Help protect children from gaming harms.

Take our survey

Please or to access all these features

Chat

Join the discussion and chat with other Mumsnetters about everyday life, relationships and parenting.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Thread gallery
45
Justsaynonow · Today 03:03

AcrossthePond55 · Yesterday 01:11

@Justsaynonow

Good morning from one of the nasties, who's currently suffering from poor air quality from US forest fire smoke. Not that we don't have enough of our own fires, and I am in awe of the bravery & skill of firefighters from both sides of the border, but he just threatened us again recently because of the impact of our fires on the US.

Yeah well you know, USA smoke is much biglyer and more powerful than your Canadian smoke. You're lucky we aren't charging you for it. And BTW your smoke is crossing our border illegally! We're going to have to send ICE to stop it. Oh, and we're going to put a tariff on your smoke too!
<takes tongue out of cheek>

Yes, God bless the firefighters and the also the 'behind the scenes' crews that support them.

Thanks. You're right, yours is biglier 😂 We come here every year and basically can't leave the motel room without a mask since I arrived yesterday. The air quality is ranging from very unhealthy to hazardous. It is awful. There's ash falling. Puts a full stop to sitting/swimming at the beach but we're making the best of it with marathon thrifting & daylong canning, haha.

JadeHare · Yesterday 23:27

Made me laugh

The Reaper Should Have Gone To SpecSavers - Trump Thread #168
Evenstar · Yesterday 18:44

Even Photoshop groups on Facebook are getting in on the Mitch McConnell story 😂

The Reaper Should Have Gone To SpecSavers - Trump Thread #168

Interested in this thread?

Then you might like threads about this subject:

logicisall · Yesterday 18:39

I had to look up 'mustelid'. Perfect word. I'm hoping some of those scent glands are intact.😈

REP22 · Yesterday 17:53

logicisall · Yesterday 17:34

Don't be silly Rep, you're whistling in the dark; way too much sense for this WH Regime.
Or the alternative reason being that Trump enjoys making the taxpayer pay for jollies meetings at his properties. Money to him is more important than effective and cheaper national security options.

Oh yes - silly me. I promise not to whistle in the dark around Trump. It may summon bats, for whom the latest trained mustelid atop his head would be a tasty prize.

logicisall · Yesterday 17:34

REP22 · Yesterday 16:46

If "National Security" is such an essential when hosting in relation to the big-balls-up-room, why does so much of the current hosting go on at his golf courses? Any caddy with an agenda could conceal a sabre alongside the nine-irons, surely?

Don't be silly Rep, you're whistling in the dark; way too much sense for this WH Regime.
Or the alternative reason being that Trump enjoys making the taxpayer pay for jollies meetings at his properties. Money to him is more important than effective and cheaper national security options.

placemats · Yesterday 16:47

Oh yes chippy tea. Food of the Goddesses.

REP22 · Yesterday 16:46

RedTagAlan · Yesterday 16:29

Ballroom blocked again. This time a Fed appeals court.

His lawyers say, "National Security". The Preservation group Lawyer says " They just don't want to go to Congress".

Always the same theme.

If "National Security" is such an essential when hosting in relation to the big-balls-up-room, why does so much of the current hosting go on at his golf courses? Any caddy with an agenda could conceal a sabre alongside the nine-irons, surely?

SerendipityJane · Yesterday 16:34

And despite months of breathless "breaking news" from all the YT legal experts, Blanche is AG.

Not sure what to spend my winnings on yet. Friday chippy ?

RedTagAlan · Yesterday 16:29

Ballroom blocked again. This time a Fed appeals court.

His lawyers say, "National Security". The Preservation group Lawyer says " They just don't want to go to Congress".

Always the same theme.

RedTagAlan · Yesterday 16:06

SerendipityJane · Yesterday 15:59

The birthright citizenship is all a front for the real issue, which is that what the president says is law. And was always meant to be. And that rather than preventing that, the entire raison d'etre of the constitution is to support that theory.

It's not Trumps fault that everyone these past 250 hasn't understood that.

I don't understand what you mean sorry, so I am in your "everyone" group.

I thought the issue with Trump is that he is demonstrating that the famed checks and balances are not enough. Because they were not expecting a wannabe King as dishonest and corrupt as him.

SerendipityJane · Yesterday 15:59

RedTagAlan · Yesterday 15:51

It all confuses me. If he want's to end birthright citizenship it should be easy. Just change the constitution. Amend the amendment.

They managed an amendment in 1992. Ah wait, that took 200 years to do apparently. James Maddison introduced it in 1789.

Longer than 2 weeks then.

The birthright citizenship is all a front for the real issue, which is that what the president says is law. And was always meant to be. And that rather than preventing that, the entire raison d'etre of the constitution is to support that theory.

It's not Trumps fault that everyone these past 250 hasn't understood that.

RedTagAlan · Yesterday 15:51

SerendipityJane · Yesterday 15:39

So who will save the US then ? Not SCOTUS. Not Congress. Not the states.

Henry ? The Mild mannered janitor ?

It all confuses me. If he want's to end birthright citizenship it should be easy. Just change the constitution. Amend the amendment.

They managed an amendment in 1992. Ah wait, that took 200 years to do apparently. James Maddison introduced it in 1789.

Longer than 2 weeks then.

SerendipityJane · Yesterday 15:39

AcrossthePond55 · Yesterday 14:56

He's now signed an EO that 1-children of 'enemy aliens', 2-children born to people 'connected to a foreign govt', and 3-those whose parents committed fraud will not automatically be citizens.

