Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

AIBU to think Burnham’s words may haunt his premiership?

872 replies

Greyrock79 · 10/09/2026 07:16

To think that Burnham’s words are going to haunt his premiership?

‘…national security can’t come at the expense of social security…’

OP posts:
Thread gallery
9
CoventryCity · 23/09/2026 12:39

BIossomtoes · 23/09/2026 09:35

No. If you promulgate misinformation I’ll correct it.

Promulgate. Great word. Not sure you have used it correctly in this instance but never bother!

sunshinesuki · 23/09/2026 12:57

YourGiddyGreyHelper · 23/09/2026 09:48

Bring back the Corn Laws!!

😆

Itchthescratch · 23/09/2026 13:21

TemperanceWest · 23/09/2026 09:44

All seems fairly sensible to me. And in line with what was promised in the manifesto.

Edited

Ah yes when Reeves promised 'we will not increase National Insurance' and subsequently hit employers with a massive increase. Even the IFS has stated that this clearly broke a manifesto promise, no matter how much Labour try and pretend that they actually just meant employee NI.

None of these tax rises are sensible or promote growth. They have unnecessarily bound themselves to not increase the major taxes so are stuck increasing smaller taxes and doing untold damage to the economy.

Also the whole ethos of prioritising social security over national security is incredibly complacent. Had history not taught us anything! The Roman Empire lasted 500 years and ultimately ended. The idea that life as we know it and the current world order will be the same forever is incredibly naive. At some point the unthinkable will happen and we will need to defend our country. This will be very hard to do when so many people seem unable to cope with a job, let alone the death and destruction that comes with war.

TemperanceWest · 23/09/2026 13:30

Itchthescratch · 23/09/2026 13:21

Ah yes when Reeves promised 'we will not increase National Insurance' and subsequently hit employers with a massive increase. Even the IFS has stated that this clearly broke a manifesto promise, no matter how much Labour try and pretend that they actually just meant employee NI.

None of these tax rises are sensible or promote growth. They have unnecessarily bound themselves to not increase the major taxes so are stuck increasing smaller taxes and doing untold damage to the economy.

Also the whole ethos of prioritising social security over national security is incredibly complacent. Had history not taught us anything! The Roman Empire lasted 500 years and ultimately ended. The idea that life as we know it and the current world order will be the same forever is incredibly naive. At some point the unthinkable will happen and we will need to defend our country. This will be very hard to do when so many people seem unable to cope with a job, let alone the death and destruction that comes with war.

The idea that life as we know it and the current world order will be the same forever is incredibly naive. At some point the unthinkable will happen and we will need to defend our country. This will be very hard to do when so many people seem unable to cope with a job, let alone the death and destruction that comes with war

If there is one thing I have learned it is that human beings are incredibly resiliant and adaptable when the worst happens.

Itchthescratch · 23/09/2026 13:39

TemperanceWest · 23/09/2026 13:30

The idea that life as we know it and the current world order will be the same forever is incredibly naive. At some point the unthinkable will happen and we will need to defend our country. This will be very hard to do when so many people seem unable to cope with a job, let alone the death and destruction that comes with war

If there is one thing I have learned it is that human beings are incredibly resiliant and adaptable when the worst happens.

The current dependence of welfare doesn't speak of this adaptability or resilience. If it's engrained in humans to rise to the challenge then maybe we are making things to easy for people?

sunshinesuki · 23/09/2026 13:48

AquamarinePearlGold · 23/09/2026 12:36

Of course the Tories are well known for always being completely truthful! 🙄

Who cares? The Tories aren't in charge, Labour are.

EasternStandard · 23/09/2026 13:53

Itchthescratch · 23/09/2026 13:21

Ah yes when Reeves promised 'we will not increase National Insurance' and subsequently hit employers with a massive increase. Even the IFS has stated that this clearly broke a manifesto promise, no matter how much Labour try and pretend that they actually just meant employee NI.

None of these tax rises are sensible or promote growth. They have unnecessarily bound themselves to not increase the major taxes so are stuck increasing smaller taxes and doing untold damage to the economy.

Also the whole ethos of prioritising social security over national security is incredibly complacent. Had history not taught us anything! The Roman Empire lasted 500 years and ultimately ended. The idea that life as we know it and the current world order will be the same forever is incredibly naive. At some point the unthinkable will happen and we will need to defend our country. This will be very hard to do when so many people seem unable to cope with a job, let alone the death and destruction that comes with war.

It’s not at all in line with the manifesto anyway. It was meant to be fully funded and fully costed. Apparently.

Itchthescratch · 23/09/2026 13:58

EasternStandard · 23/09/2026 13:53

It’s not at all in line with the manifesto anyway. It was meant to be fully funded and fully costed. Apparently.

You're right of course. The reality is the manifesto was never going to represent what Labour were actually going to do. They have had to raise loads of taxes when the manifesto and all their statements before the election implied this wouldn't happen. Even more astonishingly, they completely failed to mention that they would be implementing changes like removing the two child benefit cap. Why wouldn't they have explicitly stated that they intended to do this when it's obvious that there was a huge appetite for this in the party and there was probably an intention to do this all along? Because they knew it was and remains unpopular. This shows you the level of deception associated with the manifesto.

