Please or to access all these features

Secondary education

Connect with other parents whose children are starting secondary school on this forum.

London Oratory complete mobile phone ban even on long commutes

293 replies

Goldie1990 · 01/10/2026 13:40

Interested to hear from any current parents - how can there not be an outcry about this? With an intentionally pan-London intake where many commutes easily exceed an hour, it's the last school that should have this policy. Yet it's one of only a tiny number I can find that doesn't even permit brick phones - and it's deliberately extended to the entire school journey, making it an offense to have so much as a Nokia on hand during a transport emergency.

The head's rationale at the open evening was that there is far more danger on a smartphone these days than there is for an 11-year old crossing London by themselves. While that argument may be debatable, it breaks down completely when applied to brick phones. New guidance from DfE even recommends schools with large commuter populations to consider workarounds like handing in brick phones/keeping them switched off in their bag throughout the day. Even trackers with SOS call buttons are banned - all you're allowed is a basic tracker to see where they are (but with no means of contacting them).

OP posts:
Bigmove25 · 03/10/2026 23:15

Goldie1990 · 03/10/2026 22:35

“A boy got stuck in an elevator at Earl’s Court on the way to his Latin GCSE” may be the most London Oratory anecdote imaginable. 😂 But logically, “he managed without a phone” establishes that the situation was eventually resolved, not that preventing him from contacting anyone was beneficial. And “during terrorist incidents” actually makes the argument rather more eyebrow-raising, not less…..

During 7/7 all the phone signals were jammed anyway. You couldn't get through to anyone for hours. You had to just work it all out and get home as best you could.

I imagine it would create more stress for parents and children having the device they have learned to depend on rended utterly useless right when they need it. That day the transport ground to a halt and the roads were blocked - so not really very much anyone could do to get to anyone anyway. Maybe, just maybe it would be better to develop resilient children in the first place so they can cope in this situation.

I do feel from this thread children having a mobile phone is more about the parent's reliance (addiction) and passing this on to their children. Very often this insistence on a child having a phone is more about parental anxiety of perceived danger than offering any real benefit to the child. It's just slightly less creepy giving them a phone than sewing a tag into their shoe!

As an aside I (a short arsed woman past my prime) was in Victoria with my DC at about 4pm on Wednesday. As we walked I put my hand into my bag. A hoodie on a lime bike must have jumped onto the pavement and, as I retrieved a bag of popcorn for DC from my bag, he was right beside me. I saw a look of extreme annoyance on his face, as he bumped himself back on the road (presumably to do another round). I explained to DC what had just happened and why...

Someone up there must have been watching out for me as my peri-menopausal brain meant I'd put my phone in my other bag and left it at home anyway! I also ended up walking in the wrong direction for a couple of minutes, so stopped a stranger and asked for directions. He got his phone out and after a pleasant exchange we were all on our way. People are mainly nice and helpful - who knew?

KilkennyCats · 03/10/2026 23:30

Ponderingwindow · 03/10/2026 22:38

No. I am normally a rule follower, almost to a fault. This particular rule puts her in danger. It is a bad law.

many of the people who passed it even admitted it was a blunt, poorly written law, but they were in a rush before the legislative session closed so they chose to pass something rather than craft a better law. They felt they had to do something about phones in schools, but did not take the time to deal with all the issues the law they wrote created.

Thankfully our school has made it clear they know the law was poorly written. They have adopted a don’t ask, don’t tell philosophy. There are no bag searches. As long as students aren’t stupid, no one is going to get caught with a turned off phone in the bottom of their bag.

My child is also almost an adult. Many of her classmates are adults. They go from school straight to internships and part-time jobs. Telling them they can’t carry a phone is illogical and completely impractical.

Almost an adult? And she’s in actual danger leaving the house without a phone?!

ProudBlackMomma · 03/10/2026 23:44

Judging by the number of newly hatched year sevens walking the streets after school glued to their phones, I’m talking heads down gawping at their screens like their lives depend on it, I think the Oratory is to be applauded for their policy. It’s so depressing seeing youngsters so attached to their devices. Makes them so vulnerable to mugging too. The Oratory has it right.

Ponderingwindow · 04/10/2026 00:52

KilkennyCats · 03/10/2026 23:30

Almost an adult? And she’s in actual danger leaving the house without a phone?!

where we live, yes. It isn’t a dense area where she can count on asking for help if she is injured.

I suppose I could get her a satellite radio or something, but the way they wrote our law, they would be covered as well.

as I said. Badly written, blunt law.

KilkennyCats · 04/10/2026 10:09

Ponderingwindow · 04/10/2026 00:52

where we live, yes. It isn’t a dense area where she can count on asking for help if she is injured.

I suppose I could get her a satellite radio or something, but the way they wrote our law, they would be covered as well.

as I said. Badly written, blunt law.

