Please or to access all these features

Secondary education

Connect with other parents whose children are starting secondary school on this forum.

London Oratory complete mobile phone ban even on long commutes

293 replies

Goldie1990 · 01/10/2026 13:40

Interested to hear from any current parents - how can there not be an outcry about this? With an intentionally pan-London intake where many commutes easily exceed an hour, it's the last school that should have this policy. Yet it's one of only a tiny number I can find that doesn't even permit brick phones - and it's deliberately extended to the entire school journey, making it an offense to have so much as a Nokia on hand during a transport emergency.

The head's rationale at the open evening was that there is far more danger on a smartphone these days than there is for an 11-year old crossing London by themselves. While that argument may be debatable, it breaks down completely when applied to brick phones. New guidance from DfE even recommends schools with large commuter populations to consider workarounds like handing in brick phones/keeping them switched off in their bag throughout the day. Even trackers with SOS call buttons are banned - all you're allowed is a basic tracker to see where they are (but with no means of contacting them).

OP posts:
ProudBlackMomma · 13/10/2026 22:35

Goldie1990 · 13/10/2026 14:03

Hopefully? That’s a bit harsh isn’t it. :-)

Also, not to be pedantic it’s not vastly oversubscribed. It’s moderately oversubscribed.

Totally agree with @KilkennyCats

@Goldie1990 for the love of god please do not apply to this school. You’ll be one of those parents with a path beaten to the head’s door complaining about everything. I sincerely hope another more deserving Catholic boy gets the place instead.

Goldie1990 · 14/10/2026 00:51

ProudBlackMomma · 13/10/2026 22:35

Totally agree with @KilkennyCats

@Goldie1990 for the love of god please do not apply to this school. You’ll be one of those parents with a path beaten to the head’s door complaining about everything. I sincerely hope another more deserving Catholic boy gets the place instead.

Edited

Why exactly would my DS be ‘less deserving’ than other Catholic boys?

Let’s just say that my behaviour is objectively unreasonable, that none of the concerns I’ve raised about LOS banning 11 year olds from all means of emergency communication with parents on long commutes are valid, and that I deserve prison for even raising the matter. How does that make my DS less deserving?

OP posts:
starsinthemaking · 14/10/2026 08:52

Goldie1990 · 14/10/2026 00:51

Why exactly would my DS be ‘less deserving’ than other Catholic boys?

Let’s just say that my behaviour is objectively unreasonable, that none of the concerns I’ve raised about LOS banning 11 year olds from all means of emergency communication with parents on long commutes are valid, and that I deserve prison for even raising the matter. How does that make my DS less deserving?

It doesn’t make your boy any less or more deserving, that's right.

However, you have a bee in your bonnet and are prepared to cause completely avoidable disruption for teachers and SLT at a school your child doesn’t even attend. This comes with opportunity cost and the time, energy resources that would be spent on dealing with your 'challenge' could be much better utilised and should be spent educating and supporting the children who actually attend the school.

Parents absolutely have the right to challenge policies where there are legitimate concerns, but there’s a difference between that and pursuing an ideological crusade over a policy you c a simply avoid by choosing a different school. It just sounds like an unhealthy fixation. These kind of complaints and challenges aren’t harmless. I've met parents like you who thrive on conflict with teachers , with little regard or empathy for the impact on others. Disagree with the policy if you wish, but why should an entire school community bear the cost of your personal crusade?

Goldie1990 · 14/10/2026 09:04

starsinthemaking · 14/10/2026 08:52

It doesn’t make your boy any less or more deserving, that's right.

However, you have a bee in your bonnet and are prepared to cause completely avoidable disruption for teachers and SLT at a school your child doesn’t even attend. This comes with opportunity cost and the time, energy resources that would be spent on dealing with your 'challenge' could be much better utilised and should be spent educating and supporting the children who actually attend the school.

Parents absolutely have the right to challenge policies where there are legitimate concerns, but there’s a difference between that and pursuing an ideological crusade over a policy you c a simply avoid by choosing a different school. It just sounds like an unhealthy fixation. These kind of complaints and challenges aren’t harmless. I've met parents like you who thrive on conflict with teachers , with little regard or empathy for the impact on others. Disagree with the policy if you wish, but why should an entire school community bear the cost of your personal crusade?

I've met parents like you who thrive on conflict with teachers, with little regard or empathy for the impact on others.

This is a fairly sweeping psychological judgment based on my participation in a discussion forum. You don't know whether I thrive on conflict with teachers. Nor do you know how much regard I have for school staff.

