Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To think if a 33 year old has kids

147 replies

Nothingcampares8 · 20/09/2026 01:24

It will likely be in the next two years as otherwise they will be too old

OP posts:
Goawayimreading · 20/09/2026 08:22

That’s fair @OneAmberFinch but personally I’d put that age as much higher than 33.

To be honest though and while I don’t want to sound awful, I grew up in a very deprived sort of area: it was hit hard in the 80s and while it sort of recovered it is still very much a white working class kind of area.

I went back to live there briefly following the death of a parent, around ten years ago now so when I was 34-36. Most of the girls I was at school with had children who were definitely upper primary age or lower secondary. I would say it was normal to start your family sometime between 20-24 and to have your last baby before your thirtieth. Usually at around 27/28.

In contrast where I live now is more affluent and the age of the parents is definitely older. There is a socioeconomic factor to it, which isn’t to say everyone who has a baby in their 40s is wealthy or that everyone who starts their family in their 20s is not, but is is a aspect.

In my NCT group the ages of the first time mums were 42, 40 and 40, 37 and 37 (one of those only just 37) and 34. But NCT attracts a particular type it is said.

Littledidsheknow · 20/09/2026 08:21

I was 37 and 41 when I had my two youngest.
No, 35 is not too old by any stretch!

ifonly4 · 20/09/2026 08:21

I was 34 when I had DD. I've been part of a friendship group of six Mums. My friends were 29, 30, 35,37 and 39 when they had their first children. I've known them for 20 years. My other two friends, one was 34 when she had her first, the other 18, but in a second relationship had a third at 37. OP, can you tell me why we were too old.

We all provided a loving, secure home for our children, were able to work if we choose until they were at least 18 so financially had the money to allow them to go to clubs/holidays/have fun experiences as a family. We went to school events/had energy for playdates/sleepovers. We're now 57+, one or two have had health hiccups, but nothing longterm or major and we can still be there for our children if required now they're in their 20s.

diddl · 20/09/2026 08:16

Do they want children?

OneAmberFinch · 20/09/2026 08:15

OP's question is quite clear I think. It's not "is it possible for anyone ever to have a kid after 33/35?".

There's certainly a tipping point age where, given that you don't have kids yet at age x, it becomes more likely than not that you'll never have them. This is for all possible reasons combined: not interested, focusing on other interests/career, couldn't find a partner, medical infertility, etc.

This is not necessarily the same tipping point age where, given that you want kids and have a partner and start TTC, it becomes more likely than not that you biologically won't be able to conceive and carry a pregnancy to term.

Meadowfinch · 20/09/2026 07:04

Slightyamusedandsilly · 20/09/2026 01:46

More or less agree. While obviously people can have babies at whatever ages they want, some ages are too young and some are too old. Having children is a young adult's job. Not having children when you're a child yourself or when you're grandparent age.

What a narrow (and incorrect) view.

ilovepuppies2019 · 20/09/2026 07:03

Slightyamusedandsilly · 20/09/2026 01:46

More or less agree. While obviously people can have babies at whatever ages they want, some ages are too young and some are too old. Having children is a young adult's job. Not having children when you're a child yourself or when you're grandparent age.

Don't be daft. A 36 year old is not a grandparent and nor is a woman in her early 40s. Many women don't get the perfect circumstances to have a child at the 'optimal' age.

cutarug · 20/09/2026 07:01

DC1 at 35
DC2 at 36
DC3 at 39

So, no?

Sartre · 20/09/2026 07:00

I made my mum a grandma at 38 which is quite shocking really because I’m now 33 and if my children did that to me, I would be completely horrified. I’ve made this crystal clear to them but they’re sensible kids on totally different tracks. To be fair to me I still got a PhD in spite of it all. I had a much more turbulent childhood than they have too and had to deal with lots of trauma.

Would I want more children now though? Probably not. I had my final child at 27. He has SEN and is a runner. I run long distance and started specifically to keep up with him. I imagine chasing after him would be harder if I were a lot older. There are benefits to waiting but also downsides, being an older and less agile grandparent would be one. FIL is 70 which again, crazy to me because my own dad is only 54. FIL couldn’t chase after DS.

