Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Here we are again - waxing

32 replies

AutumnRose1 · 07/01/2020 16:51

I’m hoping this isn’t true

But sadly I think it is

www.thepostmillennial.com/breaking-jessica-yaniv-sues-more-women-salon-owners-for-wax-job-refusal/

OP posts:
Goosefoot · 07/01/2020 20:01

midcenturylegs

I have really wondered this.

One reason is that a lot seemed to go under the radar in terms of the legislative stuff. It was accomplished and no one really even knew about it, and anyone who noticed at all assumed it was part of gay rights which was unquestionable.

The first many people heard of it to worry at all was C-16, and it was too quick to really get any momentum behind it. God bless Murphy and Peterson they were on before most people had even thought it through. In general though, universities are completely in thrall to identity politics.

A bit like the UK, all of the left political parties have supported it all, and there seems to have been very little internal controversy. I was a bit shocked the Green leader Elizabeth May did, she struck me as someone who might be GC, but nope.

The CBC has completely buried it all. Up until recently they were implicitly trusted, if not as unbiased, as being fair and honest in their reporting. Not many people realise the degree to which they have suppressed these things.

ArranUpsideDown · 07/01/2020 19:52

This relates to the JY suit (with additional material) discussed in this extensive thread:

www.mumsnet.com/Talk/womens_rights/3788755-Our-favourite-Canadian-is-at-it-again

midcenturylegs · 07/01/2020 19:46

How has it got to this point in Canada? I know Canadian GC feminists are looking to those in the UK with hope this madness gets overcome; but what happened specifically in Canada that has let this happen?

OhHolyJesus · 07/01/2020 19:43

So it's leg waxing, still it requires being in underwear...I suppose you could wear shorts but given the history of this customer it's not going to be the outfit of choice is it.

As PP says, it's perfectly legal to refuse anyone a service. I could understand a man or woman not wanting to wax their own genitals as it's bloody tricky to DIY but leg waxing is easy to do for yourself.

This is not about body waxing it's about power, playing the victim, attention seeking and using the current work approach to laws of the land for media coverage.

Ereshkigal · 07/01/2020 19:33

Ah so it's not balls this time, ok I can see that they might rule differently. I hope not.

Ereshkigal · 07/01/2020 19:30

Why are they still allowing this person to bring the exact same cases they ruled were vexatious?

TheTigersBride · 07/01/2020 18:51

They don't need to even consider protected characteristics. Any business has the right to refuse a difficult customer. That is getting lost sight of.