Help protect children from gaming harms.

Take our survey

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Half of Americans can’t read

205 replies

Balalabab · Yesterday 16:32

So the title is slightly clickbaity I feel.

But this is what is being said in a podcast I am listening to called ‘Sold a story’.

Ironic if the title is wrong considering the name of the podcast 😂

Anyway.. story goes that in Covid a bunch of adults all over the US realised their children couldn’t actually read.

What they had been taught to do was learn a bunch of words by sight, and then as reading became more complex they would look at the first few letters and guess from the context.

One of the example given was instead of ‘Poland was invaded by Germany.’ Someone who used this method read ‘Poland was invited by Germany.’

This reminded me of a story my in-law told me (he is mid 60s) of how he couldn’t actually read. And it was only when he went to his grammar school interview and asked to read a text did they recognised he couldn’t actually read. He knew he couldn’t read. That made absolutely no sense to me until I heard this podcast about people who are effectively half reading. Going through the motions and faking it. But who actually cannot read.

My mind is blown. And I am gripped by this rabbit hole.

In America; this ‘whole word’ method of reading has been a political war for the past 60 years. Politicised to be a left vs right issue and has now been called by some ‘The reading wars’. I have asked tried to ask on Reddit about this 3 times and every time it has been deleted. I don’t know if that’s denial of the issue, embarrassment, or just Reddit being Reddit.

Anyway this has really captured me. Has America fixed this? Do we have this problem in UK as we were using this teaching method many years ago too? How many British people can’t actually read? Whats going to happen to the Gen Z’s who can’t read!

And finally a down the rabbit hole fact for you - that image of Bush sitting in a classroom when 9/11 happened. The most famous image of Bush seen by nearly everyone in the developed world. He was in that school because he was trying to ban ‘whole word’ learning and push phonics first learning. This has really has been an invisible elephant in the room.

OP posts:
AirborneElephant · Yesterday 16:42

I learned through “whole word”, phonics are completely alien to me. But all of my age group that I know can read just fine - when confronted by an unfamiliar word we sound it out using bits of familiar words in exactly the same way as phonics although I certainly use slightly different individual bits.

So while I agree the scientific evidence is behind phonics being better and therefore that is what should be used now, I think it’s silly to suggest that those that learned through a different method are somehow illiterate. I’m sure there are a few, but I’m equally sure it’s not half of America!

AirborneElephant · Yesterday 16:43

It also helps with unfamiliar words that my age group learned Latin from primary onwards, so we’re pretty good at etymology in general.

seahorsessky · Yesterday 16:44

It's possible to sound a word out using phonics and not know what it means.
Gleb.
Bamp.
You can read them...
Equally, some children did learn to read "whole word" and could read whole novels at 5.
So it's not about the method, and there's many different phonics schemes. All aspects of reading are important.

foriamtheratofthehighway · Yesterday 16:44

This is interesting actually- my daughter is 5 and just started year 1. I think she can read (or read as well as is expected at her age anyway), but sometimes she gets a word wrong and has said the word she thinks it should be from the context, when actually it's a slightly different word. In her case I think it's just her brain not quite going at the speed she wants it to, but I can see how it develops into a problem.

drspouse · Yesterday 16:46

seahorsessky · Yesterday 16:44

It's possible to sound a word out using phonics and not know what it means.
Gleb.
Bamp.
You can read them...
Equally, some children did learn to read "whole word" and could read whole novels at 5.
So it's not about the method, and there's many different phonics schemes. All aspects of reading are important.

It really isn't.
Phonics is needed to read new words.
The US was very behind compared to the rest of the world in using phonics teaching.
This is a very good podcast @Balalabab .

Neurodiversitydoctor · Yesterday 16:47

I am dyslexic and am much better at whole word recognition - it's horse for courses isn't it ?

Balalabab · Yesterday 16:47

AirborneElephant · Yesterday 16:42

I learned through “whole word”, phonics are completely alien to me. But all of my age group that I know can read just fine - when confronted by an unfamiliar word we sound it out using bits of familiar words in exactly the same way as phonics although I certainly use slightly different individual bits.

So while I agree the scientific evidence is behind phonics being better and therefore that is what should be used now, I think it’s silly to suggest that those that learned through a different method are somehow illiterate. I’m sure there are a few, but I’m equally sure it’s not half of America!

