Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Ofcom banning GC viewpoints on our airwaves

32 replies

dyslek · 06/01/2021 23:55

Spiked article; www.spiked-online.com/2021/01/06/ofcom-wants-to-no-platform-trans-sceptics/

OP posts:
New posts on this thread. Refresh page
RadandMad · 03/02/2021 09:43

@Gasp0deTheW0nderD0g

Offence. Hmm. If a GP tells a patient that she is overweight and needs to eat less and take more exercise, the patient may be extremely offended, but it doesn't stop it being true. If a teacher tells a child that a piece of work is substandard, the child may be offended, but it doesn't stop it being true. If a critic writes that an actor's performance was poor, the actor may be offended, but it doesn't stop it being true.
This. I'm bloody sick of being offended equated with actual harm or intent to harm.
Zinco · 03/02/2021 00:05

"They trotted out Nigel Farage all the time for fucking "balance". But can't have balance for trans issues. Sigh"

To be fair, it turned out that 52% of people agreed with Farage. I can only imagine that a lot of the BBC types think, "But that's why it's so dangerous to give him coverage! The public may agree!".

Zinco · 02/02/2021 23:51

"Ffs, why does she keep going on about “causing offence”? What does that even mean, in practice, and why does she only seem to care about perceived offence in one direction?"

Yes, that looked strange to me also. It's political debate. People will strongly disagree. They attack each other's positions. It generates some heat, and some people are always going to be offended. If you find yourself getting angry being exposed to contrary viewpoints, you do have the option of limiting what you watch.

I think the emphasis should be on open and robust debate of the issues; not being "sensitive" because some people might get offended. Oh you're easily offended? Then stay away from political debate.

highame · 02/02/2021 15:33

I think Ofcom can be judicially reviewed. We need someone to take this on. I would dig for LGB Alliance to take them on.

There are some big consultations going on at the moment. Free Speech and Hate Crime (UK not Scotland) etc. I think the Government has some real concerns about the capture culture and I'd be interested to see how this develops.

Isn't Melanie due to leave? A lot of the top jobs are now going to people who haven't been Stonewalled. Not sure where I'm going with this but FoI might yield something?

Apollo440 · 02/02/2021 14:44

Well that would be an interesting appointment. I can guess what he would think of Ofcoms censorious approach!

severnboring · 08/01/2021 08:59

Can't Ofcom see how this plays into the hands of the likes of Russia Today? Who they have rightly sanctioned in the past.
If Ofcom treat saying that sex exists in the same way as they treat propaganda from an authoritarian state, that suits the authoritarian state down to the ground.
They get to position themselves as brave truth-tellers, and Ofcom's false equivalence enables them to further erode the distinction between true and false. Thanks Ofcom!

EightiesRobot · 07/01/2021 17:47

I complained to Oliver Dowden about the comments at the committee meeting but no response yet. Will be chasing up soon.

hedgehogger1 · 07/01/2021 17:19

No one gives a crap about offending women though. Or should that be "uterus havers"

hedgehogger1 · 07/01/2021 17:17

They trotted out Nigel Farage all the time for fucking "balance". But can't have balance for trans issues. Sigh

Gasp0deTheW0nderD0g · 07/01/2021 17:03

Offence. Hmm. If a GP tells a patient that she is overweight and needs to eat less and take more exercise, the patient may be extremely offended, but it doesn't stop it being true. If a teacher tells a child that a piece of work is substandard, the child may be offended, but it doesn't stop it being true. If a critic writes that an actor's performance was poor, the actor may be offended, but it doesn't stop it being true.

Ofcom banning GC viewpoints on our airwaves
Ereshkigalangcleg · 07/01/2021 16:53

Inher role as Permanent Secretary Dame Melanie chaired the Civil Service People Board, leading workforce strategies across all government departments. She was also Civil Service champion for diversity and inclusion.

Interesting. This thread may be relevant?

www.mumsnet.com/Talk/womens_rights/3520371-civil-service-trans-policy-what-can-i-do

highame · 07/01/2021 16:32

Thanks very much for that transcript jeaux90.

Imnobody4 · 07/01/2021 16:20

Inher role as Permanent Secretary Dame Melanie chaired the Civil Service People Board, leading workforce strategies across all government departments. She was also Civil Service champion for diversity and inclusion.
I suspect she's already been Stonewalled.
I've not written to complain yet because I've been waiting for the actual transcript. Now I will.

Procrastinator3 · 07/01/2021 15:45

I think Ofcom can be judicially reviewed. We need someone to take this on.

applestrudels · 07/01/2021 15:44

Ffs, why does she keep going on about “causing offence”? What does that even mean, in practice, and why does she only seem to care about perceived offence in one direction?

HecatesCats · 07/01/2021 15:25

Stonewall have clearly worked hard on this. Melanie Dawes is fully signed up to their agenda.

jeaux90 · 07/01/2021 15:19

And yes I have written to my MP on this who has responded very positively in the past about the GRA etc I met with him which I think helps.

jeaux90 · 07/01/2021 15:17

If you continue reading through the PDF (I watched the session and it's still available) Damian Green comes back and challenged her on the nodding along and agreement with John Nicholson.

