Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

AIBU to think Bonnie Blue should be arrested?

284 replies

BellesAndGraces · 11/09/2026 10:40

Bonnie Blue’s latest stunt is to post a video holding her newborn, surrounded by masked men while talking about getting back to making sexual content after having a c-section. Her baby’s onesie matches the colour of the mask worn by the men.

How this is not using a baby to promote sexual content, I do not know. It’s sickening.

I know all she wants is publicity but I sincerely hope this time she gets all the attention she deserves and her baby is taken away from her and placed with a family that can give the child the love, care and protection a child needs. The Tories have reported her to the NSPCC but why has she not been reported to the police??

OP posts:
New posts on this thread. Refresh page
RowsOfFlowers · 18/09/2026 10:54

IDontHateRainbows · 18/09/2026 10:50

She did the 'schoolchild orgy' scene using very young looking but legally old enough performers. This was on the documentary about her. Some of the female perfomers looked like they were about 12. Disgusting.

It’s awful isn’t it, content she’s promoting! Trouble is there’s a market for it and she knows what she’s doing

IDontHateRainbows · 18/09/2026 10:50

RowsOfFlowers · 16/09/2026 09:42

We can agree to disagree - I did not actually call her a paedophile, I said that she is promoting (in my opinion) paedophilic pormographic content - she also did that weird golden shower thing too. I think most of us can agree that doll is there to emulate a baby.

She did the 'schoolchild orgy' scene using very young looking but legally old enough performers. This was on the documentary about her. Some of the female perfomers looked like they were about 12. Disgusting.

ThatCyanCat · 17/09/2026 22:25

OonaStubbs · 17/09/2026 21:22

The police should fit her up as she is clearly a wrong'un.

You can't be serious.

OonaStubbs · 17/09/2026 21:22

The police should fit her up as she is clearly a wrong'un.

prh47bridge · 17/09/2026 10:29

OonaStubbs · 17/09/2026 06:58

They should lock her up for tax evasion like they did with Al Capone when they couldn't pin racketeering charges on him.

That needs proof that she is actually evading taxes. As far as I am aware there is no evidence that she is doing so.

OonaStubbs · 17/09/2026 06:58

They should lock her up for tax evasion like they did with Al Capone when they couldn't pin racketeering charges on him.

PlantainArama · 16/09/2026 10:12

I get the paedophile / not paedophile point.

But i do think a person's behaviour can be paedophile adjacent and/ or paedophile enabling. Where women have helped men abuse children, I'm not convinced there's always a sexual element for the woman in the same way. I think that pleasing the man involved is often the primary motivator for the woman.

Women in these positions clearly have very fucked up relationships with boundaries and power imbalances, which is also what paedophilia seeks to subvert.

RowsOfFlowers · 16/09/2026 09:42

prh47bridge · 16/09/2026 09:22

The term paedophile is misused a lot on Mumsnet. Pretty much whenever someone posts about a 16-year-old having consensual sex with his 15-year-old girlfriend, someone will call him a paedophile.

A paedophile is someone who is primarily sexually attracted to pre-pubescent children. There is no evidence that Bonne Blue is a paedophile.

Paedophilic content is content showing the sexual abuse, exploitation of sexualisation of children. Such content is illegal. If Bonnie Blue made such content, she would be committing an offence. She has not suggested that her baby (if there is one) will be involved in pornographic content in any way. So no, she is not promoting paedophilic content.

Including her baby in this video is repugnant. I would be happy to support a law making this an offence. However, calling her a paedophile and claiming she is promoting paedophilic content is wrong and unhelpful.

We can agree to disagree - I did not actually call her a paedophile, I said that she is promoting (in my opinion) paedophilic pormographic content - she also did that weird golden shower thing too. I think most of us can agree that doll is there to emulate a baby.

Boomer55 · 16/09/2026 09:24

overnightangel · 11/09/2026 10:45

Beyond vile. Needs investigating pronto and the baby placed elsewhere

Awful. I hope social services are watching all this. 🤮

prh47bridge · 16/09/2026 09:22

RowsOfFlowers · 15/09/2026 13:29

I disagree - it’s no longer just promoting pornographic content if there is a baby or a baby doll involved imo!

