Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To think most women on here hate men

739 replies

Tanyahawkes · 07/05/2024 18:45

Sorry for the rant but I’m noticing a pattern on mn, any post involving a man and a disagreement results in multiple calls of he’s a narcissist, he’s abusing, he’s controlling, leave the bastard!

I’ll admit that a list of posts do involve behaviour that is not nice from dh and dp. So many posts also can be interpreted in many ways too, I just feel like a large number of women jump to the worst conclusion first about a strangers partner, having only one side of a story told in a short version.

for anyone misunderstanding me, if a post says the partner is hurting physically, calling names, cheating, putting the op down, then yes I agree, ltb (so long as the post is true) it’s when a post says “great relationship, today partner upset me and we couldn’t see eye to eye” and everyone calls the poor guy a narcissist etc

OP posts:
Thread gallery
12
Tanyahawkes · 09/05/2024 13:24

PamPamPamPam · 09/05/2024 13:19

@Tanyahawkes from my perspective I do not see any value in us calling each other names but respectful debate needs to go further than that as well.

These conversations need to move beyond the personal and we actually need to be able to have a wider discussion. I personally do get very frustrated in conversations like this where posters focus all their arguments on their own personal situations without actually looking beyond themselves.

This is not about how poster X feels about their lovely husband, it is about the fact that we live in a societal structure that does not work for the vast majority of citizens, with women bearing the brunt.

Thankyou for your respectful response, I fully agree it should not get personal, and this is my point in some of my more recent replies, it should never have got personal, it should have been possible to have a grown up discussion. One where nobody was made to feel as though their opinion was invalid, not one person.

yes society still has a very long way to go, changes for the better are too slow

OP posts:
PamPamPamPam · 09/05/2024 13:19

@Tanyahawkes from my perspective I do not see any value in us calling each other names but respectful debate needs to go further than that as well.

These conversations need to move beyond the personal and we actually need to be able to have a wider discussion. I personally do get very frustrated in conversations like this where posters focus all their arguments on their own personal situations without actually looking beyond themselves.

This is not about how poster X feels about their lovely husband, it is about the fact that we live in a societal structure that does not work for the vast majority of citizens, with women bearing the brunt.

Tanyahawkes · 09/05/2024 13:09

PamPamPamPam · 09/05/2024 12:52

@Tanyahawkes you are missing out a lot of nuance.

If someone calls me an idiot in one conversation that is not abusive.

If that same person continuously and systematically keeps calling me stupid then that is abuse. I am yet to come across a thread on MN where a poster creates a post because their male partner has called them ONE name ONCE. You dig a little deeper and it always turns out that there was a pattern of behaviour and then a specific instance has been the straw to break the camel's back.

So yes, out of context there are threads where a poster may say their partner has just called them stupid and they've had enough. And then in subsequent posts it becomes clear that while the name calling is new, the behaviour is not, and it is just a new aspect of the abuse. That is what the posters on this thread are saying and what you do not seem to be understanding.

In the previous example of the poster's husband going off on her when she is pregnant, she clearly says that he has always had anger issues and been moody. So while that may have been the first ever instance where he threatened to divorce her and started yelling at her, it is certainly not the first instance of her having to be aware of, and potentially placate, the anger and moodiness of this man. Perhaps it is the first time that it has been directed at her and it has opened her eyes to how dangerous and abusive that pattern of behaviour actually is? But yes, on the surface of it, you could make the argument that that woman had one argument with her husband and posters are telling her to LTB. Your argument would be wrong.

Again I do see your points. Can anybody answer this for me thought please, if I had called another member of Mumsnet stupid (directly or implied) for their views, what would have been your reaction towards me?

OP posts:
Tanyahawkes · 09/05/2024 13:05

5128gap · 09/05/2024 13:01

You must see the difference between a stranger calling you stupid on a forum on the basis of something you have said that they believe to be unintelligent (which is rude, but simply a case of judgement based on what you've revealed of yourself in your post); and your life partner who knows and is supposed to respect you, doing the same?

