Please or to access all these features

Conflict in the Middle East
Thread gallery
123
EasterIssland · 07/02/2024 19:55

EasterIssland · 07/02/2024 19:46

Please report it. The more of us that report it then the comments will get deleted and if someone keeps doing it then being kicked out of mn. @mnhq shouldn’t allow any dehumanisation, independently of sex , nationality or religion

And I should add that if after reporting it you see that the comment hasn’t been deleted please question the reason behind , I tend to say if I said this about Israel / Jewish would the comment be left behind or deleted ?

I once even copied the comment of a poster I wasn’t happy with. Changed the word Palestine for israel and posted it. Not long after I got my comment reported and deleted. So I went back to mnhq to ask why the difference in behaviour. I got an apology and the comment I had reported deleted.

OP posts:
ConnieCounter · 07/02/2024 19:50

EasterIssland · 07/02/2024 19:46

Please report it. The more of us that report it then the comments will get deleted and if someone keeps doing it then being kicked out of mn. @mnhq shouldn’t allow any dehumanisation, independently of sex , nationality or religion

Of course.

HeidiInTheBigCity · 07/02/2024 19:48

EasterIssland · 07/02/2024 19:34

I’ve reported the comment for hate speech. Hopefully many will do and comments like this won’t be allowed in mn. They’re downgrading the Palestinians and that shouldn’t be acceptable

I would not necessarily call it "downgrading" as much as "erasing".

The whole thing is a long-standing pro-Israel trope that, in essence, states "there are no Palestinians - just generic "Arabs" - and, as such, Palestinians are no nation and hence have no claim to a nation-state" (to summarise crudely).

The whole thing is, of course, quite ridiculous on several different fronts:

  1. The notion of a "nation", the idealisation of the "nation-state" and everything that this implies are, largely, an invention of the 19th century that subsequently gained in popularity. The Zionist movement itself is a product of this questionable trend - never had anyone thought of "Jews as a nation" before being a nation was suddenly fashionable as of about the period of romanticism - nor, for that matter of the French or of Germans!
  2. There is ample evidence for the emergence of a distinct Palestinian identity from, at the very least, the very early 20th century onwards - in line with (see above) the whole "nation" idea gaining traction everywhere!
  3. Technically, you do not need to be a "nation" in order to feel a deep connection to your land, your community, your customs, your language and culture! Your neighbours! Plenty of people have been upset about being driven into exile before the concepts of nations and nation states even existed!
EasterIssland · 07/02/2024 19:46

ConnieCounter · 07/02/2024 19:45

Gosh, so much dehumanising and hateful language about Palestinian people on this thread, which is about objecting to their genocide.

I don't understand why you're here?

Please report it. The more of us that report it then the comments will get deleted and if someone keeps doing it then being kicked out of mn. @mnhq shouldn’t allow any dehumanisation, independently of sex , nationality or religion

OP posts:
ConnieCounter · 07/02/2024 19:45

Gosh, so much dehumanising and hateful language about Palestinian people on this thread, which is about objecting to their genocide.

I don't understand why you're here?

Scirocco · 07/02/2024 19:37

sunick · 07/02/2024 19:11

If Palestinians were stopped from leaving why are there so many of them in the West?
And how did Humza Yousef's in laws manage to return to Gaza for a holiday if they're not allowed to go back there?
Or to return to carry out operations as a number of doctors do ?

Edited

People can apply for visas to leave, often linked with studying or employment.

I'm not going to comment on the specifics of an individual family's circumstances, out of respect.

In general terms, though, people with family resident in Gaza can apply to visit for short periods. That's very different from being allowed to move back permanently.

People can try to move back permanently but there's no automatic right. If they leave, they may never get to go back.

People such as doctors may get visas for short or medium term work, usually linked with a specific aid programme or healthcare project. They then have to leave again. Some people may be part of projects that involve staying for 6 months at a time.

EasterIssland · 07/02/2024 19:34

Scirocco · 07/02/2024 19:28

Why do you keep putting quotation marks around Palestinians?

I’ve reported the comment for hate speech. Hopefully many will do and comments like this won’t be allowed in mn. They’re downgrading the Palestinians and that shouldn’t be acceptable

OP posts:
showmethegin · 07/02/2024 19:31

You either care about murder or you don't. You can't say repeatedly how horrified you are that 1200 Jewish people were murdered on 7 October but not be equally horrified that nearly 30,000 Palestinians have been killed since.

You either care about innocent people being murdered or you don't.

Scirocco · 07/02/2024 19:28

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Why do you keep putting quotation marks around Palestinians?

EasterIssland · 07/02/2024 19:24

sunick · 07/02/2024 19:11

If Palestinians were stopped from leaving why are there so many of them in the West?
And how did Humza Yousef's in laws manage to return to Gaza for a holiday if they're not allowed to go back there?
Or to return to carry out operations as a number of doctors do ?

Edited

Have you ever considered reading about Palestinians ? Or is it just your misconceptions and happy to carry that way?

OP posts:
sunick · 07/02/2024 19:14

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

sunick · 07/02/2024 19:11

If Palestinians were stopped from leaving why are there so many of them in the West?
And how did Humza Yousef's in laws manage to return to Gaza for a holiday if they're not allowed to go back there?
Or to return to carry out operations as a number of doctors do ?

Scirocco · 07/02/2024 15:33

anotherfatyorkie · 07/02/2024 14:03

That's rather simplistic, when it's Israel that's under threat of mass destruction.

Have you seen what's happening in Gaza or the occupied West Bank recently?

Because it's kind of not ok.

anotherfatyorkie · 07/02/2024 14:54

Hmm,
Since I made the suggestion about people moving out of harm's way I have discovered that some Palestinians are, in fact "Stateless" which raises a whole shed-load of problems when it comes to travel.

