Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

AIBU not to reduce my children’s Christmas presents to match stepchildren’s?

268 replies

HelloEveryoneHere · 24/09/2026 10:49

have a blended family. This is the first Christmas we will all be together on Christmas morning. I have 3 children, my DP has 2. Generally we still take control of our own children’s presents at Christmas. As money wise it’s a bit tight if I were to add 2 more children I need to buy for.
I usually spend X amount for each of my children which is what I can afford. That includes stockings and Christmas Eve boxes. This year is also the first year they’ll be here for Christmas Eve. My DP doesn’t usually do boxes so I will get an extra 2 for them so they’re not left out. But for presents he also spends X amount on them each which is around half the amount of what I spend. He can’t really afford to spend more and says I should reduce what I spend on my kids so it’s equal. AIBU if I don’t do that?
I feel that my kids shouldn’t have less than what they’re used to, but also can see that it won’t look great if his kids have less to open. But for me, I have my kids 100% of the time. My DPs kids will go to their mums later in the day and get presents there too, so I feel it’s unfair for my children to get less when generally over all they get less anyway.
Moving in together hasn’t saved us money as obviously we needed a bigger house which costs a lot more to run. 2 of my kids share a bedroom, everyone else has their own room even though his kids are here less than half the time. But I agreed with that as they’re older. But I don’t want my kids to have less of everything to accommodate my step kids all the time when actually their maternal family spoil them so they’re not really missing out. But I know kids probably won’t see it that way. What would you do?
I don’t begrudge my step kids in any way, they’re lovely kids. But I am a sole parent to mine effectively and feel I need to prioritise them. My DP understands this but says to his kids it will look like WE have spent less on them as obviously the kids don’t know that we keep things separate. Previous years they’ve opened presents separately so hasn’t been an issue.

OP posts:
New posts on this thread. Refresh page
LiquoriceAllsorts2 · 25/09/2026 22:35

Imseriouslyyouguys · 25/09/2026 10:27

“But yes I probably could budget better. But irrelevant as that’s what I’ve always done”

Just because it’s what you’ve always done doesn’t mean you have to continue!

Your children are definitely young enough not to realise you haven’t spent the same or the pile is not as massive as previous years. It would probably be less overwhelming for them to not have such a huge pile of presents and definitely better for the planet (you’ve admitted many are thrown away after a few months, another indication that they don’t actually value the things you’ve got them).

Why don’t you cut your £300 per child budget down to £150 and put the other £150 in savings for them? This would build up to a significant amount if you did it every year and they’d really appreciate that when they’re older and need driving lessons/want to travel the world or similar. Far better than money wasted on a huge pile of toys that they’re not bothered about within months.

Why should she have to.

Newname26 · 25/09/2026 21:53

Op I get you want your DH with you when you give them the rest of their gifts.

I'd been tbinking it would be lunch time not mid afternoon when the kids left.
And you have the issue of gifts appearing when in my house Santa delivers all gifts (like a magical courier service)

How's would it work to have the same number of gifts rather than value of gifts?
Equal but in a different way?

Ophy83 · 25/09/2026 20:17

HelloEveryoneHere · 24/09/2026 14:04

When did I say I don’t care that my SC could be hurt? If I didn’t care, I wouldn’t be posting on here. I would just do what I wanted regardless! I’m very aware of how their feelings could be hurt hence wanting to find a solution that I’m also happy with. Because I also care about my own kids! Not sure what’s wrong with that. And I never said I wouldn’t consider giving presents later on. I’m still reading through all the comments. But if you need validation, that is a good suggestion. (Not sure why it has to come with a dig) I’m just trying to figure out the logistics of it. So thank you to everyone who suggested that.
I could go to my parents later but my SC aren’t going until 3pm. My DP will be back home around 4pm. So we had planned to go straight there as that will only give us a couple of hours there anyway. So going later will just be really rushed. So I wasn’t being rude by not immediately saying that’s a great idea. As I said, I’m just thinking about it.
But the other points in your post, you’re absolutely right. I don’t want to do those things.

That gives you a whole hour - your DP doesn't need to be there for you to give your kids their presents, they're from you not him.