Yes of course that is valid that you should expect loved ones to treat you better than strangers. At the same time is it then ok for a stranger to abuse you? And I mean any abuse, no matter how mild or severe, I’m not in any way comparing mild verbal abuse to much worse scenarios? And yes, calling someone stupid is mild verbal abuse

OP posts:
5128gap · 09/05/2024 13:01

Tanyahawkes · 09/05/2024 12:37

What does me saying one person called me stupid have to do with the comment I replied to? These are 2 different things, and quite frankly the fact that if a man calls his partner stupid, or even implies it, he gets called an abuser, yet if a woman does the same to another woman it’s not classified as abusive by these same women, this absolutely astounds me. If a man was to say to a woman half the things that have been said to me by women on this thread, he’s an abuser, gaslighting maybe, yet I’m meant to roll over and take it from women online. Why is this?

You must see the difference between a stranger calling you stupid on a forum on the basis of something you have said that they believe to be unintelligent (which is rude, but simply a case of judgement based on what you've revealed of yourself in your post); and your life partner who knows and is supposed to respect you, doing the same?

PamPamPamPam · 09/05/2024 12:52

@Tanyahawkes you are missing out a lot of nuance.

If someone calls me an idiot in one conversation that is not abusive.

If that same person continuously and systematically keeps calling me stupid then that is abuse. I am yet to come across a thread on MN where a poster creates a post because their male partner has called them ONE name ONCE. You dig a little deeper and it always turns out that there was a pattern of behaviour and then a specific instance has been the straw to break the camel's back.

So yes, out of context there are threads where a poster may say their partner has just called them stupid and they've had enough. And then in subsequent posts it becomes clear that while the name calling is new, the behaviour is not, and it is just a new aspect of the abuse. That is what the posters on this thread are saying and what you do not seem to be understanding.

In the previous example of the poster's husband going off on her when she is pregnant, she clearly says that he has always had anger issues and been moody. So while that may have been the first ever instance where he threatened to divorce her and started yelling at her, it is certainly not the first instance of her having to be aware of, and potentially placate, the anger and moodiness of this man. Perhaps it is the first time that it has been directed at her and it has opened her eyes to how dangerous and abusive that pattern of behaviour actually is? But yes, on the surface of it, you could make the argument that that woman had one argument with her husband and posters are telling her to LTB. Your argument would be wrong.

taleasoldashoney · 09/05/2024 12:50

Tanyahawkes · 09/05/2024 12:47

I didn’t say you have personally said that, but how many would say this was unkind, or a red flag, verbal abuse etc? I do feel like some people on here actually don’t want to see another persons point of view

Then I am confused as to why you are asking me to explain other peoples thinking.

I do feel like some people on here actually don’t want to see another persons point of view

Given when other people have alternative points of view about the threads you posted you referred to that as "being flamed" you might want to look to your own behaviour a little.

Tanyahawkes · 09/05/2024 12:47

taleasoldashoney · 09/05/2024 12:43

If a man was to say to a woman half the things that have been said to me by women on this thread, he’s an abuser, gaslighting maybe, yet I’m meant to roll over and take it from women online. Why is this?

Where have I said this?

I didn’t say you have personally said that, but how many would say this was unkind, or a red flag, verbal abuse etc? I do feel like some people on here actually don’t want to see another persons point of view

OP posts:
taleasoldashoney · 09/05/2024 12:43

Tanyahawkes · 09/05/2024 12:37

What does me saying one person called me stupid have to do with the comment I replied to? These are 2 different things, and quite frankly the fact that if a man calls his partner stupid, or even implies it, he gets called an abuser, yet if a woman does the same to another woman it’s not classified as abusive by these same women, this absolutely astounds me. If a man was to say to a woman half the things that have been said to me by women on this thread, he’s an abuser, gaslighting maybe, yet I’m meant to roll over and take it from women online. Why is this?

If a man was to say to a woman half the things that have been said to me by women on this thread, he’s an abuser, gaslighting maybe, yet I’m meant to roll over and take it from women online. Why is this?

Where have I said this?

Tanyahawkes · 09/05/2024 12:37

taleasoldashoney · 09/05/2024 12:25

Can you please explain them why you called a poster "practically abusive" just for implying you were stupid then?

You seem to have a very low bar for posters, mostly women on here, and where you accuse them of being abusive, and when you deem it reasonable for posters to think a man might be abusive.

People having a different opinion to you are not necessarily flaming you. You have quite a victim mentality which is interesting to see over the course of the thread.

