Please or to access all these features

30 days only

Feeling frustrated and sad about my daughter’s three-day suspension.

219 replies

Ffs1234 · 19/10/2026 18:20

My 13-year-old daughter has been given a three day suspension for making a TikTok dance with friends in the school toilets while on break and I’m feeling frustrated and sad about it.
I completely understand the reason for the rule. Filming in toilets raises privacy concerns, and I accept that she broke the rules and should face a consequence…as does she!
According to her, several girls were dancing together and knew they were being recorded. The video wasn’t posted or shared. I know that doesn’t make it acceptable, but I do think the circumstances should matter.
This is her second year of secondary school and she has never been in trouble before and has a really positive school record. She plays sport and has had awards for attendance, won competitions etc. The policy says “up to three days”, so I’m struggling to understand why three days is appropriate for her first incident, but the decision has been made.
I’m not asking for her to get away with it. I am and will support the school in making sure she understands why it was wrong. I just feel disappointed that one lapse in judgement has resulted in three days out of school when she has otherwise consistently behaved well.
Has anyone had a similar experience? Did the school take your child’s previous record into account?
Please go easy I’m disappointed and angry at my dd and this situation, just looking for friendly advice I suppose.

OP posts:
SabrinaBricklayer · 20/10/2026 07:51

DebbieSavage · 19/10/2026 20:51

I'll never understand schools in this country. During a sanctioned break this person's daughter and a few friends decide to be creative and make a dance video and the administration decide to suspend them for 3 frickin days??!! What a way to punish innovation, but I guess that's the whole point isn't it? We need more drones for the daily grind.

Just tell your daughter she did nothing wrong and you are proud of her. Institutions in this country just exist to pull people down instead of letting them shine.

What a load of bollocks. Proud her daughter is filming in a school toilet? Shining by filming in a toilet? I can see why you’re having trouble understanding things.

Do you know you can be sacked from your job for doing the same thing?

localnotail · 20/10/2026 07:41

GladThatILiveAmIThatTheSkyIsBlue · 19/10/2026 22:38

@localnotail wrote Make sure you request classwork for the three days, schools sometimes not very good with this.

Do non-teachers realise how much extra work this will probably give them? It’s not just a matter of saying, “Do exercise 5 p231 questions 1-10,” partly because if the student was not in the lesson they may not know how to do the new work.

Edited

If student was not in lesson there is always online recourses available.

Suspension is a serious matter but the child's learning should not be interrupted.

tomorrowfollowstoday · 20/10/2026 04:07

Ffs1234 · 19/10/2026 21:10

Yes up to 3 days for the phone out in the bathroom area.

Filming in a toilet is completely inappropriate, you don't seem to understand that. You're more focused on the punishment than on helping your DD understand why this behaviour was understandably something that school will take seriously.

sittingonabeach · 20/10/2026 00:20

Phones are treated as prohibited items in our local schools, so instant suspension if seen. Add in filming and then filming in the toilet area, 3 days could be seen as light punishment.

Students will know the repercussions, OP’s DD would have known what the risk was.

If she had filmed someone in the toilet, even accidentally she could have been in the shit (excuse the pun)

Toilets and phones are not a good mix in schools, there is a reason governments/schools are bringing in rules about phone use in schools

ifonlytheydlisten · 20/10/2026 00:14

Schools are mandated to not allow phone use in schools now. So harsh punishments all round

sittingonabeach · 20/10/2026 00:07

tsmainsqueeze · 19/10/2026 23:43

You will look back on this and realise it didn't matter that much really.
There are so many other awful things she could have done that really did justify the punishment given.
She probably won't do anything like this again, if she were mine I'd back the school up but secretly be thinking that they were a bit over the top with a 3 day suspension.

It per the school’s behaviour policy, which both the DD and OP will have agreed to when signing up to the school

tsmainsqueeze · 19/10/2026 23:43

You will look back on this and realise it didn't matter that much really.
There are so many other awful things she could have done that really did justify the punishment given.
She probably won't do anything like this again, if she were mine I'd back the school up but secretly be thinking that they were a bit over the top with a 3 day suspension.

user1464187087 · 19/10/2026 23:33

Bluecandy · 19/10/2026 22:56

This is a clear example of false equivalence - equating murderers with girls having fun is ridiculous.

the disproportionality of the punishment is shocking, as is the number of people living in a parallel universe who agree with this level of discipline being imposed for what is a harmless act.

If children are ingenious enough to have their phones in school without being caught and have some fun amongst the learning, why shouldn’t they do so?

They were caught though.

GladThatILiveAmIThatTheSkyIsBlue · 19/10/2026 23:24

sittingonabeach · 19/10/2026 22:43

In England schools have to provide work for suspended pupils. Pupils also shouldn’t be out and about during school hours

I didn't know that - but 'work' need not be classwork.

I took 'classwork' to mean work the class would be doing in her absence, but that might not be correct.

The work suspended pupils get could be something generic which would not need to be set individually by the class teachers. That would be a reasonable request.

As to the pupils staying at home, I would expect so but am not able to comment.

sittingonabeach · 19/10/2026 23:20

Motheranddaughter · 19/10/2026 23:16

I certainly taught mine to challenge authority if it was wrong
i think the punishment was OTT
I certainly wouldn’t punish her at home

Why was punishment OTT? Also it accords with the school’s behaviour policy, which both DD and OP should know

Motheranddaughter · 19/10/2026 23:16

Nofeckingway · 19/10/2026 18:33

Just because she is normally well behaved , this is not good behaviour. It's called a first offense . Please back up the school on this . Don't teach that you should challenge authority because you in your opinion it's unfair . It's not . I do sympathise as it happened to me too and I wanted to intervene but soo glad I didn't.

