Help protect children from gaming harms.

Take our survey

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Whole families on UC, PIP, DLA and carers' allowance for each other?

581 replies

Hutinthemiddleofnowhere · 05/09/2026 23:03

This isn't a bashing, rather a genuine observation and we're privileged in the UK to have support with benefits and disabilities.

Having adopted 2 siblings with special needs over a decade ago it opened me up to a whole new world to me. With DC in specialist schools and needing a lot of intervention from agencies and medical support I've met so many parents and children. As a teacher this was so insightful and, while having always been extra devoted to students who had difficulties, my own experience as a parent took it to another level.

Teaching, I was always aware and sympathetic to those who barely made it to lesson, almost fell asleep but professionally had to adhere to the 'not participating' and when told to 'fuck off' it was call out. I knew there would be further investigation as to why they act like this by more able and senior colleagues. Didn't take it personally but, as you can imagine, it's difficult when you have several students like this while under the pressure of teaching a tricky maths part of the syllabus.

So as a parent of ND DC I experienced it from the other side. It was very difficult because our DC were causing disruptions due to their severe diagnosis.

Throughout our journey and specialist schools I saw a lot of reality. This comes (finally) back to my point. Year after year it became blatantly obvious that the vast majority of children have parents with their own issues, whether hereditary or learnt behaviour.

I got a job at the primary school as a liason officer so met most parents. All lovely and care about their DC but sadly struggled with managing themselves, their homes etc. Those few who weren't eligible for taxis and escorts (walkable distance) relied heavily on GPs to take and pick up from school. There were some parents who did drive and drop off, like me, but it was about 5%.

So mostly the parents were on UC, claimed PIp for anxiety and MH, got DLA for all DC and also carers' allowance for looking after DC. While i visited it was clear they were were reclusive, their days were spent watching TV, gaming, DC picked up in a taxi and they had struggled to get out of bed, knew they are provided breakfast at school, went back to bed. Yes I've seen this on an early morning visit multiple times.

I understand but also a part of me felt frustrated that they had fallen into a rut, able bodied, could have long conversations, but have had so much support that has enabled this.

As a school we reached out to parents to come and integrate, provided workshops, held informal educational classes how we can help our DC. As a parent and before being employed there I attended these and it so nice to meet other parents. The reality... they just sat there, being served coffee by an already busy TA, talked all the way through the presentations then left, after already leaving several times for a smoke during an hour and half get together. Still as an attending parent at this point I could see TA was struggling so stepped in to help serve the refreshments, set up equipment and clear up afterwards. One Mum asked me to open a window, another asked to give her some biscuits...I was the same as them, a parent, but they were just totally oblivious to the situation.

Then walking out, having cleaned up and they were chatting outside, all I heard was that was so boring, I know how to bring up my kids, waste of time coming out, so what you doing now, probably Netflix.

Then getting the role and seeing deeper into their lifestyles it confirmed that actually so many of these parents had come from a generational cycle with low aspirations and no encouragement within modern education, social workers or support from us all could change their mindsets of behaviour. Sadly it really is a case of we get money, DC have their consoles, school provides meals and exercise, bags of amazing stuff at Christmas and end of year which we don't even say thank you for, we can complain online if we don't like something etc.

This is just the basic circumstances, delve deeper and you would be shocked at how some of these poor kids live. A whole different thread would have to be made about drug dealing, violence, not allowing DC in the house so they have to become one of the balaclava gangs and so much more.

As parents, even if we have our own issues, we all need to put our DC first, not rely on others to do it for us.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
5
TreatYourKiwi · Yesterday 10:51

Palomiino · Yesterday 09:31

You saying this does not make it true. Actually it’s bollocks. There is no doctor who would be stupid enough to risk their reputation and credibility (not to mention being struck off) by faking a diagnosis for money.

And yes, the NHS does outsource diagnosis assessments to doctors doing independent work nowadays because the NHS has had money stripped away from it for years.

