Help protect children from gaming harms.

Take our survey

Please or to access all these features

Childbirth

Share experiences and get support around labour, birth and recovery.

Opinions on Anti D.

28 replies

Flossam · 06/08/2004 11:34

I know I know, there have been many threads like this. But I would really value some opinions on what other people decided to do. Feeling very apprehensive about recieving a blood product, especially as what I have read seems to say that they don't know what the effects are on the baby. They give the anti D at 26 weeks where I am, and I don't understand why? Is it proven more effective then? Because I would rather have it after birth if I actually need it. Anyones experiences and opinions would be gratefully recieved.

OP posts:
Are your children’s vaccines up to date?
gingernut · 06/08/2004 11:41

Sam, I'm Rh neg. too so wondering what to do. The guidance has changed since I had ds, when they simply monitored the antibody titre and only gave anti-D during the pg if there was a problem (which in my case there wasn't). I did have anti-D after the birth. I am seriously considering refusing to have the injection unless the blood tests show that I need it. The blood sample is being taken at 27 weeks (3 weeks' time for me).

Mears knows a lot about this subject and will hopefully see this. In the meantime I'll have a look for a thread I particularly remember where this issue was discussed.

misdee · 06/08/2004 11:41

Where i am they give it after birth, are you having regular blood tests for you anti bodies for being rh neg?

I was raised as a JW and still am wary of blood products. I looked a bit into it, and as in this area they give it after birth, i had the jab.

mears · 06/08/2004 11:39

Flossam - this has been dicussed before so I will try and find the original thread. However, before you go on to consider the risks of anti-D, do you know the bolld group of your DH/DP. If he is rhesus negative, you do not need anti-D at all.