Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To think names considered trashy 20 odd years ago could reemerge as classy name choices in the late 2020s?

110 replies

Rightsaysfred · 14/09/2026 09:44

I’m specifically thinking of Chantelle/chantal here which sounds very classy and a little French to my ears. Haven’t heard of any babies given the name in a good quarter of a century. I don’t think it would have the same associations if given to a baby now.

Same goes for names like Maddison and destiny

OP posts:
HolidayHideaway · 14/09/2026 09:46

Our great grandchildren will be Gary, Sharon, and Darren ;)

Octavia64 · 14/09/2026 09:47

Usually takes more than twenty years. Think more like 60

MidnightMeltdown · 14/09/2026 09:50

Not as long as there are people alive who remember them being chavy! These were the chav names of the millennial generation and we are only in our late 30s/early 40s. In the previous generation it was Sharon and Tracy and they still sound chavy now.

Rightsaysfred · 14/09/2026 09:50

Octavia64 · 14/09/2026 09:47

Usually takes more than twenty years. Think more like 60

Chantelle was never really that popular though so I don’t think this is the same as the granny chic phenomenon. Chantelle was just routinely denounced as a terrible trashy name when it’s really not that bad. I doubt many people will remember the weird culture of the early 00s in years to come though

Oh and it’s not my name or the name of any of my children

OP posts:
Katiesaidthat · 14/09/2026 09:51

Chantal was one of the names my mum liked in 74 when she had me. We live in Spain where "chandal" means track suit, so she dropped that one.
Names come and go in circles. So why not.

Katflapkit · 14/09/2026 09:55

I have one of the naffist names around, low rent and very common for my generation. It's a curse. I'm afraid I lack the hope, imagination and vision to see a time in the future when Maddison would ever become classy.

CurlewKate · 14/09/2026 09:57

Not much change in the names posh people use over the years. I suspect because posh people don’t have this odd fear of “top ten” names.

HolidayHideaway · 14/09/2026 09:59

Apparently Violet, a name I love, was seen as very naff by my mother’s generation. Thing was she knew elderly many ‘Vi’. I’ve never come across an 80 or 90 something Violet.

AnAlpacaForChristmasPleaseSanta · 14/09/2026 10:03

I will look forward to a whole new generation of Chardonay's running around the place.

Rightsaysfred · 14/09/2026 10:04

HolidayHideaway · 14/09/2026 09:59

Apparently Violet, a name I love, was seen as very naff by my mother’s generation. Thing was she knew elderly many ‘Vi’. I’ve never come across an 80 or 90 something Violet.

Yeah I can see this Tbf a100 odd years ago “vi” being the head lady at a brothel lol. Wouldn’t think that of any violet alive today though but now you mention it

OP posts:
HolidayHideaway · 14/09/2026 10:05

CurlewKate · 14/09/2026 09:57

Not much change in the names posh people use over the years. I suspect because posh people don’t have this odd fear of “top ten” names.

The uber Posh I know are unworried about names & if not going trad are happy to pick cool names like ‘Jessie’ & don’t have any ‘middle class’ squeamishness about it being “Jessica” on the birth cert.

Imseriouslyyouguys · 14/09/2026 10:05

Is it just the one name Chantelle or do you have any other examples?

Anyway, I don’t think it’s changed. Didn’t sound classy 20 years ago and still doesn’t.

Rightsaysfred · 14/09/2026 10:09

HolidayHideaway · 14/09/2026 10:05

The uber Posh I know are unworried about names & if not going trad are happy to pick cool names like ‘Jessie’ & don’t have any ‘middle class’ squeamishness about it being “Jessica” on the birth cert.

Yeah I was going to say the same they really don’t give af if they go for classics like George or Thomas it’s usually because that’s their father’s name (while middle and working class are too squeamish about using close relatives names). But they do sometimes go for really out there names because they KNOW they can pull it off

OP posts:
CruCru · 14/09/2026 10:09

I suspect that when my grandchildren arrive, I will be that granny who says “But you can’t possibly call a baby Keith”.

RosesAndHellebores · 14/09/2026 10:10

Names outside the classic: Elizabeth, Catherine, Ann, Mary, Caroline, Alice, Isobel, Jane/Joan, etc, come and go as fashions change:

Elsie, Ethel, Mabel, Grace (my gran's era) b 1912

Shirley, Patricia, Sheila/Shelagh, Joyce, Barbara, Anita (my mother's era) b1936

Tracey, Sharon, Debbie, Julie (Amanda, Heather, Emma/Sarah/Mary-Jane (or Ann) at the posher end (my era) b1960

Milly (short for many names), Phoebe, Imogen, Holly/Molly, Lucy (dd's era) 1998

What goes round comes round.

Littledidsheknow · 14/09/2026 10:15

Some of them, maybe.
The ones that just fell out of fashion because they became too popular will likely reemerge; the yoonique, ridiculous and misspelt (like Maddison!) may stay confined to history.
Can’t see Chardonnay, Abbeygayle or Neveah having a big resurgence.

My granny (born 1913) was Violet, “Vi”… glad it’s back after a period of naffness!

IThinkThereforeIPaint · 14/09/2026 10:16

I don't actually think of that name as trashy. I know a Chantal and a Chantelle, both in their 40s and extremely professionally impressive, so that's my association!

Comtesse · 14/09/2026 10:20

The cycle for names is much mich longer than 20 years. Maybe Chantelle will be all posh at one point but it’s a long way off. Names like Linda or Terry won’t be used for babies for decades yet. I think Maddison etc might be ready for a rethink in like 70-80 years.

Redheadedstepchild · 14/09/2026 10:30

Some could. Courtney and Brittany were nowhere then everywhere then nowhere again so could come back.

Logically, the next fashion should be for 1940's and 50's names.

I think Valerie will be the next Olivia.

wishingonastar101 · 14/09/2026 10:37

I'm mid 40's and went to school with quite a few Chantelle's.... they were generally quite trashy tbh!

WhySoManySocks · 14/09/2026 10:43

In every generation the cool retro names that parents give babies are the names of their great grandparents. The parents of the parents (babies' grandparents) are then horrified because these are the old boring names their own grandparents had.

It's kind of the same with fashion: 20 year old students in town wear the same tall white socks as my 70yo FIL, and I am watching this horrified down to my tiny colourful trainer socks.

CruCru · 14/09/2026 10:47

I think the truly posh don’t pick names that are out there. Boys are named after kings or apostles. Girls have a bit more freedom but not all that much. “Jane” is a much smarter name than “Persephone”.

Vroomfondleswaistcoat · 14/09/2026 10:52

I think the truly posh use either Royal names or names from Greek or Roman mythology and that's always been the case. For names to come back around into fashion I thought it was about 100 years, so when the generation that had those names are dying out and the names become unusual again.

TheeNotoriousPIG · 14/09/2026 10:56

I hope not! I mean, I entirely admit that I was horrified when my nephew's name was announced (his name is very much a 90's name, and is a 'naughty' name). While working in schools, I was taken aback coming across occasional children with names like Derek and Yvonne, so I'm not sure that names like Tracy and the likes will come back as "classy".

I think that, for as long as there are generations alive who remember certain names in their hey-day, there will always be a lot of, "Are they REALLY calling their baby that?!"

x2boys · 14/09/2026 10:57

I think some names will come back
But i think some names are definatley of a time
I cant see Darren , wayne or Lee ever really making a comeback
Or Lorraine , Lyndsey , Keeley either