Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

AIBU to think Bonnie Blue should be arrested?

284 replies

BellesAndGraces · 11/09/2026 10:40

Bonnie Blue’s latest stunt is to post a video holding her newborn, surrounded by masked men while talking about getting back to making sexual content after having a c-section. Her baby’s onesie matches the colour of the mask worn by the men.

How this is not using a baby to promote sexual content, I do not know. It’s sickening.

I know all she wants is publicity but I sincerely hope this time she gets all the attention she deserves and her baby is taken away from her and placed with a family that can give the child the love, care and protection a child needs. The Tories have reported her to the NSPCC but why has she not been reported to the police??

OP posts:
XmasCrackPies · 12/09/2026 22:49

Come on, the baby wearing the same fabric as the balaclavas of men that are there to fuck her? Thats not pushing the boundary thats a clear fucking dog whistle to peadophiles. Lock the fucking bitch up. Whether she was pregnant or not, if its a doll or real baby, no more hand wringing and what ifs, authorities need to step in immediately and put a stop to this.

Palomiino · 12/09/2026 23:12

XmasCrackPies · 12/09/2026 22:49

Come on, the baby wearing the same fabric as the balaclavas of men that are there to fuck her? Thats not pushing the boundary thats a clear fucking dog whistle to peadophiles. Lock the fucking bitch up. Whether she was pregnant or not, if its a doll or real baby, no more hand wringing and what ifs, authorities need to step in immediately and put a stop to this.

Well said.

JMSA · 13/09/2026 02:48

Mental slag.

Ihateboris · 13/09/2026 17:15

XmasCrackPies · 12/09/2026 22:49

Come on, the baby wearing the same fabric as the balaclavas of men that are there to fuck her? Thats not pushing the boundary thats a clear fucking dog whistle to peadophiles. Lock the fucking bitch up. Whether she was pregnant or not, if its a doll or real baby, no more hand wringing and what ifs, authorities need to step in immediately and put a stop to this.

Spot on!

ibsUniversalcredit · 13/09/2026 17:45

Lomonald · 12/09/2026 09:19

Maybe her "baby " in her posts is a doll and she is either still pregnant and trying to stay relevant or keeping her actual baby away from the cameras to stay on the right side of the law.

There’s staying on the right side of the law and there’s staying genuinely safe. She may well have a doll in the videos but if some sick pervert has a thing for that it makes her real baby a target.

Lomonald · 13/09/2026 17:49

ibsUniversalcredit · 13/09/2026 17:45

There’s staying on the right side of the law and there’s staying genuinely safe. She may well have a doll in the videos but if some sick pervert has a thing for that it makes her real baby a target.

I agree it is horrific !

70isaLimitNotaTarget · 13/09/2026 20:41

ibsUniversalcredit · 13/09/2026 17:45

There’s staying on the right side of the law and there’s staying genuinely safe. She may well have a doll in the videos but if some sick pervert has a thing for that it makes her real baby a target.

She said before she didn't go out alone - wasn;t she punched in a nightclub by another woman?

So if she does have a real life baby she would probably only go out with a bodyguard

ibsUniversalcredit · 13/09/2026 20:46

70isaLimitNotaTarget · 13/09/2026 20:41

She said before she didn't go out alone - wasn;t she punched in a nightclub by another woman?

So if she does have a real life baby she would probably only go out with a bodyguard

Surely though if that is the case then the fact she would need that level of protection for herself / her baby shows that she cannot put appropriate boundaries in place to safeguard a child? This is a social services issue she needs assessing at the very least.

SirenScream · 14/09/2026 12:34

So much for her being a savvy business woman who carefully calculates everything. She and her parents must be window licking pond life to think that was a good idea.

FairAmberEagle · 14/09/2026 12:39

She might be reading this thread.

EllaPaella · 14/09/2026 12:48

She’s a paedophile. Absolutely abhorrent human being.

OonaStubbs · 14/09/2026 17:58

She should definitely be arrested. What are the police playing at?