Where did I say doctors are faking diagnosis? What I said was, patients can reel off symptoms, get a diagnosis or medical letter, then use this to support DLA and PIP applications. I know situations where people have done exactly that. 🤷🏻‍♀️

My lived experience is that, when going to private doctors and specialists, they will write letters stating the symptoms and effects I have told them I am suffering with. In my case, these have all been genuine, but I can absolutely see how someone could go to a specialist, reel off symptoms and get them to write a letter stating the patient had / was suffering from symptoms or conditions, when the patient is exaggerating or not being honest. For example, I went to a private gastroenterologist and told them my symptoms - they subsequently diagnosed me with IBS (there is no test for this) - and wrote a letter to my GP with my symptoms, the impact on my life and recommendations for prescriptions. How does one police whether I was telling the truth or not in this scenario?

Urgentbiscuitrequired · Yesterday 10:50

It may or may not be, but your 'experience' sounds completely made up and this does come across like a propaganda benefit bashing thread. 🤖

Having a SEN kid is really fucking hard. You may have had everything given to you as an adopter, but it isn't the reality for most SEN parents with biological SEN children. I had two tribunals in a year, all whilst my son barely slept more than three hours most nights and both of us were working.

The reason why one of us claims UC (after both trying to work full time) is because of lack of sleep, endless SEN admin/chasing professionals, exhaustion of managing a child with PICA and meltdowns and the constantly cleaning and tidying you get with a child with severe learning disabilities and sensory seeking behaviour. Plus there is no afterschool or holiday clubs which either one or two people cannot cover for the 15 or so weeks they have off in the holidays. Even couples dont get 15 paid weeks of leave a year or a job that supports that sort of leave.

People manage behaviour at home that an entire team of people manage in a school or a MH unit and even in a MH unit they can manage with meds. We are really fighting just to access medication for our son now. There is just you at home and services that placate you and just don't help, not a team of people there all the time.

The fact you don't get this as a supposed person raising SEN kids makes your opening post really hard to believe as genuine. And how do you explain families who have a normal, thriving child and one with high needs?

The reason parents don't engage in your wonderful groups is because they have tried everything before and you are not offering anything new to them and they are extremely patronising, or just not offering a decent solution. Frantically flicking through a book of PEC cards in the morning to find 'get dressed' with a child that with turn away as soon as you get them out is something we have all tried and just isn't practical. We've got a new app out now to do this, but how long have people in these group suggested this. One solution doesn't work for all kids but it is assumed it does.

There are probably cases like you say, but my experience is it is a very small minority. They will always exist sadly, as they always have.

Movingonup313 · Yesterday 10:50

This is the world I grew up in. It is still going - I left it behind in the 90s and have odd updates from someone who married into the family. I saw draft applications for various benefits/social housing a few years ago and was disgusted by it. I dont know why cross checks arent done across local authorities etc. They all know how to maximise benefit claims, all know the appeals systems, all know what symptoms to complain of to bolster claims. One ND moves out, move on to getting another child diagnosed. Finding out everything they are entitled to at the schools, all the charities who give free things to these families. They only ever work cash in hand, have cupboards FULL of prescription meds they dont need but get it free and take it to bolster their fraud. And dont ask me about their 7/8 holidays abroad each year including cruises. It goes on and on. They dont flaunt the holidays on sm as not daft that way - their semi legal pals do though - the benefits officers wouldnt know the friends. They contribute nothing, criticise everything and access EVERYTHING they possibly can.

On the contrary there are families who should get help, who need help and would qualify - but barely access a thing - for various reasons.

And families fighting tooth and nail for basic help.

x2boys · Yesterday 10:44

BestZebbie · Yesterday 10:15

Ime SEN school tends to mean fairly educated middle class parents because of the lengthy administrative fight required to get there, which can be facilitated by comfort with paperwork and legislation, willingness to challenge professionals, money to speed up the gathering of reports and potential tribunal costs, and the infamous "sharp elbows".

PRU and sitting-in-the-corridor-in-mainstream is slightly more the demographic you describe, as these are the default LA option for a child who is struggling in the classroom and therefore what you end up with if you don't have a very determined parent taking the SEN system on as a part-time office job around doing the actual care.