What does me saying one person called me stupid have to do with the comment I replied to? These are 2 different things, and quite frankly the fact that if a man calls his partner stupid, or even implies it, he gets called an abuser, yet if a woman does the same to another woman it’s not classified as abusive by these same women, this absolutely astounds me. If a man was to say to a woman half the things that have been said to me by women on this thread, he’s an abuser, gaslighting maybe, yet I’m meant to roll over and take it from women online. Why is this?

OP posts:
taleasoldashoney · 09/05/2024 12:25

Tanyahawkes · 09/05/2024 12:13

I fully accept that the way this is told by the op is a bad reaction on his part all round, he may well be like this all the time. I’m also aware and of the opinion that the person who posted may have been upset and maybe recounted it in a way where some small details are not there, to say someone has a temper in not an outright “they are an abuser” I know people who are quick to temper who are not abusers. In every situation there are 3 sides, his, hers and the truth for example, and by this I don’t mean anyone outright lies (some do) but sometimes emotions may make people tell their version in a way that is not 100% the way it happened. Sometimes! And this is not the case all of the time, I’m not talking about if someone does something that is 100% abuse, hitting, rape, sexual assault and a lot more situations are black and white wrong and abuse

no doubt I’ll get flamed for this again though

Can you please explain them why you called a poster "practically abusive" just for implying you were stupid then?

You seem to have a very low bar for posters, mostly women on here, and where you accuse them of being abusive, and when you deem it reasonable for posters to think a man might be abusive.

People having a different opinion to you are not necessarily flaming you. You have quite a victim mentality which is interesting to see over the course of the thread.

Tanyahawkes · 09/05/2024 12:13

Maray1967 · 09/05/2024 11:53

I’d be done with a man who behaved like that. Truly awful.

My DH upset me once when I was pregnant / silly argument over directions when driving. I was upset - he was falling over himself to apologise. I would have accepted nothing less. In the thread you’ve linked, he compounded his initial carrying on by doubling down on the blame. What is wrong with telling someone that that marriage is not good? It isn’t.

I fully accept that the way this is told by the op is a bad reaction on his part all round, he may well be like this all the time. I’m also aware and of the opinion that the person who posted may have been upset and maybe recounted it in a way where some small details are not there, to say someone has a temper in not an outright “they are an abuser” I know people who are quick to temper who are not abusers. In every situation there are 3 sides, his, hers and the truth for example, and by this I don’t mean anyone outright lies (some do) but sometimes emotions may make people tell their version in a way that is not 100% the way it happened. Sometimes! And this is not the case all of the time, I’m not talking about if someone does something that is 100% abuse, hitting, rape, sexual assault and a lot more situations are black and white wrong and abuse

no doubt I’ll get flamed for this again though

OP posts:
Abhannmor · 09/05/2024 11:59

StormingNorman · 07/05/2024 18:50

I know exactly what you mean. My DH moaned at me for not emptying to hoover the other day and I had a giggle about what MN would have had to say 🤣😂🤣

Spoiler: I never empty it as it’s gross.

It is super grody isn't it? 😂 leave him !

Maray1967 · 09/05/2024 11:53

Tanyahawkes · 07/05/2024 19:11

I’d be done with a man who behaved like that. Truly awful.

My DH upset me once when I was pregnant / silly argument over directions when driving. I was upset - he was falling over himself to apologise. I would have accepted nothing less. In the thread you’ve linked, he compounded his initial carrying on by doubling down on the blame. What is wrong with telling someone that that marriage is not good? It isn’t.

5128gap · 09/05/2024 11:38

Thanks for that @taleasoldashoney
I hope all those setting up false comparisons between on line misogyny and the so called 'misandry' on MN take note and feel suitably embarrassed by their own ignorance and hyperbole. And perhaps even be inspired to direct their policing of online sexism to the place where its most urgently needed.

taleasoldashoney · 09/05/2024 11:26

This is men talking about infertile women online

Now I'm pretty sure as an infertile women I haven't said anything like this about men on here

To think most women on here hate men
To think most women on here hate men
To think most women on here hate men
To think most women on here hate men
To think most women on here hate men
5128gap · 09/05/2024 11:00

vivainsomnia · 09/05/2024 10:25

For those who agree that the criticizing if men as a whole on MN is fully justified, how do you feel about men's threads on other forums criticizing women as a whole?

