Joan McAlpine MSP now asks about how Police record transgender criminals

It's simply hiding vawg stats, because the violators of the world cannot allow the deaths statistics to be shouted from the rooftops, if it's done under the guise of being 'woman' it equalises, falsely

Joan fights back. She really gets it

Joan McAlpine
@JoanMcAlpine
It's not a good look to attempt to bully and shame another woman simply because she welcomed a discussion about the consequences of replacing biological sex with self-declared "gender identity"
@heraldscotland

@RBFMaguire

Thread here: mobile.twitter.com/JoanMcAlpine/status/1107264937523625985

Another article on the skewing of crime stats. It's a bit brief but at least it's getting the issue out there

I wish one of these articles would point out what the DM said about sexual crimes committed by "women" has actually massively increased over the past few years.

So little dot joining

Another article on the skewing of crime stats. It's a bit brief but at least it's getting the issue out there

Transgender suspects able to ‘skew’ crime statistics

www.scotsman.com/news/politics/transgender-suspects-able-to-skew-crime-statistics-1-4890466

Poor old “Brian Dempsey” has shown up yet again in the btl comments to repeat the same old lie that anyone who questions ANY of the pillars of trans ideology “thinks that we are defined by our genitals.”

Honestly, you’d have to be thick as two short planks to believe that feminism is a movement aimed at reducing all women can be to their body parts. Which is why TRAs wanting to call women “menstruators” and “cervix-havers” is so, so telling.

Backlash has begun

SNP equalities chief in row over trans rights comments

www.heraldscotland.com/news/17506875.snp-equalities-chief-in-row-over-trans-rights-comments/

thread:
www.mumsnet.com/Talk/womens_rights/3533532-Eleanor-Scott-article-Did-Mumsnet-Just-Hand-Penny-Mordaunt-Her-Arse

Page 18

For She did labour mightily, and brought forth a gnat's fart.

Has Penny actually showed up on that thread? I’m hopping about, but not uet found any posts from Penny.

God help.us Joan! Any chance Joan has seen the car crash on the penny Mordaunt's web dictat "chat"

Six were convicted of rape, 37 of sexual activity with or involving a child, one of sexual grooming, 35 for internet child pornography offences and four for exposure and voyeurism.

Trans Crime UK lists 23 sex offences convictions in 2016.

transcrimeuk.com/2016-convictions/

11 of those are using a female name. We can pretty much assume that these will therefore have had their crimes recorded as female. It could be all 23 for all we know. And we also know that this website relies on press reporting so is far from complete.

Therefore, at the lowest reasonable estimate, 11 of 78 female sex offfences convictions achieved in 2016 were not crimes committed by women. That's 14%. The lowest reasonable estimate.

Let’s not forget the media reporting guidelines which also serve to obfuscate and conceal the true nature of these crimes.

This isn't just about the men who are imprisoned.
It's not just about the ones that were prosecuted either.

This is about all ARRESTS/Summonses/complaints in all crime and nuisance categories - from 'drunk and disorderly' to domestic violence, from neighbour disputes to possession of indecent material involving children. And everything in between.

Crime figures are unreliable now. It's might be easy to rectify the serious ones involving imprisonment - not so easy to rectify all those other crimes, misdemeanours and the ones that were proceeeded by summons.

What a mess. Good for Joan - asking the questions that politicans should have been asking all along.

Oh, just sen Clovens post. Yeah, so double already it seems.

And yet the papers have been asking for a number of years “why have women got so violent?”

Quite.

I can see a HUGE spike in 'female' sex offenses. Like, meaning at the very least double the usual number.

"Norma Stanley Fletcher, you have been found guilty of the offence tried by this court...."

Perfect, Betty! POGD it is.

Can we start using POGD (Prison Onset Gender Dysphoria) to describe the phenomenon of sex offenders ‘coming out as trans’ on arrest/while incarcerated?

Times, 'Letting criminals self-identify gender ‘putting women at risk’

(extract)
"Joan McAlpine, a fellow SNP MSP, had raised concerns that sexual offences are disproportionately perpetrated by biological men and asked whether self-identification would therefore lead to a “misleading” rise in the number of women recorded as sex-offenders. Official statistics show that 1,007 men were convicted for sexual crimes from 2017 to 2018, compared with 46 women.