The term paedophile is misused a lot on Mumsnet. Pretty much whenever someone posts about a 16-year-old having consensual sex with his 15-year-old girlfriend, someone will call him a paedophile.

A paedophile is someone who is primarily sexually attracted to pre-pubescent children. There is no evidence that Bonne Blue is a paedophile.

Paedophilic content is content showing the sexual abuse, exploitation of sexualisation of children. Such content is illegal. If Bonnie Blue made such content, she would be committing an offence. She has not suggested that her baby (if there is one) will be involved in pornographic content in any way. So no, she is not promoting paedophilic content.

Including her baby in this video is repugnant. I would be happy to support a law making this an offence. However, calling her a paedophile and claiming she is promoting paedophilic content is wrong and unhelpful.

RowsOfFlowers · 15/09/2026 20:36

70isaLimitNotaTarget · 15/09/2026 20:21

It's a doll..........

Yeah but it’s her behaviours as a mum ……..

70isaLimitNotaTarget · 15/09/2026 20:21

RowsOfFlowers · 15/09/2026 19:35

Her life is a joke. Feel so sorry for this child.

It's a doll..........

ThatCyanCat · 15/09/2026 19:45

She couldn't be like this without demand, though. She's a symptom, not the disease itself. There's only one of her. How many men participate and perpetuate it?

PolkaDotPorridge · 15/09/2026 19:36

RowsOfFlowers · 15/09/2026 10:23

I agree tbh and many others also do too. Promoting paedophilic content. Such a vile creature!

Agreed. She’s absolutely sickening.

RowsOfFlowers · 15/09/2026 19:35

70isaLimitNotaTarget · 15/09/2026 18:44

She's planning to "auction" the baby's name Hmm
Annabel
Barbie
Sindy

Her life is a joke. Feel so sorry for this child.

70isaLimitNotaTarget · 15/09/2026 18:44

She's planning to "auction" the baby's name Hmm
Annabel
Barbie
Sindy

RowsOfFlowers · 15/09/2026 13:29

prh47bridge · 15/09/2026 12:49

Promoting pornography in this way is repugnant and raises serious safeguarding concerns but, even if that is her baby and not a doll, it does not make her a paedophile, nor is it promoting paedophilic content. She is promoting pornographic content. There is no indication that she intends to include her baby (if it exists) in any of her pornographic content. If she does, that would be a criminal offence.

I disagree - it’s no longer just promoting pornographic content if there is a baby or a baby doll involved imo!

ThatCyanCat · 15/09/2026 13:06

Would it be criminal if, instead of using a baby/doll with its face obscured, she used a real five year old child with their face also obscured? It may not be promoting actual CSA content but surely it can't be ok to use children or replicas of them to promote even legal pornography?

prh47bridge · 15/09/2026 12:49

RowsOfFlowers · 15/09/2026 10:23

I agree tbh and many others also do too. Promoting paedophilic content. Such a vile creature!

Promoting pornography in this way is repugnant and raises serious safeguarding concerns but, even if that is her baby and not a doll, it does not make her a paedophile, nor is it promoting paedophilic content. She is promoting pornographic content. There is no indication that she intends to include her baby (if it exists) in any of her pornographic content. If she does, that would be a criminal offence.

prh47bridge · 15/09/2026 12:44

OonaStubbs · 14/09/2026 17:58

She should definitely be arrested. What are the police playing at?

The police won't arrest her until she commits an actual crime. What she has done certainly raises serious safeguarding concerns and I condemn it unreservedly, but she does not appear to have committed a criminal offence.

RowsOfFlowers · 15/09/2026 10:23

EllaPaella · 14/09/2026 12:48

She’s a paedophile. Absolutely abhorrent human being.

I agree tbh and many others also do too. Promoting paedophilic content. Such a vile creature!

OonaStubbs · 14/09/2026 17:58

She should definitely be arrested. What are the police playing at?

EllaPaella · 14/09/2026 12:48

She’s a paedophile. Absolutely abhorrent human being.

FairAmberEagle · 14/09/2026 12:39

She might be reading this thread.

SirenScream · 14/09/2026 12:34

So much for her being a savvy business woman who carefully calculates everything. She and her parents must be window licking pond life to think that was a good idea.

Swipe left for the next trending thread