It seems many Palestinians obtained naturalisation and citizenship in the countries in which they settled outside the Middle East and North Africa.

However, this is not the case for Palestinians in the Arab world. The Arab States did not want to undermine the Palestinian’s refugee status for political reasons and thus would not normally give them citizenship. However, Palestinians were given the same rights to work as nationals of a particular Arab State in which they resided and the right to live and return to that State, although in the case of Egypt a re-entry visa to do so was required.

I really don't get this at all.

When the Home Office revoked Shamina Begum's British Citizenship people all over the world were throwing up their hands in horror and telling us (GB) that we had no right to make her "Stateless".
Yet here we have a whole group of people who seem to be classed as "permanent refugees".

My brain hurts.🤔

anotherfatyorkie · 07/02/2024 14:16

Auvergne63 · 07/02/2024 11:41

Israel indirectly controls the Rafah Crossing and Israeli fighter jets bombed the Rafah crossing while imposing stringent conditions on Egypt regarding the entry of humanitarian convoys.

What does 'indirectly' mean?

I wasn't talking about convoys, I was talking about people on foot/bikes or in cars.

anotherfatyorkie · 07/02/2024 14:03

PeasfullPerson · 07/02/2024 13:18

Maybe instead of responding to the terror attack by mass destruction, death and suffering, the people of Israel could have simply claimed asylum in another country.
Now, do you see how cruel and ignorant it is to suggest the people of Gaza are forced to leave.

That's rather simplistic, when it's Israel that's under threat of mass destruction.

BackandForthRoundandRound · 07/02/2024 13:19

PeasfullPerson · 07/02/2024 13:18

Maybe instead of responding to the terror attack by mass destruction, death and suffering, the people of Israel could have simply claimed asylum in another country.
Now, do you see how cruel and ignorant it is to suggest the people of Gaza are forced to leave.

Well said

PeasfullPerson · 07/02/2024 13:18

Maybe instead of responding to the terror attack by mass destruction, death and suffering, the people of Israel could have simply claimed asylum in another country.
Now, do you see how cruel and ignorant it is to suggest the people of Gaza are forced to leave.

PeasfullPerson · 07/02/2024 13:15

Why don’t the people of Israel find a new home in another country? Probably because they don’t want to, and they shouldn’t have to. The same as many people in Gaza.

Auvergne63 · 07/02/2024 11:41

anotherfatyorkie · 07/02/2024 11:31

Israel doesn't control the Rafah Crossing, so they could leave via Egypt.

Israel indirectly controls the Rafah Crossing and Israeli fighter jets bombed the Rafah crossing while imposing stringent conditions on Egypt regarding the entry of humanitarian convoys.

anotherfatyorkie · 07/02/2024 11:31

Auvergne63 · 07/02/2024 11:26

Why is that such an outrageous suggestion.?
People arriving in the UK to claim asylum status (75% of them are successful) are fleeing persecution by their own government or civil war; Palestinians by the Israeli government who also stop them from leaving. If they did manage to leave their land, they are not allowed to return, contrary to international laws.
That is why it is outrageous.

Israel doesn't control the Rafah Crossing, so they could leave via Egypt.

Auvergne63 · 07/02/2024 11:26

Why is that such an outrageous suggestion.?
People arriving in the UK to claim asylum status (75% of them are successful) are fleeing persecution by their own government or civil war; Palestinians by the Israeli government who also stop them from leaving. If they did manage to leave their land, they are not allowed to return, contrary to international laws.
That is why it is outrageous.

Snowypeak · 07/02/2024 11:19

Lots of people choose to move and travel. Most prefer to to stay in their homeland and don’t want to be forced out (as is happening in Gaza).

anotherfatyorkie · 07/02/2024 11:09

Scirocco · 07/02/2024 07:19

Because it's their home? Because for many of the people there, that's the only home they've ever known?

Seriously, your solution to a group of people experiencing persecution and oppression in their own homes is "why don't they move"?

Where is your empathy for fellow humans?

"Seriously, your solution to a group of people experiencing persecution and oppression in their own homes is "why don't they move"?"

Why is that such an outrageous suggestion.?

People arrive here on our shores most weeks claiming to be suffering persecution and oppression. Are you saying they shouldn't be moving to escape that?

I worked with a guy who's father lived in Gaza when it was controlled by Egypt. He took advantage of the bursaries/grants made available to Gazans by Nasser's government and went to study Medicine at a University in Cairo. He eventually moved to UK and worked in a GP practice.

Are you saying that Palestinians have no agency?

Scirocco · 07/02/2024 10:57

sunick · 07/02/2024 10:20

There can be no peace until Hamas abandon their aims to annihilate both Israel and all Jewish people.
And the prospect of that, given that Gaza occupants are subject to anti semitic conditioning in their schools enabled by UNRWA employees thousands of whom are sympathetic to Hamas or members of Hamas, is very unlikely.

Actually, a lot of people I knew in Gaza were not subject to any form of conditioning.

And UNRWA is not some sinister anti-semitic organisation. It's an aid organisation. Allegations have been made about some employees - it's entirely right that those allegations are investigated and action taken if they are demonstrated to be correct, both in terms of consequences for individuals and wider strategic changes to prevent recurrence. However, we should not rush to pre-emptively call for the dismantling of one of the only organisations working in an area of humanitarian crisis. Thousands of people depend on UNRWA for survival.

When you talk about UNRWA employees and other people in Gaza in such a sweeping manner, please try to remember that some of us did know and care about people in Gaza as people. People that we knew, liked, worked with. And that you are tarring our dead loved ones with an unjustly applied label of anti-semitism.