Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Work

Chat with other users about all things related to working life on our Work forum.

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

MNHQ here: post your pregnancy & maternity work questions here for FREE legal advice from Maternity Action

37 replies

RowanMumsnet · 09/09/2021 17:05

Hello

LATEST CLINIC (15th-19th November) HERE.

A big autumn-style welcome back to our regular FREE legal clinics with a brilliant team of volunteer specialist employment solicitors and barristers, organised by Maternity Action.

Are you confused about your rights during maternity leave? Have you come back to find you're in a completely different role? Has your employer told you it's not possible to take parental leave? Are you a dad who's struggling to get your employer to understand Shared Parental Leave? Do you think you are being treated differently since becoming a parent? We've got you.

See below for the details - but if you have a worry, concern or question about anything to do with work and pregnancy, maternity, paternity, adoption or parental leave, then please put it here and hopefully the wonderful barristers and solicitors will be able to help you find a way through.

You can also take a look here to see some common questions and answers from previous clinics.

Free online advice clinic – 13 - 17 September 2021
Mumsnet and Maternity Action are teaming up to provide an online legal clinic, offering free advice on pregnancy, maternity and parental rights at work from volunteer employment solicitors and barristers who are members of the Employment Law Association.
Maternity Action reports huge demand for its advice line, especially topics such as redundancy during maternity leave, return to work and maternity pay, and on Mumsnet's Talk forums, the topic of employment rights is a hardy perennial.

The clinic will respond to this demand in a hopefully innovative way, providing free, accurate, public advice online and raising awareness of parents' rights at work. It will also enable Maternity Action and Mumsnet to identify trends and produce permanent content to address areas in which employers and workers could benefit from clear, upfront guidance.

The clinic will take the form of a 'Q&A' session on Mumsnet, with members of the public posting questions about your questions on pregnancy, maternity and parental rights at work and benefits on a dedicated public discussion thread. Specialist solicitors and barristers will take necessary additional detail via private messaging before posting up answers and advice.

The clinic will run for a week from Monday 13th to Friday 17th September. We will do our best to provide all answers during the week but, at the latest, by the Tuesday of the following week. You can find information on where to go for more help once the clinic has ended here.

What to do if you’d like to post a question

  1. If you have a question about your rights at work during pregnancy, maternity or parental leave please post it online during the week of the clinic. Please give as much information as possible but remember that this is an online forum and can be viewed by the public – including your colleagues and employer. Please don’t name your employer publicly if you are likely to be taking action against them in future. You can use the private message facility to disclose any information you would prefer to keep off the public forums.

  2. Please send your name and the name of your employer by private message to MaternityActionfreeadvice so that it can be passed on to the volunteers to do a conflict of interest check. We cannot post a reply until you have sent this information by private message.

  3. Once your advice has been posted online, you will have an opportunity to provide feedback. This helps us to find out whether you found the advice helpful, whether it helped you to resolve your situation at work and some information about you. All survey responses are anonymous and confidential. Providing feedback will help us to see what improvements can be made in developing this type of online free legal advice clinic. You can fill out the survey here.

Ts and Cs – please read

The advice provided to an individual poster is based only on the information provided by that poster. Advice on this thread is also particular to the individual who has asked for it and is likely to be specific to that person’s situation. A poster may have provided further relevant information by private message which will not appear on this thread. So please take care if you choose to apply that advice to your own situation - it is recommended that you first take legal advice from one of the sources we have suggested here.

Mumsnet, Maternity Action and Maternity Action's volunteers accept no liability for any loss suffered as a result of an individual choosing to follow advice provided to another poster's question on the thread.
The lawyers, all of whom are specialists in employment law, will be working as volunteers for Maternity Action in respect of the clinic. Any personal information collected as a result of the clinic will be held by Maternity Action and will be deleted after 18 months. If you wish to make a complaint about the service you received, you can use Maternity Action’s complaints policy here.

OP posts:
JasonMomoasgirlfriend · 16/09/2021 14:59

@MaternityActionfreeadvice hi there again. Just in the back of panda8383's question....my work have a policy where if you are off sick more than 3 times in a 52 week rolling period then this automatically triggers a capability meeting.

I have had 4 instances of sicknesa on the last 52 weeks but the last one was 2 weeks off just a week ago because of pregnancy related fatigue.
So would it be classed as a sickness instance that could trigger a capability meeting or should that be ignored because it's pregnancy related?

