To think Meghan Markle has every right to worry about her security?

Didn't you know it's all a conspiracy ?

People Magazine? 🤞🏼

You bet

... orders copy...

A years subscription?

Why not. I can keep up to speed with Their Royal Sussexes 👍🏼

Well it will all be from the horses mouth

Those that feel hatred for two people they don't know who don't affect them really need to have a good think about whether they need to take a step back. It's that bizarre and unwarranted.

Yes. That’s the nub of it.

Even if, for some reason you loathe them, it doesn’t exactly affect anyone’s day if they are resident in the UK or the USA.

And if you object that your taxes may be spent on their security why do you only feel upset about that in isolation rather than the fact that:

~The official figure of £86m for the Sovereign Grant excludes massive expenses such as security for the entire family (£150m), local council event costs, and royal travel for all of the royals, and as such is highly misleading and underestimated.

~That Edward and Sophie live in a £30 million pound mansion with 120 rooms for which they pay a peppercorn rent for doing a job arguably no more onerous or complex than your average petrol station operative.

~The Duchies of Lancaster and Cornwall generate over €40 million annually for the King and the Prince of Wales and as they are historically state assets, their profits should go directly to the public treasury.

~Legally, the monarch is exempt from the 40% inheritance tax normally applied to wealthy estates, saving the royal family an estimated £250 million during recent successions.

~And while the King and William now share selective accounts to apparently “show transparency”, and pay some income and capital gains taxes voluntarily, they remain legally exempt from standard taxation on their sovereign estates and duchies under historical laws. In fact neither the monarch, or the Prince of Wales, is legally bound to pay income, capital gains, or inheritance taxes. Paying income tax remains legally voluntary for the monarch, and the lack of independent auditing allows them to obscure their true contributions and savings in this area.

~That continuing to increase public funding for a wealthy hereditary institution represents a misuse of public money, especially when we are renovating Buckingham Palace to the tune of £369 million, and that sum is being funded from the public purse through a temporary, parliament-approved increase—or "uplift"—in the state-funded Sovereign Grant , which temporarily raised the percentage of Crown Estate profits allocated to the royal household from 15% to 25% for the duration of the project. All this while our public health systems crumble.

~And btw the British public were given no choice or control over the decision to renovate a building that no member of the RF actually lives in anymore, and the public purse is renovating BP when our taxes already fund a perfectly good castle at Windsor.

~Not to mention the RF covering up the activities of a family member for many years, (and paying off his accuser to avoid a trial to the tune of €12 million) who was appointed to represent the UK in a trade envoy job, in which role he allegedly made many lucrative side deals for himself, allegedly behaved inappropriately if not criminally towards vulnerable young women, allegedly revealed state financial dealings to unauthorised cronies and allegedly endangered state security by inviting dubious individuals such as a Chinese spy and the convicted Libyan gun runner, Tarek Kaituni, as well as Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell to BP. And that AMW’s public funded security did nothing to prevent that?

Why does all of that not infuriate you at least as much, or even more, than H & M?

Yes. That’s the nub of it.

Even if, for some reason you loathe them, it doesn’t exactly affect anyone’s day if they are resident in the UK or the USA.

And if you object that your taxes may be spent on their security why do you only feel upset about that in isolation rather than the fact that:

~The official figure of £86m for the Sovereign Grant excludes massive expenses such as security for the entire family (£150m), local council event costs, and royal travel for all of the royals, and as such is highly misleading and underestimated.

~That Edward and Sophie live in a £30 million pound mansion with 120 rooms for which they pay a peppercorn rent for doing a job arguably no more onerous or complex than your average petrol station operative.

~The Duchies of Lancaster and Cornwall generate over €40 million annually for the King and the Prince of Wales and as they are historically state assets, their profits should go directly to the public treasury.

~Legally, the monarch is exempt from the 40% inheritance tax normally applied to wealthy estates, saving the royal family an estimated £250 million during recent successions.

~And while the King and William now share selective accounts to apparently “show transparency”, and pay some income and capital gains taxes voluntarily, they remain legally exempt from standard taxation on their sovereign estates and duchies under historical laws. In fact neither the monarch, or the Prince of Wales, is legally bound to pay income, capital gains, or inheritance taxes. Paying income tax remains legally voluntary for the monarch, and the lack of independent auditing allows them to obscure their true contributions and savings in this area.

~That continuing to increase public funding for a wealthy hereditary institution represents a misuse of public money, especially when we are renovating Buckingham Palace to the tune of £369 million, and that sum is being funded from the public purse through a temporary, parliament-approved increase—or "uplift"—in the state-funded Sovereign Grant , which temporarily raised the percentage of Crown Estate profits allocated to the royal household from 15% to 25% for the duration of the project. All this while our public health systems crumble.

~And btw the British public were given no choice or control over the decision to renovate a building that no member of the RF actually lives in anymore, and the public purse is renovating BP when our taxes already fund a perfectly good castle at Windsor.