Retro12 · 25/09/2026 14:44

Notmycircusnotmyotter · 25/09/2026 12:57

@Retro12really? I only ever hear negative stories. I've refused to do it in my own relationship (3 years) to protect the kids' interests

It helps if the parent and step-parent are able to treat all the kids the same. I loved the "extra" siblings I ended up with. My step-dad was also so much fun and taught me so much, he never tried to replace my dad. He become a good friend and someone I could rely on. I suppose it's how good the parent is at choosing the right fit, and if it doesn't work, to put the kids first and walk away.

ForPlumReader · 25/09/2026 13:03

I've never understood the need to spend exactly the same on everyone, so maybe missing the point. I buy all kids something i they will like. Sometimes one gets more spent on them than others but it should balance itself out. In my experience younger children don't need a lot spent on them, presents get smaller but dearer as they get older.

Notmycircusnotmyotter · 25/09/2026 12:57

@Retro12really? I only ever hear negative stories. I've refused to do it in my own relationship (3 years) to protect the kids' interests

Retro12 · 25/09/2026 12:41

Notmycircusnotmyotter · 25/09/2026 12:39

Whyyyyy blend a family. It's not fair on the kids.

I disagree - I loved my blended family growing up,

Notmycircusnotmyotter · 25/09/2026 12:39

Whyyyyy blend a family. It's not fair on the kids.

Purpleelephantsandunicorns · 25/09/2026 12:29

HelloEveryoneHere · 25/09/2026 11:00

Thank you for all the helpful suggestions. I will put presents aside for Boxing Day. The reluctance was more my 8 year old questioning things if they’re different. He’s so so clever but maybe it’s just him starting to realise there is no Santa. I thought I had a couple more years!

TBH most are realising at 8. 10 and still believing would be unusual.

FluffMagnet · 25/09/2026 12:28

(Ah, see this has already been discussed)

FluffMagnet · 25/09/2026 12:27

Soery if this has already been mentioned, but surely the simple option is to hold back a few special presents each that they get in the evening when your step children go to their mother's house? Both sets of children get more or less the same in the morning (perhaps framed as being from you are your partner if necessary to soothe feelings) and mum presents are handed out in the afternoon? Added bonus of spreading out the joy and excitement all day long.

HelloEveryoneHere · 25/09/2026 11:10

Ionlymakejokestodistractmyself · 25/09/2026 11:04

I could hold some presents back, just feels it ruins the ‘magic’ of Christmas’

So people who can only afford to spend 50 quid are ruining the magic of Christmas for their kids?

Yes that’s exactly what I meant 🙄

OP posts:
Ionlymakejokestodistractmyself · 25/09/2026 11:04

I could hold some presents back, just feels it ruins the ‘magic’ of Christmas’

So people who can only afford to spend 50 quid are ruining the magic of Christmas for their kids?

HelloEveryoneHere · 25/09/2026 11:00

Thank you for all the helpful suggestions. I will put presents aside for Boxing Day. The reluctance was more my 8 year old questioning things if they’re different. He’s so so clever but maybe it’s just him starting to realise there is no Santa. I thought I had a couple more years!

OP posts:
HelloEveryoneHere · 25/09/2026 10:49

Imseriouslyyouguys · 25/09/2026 10:27

“But yes I probably could budget better. But irrelevant as that’s what I’ve always done”

Just because it’s what you’ve always done doesn’t mean you have to continue!

Your children are definitely young enough not to realise you haven’t spent the same or the pile is not as massive as previous years. It would probably be less overwhelming for them to not have such a huge pile of presents and definitely better for the planet (you’ve admitted many are thrown away after a few months, another indication that they don’t actually value the things you’ve got them).

Why don’t you cut your £300 per child budget down to £150 and put the other £150 in savings for them? This would build up to a significant amount if you did it every year and they’d really appreciate that when they’re older and need driving lessons/want to travel the world or similar. Far better than money wasted on a huge pile of toys that they’re not bothered about within months.

