I was interested to read this report from the Charity Commission.
Basically they tested five schools to decide whether they were charitable or not. Fees ranged from £6k to £15k per year.
The definition of charitable is a new one, since 2008. It is here.
The key criterion is
"F3 Principle 2b Where benefit is to a section of the public, the opportunity to benefit must not be unreasonably restricted"
in particular
"F10. Restrictions based on ability to pay any fees charged
Charities can charge for the services or facilities they provide. They can also charge fees that more than cover the cost of those services or facilities, provided that the charges are reasonable and necessary in order to carry out the charity?s aims, for example in maintaining or developing the service being provided. However, where, in practice, the charging restricts the benefits to only those who can afford to pay the fees charged, this may result in the benefits not being available to a sufficient section of the public.
...
The fact that the charitable facilities or services will be charged for, and will be provided mainly to people who can afford to pay the charges, does not necessarily mean that the organisation does not have aims that are for the public benefit; however,
an organisation that excluded people from the opportunity to benefit because of their inability to pay any fees charged would not have aims that are for the public benefit.
Therefore, where charities do charge fees, people who are unable to pay those fees must, nevertheless, be able to benefit in some material way related to the charity?s aims. This does not mean that charities have to offer services for free. Nor does it mean that people who are unable to pay the fees must actually benefit, in the sense that they choose to take up the benefit. They must not be excluded from the opportunity to benefit, whether or not they actually do so."
Basically they have determined that poor people must benefit in some way from private schools in order to have charitable status.
Of the five schools assessed, means-tested bursaries were advertised at four. The percentage of fee income going towards bursaries was: 14%, 10%, 5%,
Please or to access all these features
Please
or
to access all these features
Join the discussion on our Education forum.
Education
Private schools - should they scrap their bursaries?
119 replies
SomeGuy · 04/10/2009 04:02
OP posts:
Don’t want to miss threads like this?
Weekly
Sign up to our weekly round up and get all the best threads sent straight to your inbox!
Log in to update your newsletter preferences.
You've subscribed!
Please create an account
To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.