women, people of colour, people with disabilities, people who are same-sex attracted and many many more.”

True, but one of the latest popular notions is that “cis” women, especially white women, are extremely privileged, especially over transwomen. The only inequality that’s fashionable for young people to champion right now is “trans rights”.

I do hope you’re right and that the penny will drop for more young people.

FictionalCharacter · 15/06/2021 01:54

@SnoopyLights That’s very interesting. Explains why the usual responses to reasonable questions on Twitter is to repeat mantras, throw insults, say you are full of hate, then block you.

As long as they do that there will be no opportunity for debate and discussion.

Ereshkigalangcleg · 14/06/2021 22:58

That's really interesting, and fits my perception of how those with this kind of cognitive dissonance behave, and how angry and evasive they are.

SnoopyLights · 14/06/2021 19:11

@QuentinBunbury

My 14 yo told me I'm a transphobe and people like me are why gay people get persecuted when I asked her to define a woman SadConfused It is totally cognitive dissonance, you ask a question they can't answer without betraying a core belief (e.g. TWAW) and to deal with the discomfort they shout and run away. Hard though
I sat through a training session for PREVENT and they talked about this inability to question the narrative and how people who have been targeted for radicalisation can't deal with questions they don't know how to answer because it doesn't fit the core belief. If it's off script, it's shut down.

Every bit of that training session was ticking boxes for me about the TRA narrative and the total ban on any deviation or slightest questioning of it.

MouseyTheVampireSlayer · 14/06/2021 18:59

Not in my case. Me and DH trained at the same time. I took no career break, yet DH was advanced time and again whilst doing the same job. It got to the point it was such a wide gap that when we did decide to have children it was a no brainer who should take the 'hit'.

Ereshkigalangcleg · 14/06/2021 18:58

My favourite claim came from Alex the pediatrician who was adamant that sex was a spectrum. He later apologised and admitted it wasn't a spectrum after his university professor expressed her sadness that she didn't teach him well enough.

We discussed that fella here https://www.mumsnet.com/Talk/womens_rights/3975181-Paediatrician-claiming-sex-is-a-spectrumm^

I missed that Grin

CharlieParley · 14/06/2021 18:54

@ErrorCode

It's so nice seeing parents put their pride before their kids' respect, trust and mental wellness. You don't throw an infantile tantrum of a power trip and "come down" on it, you talk it out like an actual adult; end of story. I don't care what the age.

I agree regarding Tiktok, though - a fine source if you're looking for opinions, but certainly NOT a good reference for facts. That said, she is actually correct on this one.
While I've been aware of this for a while, I decided to check Google just now to make sure I could point people toward it.
Sniffing around on Google very lightly just now led me to "the spectrum model of sex, gender and sexuality", and academic sources as well as various other article sources are pretty uniformly stating exactly what she said: sex is a spectrum. There's even talk about XY women getting pregnant - and I'm not talking about AMAB (assigned-male-at-birth) women, either... pretty sure that one hasn't been done yet, but don't quote me on that.

I'm not really sure I could dig it back up, but my introduction into the Spectrum Model was courtesy of a biologist who posted a rather expansive thread on the matter over on Twitter, and something that caught my eye was a graph they included showing that the spectrum looks more like a camel's back: what are recognized as "male" and "female" - even themselves including a broad spectrum of distinct patterns in sex-related biochemistry and neurochemistry - are ultimately just peaks in the spectrum, which valleys out in the middle and on the sides (don't ask me about the sides, I may have heard of super-polarized sexes or something, but if so that was a long time ago, probably on an episode of House, M.D. thus to be taken with a grain of salt, and ultimately I'm not well-versed enough to discuss whatever it is that lies on the periphery of that spectrum.).

Oh ErrorCode, you really need to do more than "sniffing lightly around Google" if you want to disprove that sex in humans is binary and immutable.

If you understood sex differentiation then you would know that "an XY woman giving birth" does not disprove the sex binary.

Sex chromosomes are the starting point of sex differentiation.

Male-bodied and female-bodied people are the end point of sex differentiation.

Which is why an XY-woman giving birth is neither impossible nor proof that sex is a spectrum. An individual born with complete gonadal dysgenisis (the XY-woman in question) has a female body and so falls firmly on the female side of the human sex binary. FYI, there is a total of one (1!) reported case of an XY-woman becoming pregnant unassisted in the medical literature to date. This is extremely rare precisely because sex differentiation in a XY-woman which has not followed the usual pathway that more than 99% of XY- individuals follow, does not normally result in a fertile woman able to get pregnant unassisted.

And yes, there have been various people claiming that sex is a spectrum. Invariably they fail to demonstrate the veracity of their claims and are easily disproven. I guess you didn't see that.

My favourite claim came from Alex the pediatrician who was adamant that sex was a spectrum. He later apologised and admitted it wasn't a spectrum after his university professor expressed her sadness that she didn't teach him well enough.

We discussed that fella here www.mumsnet.com/Talk/womens_rights/3975181-Paediatrician-claiming-sex-is-a-spectrum

We pretty much discussed and/or rebutted every one of the popular threads or articles claiming that sex is a spectrum here on FWR. I'm sure we can link you to the Mumsnet thread if you tell us which Twitter thread impressed you so much.