RowsOfFlowers · 15/09/2026 10:23

EllaPaella · 14/09/2026 12:48

She’s a paedophile. Absolutely abhorrent human being.

I agree tbh and many others also do too. Promoting paedophilic content. Such a vile creature!

prh47bridge · 15/09/2026 12:44

OonaStubbs · 14/09/2026 17:58

She should definitely be arrested. What are the police playing at?

The police won't arrest her until she commits an actual crime. What she has done certainly raises serious safeguarding concerns and I condemn it unreservedly, but she does not appear to have committed a criminal offence.

prh47bridge · 15/09/2026 12:49

RowsOfFlowers · 15/09/2026 10:23

I agree tbh and many others also do too. Promoting paedophilic content. Such a vile creature!

Promoting pornography in this way is repugnant and raises serious safeguarding concerns but, even if that is her baby and not a doll, it does not make her a paedophile, nor is it promoting paedophilic content. She is promoting pornographic content. There is no indication that she intends to include her baby (if it exists) in any of her pornographic content. If she does, that would be a criminal offence.

ThatCyanCat · 15/09/2026 13:06

Would it be criminal if, instead of using a baby/doll with its face obscured, she used a real five year old child with their face also obscured? It may not be promoting actual CSA content but surely it can't be ok to use children or replicas of them to promote even legal pornography?

RowsOfFlowers · 15/09/2026 13:29

prh47bridge · 15/09/2026 12:49

Promoting pornography in this way is repugnant and raises serious safeguarding concerns but, even if that is her baby and not a doll, it does not make her a paedophile, nor is it promoting paedophilic content. She is promoting pornographic content. There is no indication that she intends to include her baby (if it exists) in any of her pornographic content. If she does, that would be a criminal offence.

I disagree - it’s no longer just promoting pornographic content if there is a baby or a baby doll involved imo!

70isaLimitNotaTarget · 15/09/2026 18:44

She's planning to "auction" the baby's name Hmm
Annabel
Barbie
Sindy

RowsOfFlowers · 15/09/2026 19:35

70isaLimitNotaTarget · 15/09/2026 18:44

She's planning to "auction" the baby's name Hmm
Annabel
Barbie
Sindy

Her life is a joke. Feel so sorry for this child.

PolkaDotPorridge · 15/09/2026 19:36

RowsOfFlowers · 15/09/2026 10:23

I agree tbh and many others also do too. Promoting paedophilic content. Such a vile creature!

Agreed. She’s absolutely sickening.

ThatCyanCat · 15/09/2026 19:45

She couldn't be like this without demand, though. She's a symptom, not the disease itself. There's only one of her. How many men participate and perpetuate it?

70isaLimitNotaTarget · 15/09/2026 20:21

RowsOfFlowers · 15/09/2026 19:35

Her life is a joke. Feel so sorry for this child.

It's a doll..........

RowsOfFlowers · 15/09/2026 20:36

70isaLimitNotaTarget · 15/09/2026 20:21

It's a doll..........

Yeah but it’s her behaviours as a mum ……..

prh47bridge · 16/09/2026 09:22

RowsOfFlowers · 15/09/2026 13:29

I disagree - it’s no longer just promoting pornographic content if there is a baby or a baby doll involved imo!

The term paedophile is misused a lot on Mumsnet. Pretty much whenever someone posts about a 16-year-old having consensual sex with his 15-year-old girlfriend, someone will call him a paedophile.

A paedophile is someone who is primarily sexually attracted to pre-pubescent children. There is no evidence that Bonne Blue is a paedophile.

Paedophilic content is content showing the sexual abuse, exploitation of sexualisation of children. Such content is illegal. If Bonnie Blue made such content, she would be committing an offence. She has not suggested that her baby (if there is one) will be involved in pornographic content in any way. So no, she is not promoting paedophilic content.

Including her baby in this video is repugnant. I would be happy to support a law making this an offence. However, calling her a paedophile and claiming she is promoting paedophilic content is wrong and unhelpful.

Swipe left for the next trending thread