Meadowfinch · 20/09/2026 06:57

No, of course not. I had my ds at 45. Naturally. No assistence or planning 😁

Most of my friends had their dcs in the range 37-42. Careers & house prices !!

Do you live somewhere houses are more affordable OP?

LiquoriceAllsorts2 · 20/09/2026 06:56

No idea what your question is. Lots of people have babies at 33 or the few years after it

husbandcallsmepickle · 20/09/2026 06:55

I was 44 when I had my son.

JayJayj · 20/09/2026 06:54

I had my daughter the after I turned 37. I’m 41 next month and would have another if other things were aligned. I don’t feel too old.

bingobangs · 20/09/2026 06:49

Likely? yes

FTMs are usually 30 ish & STMs are 32 ish and most only have 2 dc max.

But I wouldn’t assume someone in their mid or late 30s would stay child free.

Goawayimreading · 20/09/2026 06:45

I’m sure loads of people assumed I would never have children (so did I tbf.) Finally got pregnant at 39 and had ds at 40. I was extremely lucky to have another child just under three years later.

Alwaysbella · 20/09/2026 06:43

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

CeciliaMars · 20/09/2026 06:34

i didn’t have my first till 36. Have three of them now.

LBFseBrom · 20/09/2026 05:56

If someone plans to have kids, they will most likely start before the age of 36 - if that is what you mean.

PivotPivotmakingmargaritas · 20/09/2026 05:09

Ohhh lord find a hobby … not making threads for fun

Hellolola · 20/09/2026 04:37

currently pregnant at 38 after one losing my fiancé at 30 and two going through years of IVF & miscarriages. So no not too old, ^^life happens and we do what we can with the time we have.

CrazyMidget · 20/09/2026 04:36

PyongyangKipperbang · 20/09/2026 04:23

So I, at 53 am a "senior" then?

My older kids could have made me a grandmother by now, but my youngest is still at school and living at home. I work and care for my elderly parents.

I do not get any discounts etc. I am very much not a senior, and I know a fair few people much younger than me who are grandparents.

I am guessing you are American.

I'm English, 51, and of course you're not a senior at 53, ffs. I have no idea why you'd think I thought that seniors are people in their fifties. Or why you think I'm American. Senior usually refers to people of state pension age or those who qualify for senior benefits like the free bus pass. I have no idea why you're so offended. Would you prefer to just be called "an old person" when you become a senior? As in "old-person discount"? And do you object to other terms that denote a person's stage of life, like "teenager" or "middle-aged"? Honestly, you are being ridiculous.

PyongyangKipperbang · 20/09/2026 04:23

CrazyMidget · 20/09/2026 04:12

Eh? What's wrong with that? It's what they're called. Senior discount, senior mental health, etc. It's seen as more respectful than saying old or elderly. I can't believe you wrote "Really?" as if I'd said "batty old person" or something. My late father (died two years ago at age 84) used it often to refer to his generation. It's a very, very common and accepted way to refer to people experiencing what the French call the Third Age. Really no need for a "Really?" at all. I can't believe you're so astonished by that term.

Edited

So I, at 53 am a "senior" then?

My older kids could have made me a grandmother by now, but my youngest is still at school and living at home. I work and care for my elderly parents.

I do not get any discounts etc. I am very much not a senior, and I know a fair few people much younger than me who are grandparents.

I am guessing you are American.

CrazyMidget · 20/09/2026 04:12

PyongyangKipperbang · 20/09/2026 03:27

A senior

Really?

Eh? What's wrong with that? It's what they're called. Senior discount, senior mental health, etc. It's seen as more respectful than saying old or elderly. I can't believe you wrote "Really?" as if I'd said "batty old person" or something. My late father (died two years ago at age 84) used it often to refer to his generation. It's a very, very common and accepted way to refer to people experiencing what the French call the Third Age. Really no need for a "Really?" at all. I can't believe you're so astonished by that term.

Sodthesystem · 20/09/2026 04:11

Nah. 43 maybe.

StolenTeapots · 20/09/2026 04:06

Uhoh not sure what to do with the baby sleeping beside me then...I'm 40

Swipe left for the next trending thread