Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

Part 2: MN misrepresentation in recommendations: a depressing blend of abject amateurism and outright greed

291 replies

Wondermoomin · 05/05/2025 17:36

Welcome to part 2. The quote I’ve added in the title is actually a generic quote about MNHQ not specifically about product recommendations, but it’s very eloquent and quotable.

Here is part one: https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/am_i_being_unreasonable/5326652-mn-have-used-my-quote-to-promote-a-product-ive-never-bought

And here’s a brief summary so far:

  • MN were caught out, allegedly acting in breach of ASA guidelines among other things
  • The thread was temporarily hidden
  • MN then provided a few explanation posts saying that this was a one-off cock-up and sorry that we MNers were confused
  • Then we were told that in 99% of cases, the quotes refer to the specific products being featured; in a tiny minority, they are referring to a generic product category and will make that clearer
  • Several users easily discovered multiple other examples, suggesting that it wasn’t just 1% of cases, or a one-off cock-up
  • MN went on an editing spree of their swears by/recommendations sections (editing about 64 out of 75 things), also suggesting it’s not just 1% or an isolated cock-up
  • The thread largely disappeared from active and trending, suggesting it’s been suppressed
  • MN says it hasn’t been suppressed, threads appear in active based on popularity and how new they are
  • Another MN source shows that they do sometimes remove threads from active to give them a chance to “calm down”

Please feel free to use this thread to capture any other examples you find, to update on anything you hear back from ASA, to provide your own professional or common sense input.

If you don’t agree, it’s probably not the thread for you so please feel free to pass on by! An issue doesn’t have to be the most pressing matter of our times to be important, and I think it’s important that trusted brands don’t mislead consumers.

MN have used my quote to promote a product I’ve never bought 🤔 | Mumsnet

AIBU to expect MN recommendations, where they quote a poster/member, to be genuine? I like being able to rely on recommendations in MN swears by...

https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/am_i_being_unreasonable/5326652-mn-have-used-my-quote-to-promote-a-product-ive-never-bought

OP posts:
Thread gallery
24
MNPopcornMonitor · 05/05/2025 19:07

Interested to join this very Active thread.

Wondermoomin · 05/05/2025 19:05

UpJacksArseAndRoundTheCorner · 05/05/2025 18:59

Well that's quite some thread title!

It’s a quote from another poster on the other thread. It’s actually about MNHQ in general, but that’s the same product category anyway.

OP posts:
Spies · 05/05/2025 19:00

UpJacksArseAndRoundTheCorner · 05/05/2025 18:59

Well that's quite some thread title!

Accurate though.

UpJacksArseAndRoundTheCorner · 05/05/2025 18:59

Well that's quite some thread title!

PolarQueen · 05/05/2025 18:56

Thanks for the new thread.

None of us are stupid, we knew that there would be some financial benefit to MN promoting items in Swears By but I assumed they would see a recommendation by a poster and go to the company and say 'our member(s) liked your ABC and if you give us xyz % we will promote the item in our Swears By email which goes to this number of people.

I think what actually happens is XYZ company have some tat to get rid of, approach MN who search all the threads (going back up to 12 years) find someone who has ever mentioned a gazebo and link it to the item.

AND THEN LIE ABOUT DOING SO!

Trust is a very delicate thing and you, MN, have totally destroyed it for me.

kittensinthekitchen · 05/05/2025 18:49

MathsMagpie · 05/05/2025 17:50

Placemarking for Justine’s return after the bank holiday Wine

I predict Becky Wink

AuntyAgony · 05/05/2025 18:36

Following with interest. Wonder how long it will be Active?

Boiledbeetle · 05/05/2025 18:05

Definitely going into active in real time!

Part 2: MN misrepresentation in recommendations: a depressing blend of abject amateurism and outright greed
Boiledbeetle · 05/05/2025 18:04

🍿

Part 2: MN misrepresentation in recommendations: a depressing blend of abject amateurism and outright greed
Spies · 05/05/2025 17:52

And yep there it is, right at the top...

Part 2: MN misrepresentation in recommendations: a depressing blend of abject amateurism and outright greed
RockyRogue1001 · 05/05/2025 17:51

Pleased to report I found this in active.

I wonder if it will trend 🤔

Spies · 05/05/2025 17:50

Wondermoomin · 05/05/2025 17:48

Gosh and with only 2 posts on it before yours @Spies

Yep funny how that works isn't it. Hmm

I literally saw your previous thread in active once over the whole bank holiday weekend no matter how busy it was or how often I posted on it and yet something tells me if I post this and go back to active it will mysteriously be at the top...

MathsMagpie · 05/05/2025 17:50

Placemarking for Justine’s return after the bank holiday Wine

Wondermoomin · 05/05/2025 17:48

Gosh and with only 2 posts on it before yours @Spies

OP posts:
Spies · 05/05/2025 17:47

I'm sure literally no one on the previous thread will be surprised to learn I found my way to this thread via active threads.... 🤔

Hangingonthewall · 05/05/2025 17:47

Hope this one makes it to trending & active!