Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Jeremy Corbyn speaks about trans rights

165 replies

MacaroonMama · 19/07/2017 10:45

Haven't posted on this board before but I do read it often - sorry if I get the link wrong.

www.theguardian.com/society/2017/jul/19/let-trans-people-self-identify-gender-corbyn-urges-may

So do we need to remind Jeremy Corbyn that while supporting all minorities is important, it should NOT be bought at the price of women's rights being eroded and women's funding being cut and women's spaces being invaded?

A while back, I wrote to my MP about that private members' bill changing 'sex' to 'gender' as a protected characteristic, but he didn't reply (third time! useless!) - what is happening with that?

I am going to write again to my MP and maybe Corbyn too.

What do people think? I don't dislike Corbyn at all, And I honestly do wonder if it is a bit of trans rights being much more fashionable than women's rights!

(Please note I do not want to offend anyone, I just am worried about the rights of women and girls in our society today.)

OP posts:
Thread gallery
5
SylviaPoe · 19/07/2017 13:36

I am both surprised and upset.

I'm a Labour Party member and would like to write to them about it. Are there any template letters about self identification?

BeyondDrinksAndKnowsThings · 19/07/2017 13:35

So hang on... a man can inherit a title that his sister can't, yet still be able to be protected under the laws that protect women, just cause he says so?!

Lord bob of bobsville, taking up a positive discrimination place in place of a woman?! Shock

I did not know this.

KarlosKKrinkelbeim · 19/07/2017 13:33

Is anyone surprised by this? There are so many reasons why corbyn will get this wrong. First, he's an idiot who gets everything wrong. Second, he has no respect for women or the feminist agenda except insofar as it provides him with a stick to beat tories with. He sides with Islamic fundamentalist for gods sake, he thinks feminism is namby pamby middle class BS. Third he is frantically running after the youth vote as he has realised the young people of this country may be stupid enough to make him PM. And if they do, I'm leaving and they can have their socialist utopia- but who will pay their tuition fees if everyone like me ups and leaves, poor darlings

Walkingtowork · 19/07/2017 13:30

Actually I reckon if you asked the average person on the street, they probably wouldn't agree that women are still oppressed Sad

And that's the whole logic of our trans argument out the window.

sticklebrix · 19/07/2017 13:29

Lass I'm not May's biggest fan but agree that she probably understands the need for sex segregation where women need them. Defending that need is probably way down her list of priorities ATM and she'll get slaughtered if she tries.

stilllooksixmonthspregnant · 19/07/2017 13:28

Also furious about this, but not surprised. Fuck him.

Walkingtowork · 19/07/2017 13:25

Indominus perhaps it's liked to the 'ick' factor around women's bodies. I have 3 teenage nieces and you should see their reaction if I mention the word periods or god forbid vagina.

I was also horrified at their misconceptions about feminism. I really don't believe much progress is happening, if any.

sticklebrix · 19/07/2017 13:23

Justanother the single sex train carriages are a different issue (and MTT would be allowed to access them under self ID). But it shows how muddled Corbyn's thinking is.

LassWiTheDelicateAir · 19/07/2017 13:21

He will attach himself to any bandwagon at the moment

Corbyn is a self-important idiot. He has behaved appallingly since the election (which in case he didn't notice Labour lost) His hanging out and being cool at Glastonbury was deeply embarrassing.

May, I suspect might understand the need for single sex facilities but will be name called and bullied if she does not go along with this.

IndominusRex · 19/07/2017 13:20

Walking - I know so many women who buy into this - and many are very focussed on their kids, super into sharing birth stories, breast feeding promotion etc but apparently have a total blind spot about the fact that womens oppression is entirely based on reproductive biology.

Walkingtowork · 19/07/2017 12:50

So many people can't see the problem with this. It must be that they don't believe women are oppressed due to being biological women, hence the need to keep a word to define us.

What seems to clear to us, it just not widely believed. No idea how that can be challenged.

Is it a - they don't believe women are oppressed?
b - they think TW will are oppressed in exactly the same ways as biological women?
c - they believe women and TW are oppressed for some other reason than biology?

Collidascope · 19/07/2017 12:48

Thanks, Spaghetti. So men benefitting under a sexist law won't be thrown under that bus then. How heartening.

MacaroonMama · 19/07/2017 12:46

So incandescEnt I spelt it wrong. Oops sorry.

OP posts:
MacaroonMama · 19/07/2017 12:46

I am INCANDESCANT with rage at that.

OP posts:
SpaghettiAndMeatballs · 19/07/2017 12:44

www.tatler.com/news/articles/august-2016/trans-toffs

Until 2004, transgender people were not formally recognised 
by English law in their acquired sex. Then came the Gender Recognition Act (GRA) 2004, which allows them to be fully recognised in their new gender by the law, provided they meet certain criteria. But the lawyers who thrashed out the act must have debated the issue of trans toffs, because they made one exception. Section 16 states: 'The fact that a person's gender has become the acquired gender under this Act (a) does not affect the descent of any peerage or dignity or title of honour, and (b) does not affect the devolution of any property.' So, as the law stands, the marquess's transgender brother would not get the dukedom.

Collidascope · 19/07/2017 12:41

Assigned, what?? How on earth have they legislated for that?

SpaghettiAndMeatballs · 19/07/2017 12:40

I'm being flippant but I do love the idea of oldest daughters in the gentry suddenly deciding that they are male and whipping the family pile and title away from the younger son who had assumed that they were his.

Except they can't - that's been explicitly excluded from the laws around this.

AssignedMentalAtBirth · 19/07/2017 12:39

Collidascope
No it seems the powers that be already thought of this and ensured it could not happen. Funny that.

Collidascope · 19/07/2017 12:37

I'm being flippant but I do love the idea of oldest daughters in the gentry suddenly deciding that they are male and whipping the family pile and title away from the younger son who had assumed that they were his.

Collidascope · 19/07/2017 12:33

No prob, Macaroon. You have to put these round the link but without spaces.

I notice they haven't allowed comments at the bottom of this article. Just to stifle debate that bit more.

Lottapianos · 19/07/2017 12:31

'This is s deal breaker and I will not for vote for any party that supports this shit! Women are HALF the population and we are getting pissed off'

Very much seconded

I am horrified by this collective madness. FFs is it not obvious to anyone with their head screwed on that biology is not based on 'the feels'??!

AssignedMentalAtBirth · 19/07/2017 12:27

FFS

Yes I'm, with you Datun; I also have become rabid on this issue. Between that and the Scottish Government issuing a consultation about changing toilets in schools to gender neutral, I am on the war path with this, and, if any politicians are reading:
This is s deal breaker and I will not for vote for any party that supports this shit! Women are HALF the population and we are getting pissed off

I am going to write in response to the Scottish government consultation. Any Scottish MNs who are going to write?

nauticant · 19/07/2017 12:19

Who is he trying to attract with this?

What do you think the cross-over is between Momentum and SJW types? My reckon would be "considerable".

Datun · 19/07/2017 12:18

JustAnotherPoster00

I can't tell if you're agreeing or not, by linking that thread?

JustAnotherPoster00 · 19/07/2017 12:13

You're right of course Hmm

www.mumsnet.com/Talk/am_i_being_unreasonable/2455870-Women-only-train-carriages-really