Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To think names considered trashy 20 odd years ago could reemerge as classy name choices in the late 2020s?

110 replies

Rightsaysfred · 14/09/2026 09:44

I’m specifically thinking of Chantelle/chantal here which sounds very classy and a little French to my ears. Haven’t heard of any babies given the name in a good quarter of a century. I don’t think it would have the same associations if given to a baby now.

Same goes for names like Maddison and destiny

OP posts:
MissChanandlerBonng · 15/09/2026 06:19

Will Kayden, Brayden and Jaden be posh in 2040?

PrincessOfPreschool · 15/09/2026 06:15

My Grandmas (born c. 1905) were Dorothy and Noreen. No massive resurgence there! (Maybe a few Dorothys but never heard of a baby Noreen!). Not ALL names come back.

HorribleHisTories15 · 14/09/2026 22:13

@WaitingForMojoI think names like Florence and Mabel are incredibly cute. My grandad had a sister who passed away in childhood called Zipporah, which I love, but he forbade anyone naming their daughter that name apparently according to my DM.

I met a senior citizen Bonnie at the library in the summer. I almost fell in love with her straight away Blush . Some names do indeed have a warming effect on us.

Dexternight · 14/09/2026 20:01

My class friends were
Bonita
Hazel
Claire
Gabrielle
Marina
Lisa Marie
Sharon
Michelle
Amanda
Amelia
Maxine
Tina
This was the 80s.

HolidayHideaway · 14/09/2026 19:57

TheWytch · 14/09/2026 19:06

The historical conundrum of a name sounding too modern to be historical is actually called the "Tiffany Problem"!

It looks to have been vanishingly rare until 1960s in UK: x1 registered in 1870s, x1 in 1880s, x1 in 1923, x 1 in 1940s: 1948, 0 in 1930s..A few in 1950s. Then it takes off from 60s.

None registered from July 1837 to 1871.

Poss more common in much earlier times?

TheWytch · 14/09/2026 19:06

Sweetpea232 · 14/09/2026 15:40

A few weeks ago I was looking at the history of a ruined castle we came cross on a walk. The lady of the manor, in the thirteenth century, was called Tiffany! I thought that was a 20th century invention….

The historical conundrum of a name sounding too modern to be historical is actually called the "Tiffany Problem"!

Cadeaukatze · 14/09/2026 18:51

When I think of my primary school class we had among other names Sarah, Linda, Caroline, Tracey, Helen, Melanie, Sharon, Angela, Nicole, Nicola, Donna, Kathy/Kathryn, Catherine, Mandy, Lisa.

Boys were Matthew, Mark, Paul, Nicholas, Ian, Nigel, Kevin.

This was late 70s/early 80s.

FringedAnd · 14/09/2026 18:47

Comtesse · 14/09/2026 10:20

The cycle for names is much mich longer than 20 years. Maybe Chantelle will be all posh at one point but it’s a long way off. Names like Linda or Terry won’t be used for babies for decades yet. I think Maddison etc might be ready for a rethink in like 70-80 years.

Yes. The generation who are naming babies will have to have no memories of living Chantelles for it to potentially become chic again. And there’s a long way to go first. We still have to have the surge of babies called Paul, Susan, Linda, Denis, Keith etc.

Itsbeenalongtimeincoming · 14/09/2026 18:40

Katflapkit · 14/09/2026 09:55

I have one of the naffist names around, low rent and very common for my generation. It's a curse. I'm afraid I lack the hope, imagination and vision to see a time in the future when Maddison would ever become classy.

Across the pond Maddison isn’t trashy. Chantal still is though.

Redheadedstepchild · 14/09/2026 18:37

I think Tracy could have a comeback as a boy's name. There have been a few well known American sports players called Tracy over the last few years and there was a rapper called Tracy Curry.

There's been a couple of Country Music stars called Trace and then there's Spencer Tracy, Dick Tracy.

I think it could be a name that only needs one really famous male Tracy. I think Trace is more likely at first, then the inevitable nickname of Tracy or Tracey or TrayCee.

Trey is a name.

Stop sniggering at the back there. You teacher types will get back to me one day to say you've got a little boy called Tracy or Trace in your class. You will!

C8H10N4O2 · 14/09/2026 17:29

Rightsaysfred · 14/09/2026 09:44

I’m specifically thinking of Chantelle/chantal here which sounds very classy and a little French to my ears. Haven’t heard of any babies given the name in a good quarter of a century. I don’t think it would have the same associations if given to a baby now.

Same goes for names like Maddison and destiny

Chantal sounds French because it is an old French name from the Aquitaine region. It also has religious associations but the name predates the Catholic saint from the region. It was particularly popular in the Basque region when I had cause to look.

