Please or to access all these features

The royal family

Ham pr disasters 55! …no neither David Attenborough or John major will be head of state! ….

1000 replies

jeffgoldblum · 23/10/2026 15:27

Keep calm and carry on!

OP posts:
Thread gallery
17
BunnyBunbunbun · 24/10/2026 14:13

mateysmum · 24/10/2026 14:00

I have no time for Meghan, but I may be prepared to cut her a bit of slack on this one, even though in typical style she is trying very hard to make this a PR disaster. She was made aware of these allegations and says she was assured they were being investigated. If that is true then there probably wasn't much more she could do and I don't blame her for keeping her children from him. But......
JFC what a toxic family! There doesn't seem to be a single member that is a sane person and upstanding member of the community. Meghan's upbringing probably had a lot to do with how she turned out. To have only 1 member of your family at your wedding, then insult your in laws to the world, to seem to dispose of friends regularly and just come across as so inauthentic, it is toxic to the core. William was so right when he counselled Harry to take more time. William hard learned from the Middletons what a close, loving family is like and he knew the Markles weren't it.

I agree the Markles are a horrendous mess and wouldn't blame Meghan if she wanted nothing to do with them. She is protesting a bit too much, however, about being supposedly vilified for being estranged from her father. It really is a footnote issue and the supposed "vilification" was not much more than what any person in the public eye typically has to deal with. Not to mention, I'm sure many people find the Markles problematic and can understand why Meghan isn't close to them.

So, I can understand why no one from her father's side was at the wedding. But, what about her mother's side? Does she have no aunts and uncles? No cousins? Close family friends?

Passingthroughagain · 24/10/2026 14:13

BunnyBunbunbun · 24/10/2026 13:58

"‘A spokesman for the Sussexes told The Sun the minor date discrepancy was “understandable” given the amount of time that had passed.

"He said: “In recalling events from more than seven years ago, without the benefit of a diary entry or contemporaneous record, it is understandable that she may have been mistaken by a few months."

Lol, the've already been forced to admit the first discrepancy in Meghan's statement.

Couldn't Meghan simply have checked the letter - which she obviously had a copy of - before firing off her statement? And why doesn't she or her secretary or PA keep some kind of diary? That's what public figures do.

Since she couldn't get something so factual as the date correct, it makes you wonder what other discrepancies there might be in her account.

Maybe the letter wasn't dated?

But she did famously keep a diary of her time in the UK, so yes, she's definitely getting caught up in her lies.

MrsDanversGlidesAgain · 24/10/2026 14:13

PleasantGreenPorcupine · 24/10/2026 14:10

God almighty, it's really mad, isn't it?

I appreciate I'm stretching so hard to give her the benefit of the doubt that I could touch my heels with the back of my head, but unless she just completely blanked the whole thing for her mental protection, it does show her utterly weird sense of priorities - that she takes great offence over lipgloss not being shared but is apparently unconcerned that her DF has been accused of CSA.

BemusedAmerican · 24/10/2026 14:13

For the record, I've had to turn in a phone battery and iPad battery thst swelled dangerously for safe disposal. Also, I think TM Sr moved to Mexico in 2011 sincecitcwas cheaper than California. He may have been too broke to buy new tech.

I thought the lawyer's comments about customs were interesting. The boxes would have been shipped from Mexico to the Philippines before going onto the US. If TM Jr was able to immediately spot CSA, then a trained customs inspector should have picked it up.

Puzzledandpissedoff · 24/10/2026 14:14

jeffgoldblum · 24/10/2026 13:29

Sorry I’m so confused!!! , can anyone explain it to me or is it really as convoluted as it sounds!!

It's not you, jeff - or if it is, a lot of us are in the same boat

As usual where M&M are involved the whole thing's riddled with inconsistencies, and while whatever Thomas Snr may or may not have done isn't their fault, the natural suspicion about anything they come out with certainly is

I suppose we should just be grateful Harry's not opened his mouth so far, because when it happens it'll hardly improve matters

AnAlpacaForChristmasPleaseSanta · 24/10/2026 14:14

jeffgoldblum · 24/10/2026 13:58

Many thanks blue ! …so did Meghan lie about the date? ….is there another letter? …. Or something else?! ….

I don't know but I honestly struggle to believe anyone in the world would be able to muddle the dates over something like this.