Well that depends on what type of SEN school it is
My son goes to a school for childden with severe and profound learning disabillities
The needs of these children are evident to everyone and its very obvious msinstream wouldnt be suitable for
I am seeing a rise in SEMH schools which is good though.

NoelEdmondsHairGel · Yesterday 10:44

itsgettingweird · Yesterday 10:39

You know that’s bollocks right?

As a single parent to a disabled child I’d have given my right arm for wrap around care that could meet need so I could build a career and have higher future job prospects.

As it is whilst raising that child I’ve done a degree and worked my way up in my current role to a point I can’t earn more than £35k a year as in my career line those jobs don’t exist.

Im a highly educated intelligent woman and could have found employment and training to be a higher rate tax payer.

Unfortunately the system doesn’t allow that.

But they’ll pay me £200 a month carers (and take most of it away due to my earnings) as compensation.

ease don’t blame parents for the system and make assumptions.

Life throws enough barriers out way as it is.

You are demonstrating my point.

Neither I nor the OP are talking about you.

Yet you jump in to derail the conversation. You are defending those who abuse the system. You are trying to prevent a discussion about how to help those who are stuck in a benefits rut and don’t want to get out of it because that is what their community does and all they know.

Your defensiveness is blinding you.

OneLilacHedgehog · Yesterday 10:42

emuloc · Yesterday 09:09

It is cyclical. It was single Mothers at one point, who faced disgusting scrutiny. The thing that these groups who are being attacked have in common, is that they are vulnerable people.

There was a lot of horrible rhetoric at the time. But there was a real issue of mother's on benefits and not working at the time. At one time you could claim benefits as a single mum and not have to look for work until your child left school. The rules were changed and now most mums work at least part time. So there was a real issue that was solved.

GreatWideOcean · Yesterday 10:41

Ashhh56 · Yesterday 10:39

This feels like benefits bashing to me too.

I have autoimmune conditions, I'm on 3 different monthly injections that make me feel awful, I take 4x the daily recommended antihistamines off label by immunology that are incredibly sedating. I spend alot of time in the bath for chronic hives and struggling to walk up the stairs - usually crawl to the bathroom to wash.

My last pregnancy triggered all of the illness before anyone says "why did you have more kids" he was a non-consensual pregnancy where I fled domestic violence to safeguard him. And I don't believe in abortions for myself personally. And unfortunately due to how sick I was during the pregnancy, he was born premature, spent time in NICU and now can't eat solid food, has a multitude of non Ige mediated food allergies.

But I've written a book, I continue my studies, I'm working through my qualification ladder in the hopes to open my own alternative education provision for SEND children one day.

I do claim PIP, DLA for him and get the disabled child element on UC.

But I suppose I'm just lazy though and should do better.

You've been through a lot. I know, like almost everyone on disability payments, you would love to be able to get rid of all you have to deal with and be able to live a full and normal life. <3

Livelovebehappy · Yesterday 10:41

5128gap · Yesterday 10:20

Its 1.9%. And don't forget, that's families who've not worked yet. So will include people who will go on to work when their children are older.
To gauge how significant an issue this is, you'd need a long term study that demonstrated life long worklessness and all family member worklessness throughout entire childhood. A three year old with no working adults in their family could well become the 13 year old of working parents.

But it would be rare for both parents to not be working. I appreciate there are SAHMs, but the father would be in work.

itsgettingweird · Yesterday 10:39

NoelEdmondsHairGel · Yesterday 10:34

OP you are not allowed to say this on Mumsnet.

There are an awful lot of people on here with children with additional needs who live in fear of their benefits being cut off and come out fighting, even when you are not talking them, but about people who abuse the system or do not look beyond it.

But you are, of course, right. There are thousands and thousands of people for whom claiming benefits is all they know, and all they aspire to. Who have or perhaps when they were younger the potential to do more, but along with their families are in the benefits rut with no real desire to get out or because they have behavioural issues.