Well I’m sure everyone could budget better and spend less if they wanted to.
I’ve already there isn’t a huge pile of presents. It’s the amount of money I was asking an opinion on. But yes spending less would equal less presents to open which I suppose would look better. Admittedly in the past I was guilty of buying lots of plastic tat. Now for my oldest it could be a pair of trainers for £70, some clothes for £50, a new computer game for £40, a Lego set for £40: I spend probably around £50 for stocking and Xmas eve box stuff as usually that will have like new slippers and pjs. That only leaves £50 left for some little bits. I wouldn’t say that’s a huge amount of actual physical presents to open.
Yes I could spend less. My question was should I due to what my OP said. Not whether I should in general because it’s better for the environment or because my kids don’t need that much stuff

OP posts:
HelloEveryoneHere · 25/09/2026 10:39

Imseriouslyyouguys · 25/09/2026 10:32

Your kids are sharing a room while there are other rooms sitting empty for most of the week 🤷‍♀️. You haven’t put their needs first.

Some siblings with married parents share a room. Do they get hate for that?! My kids shared before and if I hadn’t moved here that wouldn’t have changed anytime soon. And I’ve already said that’s something we’ll look to change when they’re a bit older. It’s only recently my oldest has mentioned wanting his own room. When we first moved in he actually wanted to share a room. My youngest still does and would hate his own room. So what’s the answer then? My oldest trumps my youngest in terms of what they want.
Stop picking for the sake of it. A child doesn’t NEED their own bedroom. But yes it would be nice.

OP posts:
CinnamonBuns67 · 25/09/2026 10:37

Yanbu but I put some presents aside for DD's to open later when SD goes to her mums so SD doesn't really notice the difference. She also gets from her mum whereas DD's just get from me and DH (my DD's are DH's children too).

Imseriouslyyouguys · 25/09/2026 10:32

HelloEveryoneHere · 25/09/2026 10:26

Aren’t you a delight. There are also kids in non blended families who have no control over living in a horrible environment because actually their parents don’t get on. Or parents are secretly miserable but staying for the kids (which I guarantee a lot of kids pick up on). You have no right to judge every single blended family and put it all down to bad parenting because an adult dares introduce their kids to another adult. And how dare I enter into another relationship. Whilst people on here might not agree with how my family does things, I believe we are happier than some families out there where parents are still together. There’s something really wrong with people who feel the need to attack something I didn’t ask your opinion on. And without any knowledge of my life. My kids love having my DP and his kids around. And vice versa. We wouldn’t be living together if that wasn’t the case. We didn’t just wake up one day and decide to live together.

Your kids are sharing a room while there are other rooms sitting empty for most of the week 🤷‍♀️. You haven’t put their needs first.

Imseriouslyyouguys · 25/09/2026 10:27

HelloEveryoneHere · 24/09/2026 13:40

including stockings and a Xmas eve box I don’t think that’s too excessive. But yes I probably could budget better. But irrelevant as that’s what I’ve always done. And completely different to being able to afford a 6 bed house! If I spent £100 less on them each, would that £300 a year saved buy me a bigger house?!
@Ted27 no his children probably aren’t getting many toys. I think my DP means me (and people in general) spending a lot of money on young kids is unnecessary. His kids obviously want say a pair of trainers that are like £100. So their pile will already be significantly smaller. So even if he matched my budget, unless he was buying ‘tat’ it wouldn’t get them much more anyway. But it’s not about the pile, it’s the money spent. His kids will know as the youngest mainly likes to compare. That’s the only thing I don’t really like but at the same time I don’t want them feeling a certain way that others have said they will.
But despite the responses I still feel my kids shouldn’t get less so that we can buy them more. If they didn’t go to their mums then yes absolutely. So it’s more the how I do that. My DP isn’t horrible, it was more of a suggestion but he is genuinely worried about how it will look. I think he still feels a bit bad that he lives with other children and doesn’t see his all the time (not a reason for more hate for blended families btw)
I could hold some presents back, just feels it ruins the ‘magic’ of Christmas’. Plus after his kids go we will be going to my parents house who are also not into presents really so they spend maybe £20-£30 max on them each. But they do have 10 grandchildren so understandable! Not sure I want the faff of taking the presents there so it would have to be a different day in that case

“But yes I probably could budget better. But irrelevant as that’s what I’ve always done”

Just because it’s what you’ve always done doesn’t mean you have to continue!