Ms McAlpine, 57, said: “Aside from the statistical corruption, I cannot be the only woman who finds it deeply offensive that male sexual violence can ever be badged as a female crime.

“The Crown Prosecution Service in England and Wales take a similar approach [to the Scottish government] — it’s another example of self-identification being introduced by the back door in response to publicly-funded lobby groups.”

She highlighted the case of Katie Dolatowski, 18, a transgender sex offender who preyed on girls in public toilets in Fife and was housed in women-only accommodation after being convicted. Ms McAlpine said the policy meant Dolatowski was “recorded as a woman, when this person doesn’t even have a gender recognition certificate and is therefore legally male”. (continues)
www.thetimes.co.uk/article/letting-criminals-self-identify-gender-putting-women-at-risk-8560wzkqt

threads re Dolatowski who filmed & sexually assaulted two young girls in women's supermarket toilets when he was 17 years old.

www.mumsnet.com/Talk/womens_rights/3329936-teen-films-girl-in-toilet

www.mumsnet.com/Talk/womens_rights/3496984-Article-in-Dundee-Courier-about-assault-of-10-year-old-girl-in-supermarket-toilets

re decision to house a male in female 'single sex' hostel:

(extract)
"She was released from Polmont young offender institution into women-only supported accommodation in Fife because she would otherwise have been homeless.

Asked how Dolatowski could pass a risk assessment to live in a women-only hostel having targeted two girls, a council spokeswoman said: “These are women, they weren’t girls.”

She added that the decision to admit Dolatowski to a female hostel was guided by the National Accommodation Strategy for Sex Offenders, which does not mention transgender people." (continues)
www.thetimes.co.uk/article/trans-sex-attacker-sent-to-female-hostel-c3vw35c06?shareToken=a81d15b744582b6b1f69bca121db4bf2

The change in unprecendented. There have been previous changes of status, such as the relatively recent definition of a child as anyone under 18, where previously there were juveniles under 16 and minors under 18 (or under 21 before 1969)

In these cases, the change is transparent and the trends can still be followed consistently.

I know Millytant and it's likely that there are some examples of that happening somewhere in that 6 "female rapes".

However, I'm not convinced that that would account for a sudden rise of 0-6. If it does, tbh that's an issue in itself given the conviction rates for actual rapes are at an all time low these days.

Interesting that the Daily Mail article showed images of a 27 year old female teacher who was jailed for having sex with a 16 year old pupil.
I am not easy about calling a 16 year old a child, because I and many others were and are working at 16. The teacher has clearly breached a position of trust, but the age of consent in the UK is 16.
If it had been a relationship between a 27 year old who was not a teacher and a 16 year old, then nothing would have happened.
The Mail is ignoring all the transwomen in women's jails who have committed sex offences as a male.

If you add the number of transwomen in prison for sex offences, to the number of women, it's half as much again.

Given that any of the 14,000 men in prison can identify as women, it's clearly nonsensical. Little wonder that Nic Williams could find that no one had actually counted and recorded all the prison inmates. The whole issue would have been glaringly obvious. Best not count them in case someone finds out, eh.

And what does pertinent to the crime mean? It doesn't get a lot more pertinent than the bloody statistics, does it?

And this 'stag do' example? That's the example they use on line to tell you If you are being discriminatory. It says you can't 'pretend' to be trans. Like being on a stag do and messing about.

As a provable example, it's laughable.

What fools these people are. Accepting protocols that they believe they can overlay with common sense. When it is not common sense that they are being bound by.

They wouldn't stand a chance of proving a bloke on a stag wasn't a woman, because he is as much of a woman as any other man.

Is it the premise that transwomen have a right to a private life, which includes not being outed?

Because that accounts for it.

I realise this only applies to GRC holders, not self identifiers. But it's where it has come from. And they are applying it to everyone.

Looking at Karen White, you're not allowed to say what you see.

What fools. I'm glad he looked so bloody defensive and sheepish.

A woman can be guilty of rape if she assists the rapist with a 'common purpose'.

We really need to get the details of all the serious sexual crimes that "women" committed and find out if any were men.

We do, this is impacting on what’s being taught in child protection training.