I have never once complained to our primary school in 7 years.

And describing my concern as an “unhealthy fixation” is another way of shifting attention from the merits of the policy to my supposed personality - a running theme on this thread among those defending the school.

You accuse me of lacking empathy while showing relatively little curiosity about why a parent might be concerned about an 11-year-old travelling across London without a means of emergency communication.

Why should an entire school community bear the cost of your personal crusade?

If I actually organised repeated demonstrations, flooded the school with correspondence or encouraged others to submit repetitive complaints, your argument about opportunity costs would become more compelling. But a lengthy Mumsnet thread is not itself a disruption to the school's teaching or safeguarding work. The school isn't obliged to participate in it.

You seem to be treating my willingness to debate the policy online as evidence that I'm already imposing a substantial burden on the school. Those are quite different things.

OP posts:
BarMonaco · 14/10/2026 10:01

Goldie1990 · 14/10/2026 09:04

I've met parents like you who thrive on conflict with teachers, with little regard or empathy for the impact on others.

This is a fairly sweeping psychological judgment based on my participation in a discussion forum. You don't know whether I thrive on conflict with teachers. Nor do you know how much regard I have for school staff.

I have never once complained to our primary school in 7 years.

And describing my concern as an “unhealthy fixation” is another way of shifting attention from the merits of the policy to my supposed personality - a running theme on this thread among those defending the school.

You accuse me of lacking empathy while showing relatively little curiosity about why a parent might be concerned about an 11-year-old travelling across London without a means of emergency communication.

Why should an entire school community bear the cost of your personal crusade?

If I actually organised repeated demonstrations, flooded the school with correspondence or encouraged others to submit repetitive complaints, your argument about opportunity costs would become more compelling. But a lengthy Mumsnet thread is not itself a disruption to the school's teaching or safeguarding work. The school isn't obliged to participate in it.

You seem to be treating my willingness to debate the policy online as evidence that I'm already imposing a substantial burden on the school. Those are quite different things.

That poster seems to be inventing stuff about you thriving on conflict with teachers. Strange.

Araminta1004 · 14/10/2026 10:02

The parents who attend open days, ask questions and bother to read school policies in advance really do not tend to be the problem parents!

Araminta1004 · 14/10/2026 10:17

You can debate the policy and if you become a parent, you are also free to put yourself forward as a parent governor (subject to being elected).

starsinthemaking · 14/10/2026 10:40

Leaving this thread now, I'm sure AI is generating half these posts and it's just boring nit picking. Good luck with your son's school applications.

ParentOfOne · 14/10/2026 17:37

@Goldie1990 It is unclear to me what you want out of this thread.

A discussion? You have had it. You have explained your reasons. Those who disagree have explained theirs. Not sure there is much to add. I get the impression you want everyone to agree with you; that's not going to happen.

Clarifications on the guidance? You have received those, too. It's been explained to you that the guidance states that schools should consider the impact on commuting, not that they must allow mobiles for kids commuting.

Help requesting a SEN exemption? This topic has been addressed, too. I remain of the opinion that, if you want to consider the school, you should start discussing with them now how they would handle a request to be exempted from the policy based on SEN. I think it's a long shot but, if it's important to you, try.

Behaviour on this thread has been bad from multiple parties, but my main question remains: it's unclear what you want from the thread.

Goldie1990 · 14/10/2026 21:42

ParentOfOne · 14/10/2026 17:37

@Goldie1990 It is unclear to me what you want out of this thread.

A discussion? You have had it. You have explained your reasons. Those who disagree have explained theirs. Not sure there is much to add. I get the impression you want everyone to agree with you; that's not going to happen.

Clarifications on the guidance? You have received those, too. It's been explained to you that the guidance states that schools should consider the impact on commuting, not that they must allow mobiles for kids commuting.

Help requesting a SEN exemption? This topic has been addressed, too. I remain of the opinion that, if you want to consider the school, you should start discussing with them now how they would handle a request to be exempted from the policy based on SEN. I think it's a long shot but, if it's important to you, try.

Behaviour on this thread has been bad from multiple parties, but my main question remains: it's unclear what you want from the thread.

You’re right - everything I wanted from the thread has been achieved. I’ve raised awareness of what I feel is a genuine safeguarding concern at LOS. Given how easily searchable it already is, I hope it will be useful to other parents considering the school in the future.