RowanMumsnet · 16/09/2021 15:21

Hello all

If you haven't received a reply to your query yet, it might be because you haven't sent a private message to @MaternityActionfreeadvice giving your name and the name of your employer. If this is you and you'd still like a reply, please send the PM before Friday lunchtime and the lawyers will take a look. Final answers will be posted up early next week.

This info is only to rule out conflicts of interest on the lawyers' part and will not be shared with anyone except the legal volunteers.

Thanks
MNHQ

OP posts:
theconfused · 16/09/2021 18:49

@RowanMumsnet

Hi,

I've replied to your PM!

Nojobforoldmums · 16/09/2021 23:03

I was given notice of redundancy ahead of my maternity leave commencing. My maternity leave was taken notice period. My notice period has been suspended for maternity leave and resumes on my return. Like others made redundant I was told I would have opportunity to apply for internal roles during my notice period.

I have been offered a short term assignment, which covers my remaining notice period plus one additional month. However if I take this it is not realistic that I will get to take my accrued leave (I would need to take about 6-7 weeks off out of a 3 month contract). If I want to take my accrued leave it will be over my gardening leave/notice period, removing my opportunity to look for roles. Is this acceptable?

I have been told, as someone who was given notice of redundancy ahead of maternity leave, I was not entitled to any priority placement in suitable roles. Is this correct?

Many thanks

MaternityActionfreeadvice · 17/09/2021 09:48

@DazzlePaintedBattlePants

My work no longer has a maternity and pregnancy policy - instead it’s got a new and expectant persons policy. It’s particularly important because it covers health and safety around lab work, and because it is no longer specifying expectant mothers, we can’t keep proper records as expectant fathers also count. It makes no mention of the protected class.

I’ve repeatedly emailed both Occupational Health, HR and the Equalities team about this and no one has replied to my emails. Is the policy fit for purpose?

Dear DazzlePaintedBattlePants

Thank you for your query. It is disappointing to hear that you have not had any response from your HR and the Equalities Team. An employer does not have to have policies in place although, if they do, they should obviously make sure they are as comprehensive as possible and legally accurate. You should also bear in mind that a policy does not remove your statutory rights and you can still rely on the legal minimum provided by law.

A policy can improve on the legal minimum but cannot take away your legal rights. As such, once you notify your employer of your pregnancy in writing, you are entitled to a risk assessment and for it to be kept under review throughout your pregnancy. This must specifically address any pregnancy-related risks arising from any processes or working conditions, including physical, chemical and biological agents and your employer must look at your individual role and any health conditions. There is further information on the Health and Safety Executive (HSE) website for employers here: www.hse.gov.uk/mothers/

Your employer has a legal obligation to make reasonable adjustments to remove any risks by altering your working conditions or hours of work and, if that would not remove the risks, you would be entitled to suitable alternative work or (if none was available) to be suspended on full pay. If you have evidence of risks from the work you are doing and your employer does not take action to assess and remove them you may have a claim for pregnancy discrimination and any loss of wages. If you are concerned about risks during pregnancy, I would suggest seeking further advice and getting evidence of any risks that are not being addressed from a number of sources including occupational health, HSE (as above) and from your midwife/GP.

MaternityActionfreeadvice · 17/09/2021 11:46

@ahanna91

Hi,

Hoping to get some advice on returning to work after maternity leave - I was due to return to work in April 2021 after taking a years maternity leave.
I emailed my place of work in January to ask whether I would be able to return on a part time basis after having my child, preferably 2 days of work. They responded the following day stating I could only return full time. I then got in touch with maternity advice who told me I should ask for more flexibility etc. I did this to then be told they could offer me a Tuesday/Thursday & 1 Saturday morning a month once they resume after Covid restrictions were lifted (I worked 1 sat a month before going on maternity leave). I then asked for the PM to send me over a new contract with everything in, hours, pay, holidays etc due to me going from full time to part time. I was then emailed a contract not fully filled out & told that they were back to deciding on what days they needed me due to business needs but 16 hours still remained. I replied saying I understand but would need to know days for childcare. I was then told Weds/Fri & every Saturday. I explained the week days were ideal but every Saturday was not with having a young family so there would be any flexibility? As the contract I had been sent did state 1 Saturday a month. They said no I would be required to work every Saturday. I felt I had no option but to hand my notice in.
I have now found out after taking my son to an appointment today that none of the staff are even working Saturdays at present. Is there any further action I can take as I feel like I was pushed out?