Sweetpea232 · 14/09/2026 15:40

A few weeks ago I was looking at the history of a ruined castle we came cross on a walk. The lady of the manor, in the thirteenth century, was called Tiffany! I thought that was a 20th century invention….

Redheadedstepchild · 14/09/2026 15:29

CruCru · 14/09/2026 14:56

I wonder sometimes if all the French names that the English find chic (like Ottilie, Amelie, Aurelie, Genevieve) will end up being the Michelle of the 2020s.

Meanwhile the most popular girl's name in France for 2026 is Louise which is fair enough but the second most popular is Jade.

Pronounced Jhadde with a short a somehow. Didn't see that one coming.

TorroFerney · 14/09/2026 15:29

TheSquareMile · 14/09/2026 11:50

I really liked the name Chantal and still do. I was a nanny in the South of France in my late teens and one of the lovely little girls in the family was called Chantal.

The name also acquired a certain glamour with the arrival on British TV of Chantal Cuer, who presented a wonderful programme called Téléjournal.

Edited

Was it Chantal that was married to Preston (which is not a proper name imo). She looked like a British Paris Hilton?

CruCru · 14/09/2026 14:56

I wonder sometimes if all the French names that the English find chic (like Ottilie, Amelie, Aurelie, Genevieve) will end up being the Michelle of the 2020s.

HolidayHideaway · 14/09/2026 14:03

TheSquareMile · 14/09/2026 11:50

I really liked the name Chantal and still do. I was a nanny in the South of France in my late teens and one of the lovely little girls in the family was called Chantal.

The name also acquired a certain glamour with the arrival on British TV of Chantal Cuer, who presented a wonderful programme called Téléjournal.

Edited

I think an issue is it was appropriated by Brits and then can sound a bit naff, ditto Michelle (with apologies to Michelles) thought chic.

Like being posh using serviette & dessert.

WecanbeheroeslikeBowie · 14/09/2026 14:01

Chardonnay, Chelsea and Destiny and the like were never classy first time around and never will be.

TheJuryIsOut · 14/09/2026 14:01

FruAashild · 14/09/2026 13:31

It's the misspelling of a surname that does it. And that the name started as a joke in the film Splash.

I also didn't know that! I feel like it's quite common in my area, my little niece is called Maddison

Whynottryagain · 14/09/2026 13:55

Creepybookworm · 14/09/2026 11:22

In the school I work at there are 2 Martins and a Kevin. There are also more than one Eric.

I absolutely LOVE Martin! Was very near the top of the list if I'd had a son!

Possibly because I crushed on a very cute Martin when I was 9 😂

Comeonbabylightmyaga · 14/09/2026 13:53

A family member was upset that none of her dgc had been given her name as a middle name but the boys had been given her dh name and her sisters dc had used their dm name.

Her name is Tracey. (Her sisters and Dh have more classic names).

KilkennyCats · 14/09/2026 13:50

Trashy never crosses the bridge to classy. Not in a million years.

HolidayHideaway · 14/09/2026 13:50

pontefractals · 14/09/2026 13:44

Martha, Esther and Naomi are all biblical names, so that makes some sense. I'm not sure about Louisa.
Poor Aurora. I wonder what happened to the bloke involved?

Biblical names seem to generally stand test of time.

Sharon hasn’t fared well & I wonder that’s because using it was being a bit cool/trendy - rose of Sharon etc, a feature/location not a name?

HolidayHideaway · 14/09/2026 13:46

ReturnYourParcel · 14/09/2026 13:00

Oh, interesting! My mum also used to think that flowery names were "a bit common", names such as Violet, Ivy, Daffodil, Primrose, Marigold, Pansy, Hyacinth etc. But, oddly, Rose was deemed ok!

Very much “below stairs” in Agatha Christie mansions etc. :) Which are the equivalent today?

pontefractals · 14/09/2026 13:44

RosesAndHellebores · 14/09/2026 13:05

I recently did our family trees and was surprised to see how many Marthas, Esthers, Louisas and Naomis there were, amongst all the Anns, Elizabeths and Alices that spanned 1400's to 1900's. For men the stand outs across the period were: Robert, Christopher (also expressed as +topher), James, William.

The gobsmacker was a ggg grandmother "Louisa, bastard of Aurora", born in a workhouse!

Martha, Esther and Naomi are all biblical names, so that makes some sense. I'm not sure about Louisa.
Poor Aurora. I wonder what happened to the bloke involved?

IDrinkTeaAllTheTime · 14/09/2026 13:43

FruAashild · 14/09/2026 11:21

Lindsay is a tradition Scottish boys name that is still used in Scotland. See also: Leslie. But hopefully the English will stop using them for girls.

I’m Scottish and went to school in the 90s/early 00s. All through primary and high school there were about 3-4 Lindsay’s with various spellings in my year. All girls, all Scottish.