Your children are definitely young enough not to realise you haven’t spent the same or the pile is not as massive as previous years. It would probably be less overwhelming for them to not have such a huge pile of presents and definitely better for the planet (you’ve admitted many are thrown away after a few months, another indication that they don’t actually value the things you’ve got them).

Why don’t you cut your £300 per child budget down to £150 and put the other £150 in savings for them? This would build up to a significant amount if you did it every year and they’d really appreciate that when they’re older and need driving lessons/want to travel the world or similar. Far better than money wasted on a huge pile of toys that they’re not bothered about within months.

HelloEveryoneHere · 25/09/2026 10:26

Imseriouslyyouguys · 25/09/2026 10:10

Just because there are a lot of them doesn’t mean they work. Just means there are a lot of kids putting up with a living situation they have no control over because their mum wants a new man.

Aren’t you a delight. There are also kids in non blended families who have no control over living in a horrible environment because actually their parents don’t get on. Or parents are secretly miserable but staying for the kids (which I guarantee a lot of kids pick up on). You have no right to judge every single blended family and put it all down to bad parenting because an adult dares introduce their kids to another adult. And how dare I enter into another relationship. Whilst people on here might not agree with how my family does things, I believe we are happier than some families out there where parents are still together. There’s something really wrong with people who feel the need to attack something I didn’t ask your opinion on. And without any knowledge of my life. My kids love having my DP and his kids around. And vice versa. We wouldn’t be living together if that wasn’t the case. We didn’t just wake up one day and decide to live together.

OP posts:
OlderGlaswegianLivingInDevon · 25/09/2026 10:16

No, why should your children miss out when the other children will get more presents from their Mum ( and maybe other relatives on Mum's side of the family )

Imseriouslyyouguys · 25/09/2026 10:10

HelloEveryoneHere · 24/09/2026 12:43

Given the amount of blended families these days I don’t think that’s true at all!

Just because there are a lot of them doesn’t mean they work. Just means there are a lot of kids putting up with a living situation they have no control over because their mum wants a new man.

Gall10 · 25/09/2026 09:28

Ilovelurchers · 24/09/2026 13:34

Why is it a farce?

Don't do it myself, but that's true of a lot of things and doesn't instantly render them farcical. I guess it spreads the excitement a bit, which probably is fun for the kids and perhaps their parents too? Doesn't seem to hurt anyone. And OP seems to factor it into her Xmas spending generally, so it's not increasing consumerism or debt in her case.

It’s the perfect bow down to materialism….couple of years it’ll be the ‘Boxing Day box’ Then the ‘day before birthday box’ until we get to the ‘My god, what will I buy today box’
Mumsnet seems to be filled with either those who just don’t know what to do with their 6 figure inheritance or those who are literally scrapping for a living.
I guess you’re in the former category.

Newname26 · 24/09/2026 22:34

Shelby2010 · 24/09/2026 22:10

There’s no point trying to equalise spending on a 5y old with spending on a 14y old. That wouldn’t happen even if they were full siblings with both parents living together!

I'd 100% agree with that, even with a 6year gap things are just more expensive for a teen than they are for a primary aged child.

Teen trainers are adult prices inc vat
A bike is bigger and more expensive.
Experiences can often be adult prices from age 12.
A teen is likely to be doing activities for longer and more often than a much younger kid.

Shelby2010 · 24/09/2026 22:10

FactoryRecords · 24/09/2026 22:01

My point about equalising spending on children across the board wasn’t that your children should/ would get less or that your stepchildren should give up an activity, it was that at the moment your household spends a total of (if I calculated correctly!) £7,680 per year on activities and Christmas gifts; £860 for each of your children and £2,550 for each of his. Spending on his children is higher so if he wants you to equalise the Christmas spending to make it ‘fairer’ he should be offering to equalise the activity (and any other) spending to make that ‘fairer’ too. If he’s happy to have different levels of spending on activities he should also understand there will be different levels of spending on gifts and other things.

There’s no point trying to equalise spending on a 5y old with spending on a 14y old. That wouldn’t happen even if they were full siblings with both parents living together!