Hi ladies - I've been reading around on Dr Braverman's site (he's one helpful chap, albeit I understand stonkingly expensive to have even a Skype consultation with!) and just read something really interesting on low LAD levels (I have unbelievably low LAD levels) as I think a couple of others on here also got tested? Anyway, just thought I'd share, in the spirit of being better informed! :) The lady in question had had a previous live birth, which is why he mentions that.
contrary to the incorrect thinking about LAD, if you have had a live birth you DONT want to have a positive LAD this is a sign you did not get rid of your anti HLA antibodies by failing to make the protective or blocking antibodies. The LAD does NOT test for blocking antibodies it only makes the incorrect assumption that if you have the bad anti HLA antibodies you probably made the protective ones.
It is good that yoru LAD was low, it means that is not your problem. Also you dont make anti HLA antibodies until the 3rd trimester you also should not see them in someone who has never made it past the first trimester.
The clexane should cover your other issues.
(look at my blogs for more on the LAD testing issue). LIT is recommended to frequently for the wrong reason . It may however still be good for other issues.
and a bit later:
there is a lot of confusion about LAD that I have been trying to clear up on our website. I hope I explain this well. The LAD looks for the presence of "bad" HLA antibodies, that means these antibodies WILL attack the pregnancy. It does not measure the production of the 'good" antibodies called protecive or blocking antibodies. It has been incorreclty asummed that if the bad ones are there the good ones must be too? This has been disproven.
When you are pregnant the your body first makes the bad antibodies in the third trimester, then you make the good ones which do away with . So if you come around to your next pregnancy and they are still there that is bad, it means you did NOT make the protective ones.
New studies have shown that a high LAD with a history of a previous full term pregnancy is a poor sign for success of the next ones.
Since we dont know from LIT who will and wont make the protective antibody we have to be very carefull who we recommend it to , especially if they have already completed a full term pregnancy.
So it looks like if you haven't got into the third trimester, then you WILL have low LAD levels anyway - so they're not something to worry about. Well that's one less thing on my list of worries, anyway! :)