I can’t actually remember how I was taught to read. But I am pretty sure I can 100% read.

According to the podcast clever people can learn to read through whole word because they can figure it out as you say. But most people do need to learn the sounds and they can’t.

In America it seems it was super strange. They did actually encourage… let’s look at the word… what’s the first few letters.. shall we guess what that could say… let’s read it back again and see if that makes sense. So they have actively been taught to guess.

OP posts:
AirborneElephant · Yesterday 16:48

foriamtheratofthehighway · Yesterday 16:44

This is interesting actually- my daughter is 5 and just started year 1. I think she can read (or read as well as is expected at her age anyway), but sometimes she gets a word wrong and has said the word she thinks it should be from the context, when actually it's a slightly different word. In her case I think it's just her brain not quite going at the speed she wants it to, but I can see how it develops into a problem.

I think this shows that phonics is not how a fully fluent reader actually reads. We don’t sound out the words syllable by syllable in our heads, we “skim” the sentence visually and understand the meaning. If your daughter is transitioning to this that’s great, and yes of course she’ll make some mistakes on the way.

Another2Cats · Yesterday 16:50

AirborneElephant · Yesterday 16:43

It also helps with unfamiliar words that my age group learned Latin from primary onwards, so we’re pretty good at etymology in general.

Do you mind if I ask which country that is?

I can't think of any national curriculum that would include Latin. Are you perhaps talking about a private school that you attended?

WhatNoRaisins · Yesterday 16:50

I imagine that you can get away with the whole word method if you've got someone who listens to you read and can correct you if you're struggling.

I think at least some parts of the US have no child left behind policies with reading which has given a bit of an incentive to dumb down what classes are expected to be able to read which can't be helping.

AirborneElephant · Yesterday 16:52

Another2Cats · Yesterday 16:50

Do you mind if I ask which country that is?

I can't think of any national curriculum that would include Latin. Are you perhaps talking about a private school that you attended?

There was no national curriculum back in my day, that only came in in 1988. Latin was very common in state and private primaries.

Fattypantss · Yesterday 16:54

My ds is 23.

I home educated him until he was 9.

I never taught him to read by using phonics. He stated to learn to read at 4 by learning whole words. Phonics never even entered my brain, I assume I learned to read whole words, but I don’t ever remember learning how to read, I could read well supply young (by 3, apparently, I’m not clever at all I’m thick as all fuck so I don’t know how I read early).

Anyway, don’t know what my point is, but ds got level 9s in English and English lit GCSE and managed to get though a degree, so I assuming he can actually read from learning that way.

My younger two children both went to school from nursery age and I’ll admit, I think phonics is a bit of a faff. My youngest is just turned 6, a fabulous reader, she hated phonics and naturally just wanted to learn whole words. She absolutely hated phonics in reception and last year in year one and used to ask what the point was.

Fattypantss · Yesterday 16:55

Another2Cats · Yesterday 16:50

Do you mind if I ask which country that is?

I can't think of any national curriculum that would include Latin. Are you perhaps talking about a private school that you attended?

I did Latin at my grammar in the early 90s and my 12 year old does Latin at her grammar school now.

calishire · Yesterday 16:55

I’m an American 1980s baby and I have no idea how I learned to read but I do remember these incessant commercials/infomercials for a reading program called “Hooked on Phonics”. I guess it was “revolutionary” because that’s not how it was being taught in schools 🤷🏻‍♀️

MargotLovesTom · Yesterday 16:58

AirborneElephant · Yesterday 16:52

There was no national curriculum back in my day, that only came in in 1988. Latin was very common in state and private primaries.

I'm in my mid 50s and don't know one person who did Latin at their bog standard state school.

In my school we first learned to read using ITA, and then had to forget that and learn the standard way (definitely wasn't phonics in the 1970s!).

risingup · Yesterday 16:58

Yes i've seen this too it's all over Youtube if you look. It's generational though, not all ages are suffering so not half the population by any means, a sizable portion though.

It's a covid thing. Huge gaps in learning. It's definately a thing here too, i've been in contact with too many people who were "educated" during Covid to not recogise that this is happening. Including the 18 year old lad working on the childrens ride who couldn't work out 10 minus 3. Thats just todays example.

