Please or to access all these features

Politics

What do with think will be in Labour’s budget?

606 replies

tenpairsofshoes · 12/10/2026 19:04

They don’t seem to be giving much away but any indication that they might help kickstart the economy or are we just going to get £2 bus fares, £45 off our elec bill a year and petrol prices on google map? None of Labour polices seem to help anyone that is really struggling but isn’t in receipt of UC! I’m speaking as a single mother who is trying to sell a property to move on with my life but can’t. Yes I know I’ve very fortunate to have bricks and mortar but that doesn’t mean I’m loaded (because the property isn’t worth much)! I feel like everyone is expecting the chancellor pull a rabbit out of a hat but I think we’ll all be very disappointed/pissed off!

OP posts:
Thread gallery
16
NorthXNorthWest · Today 17:03

Papyrophile · Today 09:52

I was listening to the Times Radio's first look at the headlines last night, and one of the political editors was expressing her opinion that AB is planning to call a snap winter GE before RR's tax increases already in the pipeline for next year take effect.

Healey's first Budget was, in her opinion, likely to be fairly anodyne while they wait for the Milburn and McFadden reports and this might be Labour's best chance for an updated mandate and for AB to consolidate his position.

Here's hoping for a hung parliament.

Badbadbunny · Today 17:05

NorthXNorthWest · Today 17:03

Here's hoping for a hung parliament.

Hell no. Look at the foul up last time when we suffered a Tory/LibDem coalition for a term. Loads of horse-trading without any coherent strategy.

NorthXNorthWest · Today 17:07

Badbadbunny · Today 17:05

Hell no. Look at the foul up last time when we suffered a Tory/LibDem coalition for a term. Loads of horse-trading without any coherent strategy.

You would rather a decade of tax and spend? The erosion of private property, and a well fed but shackled working class?

EasternStandard · Today 17:33

Badbadbunny · Today 13:27

Who said anything about tax cuts to the wealthiest?

But if it keeps the wealthiest in the UK and draws the wealthiest into the UK from abroad, and thus increases our tax take and grows the economy, what's not to like?

Edited

Not everyone likes this, but I agree I don’t get why driving out tax payers is a good idea.

EEexpat · Today 18:32

@EasternStandard

Not everyone likes this, but I agree I don’t get why driving out tax payers is a good idea.

Particularly high taxpayers. Chris Rokos was paying £330 million per year before he decided to leave the UK. So, there’s £27 million per month the government loses in tax take plus whatever he could have spent from his large disposable income.

Add that to Labour’s NIC increase which cost between 200,000 and 276,000 jobs. There’s approximately £1.4 billion lost in tax take. Add job seekers allowance claimed adds another £1.2 billion the government has to pay out.

If taxes increase on Wednesday 28 October 2026, oh dear.

Ruskins · Today 19:49

British businesses are now financing a government that has completely lost control of its spending, while being lectured about the need to contribute more.

The latest figures are staggering. The government borrowed another £24.5 billion in September alone, with £10.9 billion payable in interest on existing debt. That is the highest September interest bill on record.

National debt has now exceeded £3 trillion. Consider what this means for the millions of company directors struggling to keep their businesses profitable.

They pay Corporation Tax on their profits, employers' National Insurance on their payroll, business rates on their premises and countless other taxes and regulatory costs before they can even contemplate rewarding themselves for the risks they take.

Their employees are taxed on their earnings, their customers are taxed on their purchases, and virtually every commercial transaction generates another opportunity for the Treasury to collect revenue.

Yet despite this enormous contribution, the government still cannot balance its books.

In September, tax receipts actually increased by £3.5 billion compared with the previous year. Corporation Tax receipts alone increased by almost 10%. The reward for generating all that additional revenue? Another Budget threatening further punishment for the businesses producing it.

Labour is incapable of understanding a fundamental principle of economics. You cannot continually increase the cost of employing people, discourage investment, penalise profitability and then express surprise when economic growth disappears.

The £100,000 income tax trap is another excellent example of a system designed to punish financial success. Work harder, earn more, employ more people and the Treasury will find another way to take a larger share.

Meanwhile, the interest on yesterday's government spending is consuming billions that could otherwise support infrastructure, public services and economic development.

For company directors, the message is becoming impossible to ignore. Their businesses are expected to generate the wealth, create the employment, shoulder the commercial risks and finance an increasingly expensive state that shows precious little understanding of how wealth is actually created.

There is a limit to how much punishment the productive economy will tolerate before investment, capital and business activity move elsewhere.

Labour would do well to remember that businesses are not an inexhaustible source of revenue. Without profitable businesses and the people prepared to run them, there is no tax base to exploit.

Britain doesn't have a shortage of taxpayers. It has a government with a spending problem, and another Budget is approaching in which those responsible for generating the country's wealth will once again be expected to pay for it.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Swipe left for the next trending thread