Challenor on LBC this morning

Tbh the Challenor family history has every risk factor going for a child to end up identifying as trans:

• Autism
• At best, a traumatic/ chaotic family life (I won't speculate on the nature of this, but given David's later convictions nothing would surprise me)
• Time spent in care
• Lots of time spent online with much older trans "mentors" and "big sisters"
• Entry at a young age into an online fetish community
• A mother who may have fictitious disorder/ FD by proxy

The same background elements that we keep seeing again and again and again.

Truly shocking. All of it

I heard that too. It's very unusual for kids who are taken into care to be then adopted from what I understand. Things must've been pretty bad.

Apparently Joe and Daniel were by a different partner to the 3 Challenor kids, and were both taken into care and then adopted as toddlers. No idea what happened to Bethany and Christopher.

Several serial killers have had the same MO @ByGrabtharsHammarWhatASaving

It's that classic "life and soul of the community family guy charity giver etc etc" thing I think ZebrasAreBras. Where abusers ingratiate themselves into every do-gooder thing going to seem totally above suspicion.

Tina also called the little girl who was abused a 'slut' As if it was her fault that Challenor did what he did.

It is bizarre how many connections the family had. Green Party, Pride, some Gymnastics club, Scouts aswell?, charity runs (running as "Baloo"), newspaper articles.... I mean how many families have cosy newspaper articles like that written about them? I know one - and that's because the husband was sub-editor of a national newspaper. (Interestingly, he turned out to be a paedophile too. My friend divorced him - she did not stand up and defend him in court, as Tina did )

Where are all the other children? This article from a local Coventry paper was celebrating Christopher's 2nd birthday so the youngest...are they all in care? I do hope they are far away from that house.

Tina and husband David, 35, a computer technician at Coventry University, had a great day and enjoyed spending time together. There is also Joe, 18, Daniel, 17, Ashton, six, and Bethany, three.

www.coventrytelegraph.net/news/coventry-news/special-day-little-christopher-3146043

Bloody hell, just read the KF entry on Aimee, what a childhood! But I hadn't realised they were so young - only 20! Yes they're an adult in charge of their own behaviour but they're also very very clearly being exploited and manipulated by Stonewall/ Lib Dems/ Greens etc. It's utterly disgusting.

You know, when the story of David C first broke, Tina's FB was open, and it was very strange, disturbing actually.

It showed a chaotic, cluttered house, a chaotic and strange environment to bring children up in.

It included a post where Tina posted an old picture of her children, and was berated by Aimee for deadnaming, and posting a pre-transition picture without permission.

The whole thing is very disturbing.

Just tagging in @hoodathunkit - our resident expert on creepy sex cults - to come read TriptychDebbie's post and see what they think. Any links in there to other witchy/ creepy dolls/ paedo stuff that you've heard of? I mean, it sounds utterly horrific just in isolation, but everything else seems to have plenty of tentacles linking it to other stuff so maybe this does too.

What an awful upbringing

Oops, should have read to the end of the thread. TriptychDebbie's find was what I was talking about.

Yes AC must have had a hellish childhood and as a previous poster stated, no one could have endured living with a father like David Challenor and been unharmed.
And, from what I've read on another forum, his mother has mental health problems of her own that blighted her childrens' upbringing.

Also found this....

Just found out that some of the women on Twitter who have been flagging this up are now blocked by Coventry LibDems.

Their cognitive dissonance is shocking.

We don't want you or your fiance here in the USA Aimee. I don't think I have to worry too much about you showing up on our shores long-term as there's no way that you'll get through our process.

I don't wish your fiance on the UK either but at least he's a nobody pervert. You have unfortunately found a place to marginalize and denigrate actual women which makes you just as scary as your guy (but in a different way).

Aimee the fact that you would be involved with someone that is openly into the things your fiance is into tells a great deal about you - you need help and should never be allowed around children or the vulnerable.

This whole situation is crazy. How can everyone be turning a blind eye to this shit.

Though back to the beginning of this thread, I really hope Aimee gets on to the BBC and ITV 6 o'clock TV news that would really illuminate the public.

I remember some of those links. One of them was a seemingly random link between a 14 year old Aimee and a reasonably high profile middle aged AGP from another part of the country on a photography website.

I have looked for it again as it would be relevant in a safeguarding context, but again it is gone.

Poor child. But Aimee is now an adult and needs to seek help to repair the damage of her childhood. The LibDems and Stonewall are irresponsible and exploitative.

Just for info / bumping

Other thread posted for the AC / NK situation

thread...

www.mumsnet.com/Talk/womens_rights/3639203-Nathaniel-Knight-partner-of-Aimee-Challenor-worrying-twitter-admissions

I remember when all this kicked off a year or so ago, and before the Challoners deleted most of their online history, following links to old but still extant sites showing the then 14 year old AC, in furry puppy persona, interacting online with this degenerate.

And they are now 'engaged'?

I have no words. Well, I do, but... y'know.

I posted this on the other thread:

From Twitter's Child Sexual Exploitation Policy
help.twitter.com/en/rules-and-policies/sexual-exploitation-policy
The following behaviors are also not permitted:

sharing fantasies about or promoting engagement in child sexual exploitation;

Reporting form
help.twitter.com/forms/cse

Nathaniel and David Challenor seem to be strong influences on Amy. Amy then sits on Stonewall's trans-advisory panel, which is hugely influential in setting Stonewall policy on the "addied letters", ie T, Q,K+++

Stonewall then has huge influence over firms, schools, charities and the Civil Service and in the form of the bright rainbow splashed everywhere, over us and our children. So pups are on pride marches alongside Mermaids. Rainbow colours on the Barclays app, and and and.

The message is that kink is normal. Kink is cool and fun.

If instead of the rainbow, Barclays used this guy, or David Challenor in their ads and promotion, I doubt it would achieve the same effect. But this is where it starts...and ends.

Barclays and the rest of you, wake up. Rubber, fur, dog collars should be left to consenting adults in private. This is what the rainbow now represents. Leave those kids alone.

Bloody hellfire.

There is no such thing as a “healthy “ level of sexual interest in children.

Apparently, this needs spelled out these days. Boggling.