For the umpteenth time, as has been explained over and over on multiple threads, group think is a real thing that can infect investigations / institutions.
This case was built around circumstantial evidence initially provided by the consultants, none of whom raised concerns of murder until the number of deaths had risen to an unacceptable level in their opinion. Nobody went to the pathologists or the coroner in a timely fashion. When no concerns were raised by the pathologists, it was only after the grievance issue was resolved that the police were approached, and initially the police didn't think there was a case. Whatever the consultants said to them when they had a further meeting seemed to spark it all. One has to wonder, if their suspicions were so strong, and the safeguarding of vulnerable babies was so uppermost in their minds, why theu didn't act sooner, hospital management be damned.
The case was conducted in a reverse manner starting with the identification of a suspect, and then with Dewi Evans God like input, he offered alternative theories for deaths that had been deemed natural by pathologists. By no stretch of the imagination should a case be built like this.
The argument that all these babies were "fine" and "stable" despite prematurity and other factors necessitating their presence on NICU falls apart when if that was the case it should have been a huge red flag to the pathologists at the very least, and highlighted by the senior medical staff every time it happened.
And we can go on and on in never ending circles, picking apart Lucy Letbys demeanour, her relationship with her parents, her texts, her post it notes etc etc, but it counts for diddly squat in the face of conflicting, and sometimes fabricated by Evans medical evidence plus all the "confusion" from the likes of Ravi Jayaram etc which needs to be objectively re-analysed to ensure this was a safe conviction.
But you know all this, don't you?
This case is a clusterfuck and an embarrassment to our justice system.