We all know people like this. My husband’s uncle and cousins have variously faked whiplash injuries and claimed anxiety/agoraphobia whilst simultaneously doing the odd bit of work (window cleaning) cash in hand. It is rife in their community.

You know more than most about this but you will be shot down regardless because of the levels of defensiveness on here.

It is nonetheless an important issue which needs to be tackled - we simply cannot afford as a country to have a smaller and smaller pool of net contributors funding this lifestyle. Those who shoot these concerns down never have a constructive or sensible solution to the problem - they just want the money to carry on flowing. But where will it come from?

You know that’s bollocks right?

As a single parent to a disabled child I’d have given my right arm for wrap around care that could meet need so I could build a career and have higher future job prospects.

As it is whilst raising that child I’ve done a degree and worked my way up in my current role to a point I can’t earn more than £35k a year as in my career line those jobs don’t exist.

Im a highly educated intelligent woman and could have found employment and training to be a higher rate tax payer.

Unfortunately the system doesn’t allow that.

But they’ll pay me £200 a month carers (and take most of it away due to my earnings) as compensation.

ease don’t blame parents for the system and make assumptions.

Life throws enough barriers out way as it is.

Ashhh56 · Yesterday 10:39

This feels like benefits bashing to me too.

I have autoimmune conditions, I'm on 3 different monthly injections that make me feel awful, I take 4x the daily recommended antihistamines off label by immunology that are incredibly sedating. I spend alot of time in the bath for chronic hives and struggling to walk up the stairs - usually crawl to the bathroom to wash.

My last pregnancy triggered all of the illness before anyone says "why did you have more kids" he was a non-consensual pregnancy where I fled domestic violence to safeguard him. And I don't believe in abortions for myself personally. And unfortunately due to how sick I was during the pregnancy, he was born premature, spent time in NICU and now can't eat solid food, has a multitude of non Ige mediated food allergies.

But I've written a book, I continue my studies, I'm working through my qualification ladder in the hopes to open my own alternative education provision for SEND children one day.

I do claim PIP, DLA for him and get the disabled child element on UC.

But I suppose I'm just lazy though and should do better.

GreatWideOcean · Yesterday 10:37

NoelEdmondsHairGel · Yesterday 10:34

OP you are not allowed to say this on Mumsnet.

There are an awful lot of people on here with children with additional needs who live in fear of their benefits being cut off and come out fighting, even when you are not talking them, but about people who abuse the system or do not look beyond it.

But you are, of course, right. There are thousands and thousands of people for whom claiming benefits is all they know, and all they aspire to. Who have or perhaps when they were younger the potential to do more, but along with their families are in the benefits rut with no real desire to get out or because they have behavioural issues.

We all know people like this. My husband’s uncle and cousins have variously faked whiplash injuries and claimed anxiety/agoraphobia whilst simultaneously doing the odd bit of work (window cleaning) cash in hand. It is rife in their community.

You know more than most about this but you will be shot down regardless because of the levels of defensiveness on here.

It is nonetheless an important issue which needs to be tackled - we simply cannot afford as a country to have a smaller and smaller pool of net contributors funding this lifestyle. Those who shoot these concerns down never have a constructive or sensible solution to the problem - they just want the money to carry on flowing. But where will it come from?

I don't live in fear of losing benefits I don't get. I fund all my caring myself. I know how fortunate I am, and count myself privileged, to have an income that excludes me from these things without needing benefits like families with lower incomes may need. Caring is very valuable work to society and saves the taxpayer a pile.

TigerRag · Yesterday 10:35

doowkrib · Yesterday 10:21

I work in a leadership position in education and work in one of the most deprived areas of the country.

The outdated and often condescending “parenting classes” or courses councils and some schools run for families are usually tone deaf and rude. The parents on OPs “course” will have been bored because it was boring. We run support sessions for families where they share ideas with each other and we ensure empathy, understand and humility. We have a waiting list. Don’t talk at people, work with them.