Years ago someone I once worked with was arrested on suspicion of a serious crime. I can still remember the exact year I happened, and that was just with a former colleague. Pretty sure it would've been burnt into my brain had it been my father.

AtIusvue · 24/10/2026 14:14

Both Harry and Meg have great memories over every little detail and infraction of the RF…..but can’t rem the date of this?

They made a NF docu about things that happened up to 6 years earlier….but they can’t between them, remember when they got this devastating news?

AtIusvue · 24/10/2026 14:15

The MIGS would never have allowed her to make a spectacle like this.

Starryfifty · 24/10/2026 14:16

Letter was 2019. Has meg now explained why she cut contact with him in 2018?

PleasantGreenPorcupine · 24/10/2026 14:16

AtIusvue · 24/10/2026 14:14

Both Harry and Meg have great memories over every little detail and infraction of the RF…..but can’t rem the date of this?

They made a NF docu about things that happened up to 6 years earlier….but they can’t between them, remember when they got this devastating news?

Edited

Yes, how odd

jeffgoldblum · 24/10/2026 14:17

Passingthroughagain · 24/10/2026 14:09

Matt Wilkinson, The Sun's Royal Editor, has just posted on X that MM 'concedes' she wasn't shown the letter in the summer of 2018 like her statement said yesterday. No explanation for how she got it so wrong.

so in other words she lied then!!! And the sun printed her lies without checking!!!
I’m sorry to be so blunt but I’m fed up with the use of watered down language to explain away the obvious facts from this couple! ……forgot….misunderstood…..confused…..memory loss due to time …..🙄

OP posts:
BunnyBunbunbun · 24/10/2026 14:17

clarissadavenport · 24/10/2026 14:12

What a horrific cesspit this is.

It is indisputable that the letter she received exists.

Several journalists have gone on the record to state they have seen it.

She was advised to not talk about it, so as not to jeopardise any future legal proceedings.

She can hardly be held responsible for the timing of when the letter she passed on to the specialist Met Protection Unit was passed on inhouse or to where.

"She can hardly be held responsible for the timing of when the letter she passed on to the specialist Met Protection Unit was passed on inhouse or to where."

What you on about? The letter wasn't sent to her. It was sent to the Fixated Threat Assessment Centre, a specialist Met unit.

Her spokespeople have already admitted that she got the date wrong.

Perhaps get some basic and widely reported facts right before you accuse others of being horrific. You could simply have read Meghan's own statement, in which she says that a Met unit showed her the letter in 2018.

Ponoka7 · 24/10/2026 14:18

PleasantGreenPorcupine · 24/10/2026 11:59

Don't most threads meander? There's no conspiracy! You're posting what you like!

A conspiracy wasn't claimed by me. It was denied that once again a man might be a pedophile, but let's pick apart women around him, that we don't like for no sane reason.

PleasantGreenPorcupine · 24/10/2026 14:18

jeffgoldblum · 24/10/2026 14:17

so in other words she lied then!!! And the sun printed her lies without checking!!!
I’m sorry to be so blunt but I’m fed up with the use of watered down language to explain away the obvious facts from this couple! ……forgot….misunderstood…..confused…..memory loss due to time …..🙄

Yet as someone pointed out, she has a great memory for every small perceived slight from the RF!

HamTwatter · 24/10/2026 14:20

I’m impressed that people still have their phone chargers from 2011/2013.

MrsDanversGlidesAgain · 24/10/2026 14:21

So it seems the Sun was so eager to get this story out that no due diligence was done.

Passingthroughagain · 24/10/2026 14:21

jeffgoldblum · 24/10/2026 14:17

so in other words she lied then!!! And the sun printed her lies without checking!!!
I’m sorry to be so blunt but I’m fed up with the use of watered down language to explain away the obvious facts from this couple! ……forgot….misunderstood…..confused…..memory loss due to time …..🙄

Yep. It's also lies that she didn't keep records – the fact she kept a secret journal made headline news at the time!

https://www.marieclaire.com/celebrity/meghan-markle-journal-royal-secrets/

Meghan Markle

Meghan Markle Could Use Her Old Journal to Reveal Royal Secrets, A Source Has Claimed

"She wrote it all in her diary as an insurance policy."

https://www.marieclaire.com/celebrity/meghan-markle-journal-royal-secrets/

Tiddlywinks63 · 24/10/2026 14:21

SiegfriedSassoon · 24/10/2026 14:01

It's entirely possible Meghan felt that she had to remain silent about her father because of what he could reveal about her should he choose to. I'm sure we don't know the half of what she's been involved with pre Harry.