Thanks.

Dear ahanna91

Thank you for your email. I am sorry to hear about the way you have been treated.

Depending on when you resigned (as there are strict time limits for bringing employment claims), I believe there is further action you can take against your former employer.

Based on the information provided, you could potentially have a claim for indirect sex discrimination against your former employer and a claim for constructive unfair dismissal.

Indirect sex discrimination

Indirect sex discrimination arises where an employer has a rule, policy or practice which it applies to everyone but which puts employees of one sex at a particular disadvantage in comparison to the other. The employer will be vulnerable to an indirect sex discrimination claim in this situation unless it can objectively justify the rule, policy or practice which is having this discriminatory effect.

An example of indirect sex discrimination is an employer refusing a female employee’s request to work part time because they say that the job can only be done full time. The requirement that the job must be done full time is likely to disadvantage women as a group, since women generally bear a greater part of domestic and childcare responsibilities than men and are more likely to need to work part time (often referred to as the “child care disparity”). Unless the employer can demonstrate that it has legitimate business reasons for needing a full-time worker to do the job, it is likely that the employee will have a claim for indirect sex discrimination against the employer.

From the information you have given, it appears that there is a good argument to say that your former employer has indirectly discriminated against you by refusing your request to work one Saturday a week and, instead, insisting that you work every Saturday. The requirement to work every Saturday is likely to disadvantage more women than men because of the child-care disparity and therefore, is potentially discriminatory. The next question is whether your former employer had a reasonable business reason (an objective justification) for its decision. Given none of your former colleagues are working Saturdays at present, it sounds like your former employer will struggle to argue that it had a legitimate business reason for requiring you to work every Saturday. It is possible that your former employer will say that, at the time you resigned, they were really busy and needed someone to work every Saturday but business has since quietened down – however that seems an unlikely scenario given the nature of the business you worked for and the fact that other staff worked Saturdays. There is also the fact that they didn’t consult with you about their decision but instead presented it to you as a fait accompli which points towards the unreasonableness of their decision.

Constructive dismissal claim

In addition to a claim for discrimination, you may have a claim for constructive unfair dismissal if you were continuously employed by your employer for more than 2 years (a claim for unfair dismissal can only be brought if you have 2 years continuous service).

Constructive dismissal is the term used where an employee resigns in response to their employer’s conduct in breach of an important term of their employment contract. This can be a breach of an express or an implied term.

An example of breach of an express term would be where the employer fundamentally changes an employee’s duties without being contractually entitled to do so. Implied terms are incorporated into every employment contract by law, regardless of whether they have been expressly agreed between the parties. Breach of the implied term of mutual trust and confidence is often relied on by employees where the relationship between them and their employer has irrevocably broken down.

Where an employer has breached an important express or implied term of the employment contract, an employee is entitled to treat him or herself as having been “dismissed”. The employer’s conduct is often referred to as “a repudiatory breach”.

For a constructive dismissal claim to succeed, the employee needs to show that:

-Their employer was in repudiatory breach of the employment contract;
-They resigned in response to that breach; and
-They did not delay too long before resigning in response to their employer’s breach.

In your case, I consider that you could potentially rely upon the breach of the implied term of trust and confidence because of the manner in which your employer treated your request for flexible working, their disingenuous behaviour (including refusing your request outright until challenged and then changing their minds, without explanation, about the days they could give you) and their insistence (again without any apparent justification) that you had to work every Saturday despite previously telling you that you only had to work one Saturday.

In addition to showing that your employer fundamentally breached its contract, you also need to show that you resigned in response to your employer’s breach and that you did not delay too long before resigning. It is not clear from your email when you resigned but if you resigned promptly after being told you had to work every Saturday (and you didn’t return to work under the new terms offered) then you should be able to show you did not delay.

Constructive unfair dismissal cases, however, are very “fact” sensitive” and it is only possible to give you an indication of your potential claims based on the information provided. Therefore, I recommend that if you decide to pursue any potential claim against your former employer, you seek further legal advice and do so as soon as possible because of the time limits you are under (see below).