Damian Green: I want to pick up on one of the questions that John Nicolson asked. Clearly, the whole trans issue and all the arguments surrounding it are extremely sensitive, and the arguments between women who regard themselves as radical feminists and some of the trans activists get very personal and very sensitive.
Dame Melanie, you seem to agree with the proposition that anyone who disagrees with any aspect of the current, if you like, orthodox trans rights position is the equivalent of an old-fashioned racist. The most famous person who disagrees with it is JK Rowling. I find it slightly odd that a broadcasting regulator has effectively said that JK Rowling and women who think like her are the equivalent of old-fashioned racists. Is that what you are saying?
Dame Melanie Dawes: No. That mischaracterises my views considerably, if you don’t mind my saying so. What I am saying is that care needs to be taken not to cause offence. This is a very sensitive debate, absolutely, and it is one that is changing all the time, and it is very difficult to navigate. Our broadcasters do find it difficult to navigate, and what we need to do, I think, is to provide them with as much information as we can about sensible ways that they can navigate it, so that they can bring the range of views to bear but in a way that does not cause offence or needlessly step into a space where they would be making some of the mistakes you have just described.
Q681 Damian Green: You agreed with every proposition John put to you, and John brought up the thought that this is the equivalent of people who 20 years ago thought there was a balance between gay rights and anti-gay rights. He brought that explicit thing to you, and you both talked about racism as well. I would suggest that this issue needs to be dealt with with quite a lot more sensitivity.
The answer you have just given me seems perfectly sensible and appropriate but, in all seriousness and in a helpful spirit, I would suggest you go back and look at what you agreed to in your earlier evidence because, as I say, you seemed to be suggesting that women like JK Rowling are just beyond the pale. They are not allowed to enter the debate. I think that is probably an inappropriate position for a senior regulator.

Dame Melanie Dawes: I don’t think I suggested that, with the greatest of respect, and what I do think can easily happen is that voices that are providing balance in the trans debate can offend in a way that is not necessary. What I would like to achieve is for our broadcasters to have all the information they need to be able to make difficult judgments on challenging issues—apologies for using that word again—and to make sure that all the issues are aired, but in a way that does not offend people. I have not expressed a view on JK Rowling, and I certainly did not intend to.
Q682 Damian Green: Good, excellent. Let’s leave it there and move on to something that I suspect we can all agree on much more. Across the board it is agreed that regional and local broadcasting is one of the most valuable things that the BBC does. I assume Ofcom agrees with that general proposition.

highame · 07/01/2021 14:52

I have complained to MP and am going to send something to Oliver Dowden. Have a feeling that someone on the committee said that what they were proposing would mean JKR wouldn't be allowed to comment. This was dismissed but I find all of this very worrying

stumbledin · 07/01/2021 14:51

This must be the third of fourth thread about this.

The problem is everyone expressing shock and horror did not write, email or twitter their complaints when Ofcom made it clear that they would refer to Stonewall for guidance.

Gender critical groups could have got together and made a joint statement and / or tried to challenge the fact that the relevant committee didn't think it was an issue.

So yes everyone is shocked and have been on the previous threads.

What we should discuss is how we dont seen to have an idea about how to work for something that should be a common cause.

Yes it is shocking. But it was over a month ago when it was first raised.

UppityPuppity · 07/01/2021 14:48

Are the LGB Alliance going to sue for defamation?

I don’t think there is a lack of will here, by the BBC...

She’s joking right?

Imnobody4 · 07/01/2021 14:38

The transcript of the broadcasting committee is now available. It's the first one on the 15 Dec. The relevant bit starts at Q 666 from John Nicholson
committees.parliament.uk/work/90/the-future-of-public-service-broadcasting/publications
This is a sample:
Q666 John Nicolson: I notice that the BBC seems to be under the impression
that it has to balance all its reports about trans issues now by calling in
transphobic groups like the so-called LGB Alliance, to give a counter-
argument. This is absurd because you would never do a report on racism,
for example, and call in a racist organisation to say that they do not think
black people have a right to equality. What can the BBC do to address
this? Do you think it is buckling under a very well-funded, concerted
campaign to attack trans people, which seems to have been given undue
prominence recently?
Dame Melanie Dawes: I think it is a very good point, and a very good
example of something that we have been talking to Stonewall about,
about how the broadcasters can, when they feel they need to bring
balance into a debate, do it in an appropriate way, rather than in the way
that you just described, which can be extremely inappropriate.
I don’t think there is a lack of will here, by the BBC or others, but we can
do more to give people the information they need to be able to make
judgments in areas that can be quite contentious, and where the debate
can move quite quickly, to make sure they are doing the right thing.

ArabellaScott · 07/01/2021 09:57

Thanks for the link, Ereshkiga.

This is way wider than feminist concerns, affects everyone.

Very worrying.

FamilyOfAliens · 07/01/2021 09:47

On my To Do list for today!

Swipe left for the next trending thread