Or is it a case of it's ok for women to do because they are justified in doing so but men are definitely not and when they do, it's misogyny?

If there are men out there who genuinely believe that they are at risk from women - of abuse, sexual harassment, murder, are perhaps scared to walk the streets because of female violence against men, or suffering trauma from violence from women in the home, perhaps over multiple separate relationships, then if they are able to find other men online who have experienced similar for mutual support, then good for them. Similarly if men want to chat together about every day annoyances with their female partners, that's their business. You certainly wouldn't find me imposing myself into their conversations bleating that not all women were like that, that I was a nice woman and they were upsetting me. I'd simply avoid a conversation that wasn't aimed at me.
Thing is though, the forums where men do 'criticise' women dont tend to be my missus never empties the bin type chats with advice to leave her. They are typically a great deal more sinister and threatening than that.

drusth · 09/05/2024 10:56

vivainsomnia · 09/05/2024 10:25

For those who agree that the criticizing if men as a whole on MN is fully justified, how do you feel about men's threads on other forums criticizing women as a whole?

Or is it a case of it's ok for women to do because they are justified in doing so but men are definitely not and when they do, it's misogyny?

Have you seen the way men talk about women on male forums?

It's vile.

Wannabegreenfingers · 09/05/2024 10:55

I don't hate men. I'm just generally disappointed in most of them. My ex-husband wasn't a good one, and every male I've met since has let me down one way or another.

I give everyone a fair chance, and have some wonderful male friends, but potential life partners always leave me feeling, meh!

MarioIa · 09/05/2024 10:48

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

PamPamPamPam · 09/05/2024 10:39

AbFabDaaaaahling · 09/05/2024 10:29

@PamPamPamPam Guessing you're not married to a man/in a relationship with one? Genuine question...do you really hate all men? Are you fearful of all men?

Have I said I hate or fear men?

And my personal relationship with men is neither here nor there. The points that I make relate to wider society as a whole because I have the ability to move beyond incessant navel gazing and understand that my personal experiences are not necessarily representative of a global system.

AbFabDaaaaahling · 09/05/2024 10:29

@PamPamPamPam Guessing you're not married to a man/in a relationship with one? Genuine question...do you really hate all men? Are you fearful of all men?

vivainsomnia · 09/05/2024 10:25

For those who agree that the criticizing if men as a whole on MN is fully justified, how do you feel about men's threads on other forums criticizing women as a whole?

Or is it a case of it's ok for women to do because they are justified in doing so but men are definitely not and when they do, it's misogyny?

DistinguishedSocialCommentator · 09/05/2024 09:24

PieFaces · 09/05/2024 08:32

I don’t hate men, I’m surrounded by the nicest men you could wish. However I do know that not all men are like this.

Thank you Einstein

You can apply the same rule of thumb to men.

No, I'm not Einstein, fact
😀

5128gap · 09/05/2024 09:22

WhatsTheProblemSarah · 09/05/2024 07:46

I'm not surprised at this. There was a thread on here ages ago with some really interesting studies linked. Basically, men work together much better than women, and a woman/man combo will collaborate better than two women.

Another Harvard study found that women are reluctant to help other women if they're more senior to them at work. A lot of posters were replying saying that they'd been bullied by other women. I believe it's also been found that men are more sympathetic in accommodating working mothers whilst women in senior roles have more of an expectation that other women 'make the same sacrifices I had to'.

I'm very surprised at this. I work in a women dominated sector in an organisation led by women and its extremely supportive and collaborative.
I'm not going to make sweeping generalisations based on my personal experience as that would be about as compelling as making vague unsubstantiated reference to 'research', a thread on MN or what 'I believe'. However in the interests of balance, I will say that I've personally noted that work teaming that involves men often 'works' because a hierarchy is established with one man assuming a leadership 'alpha' role over less assertive men, after much time wasting and jockeying for position.
When the team is mixed sex i have noticed the men typically assume seniority over the women. This may end up being functional after a fashion, but is actually the opposite of collaboration and results in the quieter more reflective voices going unheard.
Having managed staff of both sexes for over 25 years, I should also add, I have dealt with one case of woman on woman bullying, three cases of man on woman sexual harassment, and a man on man physical assault.