Flexible working request

I am not clear from your email whether you made a statutory request for flexible working. If you did then you could have a further potential claim against your former employer because there is a procedure that employers must follow where an employee makes a statutory flexible working request. Failure to follow this procedure can give rise to a claim for breach of this statutory right (although the compensation under the statutory scheme is limited in comparison to that available for discrimination claims). For further information about this scheme please visit our website: maternityaction.org.uk/advice/child-friendly-working-hours/

Time limits

As mentioned at the outset of this advice, the ability for you to bring any claims against your former employer depends upon how long ago you resigned. There are strict time limits for bringing claims in an Employment Tribunal and if you do not submit a claim on time, it is possible that you may not be able to take it further.

In order to submit a claim, you have to contact ACAS to start the early conciliation process within 3 months less one day of the date of the act that is complained of. So, for example, if an employee is claiming that their dismissal was discriminatory and/or unfair (which includes a constructive dismissal), the employee has three months less one day from the last date of their employment to contact Acas.

Time limits can be tricky to calculate, particularly in discrimination claims where you can have more than one time limit. It is best to seek legal advice to make sure that you do not miss any.

For more details of the process you will need to follow for bring an Employment Tribunal claim please see the following information sheet on our website here: maternityaction.org.uk/advice/dealing-with-problems-at-work/ The information sheet also gives information about what you can do it you have missed your time limits. However, as mentioned, if you are considering bringing a claim, I recommend that you seek legal advice asap to fully assess which claims you may be able to bring and the relevant time limits.

It is important to mention that bringing a claim in the Employment Tribunal can be a costly and lengthy process and there is no guarantee of success. For these reasons, and depending on your time limits, you may want to try and resolve the issue first with your former employer. However, it is likely to be more difficult to reach a resolution because you have left their employment. You may decide you are better off starting the early conciliation process straight away and using the Acas conciliation service to try and reach a settlement that way. Whatever happens, you must make sure that you start the early conciliation process within the statutory time limit of 3 months less one day, as described above.

I hope this is helpful.

MaternityActionfreeadvice · 17/09/2021 11:47

[quote JasonMomoasgirlfriend]@MaternityActionfreeadvice hi there again. Just in the back of panda8383's question....my work have a policy where if you are off sick more than 3 times in a 52 week rolling period then this automatically triggers a capability meeting.

I have had 4 instances of sicknesa on the last 52 weeks but the last one was 2 weeks off just a week ago because of pregnancy related fatigue.
So would it be classed as a sickness instance that could trigger a capability meeting or should that be ignored because it's pregnancy related?[/quote]
Dear JasonMomoasgirlfriend

Any pregnancy-related sickness must be recorded separately by your employer and must not be used to disadvantage you e.g. for dismissal, redundancy or disciplinary purposes and it should not be taken into account for attendance management purposes.

Obviously it's important that when you call in sick (following your employer's sickness reporting procedures) that you let your employer know the reason for your sickness absence and any 'sick notes' must also state whether absence is pregnancy-related.

MaternityActionfreeadvice · 17/09/2021 11:54

@johnsel

Hi, I’m in my first trimester (8w) and on the verge of a promotion / pay rise (review booked in Oct) I wasn’t planning to tell my boss about the pregnancy yet until after my scan etc and until after I got this pay rise written in stone… just in case.

But unfortunately my morning sickness is so severe it’s affecting my work, so I have mentioned to my immediate team that I’m pregnant so they can cover for me when I’m having a really bad sickness day. But I have asked them not to tell the boss or HR yet.

So I guess I’m looking for advice around:

  1. If they say my sickness is too frequent that they need to tell my bosses, can they do this without my consent if it’s affecting my performance?
  2. If my bosses are to be informed could this affect my promotion and pay rise?
  3. Am I better holding out as long as I can until my promotion is confirmed before telling anyone else?
  4. Am I entitled to pregnancy related sick days (so not on my record as loads of sick days) even if I don’t ‘formally’ tell bosses & HR that I’m pregnant? Or do I have to formally report it to get support?

Any guidance would be greatly appreciated!!
Thanks

Dear Johnsel

Congratulations on your pregnancy and your upcoming promotion and pay rise. We appreciate that you are at a relatively early stage in your pregnancy and that your preference is to wait until a later stage to tell your work. However, your morning sickness is making it difficult for you to perform your role and so you have shared your news with some colleagues.

The Equality Act 2010 protects pregnant women from discrimination at work. However, you are only protected when you have told your employer about your pregnancy. If you want to benefit from this protection, you therefore need to tell your employer that you are pregnant. However, this is entirely your choice.