Without doubt there are individuals and families who game the benefits system. My best friend has debilitating MS but has been refused PIP twice as she’s fiercely independent. I know at least 10 families who happily tell anyone who will listen they fake or exaggerate mental health conditions to get PIP, UC, cars and DLA. I know one single, child free girl who gets £1800 a month by claiming she’s too anxious to go outside. She’s currently in Greece partying and using her second Facebook account to avoid being caught by DWP.

both things can be true - people game benefits but OP clearly doesn’t understand the struggles of those that don’t.

Edited

Report them if you don't believe their claims are genuine

itsgettingweird · Yesterday 10:35

WorthItLongTerm · Yesterday 10:31

Me and dh are on UC as carers and have 3 dc all getting highest rates DLA/PIP. There’s no other way for us to survive and meet their needs.

And what you and DH will be saving the system by doing g the care yourself ffaaaarrrrrr outweighs what it would cost for them to provide the care.

and you’re doing it alone, unsupported I’m sure. Flowers

NoelEdmondsHairGel · Yesterday 10:34

OP you are not allowed to say this on Mumsnet.

There are an awful lot of people on here with children with additional needs who live in fear of their benefits being cut off and come out fighting, even when you are not talking them, but about people who abuse the system or do not look beyond it.

But you are, of course, right. There are thousands and thousands of people for whom claiming benefits is all they know, and all they aspire to. Who have or perhaps when they were younger the potential to do more, but along with their families are in the benefits rut with no real desire to get out or because they have behavioural issues.

We all know people like this. My husband’s uncle and cousins have variously faked whiplash injuries and claimed anxiety/agoraphobia whilst simultaneously doing the odd bit of work (window cleaning) cash in hand. It is rife in their community.

You know more than most about this but you will be shot down regardless because of the levels of defensiveness on here.

It is nonetheless an important issue which needs to be tackled - we simply cannot afford as a country to have a smaller and smaller pool of net contributors funding this lifestyle. Those who shoot these concerns down never have a constructive or sensible solution to the problem - they just want the money to carry on flowing. But where will it come from?

x2boys · Yesterday 10:33

DontBuyAnotherBook · Yesterday 10:20

Whole family will be on UC because it is a joint claim.

It also doesnt meanbno one is working.

itsgettingweird · Yesterday 10:33

BestZebbie · Yesterday 10:15

Ime SEN school tends to mean fairly educated middle class parents because of the lengthy administrative fight required to get there, which can be facilitated by comfort with paperwork and legislation, willingness to challenge professionals, money to speed up the gathering of reports and potential tribunal costs, and the infamous "sharp elbows".

PRU and sitting-in-the-corridor-in-mainstream is slightly more the demographic you describe, as these are the default LA option for a child who is struggling in the classroom and therefore what you end up with if you don't have a very determined parent taking the SEN system on as a part-time office job around doing the actual care.

Family cohorts differ dependent on the “type” of special educational school IME.

MLD schools for moderate learning disability tend to have a higher percentage of poorly educated parents (either through life circumstance or genetic LD) and therefore higher need with regards the support to access community and services.

SLD/PMLD schools for the most severe need tend to have the highest degree of parental variation as many students who attend have severe brain damage from birth injury or random genetic variations and that isnt a genetic factor.

Independent specialist schools tend to have a higher degree of professional and highly educated parents who could afford to get independent reports and better resources to fight the system. Plus a lot of the children are LAC who are placed in more professional families in the first place or living in social care run homes or privately run social care homes.

The problem -IMO - isn’t the system or the benefits. It’s the back of recognition about why the inequities happen and societal change to support that changing.

WorthItLongTerm · Yesterday 10:31

Me and dh are on UC as carers and have 3 dc all getting highest rates DLA/PIP. There’s no other way for us to survive and meet their needs.

Slightyamusedandsilly · Yesterday 10:30

Merryoldgoat · 05/09/2026 23:12

I don’t understand what you’re trying to say. I understand the words individually but you have just strung a variety of observations together based on your experiences.

As a parent of two SEN children, both of whom are in special school, I do not recognise your characterisation of the ‘majority’ of parents.

