Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

The aftermath of the intern data leak?

91 replies

stealthsquirrelnutkin · 08/10/2018 15:17

Has anything has been done to tighten security in compliance with law after the incident in April when the paid intern doxxed the women of FWR and drove so many Feminists off the site?

www.theguardian.com/media/2018/apr/19/mumsnet-reports-itself-data-regulator-transgender-rights-row-ip-addresses-posted-twitter

OP posts:
MichaelMumsnet · 10/10/2018 09:55

Hi everyone and thanks for your questions - we're very happy to update you on the changes we made.

As soon as we became aware of the data breach we removed IP addresses from the admin view of the site. They're now only visible to a restricted number of vetted moderation staff who need to access users' registration data and IP addresses to reduce troll activity, and to a small number of senior team members. We monitor all permissions and regularly review them.

We also looked very carefully at our entire approach to data in response to this incident, and as part of our preparations for GDPR. We put in place a number of measures to make sure that we go above and beyond what's required to keep your data safe - and if you're at all concerned, we've made it very easy to find out which personally identifying information you've given us, and to change or delete some or all of that data. You can find out about that over here.

Just to reassure you again, it's extremely unlikely that anyone could be identified by an IP address alone, and no-one was 'doxxed' as a result of this breach. As Justine said at the time, we're as sure as we possibly can be that the tweeting of three posters' IP addresses was genuinely unintentional, and that the aim was to draw attention to the content of the posts, not to reveal identifiers.

We did make the police aware, just as a precautionary measure; we haven't had any further communication from them so we believe they were satisfied that the IP addresses had been revealed inadvertently. As someone has mentioned we also reported ourselves to the ICO, and they were satisfied that we'd responded effectively to the incident and closed the case.

Hope that's clear - please do shout if you have any further queries.

VickyEadie · 10/10/2018 08:32

pennydrew

Correct.

pennydrew · 10/10/2018 07:32

It’s been 2 days since Lily popped in. How long does it take? I re-joined after a long absence, after this situation which I only just heard about. But I don’t feel reassured about the safety of our data on hearing this and I’m not sure why MNHQ is taking so long to reply to you all. This was a serious incident that the woman seems to have just gotten away with? Wow. You get worse punishment for misgendering 😐

Koalablue · 10/10/2018 00:19

Place marking.

SpartacusAutisticusAHF · 09/10/2018 20:36

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

MistressFunbox · 09/10/2018 19:32

No news?

PlantsArePeopleToo · 09/10/2018 18:51

Ahh, well spotted @Gooseflesh and good point!

🤔 indeed!

Gooseflesh · 09/10/2018 14:59

Wait...Lily 🤔🤔Wink

SPOFS · 09/10/2018 14:14

Place marking Smile

stealthsquirrelnutkin · 08/10/2018 22:31

Thanks Lily.

OP posts:
DuckingGoodPJs · 08/10/2018 22:25

Thanks Lily.

I think the worrying part of the episode was the implied threat/promise of "more to come". Sure, after the initial release and backlash from that, the 'more' was not released publicly, but how do we really know personal information was not quietly passed on to 'interested parties'?

WichBitchHarpyTerfThatsMe · 08/10/2018 22:12

I would like to know too.

BernardBlacksWineIcelolly · 08/10/2018 22:06

sure Lily, thanks for the reply

LilyMumsnet · 08/10/2018 22:01

Hi all,

Just wanted to let you know we have seen this thread and will be back with any new info we have. We just want to check in with some senior members of the team first. Hope you won’t mind bearing with us.

citiesofbismuth · 08/10/2018 19:56

I think it's a case of 'sorry, not sorry'.

FekkoTheLawyer · 08/10/2018 19:30

Words have no set meaning these days. Haven't you heard?. 🤪🤪🤪

ToeToToe · 08/10/2018 19:00

I got the impression - from the stuff she wrote on her twitter before she deleted her account - that she wasn't all that sorry at all. Unless the word "sorry" has changed it's meaning too.

FekkoTheLawyer · 08/10/2018 18:55

I never realised it was so easy to get away with things!

I was pondering doing a dastardly crime then calling myself Derek d'Faux to avoid being deadnamed (as in Ireland) but now I see that I just need to say 'I'm so soooooo saweeeeeee 😇😇😇😇🙏🙏🙏 it won't ever happen again - I promise'.

ToeToToe · 08/10/2018 18:51

As far as I can remember at the time, MNHQ called Emma, (the police possibly visited her? Not sure), and she was very very very very sorry and upset about it, and didn't mean it, etc. Then Mumsnet reported themselves, then nothing else happened.

Emma was the reason I de-regged and re-regged with different details and a VPN email/IP.

MnerXX · 08/10/2018 18:44

Update would be great please MMHQ. I have reported the thread in case they haven’t seen it.

BernardBlacksWineIcelolly · 08/10/2018 18:34

I would appreciate an update too

ChrysanthemumsAreMums · 08/10/2018 18:23

nauticant

Yes

DereksSexyPyjamas · 08/10/2018 18:03

It's (surely?) a blatant breach of the GDPR.

It happened before GDPR came in. By a month or two, I think (?).

Watching this thread with a great deal of interest.

hungryhippie · 08/10/2018 17:52

I would like to know this too. Feels a bit like it was brushed under the carpet.

nauticant · 08/10/2018 17:51

IIRC she also said she still had people on the inside at MNHQ who were helping her. Was it ever confirmed if she was just BSing or if it was true?

A completely separate observation is that sometimes moderation on an FWR thread will go very hardline against GC posters. Some mods seem to be rather zero-tolerance.

Swipe left for the next trending thread