Amazing, really, that there are schools within reach of such a remote wilderness.

ProudBlackMomma · 04/10/2026 10:50

Ponderingwindow · 04/10/2026 00:52

where we live, yes. It isn’t a dense area where she can count on asking for help if she is injured.

I suppose I could get her a satellite radio or something, but the way they wrote our law, they would be covered as well.

as I said. Badly written, blunt law.

How would your daughter have coped thirty years ago? This is utterly ludicrous and over the top.

LlynTegid · 04/10/2026 10:56

Not a parent of school age children, never had to consider long commutes.

My preference if practical is the phone locked away during the school day, so not on the child whilst in lessons or break/lunchtime.

I defend the school having the rule it does, whilst not my preference. Air tags and the ability to know how trains and buses are running to time (or not) is available.

Concerns might be less if we kept to BST year round, so always going home completely in daylight.

DeftGoldHedgehog · 04/10/2026 11:00

Schools cannot control what children do outside of school nor bringing in items in their bags (other than if they suspect they are carrying something illegal). Are they going to search all bags to see if they have a little Nokia at the bottom? Sounds like overstepping to me.

KilkennyCats · 04/10/2026 11:03

DeftGoldHedgehog · 04/10/2026 11:00

Schools cannot control what children do outside of school nor bringing in items in their bags (other than if they suspect they are carrying something illegal). Are they going to search all bags to see if they have a little Nokia at the bottom? Sounds like overstepping to me.

Well, yes, they can. Clearly.

DeftGoldHedgehog · 04/10/2026 11:03

ProudBlackMomma · 04/10/2026 10:50

How would your daughter have coped thirty years ago? This is utterly ludicrous and over the top.

By using one of the myriad phone boxes that existed then and don't now.

Also where I went to school there were six buses I could take. Where DDs went to school there was one bus, which was sometimes unreliable.

DeftGoldHedgehog · 04/10/2026 11:04

KilkennyCats · 04/10/2026 11:03

Well, yes, they can. Clearly.

Yes if they act like they are operating a dictatorship. Until someone takes them to court and they find their rules have no legal effect.

KilkennyCats · 04/10/2026 11:07

So send your kid elsewhere, instead of one of the most sought after state schools in London 🤷🏻‍♀️
it’s really very simple, for most people.

custardlover · 04/10/2026 11:19

My sons got places there, I wanted them to go to the Oratory and was fine with the policy for reasons PPs stated above, but my husband was dead against it like the OP and so we went elsewhere. That was our choice and our sons are well settled elsewhere now.

But when I see my sons both glued to their phones, as their friends are, and us having to really police the time they spend on them in a way which is a struggle sometimes, it does almost make me wish we had made a different choice. I know boys who go there and they have never had a safety issue, seem far less phone-reliant for socialising and the point the head makes that there’s no point mugging the boys from LOS seems to be true.

Piglet89 · 04/10/2026 11:33

DeftGoldHedgehog · 04/10/2026 11:04

Yes if they act like they are operating a dictatorship. Until someone takes them to court and they find their rules have no legal effect.

Edited

As I have already explained upthread, such a challenge would be very, very unlikely to succeed.

DeftGoldHedgehog · 04/10/2026 11:36

DD1 and DD2 never had their bags searched at school.

ProudBlackMomma · 04/10/2026 12:21

Such an anti Oratory sentiment from some posters. If you don’t like it go elsewhere and leave your place for a boy who deserves it and will benefit from their ethos.

HawaiiWake · 04/10/2026 13:03

custardlover · 04/10/2026 11:19

My sons got places there, I wanted them to go to the Oratory and was fine with the policy for reasons PPs stated above, but my husband was dead against it like the OP and so we went elsewhere. That was our choice and our sons are well settled elsewhere now.

But when I see my sons both glued to their phones, as their friends are, and us having to really police the time they spend on them in a way which is a struggle sometimes, it does almost make me wish we had made a different choice. I know boys who go there and they have never had a safety issue, seem far less phone-reliant for socialising and the point the head makes that there’s no point mugging the boys from LOS seems to be true.

The boys have second hand smart phone at home or on headphones gaming with their friends. The no phone policy doesn’t cover home use, families just tell their DC to say they have no phones etc but they do.

Goldie1990 · 04/10/2026 14:55

Concerning seeing the comment about leaving Oratory places for boys who deserve them - as if some boys don't deserve them just because their parents happen to be worried about their safety on long commutes.

The premise that LOS is unusually oversubscribed (which, even if it were, doesn't make all of its policies necessarily right) is also open to challenge - there are many higher performing comprehensives in London today with more flexibility and receive many more first preference applications per place. LOS' waiting list in particular now reaches very far down by September (partly because, unlike most other schools, you can't join it unless you put them on the CAF originally and actively opt in to the WL after national offer day).