Me neither. The SEN coffee morning I try to attend (because I'm full time employed) is full of professionals or working women. Attendance is variable because, guess what, like me, many can only occasionally attend due to work!

x2boys · Yesterday 10:26

Itchthescratch · Yesterday 09:28

Comments like this are ridiculous.

If you are working FT in a job you hate and can barely afford to keep a roof over your head then of course you will begrudge people going on multiple holidays year and enjoying a higher standard of life than you all at the cost of the taxpayer. It isn't equitable and it will drive all sorts of perverse behaviours.

Disability and ill health is nowhere near as black and white as you and many others suggest. Many of us are slogging away at work with chronic conditions and poor health. Over three quarters of people over 45-64 have a chronic health condition and lots of these will make working harder. We can't all claim benefits and stop working. Very little help and support is available because guess what, there is no money. Yet someone pointing out that some on benefits shouldn't be on effectively tax payer funded holidays and you get called jealous. It's like the ultimate playground taunt. If you don't like something and think it's wrong then you must be jealous... We need to be able to have nuanced debate without resorting to lazy tropes like calling everyone jealous or benefit bashers.

Peoole have to meet very specific criteris to qualify for PIP
Just because a person has a chronic condtim it doesnt make them automatially eligible.

GreatWideOcean · Yesterday 10:23

ElefantAndCastle · Yesterday 09:29

I would rather that UK paid for these services than forking more or less random out.

It seems to work a lot better in other countries not to have all these paid family members. One benefit would also be useful to hand out. My native country it's a benefit a bot more than minimum wages. Not a open pot of money. At all.
No pip no extra money for being your partner's or mum's carer. No first to council housing. Not all that fuss.

If you would rather the government pays out tens to hundreds of thousands of dollars in services rather than pay a pittance in comparison in carers' allowance, you've got something else going on than economic sensibility. Carers save the taxpayer millions. If they have to give up work to help care instead of leaving it to the state for net loss to the state, it's a bargain at the price.

DontBuyAnotherBook · Yesterday 10:21

MN why are there several threads of blant discrimination against ND/disabled kids and people? Why are you allowing it?

doowkrib · Yesterday 10:21

I work in a leadership position in education and work in one of the most deprived areas of the country.

The outdated and often condescending “parenting classes” or courses councils and some schools run for families are usually tone deaf and rude. The parents on OPs “course” will have been bored because it was boring. We run support sessions for families where they share ideas with each other and we ensure empathy, understand and humility. We have a waiting list. Don’t talk at people, work with them.

Without doubt there are individuals and families who game the benefits system. My best friend has debilitating MS but has been refused PIP twice as she’s fiercely independent. I know at least 10 families who happily tell anyone who will listen they fake or exaggerate mental health conditions to get PIP, UC, cars and DLA. I know one single, child free girl who gets £1800 a month by claiming she’s too anxious to go outside. She’s currently in Greece partying and using her second Facebook account to avoid being caught by DWP.

both things can be true - people game benefits but OP clearly doesn’t understand the struggles of those that don’t.

DontBuyAnotherBook · Yesterday 10:20

Whole family will be on UC because it is a joint claim.

5128gap · Yesterday 10:20

Livelovebehappy · Yesterday 08:56

Yet recent figures suggest that a quarter of a million children live in families where no-one has ever worked. Not an insignificant amount.

Its 1.9%. And don't forget, that's families who've not worked yet. So will include people who will go on to work when their children are older.
To gauge how significant an issue this is, you'd need a long term study that demonstrated life long worklessness and all family member worklessness throughout entire childhood. A three year old with no working adults in their family could well become the 13 year old of working parents.

HouseBee · Yesterday 10:17

randomchap · 05/09/2026 23:09

Not benefit bashing? Really?

So you're not just doing a benefit bashing thread while the mods are asleep

So blatant

Not benefit bashing I think.

Just fully ableist shit from someone who thinks that if you’re chronically ill, disabled, you shouldn’t have children.
One that hasn’t noticed the fact that those children probably ended up as child carer due to the lack of support.

Yay, let blame parents who dare being ill and have a child (never mind if they got ill after the children weee born )

Swipe left for the next trending thread