Re 1- Gee, wonder who will make the determination that a person is an 'enemy alien'. Obvs that will include anyone who is brown and here illegally in the Scrotus Gang's minds.

Re 2-Children of those with diplomatic immunity are already an exception. The EO would open a broad category which I would assume would include the children of any individual who simply works for a foreign govt, and not just those in 'high places'.

Re 3- I suppose is aimed at 'birth tourism' as if someone falsifies a visa application to give birth here that's considered 'fraud', but the child still had citizenship.

It'll end up with SCOTUS. I didn't read the decision but I'm wondering if these 3 categories were mentioned as 'possible' exceptions. Alito and Thomas are rather fond of 'musing on the possibilities' if they dissent from a majority opinion. Scrotus, or most likely Nosferatu Miller, didn't pick those 3 things out of thin air.

So who will save the US then ? Not SCOTUS. Not Congress. Not the states.

Henry ? The Mild mannered janitor ?

RedTagAlan · Yesterday 15:24

He done 2 EOs on it. First one:

Ending Birth Tourism – The White House

Second one :

Continuing to Protect the Meaning and Value of American Citizenship – The White House

This bit here is the headline I think.

"(a) either parent of that person is an alien enemy, defined to include any member of a designated Foreign Terrorist Organization under 8 U.S.C. 1189 or Specially Designated Global Terrorist, consistent with the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, 50 U.S.C. 1701 et seq., and Executive Order 13224 of September 23, 2001 (Blocking Property and Prohibiting Transactions With Persons Who Commit, Threaten to Commit, or Support Terrorism), as amended;"

This bit here, "under 8 U.S.C. 1189" checking... and ....

"8 U.S. Code § 1189 - Designation of foreign terrorist organizations
U.S. Code

(a)Designation
(1)In generalThe Secretary is authorized to designate an organization as a foreign terrorist organization in accordance with this subsection if the Secretary finds that—"

So that is Rubio then. If he designates Denmark as a terror org, could be interesting. Congress not required ?

And this bit of the second EO overlaps with the first : "(c) either parent of that person engaged in a commercial transaction to purchase or access birthright citizenship for the person, or engaged in fraudulent activity to obtain citizenship, to include:"

I have no skin in this. But the US constitution is totally clear on 2 things so far as I can see. Birthright citizenship, AND.... how to change the Constitution.

This bit is worth a look:

"(d) the person is born in a territory or territorial waters of the United States where citizenship is not conferred by Federal statute."

Just checked to see if Puerto Rico is ok, and yes ok. Since 1941.

But American Samoa are in the shit. There is no federal statute I can see for them. So I expect they have filed papers already.

Ending Birth Tourism

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, it is hereby ordered: Section 1.  Purpose.  Every child deserves a safe and nurturing home where they can learn, grow, and reach their full pot...

https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2026/08/ending-birth-tourism/

AcrossthePond55 · Yesterday 14:56

SerendipityJane · Yesterday 09:15

I see Trump has decided that SCOTUS are wrong and he gets to end birthright citizenship anyway.

He's now signed an EO that 1-children of 'enemy aliens', 2-children born to people 'connected to a foreign govt', and 3-those whose parents committed fraud will not automatically be citizens.

Re 1- Gee, wonder who will make the determination that a person is an 'enemy alien'. Obvs that will include anyone who is brown and here illegally in the Scrotus Gang's minds.

Re 2-Children of those with diplomatic immunity are already an exception. The EO would open a broad category which I would assume would include the children of any individual who simply works for a foreign govt, and not just those in 'high places'.

Re 3- I suppose is aimed at 'birth tourism' as if someone falsifies a visa application to give birth here that's considered 'fraud', but the child still had citizenship.

It'll end up with SCOTUS. I didn't read the decision but I'm wondering if these 3 categories were mentioned as 'possible' exceptions. Alito and Thomas are rather fond of 'musing on the possibilities' if they dissent from a majority opinion. Scrotus, or most likely Nosferatu Miller, didn't pick those 3 things out of thin air.

MsJinks · Yesterday 11:41

WhereDoesThisToiletGo · Yesterday 09:23

Why is Trump wearing his late wife's hair?

Haha - it’s so obviously a hairpiece - but using real hair is the ideal type for this, he’s so cheap he probably thought re-use the way to go!

A family member chose to have one due to alopecia- it looks so much better than this just from local trichologist!

logicisall · Yesterday 09:54

https://www.facebook.com/share/v/1EVRtaae8e/

AI, but the lyrics!

WhereDoesThisToiletGo · Yesterday 09:23

Why is Trump wearing his late wife's hair?

Spandauer · Yesterday 09:15

Another bigly thanks @WhereDoesThisToiletGo for the Buzzfeed link.

The comments are just perfect.
Particularly liked "Has anyone seen Jimothy?" 😂

OP posts:
SerendipityJane · Yesterday 09:15

I see Trump has decided that SCOTUS are wrong and he gets to end birthright citizenship anyway.

Jaichangecentfoisdenom · Yesterday 07:53

That’s hilarious, thank you for a great laugh this morning, @WhereDoesThisToiletGo Grin I am v glad to have learned something new, before this I knew not of the existence of Jimothy.

logicisall · Yesterday 06:23

OMG, "It's not elf on a shelf but wig on a pig" will have me smiling ALL day.😂