I’ve also highlighted how unusual the policy is, particularly its extension to trackers with SOS call functions. I’ve also emphasised how Cardinal Vaughan is an academically stronger Catholic alternative with a much more flexible approach, and how many suburban comprehensives have improved in recent years to the point where many are just as high achieving as the Oratory (many even more so). So I’d encourage others uncomfortable with the policy to research alternatives carefully, using recent data (the new DfE school level data comes out tomorrow) without feeling that they have no choice but to accept it.

I really was genuinely interested in understanding how anyone would consider it sensible to ban all means of communication with parents for an 11 year old travelling across London by themselves. Some of the responses have reinforced my concern about a mindset in which the perceived benefits of an absolute ban outweigh even basic safeguards for children travelling independently.

It's also reassuring that, among those expressing a clear view on the policy, considerably more individual posters (as distinct from post volume) appear to share my concerns than support the blanket ban.

Job done. Happy to close it here, and thanks to you and others for your contributions!

OP posts:
ElizaToolittle · 14/10/2026 21:49

An hours commute at 11 years old? Wow. I'm surprised more people don't think this is odd. With no phone?
This is wrong on many levels.

ParentOfOne · 14/10/2026 21:52

@ElizaToolittle Some parents agree, some disagree, many simply think that there are way more important issues to worry about and that, if everything else kinda works for them, this is neither here nor there.

FWIW one of the reasons I don't like these schools which are lottery-based, like the Oratory in Fulham or Kingsdale in SE London, is that your circle of friends risks being too spread out, and socialising can suffer. But I also understand parents who think that's a small price to pay, if the more local schools don't work for them, for whatever reason

Twistingoliver · 14/10/2026 22:01

Thank you for raising it OP and for the valid points you made. It is unfortunate that a tiny minority of schools are taking this path, with their reasons for doing so remaining opaque.

ParentOfOne · 14/10/2026 22:09

@Twistingoliver The reasons are far from opaque. You may not agree with them, or you may think that the pros outweigh the cons, but the reasons are clear. Those who support this kind of blanket ban take the view that:

  • phones are addictive
  • in inner London, kids don't really need them (it may be different in rural areas)
  • kids won't be tempted to use phones in the bathroom
  • kids won't be glued to their screens the moment they exit the school
  • kids won't become phone zombies towards oncoming traffic
  • this reduces the risk of kids using phones inappropriately outside the school gates (bullying, sharing inappropriate content, etc

I fully get it that not everyone agrees.
But saying you don't find these reasons convincing enough is not the same as saying they are opaque. Let's not confuse the two.

ProudBlackMomma · 14/10/2026 22:19

Make it stop. This is painful. Please go away OP. You’ve said your piece. We all get it.

RoobarbsCustard · 14/10/2026 23:52

ProudBlackMomma · 14/10/2026 22:19

Make it stop. This is painful. Please go away OP. You’ve said your piece. We all get it.

She’s literally just said she’s got what she needed from this thread, but also we can unfollow if we’re not interested anymore 🤷‍♀️

PhysicsBowlChampion · 20/10/2026 23:23

My DS’s London school also has this rule. No phones on commute or in school.

However given the pandemic (DS was yr 7 in 2020), the school no longer carried out searches of blazers/bags that they apparently used to do. I argued with the school about the phone as DS had about a one hour commute on the tube but to no avail although head of year as much as said he would not be in trouble if they didn’t see the phone….

In the end I sent him with small Nokia (brick) phone to be turned off and kept in school bag. Nothing ever happened and as we became more familiar with the school, it wasn’t quite as strict as they initially stated; they just did not want to openly see any phones during school day. A boy in DS’s year was allowed to openly bring a phone to school and hand into reception each day; did not know reason; maybe health related.

He’s now Yr13 and phones are allowed.

SE13Mummy · 21/10/2026 11:04

The schools I teach in and that my DC attend have long operated a 'mustn't be seen or heard' approach to phones. The students definitely get them out and use them on the journey home but in-school use is rarely an issue.

Many moons ago, as part of a MN product test, we got an ownfone. The size of a credit card and preprogrammed with up to 12 numbers, it would work well as an emergency device. There's no screen and no number buttons so isn't something that can be used other than to contact the preprogrammed numbers. These days, it's possible to include a 999 and SOS button but without them, it may be a reasonable compromise for families whose children need to travel across London and for whom there is a need to be able to make contact with parents. A compromise to be discussed with the school though, obviously.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Swipe left for the next trending thread