Badbadbunny · 23/09/2026 14:03

The head of the IMF was on the TV news this morning warning lots of indebted countries, including the UK to get a grip on their debt in view of the inevitable forthcoming increases in interest rates. Prepare for a bumpy ride, folks, as Labour don't have a clue how to grow the economy nor reduce the humingous debt.

CoventryCity · 23/09/2026 18:45

EasternStandard · 23/09/2026 13:53

It’s not at all in line with the manifesto anyway. It was meant to be fully funded and fully costed. Apparently.

Where has the private school vat gone? Where are the thousands of new teachers. ‘To improve state schools’? Is the soggy white toast helping things?
it’s a mystery!

but thank god we don’t have to hear Starmer’s voice, or reeves’ voice ever again. I nearly vomited if I heard them.

EasternStandard · 23/09/2026 19:15

CoventryCity · 23/09/2026 18:45

Where has the private school vat gone? Where are the thousands of new teachers. ‘To improve state schools’? Is the soggy white toast helping things?
it’s a mystery!

but thank god we don’t have to hear Starmer’s voice, or reeves’ voice ever again. I nearly vomited if I heard them.

Edited

Yes at least there’s that. That was so bad.

Imdunfer · 24/09/2026 08:06

Badbadbunny · 23/09/2026 14:03

The head of the IMF was on the TV news this morning warning lots of indebted countries, including the UK to get a grip on their debt in view of the inevitable forthcoming increases in interest rates. Prepare for a bumpy ride, folks, as Labour don't have a clue how to grow the economy nor reduce the humingous debt.

She actually called for us and other countries to reduce our debt.

At the moment none of those countries can even balance their books. Every month we all borrow more just to cover our outgoings that month. You can't reduce debt until you get rid of that monthly deficit and turn it into a surplus.

The USA goes through a farce every six months of having the Senate debate whether they are going to extend the debt. They even sometimes stop paying government employees until they agree to extend it. It's a farce because they can't not. If they don't, the world's reserve currency collapses.

It's completely unsustainable.

CoventryCity · 24/09/2026 08:07

Imdunfer · 24/09/2026 08:06

She actually called for us and other countries to reduce our debt.

At the moment none of those countries can even balance their books. Every month we all borrow more just to cover our outgoings that month. You can't reduce debt until you get rid of that monthly deficit and turn it into a surplus.

The USA goes through a farce every six months of having the Senate debate whether they are going to extend the debt. They even sometimes stop paying government employees until they agree to extend it. It's a farce because they can't not. If they don't, the world's reserve currency collapses.

It's completely unsustainable.

Edited

What’s the answer?

Imdunfer · 24/09/2026 08:14

CoventryCity · 24/09/2026 08:07

What’s the answer?

Austerity like you've never seen before. Either imposed to stop financial Armageddon, or caused by it.

LuckyHazelFox · 24/09/2026 08:18

CoventryCity · 23/09/2026 18:45

Where has the private school vat gone? Where are the thousands of new teachers. ‘To improve state schools’? Is the soggy white toast helping things?
it’s a mystery!

but thank god we don’t have to hear Starmer’s voice, or reeves’ voice ever again. I nearly vomited if I heard them.

Edited

That really was a spiteful tax.

CoventryCity · 24/09/2026 08:23

LuckyHazelFox · 24/09/2026 08:18

That really was a spiteful tax.

Bitter Bridget all over. She was allegedly hurt bad by a posh boy at Oxford.. And don’t we know it..

She is such a liar talking about growing up in ‘poverty’. Bull shit. She had a house heating lighting food clothes education at a very good single sex school. Not like any poverty I’ve seen around the world.

Anyway..

CoventryCity · 24/09/2026 08:24

Imdunfer · 24/09/2026 08:14

Austerity like you've never seen before. Either imposed to stop financial Armageddon, or caused by it.

Will Labour be doing that?

Imdunfer · 24/09/2026 08:26

CoventryCity · 24/09/2026 08:24

Will Labour be doing that?

Nobody will be doing that.

CoventryCity · 24/09/2026 09:07

Imdunfer · 24/09/2026 08:26

Nobody will be doing that.

But Labour are in power. They could do that, in the uk anyway.

Imdunfer · 24/09/2026 09:13

CoventryCity · 24/09/2026 09:07

But Labour are in power. They could do that, in the uk anyway.

And commit electoral suicide at the same time.

It would be a pointless exercise of self harm unless all the over borrowed economies, particularly the USA, do the same.

CoventryCity · 24/09/2026 09:20

Imdunfer · 24/09/2026 09:13

And commit electoral suicide at the same time.

It would be a pointless exercise of self harm unless all the over borrowed economies, particularly the USA, do the same.

They could go for broke (no pun intended), they’re not going to win any future election again for a very long time. Let’s hope Andy doesn’t call one early or else we will have yet another PM.

sunshinesuki · 25/09/2026 01:12

CoventryCity · 24/09/2026 09:20

They could go for broke (no pun intended), they’re not going to win any future election again for a very long time. Let’s hope Andy doesn’t call one early or else we will have yet another PM.

And what numpty are they going to put forward if that happens?
They are running out of suitable candidates.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Swipe left for the next trending thread