Don't let her just stay at home watching TV though . All the girls that were suspended with my DD said their mothers set them daily tasks and their houses were spotlessly clean . 😀

I certainly taught mine to challenge authority if it was wrong
i think the punishment was OTT
I certainly wouldn’t punish her at home

Ihatelittlefriendsusan · 19/10/2026 23:15

Sorry, but i think the school have gone quite easy on her.

She has not only breached school rules about phones, she has breached her teachers trust by abusing the lesrning break they were given. And then she has also broken safeguarding ones by firstly filming in the toilets and secondly intending to post it.

You seem to be massive minimising what she has done here. Why is that?

sittingonabeach · 19/10/2026 23:12

Kerryblue · 19/10/2026 23:09

They could have stopped filming at that point…..?

But many students wouldn’t, that is why phones can’t be in the toilets

sittingonabeach · 19/10/2026 23:11

Wonder how many posters saying it isn’t a big deal would have an issue if their child was filmed whilst on the toilet. This is why phones are banned from school toilet areas and all students will know that

Kerryblue · 19/10/2026 23:09

user1464187087 · 19/10/2026 19:27

What if you had walked in and had a stomach bug / diarrhea and had to use one of the toilets whilst the kids were recording a dance video?
I would have been mortified.
I agree with the punishment.

They could have stopped filming at that point…..?

sashh · 19/10/2026 23:08

Ffs1234 · 19/10/2026 18:58

publicly? No she doesn’t share anything publicly, between her and her friends in the video privately…possibly. I haven’t asked her that tbh. But I will.

If she shares with anyone there is a chance, quite a big one, that it becomes public.

You need to know that and so does she.

Kerryblue · 19/10/2026 23:07

Worldinyourhands · 19/10/2026 19:19

What an absolutely massive non-issue.

Otherwise well behaved teen girls doing a silly thing - it should have been a warning. I definitely wouldn't punish at home. For what?! She hasn't done anything to you. She broke a school rule and it's being dealt with (ridiculously over zealously) by the school.

I completely agree. What a mountain out of a molehill!!

SnipSnipMrBurgess · 19/10/2026 23:03

EricTheHalfASleeve · 19/10/2026 18:29

You need to delete tiktok - to be honest I'm shocked that you don't seem that fussed about this. Filming young girls in the toilets with the intent of posting it to the internet is basically making content for sleazy men worldwide.

She is a teenager doing a tiktok dance with her friends for only her friends to see.

Calm down.

Theroadt · 19/10/2026 22:56

CharSiu · 19/10/2026 18:24

I would also punish her at home but I’m old school when it comes to behaviour.

That would be the best thing to do and do not let her know you think it’s not fair.

Would remove her phone and all tech for the 3 days at home and give her a lot of chores and studying.

This. But the reason we have such tricky youngsters now is because whenever rules are enforced the parents whine - OP says she “accepts” but she isn’t setting out consequences at home.

Bluecandy · 19/10/2026 22:56

user1464187087 · 19/10/2026 22:43

Why should murderers and rapists not do what they want?
Why does society need any rules?
Kids are at school to learn, not to be dancing in some fucking grim toilets. The phone shouldn't have even been turned on.

This is a clear example of false equivalence - equating murderers with girls having fun is ridiculous.

the disproportionality of the punishment is shocking, as is the number of people living in a parallel universe who agree with this level of discipline being imposed for what is a harmless act.

If children are ingenious enough to have their phones in school without being caught and have some fun amongst the learning, why shouldn’t they do so?

Trytobegood22 · 19/10/2026 22:47

I’m confused as to why you’re frustrated with the school. She was caught using a phone she shouldn’t be creating a TikTok in the toilets. You are disappointed in her and rightly so. What did the school
do wrong?

seahorsessky · 19/10/2026 22:45

Watch Carrie (you can stream it now). Yes, it's obviously fiction. But there have been so many things that have really happened, and too much of teachers' time is take up dealing with things that just wouldn't have been part of their job 20 years ago, meaning they're struggling to do the things they should be able to do. Most schools have phone bans now round where I live, because parents were giving smartphones to kids and there was a lot of bullying and one serious consequence-and that girl's parents had only given her a dumbphone, but she was recorded by someone else whose parents gave her a smartphone and didn't prevent her posting stuff online, when she wasn't even a teenager.

user1464187087 · 19/10/2026 22:43

Bluecandy · 19/10/2026 22:17

why shouldn’t they do what they like - it’s not impacting on anyone else. The authoritarianism of some schools and parents is astounding.

Why should murderers and rapists not do what they want?
Why does society need any rules?
Kids are at school to learn, not to be dancing in some fucking grim toilets. The phone shouldn't have even been turned on.

sittingonabeach · 19/10/2026 22:43

GladThatILiveAmIThatTheSkyIsBlue · 19/10/2026 22:38

@localnotail wrote Make sure you request classwork for the three days, schools sometimes not very good with this.

Do non-teachers realise how much extra work this will probably give them? It’s not just a matter of saying, “Do exercise 5 p231 questions 1-10,” partly because if the student was not in the lesson they may not know how to do the new work.

Edited

In England schools have to provide work for suspended pupils. Pupils also shouldn’t be out and about during school hours

GladThatILiveAmIThatTheSkyIsBlue · 19/10/2026 22:38

@localnotail wrote Make sure you request classwork for the three days, schools sometimes not very good with this.

Do non-teachers realise how much extra work this will probably give them? It’s not just a matter of saying, “Do exercise 5 p231 questions 1-10,” partly because if the student was not in the lesson they may not know how to do the new work.