Balalabab · Yesterday 16:59

drspouse · Yesterday 16:46

It really isn't.
Phonics is needed to read new words.
The US was very behind compared to the rest of the world in using phonics teaching.
This is a very good podcast @Balalabab .

It’s got me completely hooked. Partly I think due to in-laws story which I never understood and it’s finally clicked how that could happen.

OP posts:
AirborneElephant · Yesterday 17:00

MargotLovesTom · Yesterday 16:58

I'm in my mid 50s and don't know one person who did Latin at their bog standard state school.

In my school we first learned to read using ITA, and then had to forget that and learn the standard way (definitely wasn't phonics in the 1970s!).

Edited

Ok. It probably varied area by area or school by school. Most people in their 50s and above that I know learned Latin. Its major advantage is that if you learned it the Monty python romans scene is hysterically funny.😁

CousinBette · Yesterday 17:00

risingup · Yesterday 16:58

Yes i've seen this too it's all over Youtube if you look. It's generational though, not all ages are suffering so not half the population by any means, a sizable portion though.

It's a covid thing. Huge gaps in learning. It's definately a thing here too, i've been in contact with too many people who were "educated" during Covid to not recogise that this is happening. Including the 18 year old lad working on the childrens ride who couldn't work out 10 minus 3. Thats just todays example.

Covid didn’t last long enough for this to be true.

MrsBennetsPoorNervesAreBack · Yesterday 17:01

I learnt to read with the "look and say" method, which I think is the same thing as the whole word approach. I can definitely read!!

I don't know how my dd learnt to read. She was self taught before starting school. I certainly didn't teach her phonics though who knows what she might have picked up elsewhere. I suspect that she learned via some version of "look and say" but she did later learn phonics at school.

I think the average reading age for adults in the UK is around 10.

Fattypantss · Yesterday 17:04

risingup · Yesterday 16:58

Yes i've seen this too it's all over Youtube if you look. It's generational though, not all ages are suffering so not half the population by any means, a sizable portion though.

It's a covid thing. Huge gaps in learning. It's definately a thing here too, i've been in contact with too many people who were "educated" during Covid to not recogise that this is happening. Including the 18 year old lad working on the childrens ride who couldn't work out 10 minus 3. Thats just todays example.

I don’t understand the gaps in learning from Covid.

My middle child turned 6 a day before her school closed. They were at home from March to September and then what, December until March the following year?

How could some children, unless they were already struggling of course, be so behind with just a few months?

I used to travel for months at a time with ds when he was home educated, we only did minimal maths and English when backpacking the world, and he was bounds ahead when he started school in year 4.

I do know that some children struggle, but I don’t get these massive gaps in education.

Septembersunrays · Yesterday 17:05

AirborneElephant · Yesterday 16:42

I learned through “whole word”, phonics are completely alien to me. But all of my age group that I know can read just fine - when confronted by an unfamiliar word we sound it out using bits of familiar words in exactly the same way as phonics although I certainly use slightly different individual bits.

So while I agree the scientific evidence is behind phonics being better and therefore that is what should be used now, I think it’s silly to suggest that those that learned through a different method are somehow illiterate. I’m sure there are a few, but I’m equally sure it’s not half of America!

This but op how can it be a political issues !!

That's mind blowing !

Phonics is absolutely a cult in the UK and it doesn't surprise me if this is the back ground that's it's driven by politics at all because something is bloody weird about the whole thing .

I have two DC . One learned to read very easily via phonics and one didn't. The one that struggled it had big effects on her and thanks to here i was advised to go back to whole words.

This worked for her and very fast.

Why oh why can't we simply have a few methods on the bloody go until the child can read.

It's utter madness to force one or the other .

WonderingWanda · Yesterday 17:07

I asked Google and is says in the early 80's that we used whole word rather than phonics in the UK. I do remember learning word sounds like ought, bought, nought. And a tv programme called Look and Read featured quite heavily with a little pen called Wordy. I think I read really well and always have done.

Why do you think Gen Z won't be able to read op?

Septembersunrays · Yesterday 17:08
  • just remember there is a vast investment into phonics now and whole industry built around it .
Alittlefrustrated · Yesterday 17:09

AirborneElephant · Yesterday 16:52

There was no national curriculum back in my day, that only came in in 1988. Latin was very common in state and private primaries.

Yes, DP did Latin in a state school. He's 62. L