And I think that the true reason for leaving the USA has yet to be revealed; this is the blip before the tsunami. I als greatly suspect that if she starts throwing dirt at her family then the ensuing response from them will be shocking revelations about her previous life.
No way is she a sweet innocent ingenue however hard she tries.

AutumnCrowOfTheChillWind · 24/10/2026 14:21

Passingthroughagain · 24/10/2026 11:10

Do you think this is why she's rushed back to the UK? She never reported him to US authorities the entire time she was in Cali – the Americans won't look kindly on that. Without being too grim, it makes her – and Harry – complicit in his continued abuse of children, if he is guilty, which he increasingly appears to be.

I think it could explain why Harry decamped back to UK so rapidly and has tried to get under the wing of his father the monarch so desperately. He wants protection from any actual (long overdue, no thanks to HaM) investigation.

It might also explain his naive obsession with the IPP status he wants (but will never have). He wants sanctuary like diplomats have, because he doesn’t want to have to answer questions on his inaction.

And where’s Harry?

jeffgoldblum · 24/10/2026 14:22

BunnyBunbunbun · 24/10/2026 14:17

"She can hardly be held responsible for the timing of when the letter she passed on to the specialist Met Protection Unit was passed on inhouse or to where."

What you on about? The letter wasn't sent to her. It was sent to the Fixated Threat Assessment Centre, a specialist Met unit.

Her spokespeople have already admitted that she got the date wrong.

Perhaps get some basic and widely reported facts right before you accuse others of being horrific. You could simply have read Meghan's own statement, in which she says that a Met unit showed her the letter in 2018.

Ignore…the insults come thick and fast when ham have once again cocked up and we are apparently not supposed to notice or comment on it!!

OP posts:
AnAlpacaForChristmasPleaseSanta · 24/10/2026 14:24

PleasantGreenPorcupine · 24/10/2026 14:18

Yet as someone pointed out, she has a great memory for every small perceived slight from the RF!

Like not sharing a lipgloss.

smilesy · 24/10/2026 14:25

HamTwatter · 24/10/2026 14:20

I’m impressed that people still have their phone chargers from 2011/2013.

I have one from 2006 because I have my original iPod video and it has to be plugged in all the time to work 😂. As you were….

Orvillee · 24/10/2026 14:26

EmpressSisi · 24/10/2026 13:53

My head is hurting!

I’m genuinely baffled as to why she’s involved herself in this when she could have simply expressed her concerns over the victims and left it at that.

Instead, she’s created a whole new mess for herself, inviting questions and scrutiny when she could have remained entirely out of it.

She really is an absolute PR nightmare.

Sometimes I just want to shake her and confiscate all her communication tools for her own good. She needs saving from herself!

I agree. But her fragile ego alongside her poor impulse control has shown her to emotionally knee jerk react every time. She has no ability to process, to be considered and strategic or to see the broader context and impact on others. In this case the victims. She is triggered to grift and grasp and grab every opportunity for herself.

Here she is attempting to conflate two very separate events which may or may not be connected (that’s for LE in various jurisdictions to conclude) just to pump up her reputation.

Why is she involving herself here - her actions are only ever self serving but she’s making a terrible mess that’s distracting and derailing from any clarity and truth for investigation.

She really is chaotic,

Starryfifty · 24/10/2026 14:27

AutumnCrowOfTheChillWind · 24/10/2026 14:21

I think it could explain why Harry decamped back to UK so rapidly and has tried to get under the wing of his father the monarch so desperately. He wants protection from any actual (long overdue, no thanks to HaM) investigation.

It might also explain his naive obsession with the IPP status he wants (but will never have). He wants sanctuary like diplomats have, because he doesn’t want to have to answer questions on his inaction.

And where’s Harry?

Yes but since they returned they have done absolutely exactly to piss off the RF so know knows

AnAlpacaForChristmasPleaseSanta · 24/10/2026 14:28

HamTwatter · 24/10/2026 14:20

I’m impressed that people still have their phone chargers from 2011/2013.

I have an actual phone from 2013. It has lots of important, sentimental messages on it that I wasn't able to transfer over when I got a new model so I just kept it.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.