~Not to mention the RF covering up the activities of a family member for many years, (and paying off his accuser to avoid a trial to the tune of €12 million) who was appointed to represent the UK in a trade envoy job, in which role he allegedly made many lucrative side deals for himself, allegedly behaved inappropriately if not criminally towards vulnerable young women, allegedly revealed state financial dealings to unauthorised cronies and allegedly endangered state security by inviting dubious individuals such as a Chinese spy and the convicted Libyan gun runner, Tarek Kaituni, as well as Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell to BP. And that AMW’s public funded security did nothing to prevent that?

Why does all of that not infuriate you at least as much, or even more, than H & M?

Yes. That’s the nub of it.

Even if, for some reason you loathe them, it doesn’t exactly affect anyone’s day if they are resident in the UK or the USA.

And if you object that your taxes may be spent on their security why do you only feel upset about that in isolation rather than the fact that:

~The official figure of £86m for the Sovereign Grant excludes massive expenses such as security for the entire family (£150m), local council event costs, and royal travel for all of the royals, and as such is highly misleading and underestimated.

~That Edward and Sophie live in a £30 million pound mansion with 120 rooms for which they pay a peppercorn rent for doing a job arguably no more onerous or complex than your average petrol station operative.

~The Duchies of Lancaster and Cornwall generate over €40 million annually for the King and the Prince of Wales and as they are historically state assets, their profits should go directly to the public treasury.

~Legally, the monarch is exempt from the 40% inheritance tax normally applied to wealthy estates, saving the royal family an estimated £250 million during recent successions.

~And while the King and William now share selective accounts to apparently “show transparency”, and pay some income and capital gains taxes voluntarily, they remain legally exempt from standard taxation on their sovereign estates and duchies under historical laws. In fact neither the monarch, or the Prince of Wales, is legally bound to pay income, capital gains, or inheritance taxes. Paying income tax remains legally voluntary for the monarch, and the lack of independent auditing allows them to obscure their true contributions and savings in this area.

~That continuing to increase public funding for a wealthy hereditary institution represents a misuse of public money, especially when we are renovating Buckingham Palace to the tune of £369 million, and that sum is being funded from the public purse through a temporary, parliament-approved increase—or "uplift"—in the state-funded Sovereign Grant , which temporarily raised the percentage of Crown Estate profits allocated to the royal household from 15% to 25% for the duration of the project. All this while our public health systems crumble.

~And btw the British public were given no choice or control over the decision to renovate a building that no member of the RF actually lives in anymore, and the public purse is renovating BP when our taxes already fund a perfectly good castle at Windsor.

~Not to mention the RF covering up the activities of a family member for many years, (and paying off his accuser to avoid a trial to the tune of €12 million) who was appointed to represent the UK in a trade envoy job, in which role he allegedly made many lucrative side deals for himself, allegedly behaved inappropriately if not criminally towards vulnerable young women, allegedly revealed state financial dealings to unauthorised cronies and allegedly endangered state security by inviting dubious individuals such as a Chinese spy and the convicted Libyan gun runner, Tarek Kaituni, as well as Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell to BP. And that AMW’s public funded security did nothing to prevent that?

Why does all of that not infuriate you at least as much, or even more, than H & M?

Absolutely spot on the hypocrisy of these M&H haters is through the roof!

Absolutely spot on the hypocrisy of these M&H haters is through the roof!

Those that feel hatred for two people they don't know who don't affect them really need to have a good think about whether they need to take a step back. It's that bizarre and unwarranted.

Well the HAMS do anything for it do they ? They are grifters.

How do you know people feel "hatred" for them ? Has there been a poll on that ? Has anyone on here actually said they hate them ?

Is this the same type of lazy comment pulled out time and time again along the lines of you don't know them/ why do you care etc?

Just because people criticise them it doesn't mean they " hate " them . That would be like saying people who praise their actions " love" them. It doesn't make logical sense.

People are entitled to their own opinions one way or another but please don't try to insinuate that there is something mentally wrong with people who criticise the Sussexes. Don't come back with a " I didn't say that " either as your insinuations are clear for anyone to see. There is nothing clever about taking a dig at people's mental health because they choose a different path from yourself. When people resort to personal attack they have already lost their point.

@rocklivia Perhaps read the post I was responding to, and address your post to that poster.

"There is real hatred for them here" was what it said.

I wholeheartedly agree. There is a lot of weaponisation of mental health /illnesses being used as an insult towards those who disagree with their opinion. It’s lazy, childish and used by those who either think it’s 2020 when people might have believed these ridiculous statements or by those who have simply run out of road in their arguments so resort to petty insults.

How do you know people feel "hatred" for them ? Has there been a poll on that ? Has anyone on here actually said they hate them ?

Is this the same type of lazy comment pulled out time and time again along the lines of you don't know them/ why do you care etc?

Just because people criticise them it doesn't mean they " hate " them . That would be like saying people who praise their actions " love" them. It doesn't make logical sense.

People are entitled to their own opinions one way or another but please don't try to insinuate that there is something mentally wrong with people who criticise the Sussexes. Don't come back with a " I didn't say that " either as your insinuations are clear for anyone to see. There is nothing clever about taking a dig at people's mental health because they choose a different path from yourself. When people resort to personal attack they have already lost their point.