SmokedDuck · 14/06/2021 18:48

@JediGnot

"Men generally only earn more because their wives take career breaks and their career stalls."

Are you sure about that? I thought that other factors were also at play -

(1) Men more likely to be in dangerous and physically exhausting jobs that not everyone can or is willing to do. Women more likely to be in shamefully undervalued caring jobs.

(2) Sex discrimination meaning two similar office workers might earn different money, with the man earning more, even before either has had kids.

(3) Maybe others.

There are several, but women taking career breaks seem to be the main one. Actual discrimination on pay seems to be fairly uncommon, probably because you can't really even do it in a lot of sectors. Types of careers ie, dangerous, or choosing ones with more regular hours, is a factor too, as you say.

Also - I seem to recall seeing this but I don't remember where or how old it is, but if the male partner tends to be a little older than the female one, he is likely to be farther on in his career when they have kids.

TrainedByCats · 14/06/2021 18:26

@MouseyTheVampireSlayer

Trite male The reason that less dad's are the sahp has nothing to do with turn ons and everything to do with finance. Most men are bigger earners than their partners and so when it comes to maternity leave or career breaks the women takes the hit because it makes financial sense (and also biological sense if you breastfeed) I'd love DH to split the maternity but he earns double what I do despite us training at the same time in the same field. He got up the ladder quicker. Believe me, the fact he can change a nappy and will take Ds for a morning when baby has been up all night isn't just a 'turn on' it's a godsend.

And women fancy lots of different types of men. Benedict Cumberbatch, Jonathan Rhys Meyers, Killian Murphy. Furthermore, if there's over representation of beefy guys it's because directors, who are overwhelmingly male, seek them out.

There's also nothing wrong with fancying beefy guys anyway, apparently Jason Momoa is lovely in real life.

I was by far the biggest earner at the time of my first child. My OH had no interest in taking time off to look after the baby. If I’d insisted so I could get back to work he’d have done the absolute minimum amount of time before external childcare and would have been constantly frustrated that the baby wouldn’t fit around what he wanted to do. I also needed physical recovery time before going back to work so took the maternity leave. Two decades after having two children my salary has been on a steady decline and my OH’s has continued on a steady steep upwards trajectory. I’m just as competent as I was when I got the better paid jobs and max bonuses before having children. We have similar skill levels and started working in similar area, I’ve had to make more compromises and take flexibility over career as someone had to be the parent. I continued to be recognised as an expert in the industry external to my employer he is not.

I discovered my son had called a woman a ‘terf’ on twitter and I let him know exactly how angry I was about him using a slur on a woman to dismiss their point of view and how that made me feel as his mother. He apologised and says he’s changed his view, if I find he hasn’t I know I’ll regret the sacrifices and hard work I’ve put into trying to be a good mother. I don’t expect him to have the same view as me and I know he doesn't in various other areas but I expect as a minimum for him to treat women with respect and some modicum of understanding of the impact of social pressure and sex differences on women.

GAHgamel · 14/06/2021 18:24

@ErrorCode if sex is a spectrum, what's the variable on the x-axis that we're being distributed along please?

JediGnot · 14/06/2021 17:56

"Men generally only earn more because their wives take career breaks and their career stalls."

Are you sure about that? I thought that other factors were also at play -

(1) Men more likely to be in dangerous and physically exhausting jobs that not everyone can or is willing to do. Women more likely to be in shamefully undervalued caring jobs.

(2) Sex discrimination meaning two similar office workers might earn different money, with the man earning more, even before either has had kids.

(3) Maybe others.

RadandMad · 14/06/2021 17:41

@MouseyTheVampireSlayer

Trite male The reason that less dad's are the sahp has nothing to do with turn ons and everything to do with finance. Most men are bigger earners than their partners and so when it comes to maternity leave or career breaks the women takes the hit because it makes financial sense (and also biological sense if you breastfeed) I'd love DH to split the maternity but he earns double what I do despite us training at the same time in the same field. He got up the ladder quicker. Believe me, the fact he can change a nappy and will take Ds for a morning when baby has been up all night isn't just a 'turn on' it's a godsend.

And women fancy lots of different types of men. Benedict Cumberbatch, Jonathan Rhys Meyers, Killian Murphy. Furthermore, if there's over representation of beefy guys it's because directors, who are overwhelmingly male, seek them out.

There's also nothing wrong with fancying beefy guys anyway, apparently Jason Momoa is lovely in real life.

Men generally only earn more because their wives take career breaks and their career stalls.
oldwomanwhoruns · 14/06/2021 13:46

This video by Plebity is good - it's a demonstration of the 'asking questions' technique, for discussing this topic

They have some other great youtube videos too. They've both been 'cancelled' for daring to speak about this stuff!

JediGnot · 14/06/2021 13:07

That video on another recent thread is great -

If I was OP I'd make DD an offer. Choose any video she wants to explain why TRAs are right, maybe even a few short videos. Her choice as to which videos get watched first, but you'll watch the above GC video together, and her videos of choice and then you will each explain what you agree with in the other's video(s), and what you disagree with and why. And if it comes down to facts you wil both try to go away and try to evidence the facts using data from reliable sources.

Swipe left for the next trending thread