I'd encourage parents who are worried like me to really check in detail how your local schools are performing these days, as you could be pleasantly surprised. Cardinal Vaughan is of course there too as a higher performing option with brick phones allowed and similar ethos. Search for schools, colleges and multi-academy trusts - Compare school and college performance data in England - GOV.UKSearch for schools, colleges and multi-academy trusts - Compare school and college performance data in England - GOV.UK

OP posts:
KilkennyCats · 04/10/2026 14:57

Goldie1990 · 04/10/2026 14:55

Concerning seeing the comment about leaving Oratory places for boys who deserve them - as if some boys don't deserve them just because their parents happen to be worried about their safety on long commutes.

The premise that LOS is unusually oversubscribed (which, even if it were, doesn't make all of its policies necessarily right) is also open to challenge - there are many higher performing comprehensives in London today with more flexibility and receive many more first preference applications per place. LOS' waiting list in particular now reaches very far down by September (partly because, unlike most other schools, you can't join it unless you put them on the CAF originally and actively opt in to the WL after national offer day).

I'd encourage parents who are worried like me to really check in detail how your local schools are performing these days, as you could be pleasantly surprised. Cardinal Vaughan is of course there too as a higher performing option with brick phones allowed and similar ethos. Search for schools, colleges and multi-academy trusts - Compare school and college performance data in England - GOV.UKSearch for schools, colleges and multi-academy trusts - Compare school and college performance data in England - GOV.UK

Just choose your local school!! This is a bloody ludicrous thread.

Bigmove25 · 04/10/2026 18:28

KilkennyCats · 04/10/2026 14:57

Just choose your local school!! This is a bloody ludicrous thread.

Oh I don't know. I was half hoping someone one here was going to get so worked up they would petition the Holy See about it!
Since some parents seem to think phones have some supernatural quality that offers safety and protection to their children (rather than being a lump of plastic with some electronics) I thought they could convince the Pope to pass a Canon Law that any phone blessed by a priest actually transfigures into the Holy Ghost! I agree bloody ludicrous.

ProudBlackMomma · 04/10/2026 18:49

Goldie1990 · 04/10/2026 14:55

Concerning seeing the comment about leaving Oratory places for boys who deserve them - as if some boys don't deserve them just because their parents happen to be worried about their safety on long commutes.

The premise that LOS is unusually oversubscribed (which, even if it were, doesn't make all of its policies necessarily right) is also open to challenge - there are many higher performing comprehensives in London today with more flexibility and receive many more first preference applications per place. LOS' waiting list in particular now reaches very far down by September (partly because, unlike most other schools, you can't join it unless you put them on the CAF originally and actively opt in to the WL after national offer day).

I'd encourage parents who are worried like me to really check in detail how your local schools are performing these days, as you could be pleasantly surprised. Cardinal Vaughan is of course there too as a higher performing option with brick phones allowed and similar ethos. Search for schools, colleges and multi-academy trusts - Compare school and college performance data in England - GOV.UKSearch for schools, colleges and multi-academy trusts - Compare school and college performance data in England - GOV.UK

Concerning? Are you having a laugh?

Araminta1004 · 04/10/2026 19:07

Nah it is not that. For those of us who are more liberal modern Catholics it is just too old fashioned to deem modern forms of communication the coming of the Anti Christ. What are we now, a new form of Waldorf/Steiner/Mormons? Besides, yes, phones can be detrimental but they also enable when used properly a lot of peer on peer communication and learning and understanding of modern life. And partly they also enable questioning of authority, including Church Authority. Whilst I am a practising Catholic with DC who have all been altar servers and choir singers etc, the bit about overstepping and authoritarianism doesn’t sit right with me. And clearly I am not the only one.

backformoreofthesame · 04/10/2026 19:10

OMG how can they survive ?

I swear on my teddy bear that should any child ever have a transport emergency I will phone any number they ask for and ensure they get home safe

its such a sad sad world that you would trust to tech over humans

Goldie1990 · 04/10/2026 19:49

backformoreofthesame · 04/10/2026 19:10

OMG how can they survive ?

I swear on my teddy bear that should any child ever have a transport emergency I will phone any number they ask for and ensure they get home safe

its such a sad sad world that you would trust to tech over humans

Over strangers?

OP posts:
RoobarbsCustard · 04/10/2026 19:52

backformoreofthesame · 04/10/2026 19:10

OMG how can they survive ?

I swear on my teddy bear that should any child ever have a transport emergency I will phone any number they ask for and ensure they get home safe

its such a sad sad world that you would trust to tech over humans

Based on your sarcastic and belittling response, I’m hoping you’re not the one they approach.