Please or to access all these features

Site stuff

Join our Innovation Panel to try new features early and help make Mumsnet better.

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

Hackergate part four - PLEASE READ!

993 replies

RebeccaMumsnet · 20/08/2015 10:12

Previous thread here and original thread here

We will post here throughout the day with updates and info, please do post any questions and we will get to them as soon as possible.

If you need to get in touch off of the boards, please email [email protected], we have a team of people working through the inbox now and will get back to you ASAP but please do bear with us, it's very busy.

There is also a specific thread about passwords here.

Thanks all
MNHQ

OP posts:
Thread gallery
10
YonicScrewdriver · 21/08/2015 11:05

Wolsey

There are people who are on the list AND who have other concerns such as abusive exes. Whilst MNHQ are no doubt taking your request seriously, they do need to triage and prioritise.

00100001 · 21/08/2015 11:05

Wolsey "All I am after is an acknowledgment [sic] of a message sent two days ago confirming that they will take steps to remove my positing history and then account for the site."

I'm sure you will get a response. MN are actually pretty good at responding quickly in normal circumstances.

VowelMovement · 21/08/2015 11:04

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

00100001 · 21/08/2015 11:03

Well wolsey - for you to come on here and say that they "have handled this whole debacle in a slow and ineffective way" rather implies you know how to handle these things.

I'm sure your advice and expertise in reacting to hacking scandals would be most appreciated.

Wolsey · 21/08/2015 10:58

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

LittleRedRidingHoodie1 · 21/08/2015 10:58

Oh fgs. Well- I am not Jeffrey because I can't even bold text to quote it! Blush

LittleRedRidingHoodie1 · 21/08/2015 10:57

*Today 10:44 DontTellThePrincessBride

I don't think there are as many of them as they claim either. I think it's been one person and it's snowballed so hers gotten a couple of his mates in to help and I think that with the furore that has erupted it is rapidly escalating beyond their control.*

I agree with this.

00100001 · 21/08/2015 10:52

Calm down Jeffrey.
It's a free world, anyone can reply to your posts wolsey

00100001 · 21/08/2015 10:51

wolsey feel free to pop over to MN Towers and show them how to handle this situation! Maybe make a power point showing them what they should have done? I'm sure they'd appreciate it!

Wolsey · 21/08/2015 10:50

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

00100001 · 21/08/2015 10:49

I am rather imagining Jeffrey being a bit deflated - he didn't get all that much attention form this. He was all over the boards and Tiwtter etc and all "Oh ho! total 1337 and a madhax0r - gonna bring Mumsnet down for keks"

And then Ashley Madison happened. Grin

DontTellThePrincessBride · 21/08/2015 10:44

I don't think there are as many of them as they claim either. I think it's been one person and it's snowballed so hers gotten a couple of his mates in to help and I think that with the furore that has erupted it is rapidly escalating beyond their control.

JeffreysMummyisCross · 21/08/2015 10:42

No one who has children of their own would send a swat team to a house knowing there was children sleeping there.
I dont think they are fathers either. But if they are, this proves that their ex-partners are entirely justified in withholding access to the children.

Jasonandyawegunorts · 21/08/2015 10:41

I addressed my comment to MNHQ (who have handled this whole debacle in a slow and ineffective way).

3000 People were on that list, there has been an actual attack on the staff and they have been coming online to post at all hours of the night, they are clearly doing things as fast as they can.

What make you so special, that you think they should stop everything so they can delete your posting history, which as has been explained won't make any difference?

Simurgh · 21/08/2015 10:38

*Ashley Madison

Simurgh · 21/08/2015 10:37

I think it's possible to disregard the effect of a SWAT if you're a young teenager/mentally a young teenager as many of his followers seem to be. Much of this will be eclipsed by the Ashey Mdadison hack though, I think, or the next big one that comes along. I hope only that MNHQ learn this lesson for our future.

Wolsey · 21/08/2015 10:37

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

DontTellThePrincessBride · 21/08/2015 10:36

I didn't "actively seek him out". There were several of us chatting about the DDOS attack, he got @'d into the conversation. However investigation has shown that he didn't get my address details from MN.

I think in this sort of situation it's all too easy to link unrelated events and put hem down to one cause when really they're not due to the same issue. My opinion is that until there is evidence to say otherwise then the email issue isn't related

PermetsTu · 21/08/2015 10:35

And Lavri, can I please wish you all the very best for some positive news. Please don't feel chased away from MN. The things that make it great (that's all of us btw) haven't changed.

I was going to PM you but I think the PM system is probably best left alone for now.

RepeatAdNauseum · 21/08/2015 10:35

FFS. Fed up of MN double posting everything I write now. Grr.

RepeatAdNauseum · 21/08/2015 10:35

Wolsey It's not a priority right now, because it makes no difference. It won't remove your posts anyway, they will be accessible through the cache if someone wanted to look for them, so it makes no difference.

Put in a dereg request and log off, if that's what you need to do, but you're wasting your time waiting for MNHQ to delete your posts before you go because they are on the internet anyway, deleting them now is an exercise in futility.

Everyone using the internet should be aware that you can't decide to remove everything after the fact. Once you've posted it, it's there, for good. Asking for it to be removed now is useless.

RepeatAdNauseum · 21/08/2015 10:34

Wolsey It's not a priority right now, because it makes no difference. It won't remove your posts anyway, they will be accessible through the cache if someone wanted to look for them, so it makes no difference.

Put in a dereg request and log off, if that's what you need to do, but you're wasting your time waiting for MNHQ to delete your posts before you go because they are on the internet anyway, deleting them now is an exercise in futility.

Everyone using the internet should be aware that you can't decide to remove everything after the fact. Once you've posted it, it's there, for good. Asking for it to be removed now is useless.

PlayingSolitaire · 21/08/2015 10:34

Thanks RebeccaMumsnet. It's reassuring to know you're about. It's a bit like hearing the Today programme and knowing we're not under nuclear attack.

FuckOffJeffrey · 21/08/2015 10:32

I think I might have figured something out about Jeffrey. I've let MNHQ know but obviously don't want to post here as he will be watching this thread.

On another note I think if there was a swatting last night we would have heard about it by now. I don't buy the story about it being revenge for fathers. No one who has children of their own would send a swat team to a house knowing there was children sleeping there.

ItsAllGoingToBeFine · 21/08/2015 10:31

Wolsey But your username and posting history have always been openly available on the internet? And even if MN removes all the posts, they will still be available on the internet...