With regard to your specific questions:

  1. It sounds like you have told colleagues/friends at work about your pregnancy rather than anyone in a position of authority. Whilst you have asked those individuals to keep the information confidential, there is no legal requirement on them to do so. As you can appreciate, the fact that you have told some colleagues about your pregnancy makes it reasonably likely that your boss and HR will find out. From a professional perspective and as a courtesy you may want to consider telling them yourself, before another member of the team does.
  1. If the fact of your pregnancy negatively impacted your promotion and pay rise this would be pregnancy related discrimination and would be unlawful. As above, remember that you are only covered by the Equality Act if you have notified your employer of your pregnancy. If you think they might have found out and that is influencing their behaviour, you could still make an argument for pregnancy related discrimination, but it would be easier to establish if you had formally notified them yourself. Of course, whilst the fact of your pregnancy should NOT impact your promotion and pay rise, it doesn’t mean it won’t. You know your employer best; if you consider that this is a possibility then, as a general recommendation, you should document any and all discussions you have previously had with your employer around your pay rise and promotion. If you have been given cause to believe that the October review is merely a formality, then we suggest you document the basis for this belief, including any specific times (with dates if possible) that you have been given these assurances by your employer. This would help as evidence in the event of any dispute. You may also want to specifically discuss this with your boss and HR when you notify them of your pregnancy. I.e. “I trust this will not impact my upcoming review round, when I am expecting to receive confirmation of my promotion and pay rise”.
  1. There are pros and cons to each approach but please note that you are not protected until you notify your employer.
  1. You are not protected until you notify your employer. If your employer held your pregnancy-related sickness absences against you (for example by instigating a performance management process) and/or denied you company sick pay as a result of pregnancy-related sickness, this would likely be discriminatory.

We hope that is helpful and good luck with your performance review.

RowanMumsnet · 17/09/2021 12:15

Hello

We're going to close this thread to new questions now. Thanks for all your queries - we'll post up the remaining answers early next week.

If you missed the boat on this one please keep your eyes peeled for another Maternity Action clinic in three months or so.

Thanks
MNHQ

OP posts:
MaternityActionfreeadvice · 22/09/2021 13:10

@Nojobforoldmums

I was given notice of redundancy ahead of my maternity leave commencing. My maternity leave was taken notice period. My notice period has been suspended for maternity leave and resumes on my return. Like others made redundant I was told I would have opportunity to apply for internal roles during my notice period.

I have been offered a short term assignment, which covers my remaining notice period plus one additional month. However if I take this it is not realistic that I will get to take my accrued leave (I would need to take about 6-7 weeks off out of a 3 month contract). If I want to take my accrued leave it will be over my gardening leave/notice period, removing my opportunity to look for roles. Is this acceptable?

I have been told, as someone who was given notice of redundancy ahead of maternity leave, I was not entitled to any priority placement in suitable roles. Is this correct?

Many thanks

Dear Nojobforoldmums

Thank you for your enquiry.

It is difficult to advise fully based on the limited information provided and without sight of your employment contract and the policies and procedures in place at your workplace regarding redundancy and maternity leave. However, I have made some assumptions and sought to address your queries as far as possible below.

Notice period and short term assignment

I assume from what you had said that a redundancy process has been carried out by your employer, you have been served with notice of termination and are currently in your notice period (the length of which I am unclear of), albeit you are on maternity leave. However, your employer has said that if any alternative roles come up during your notice period, you can still apply for them and the short term assignment is one such role. If you decide to accept this role, this should not impact on your entitlement to accrued leave. If you are unable to take your accrued leave before your employment terminates, then you should be entitled to be paid in lieu of this leave on termination of employment, subject to the terms of your employment contract.

Priority for suitable alternative vacancies

Regulation 10 of the Maternity and Parental Leave etc. Regulations 1999 states that if a redundancy situation occurs whilst an employee is on maternity leave and there is a suitable alternative vacancy, then you are entitled to be offered (before the end of your employment under your existing contract) alternative employment with your employer. Therefore, it would seem that if a suitable alternative role comes up during your notice period and whilst you still are on maternity leave, that this priority right would apply. If there was a suitable alternative role that you were not offered this may be an automatic unfair dismissal.

Enhanced redundancy package

If you have been offered an enhanced redundancy package, this should offer more than any statutory redundancy payment and this is an option you should consider carefully. Please note that packages of this sort usually require you to enter into an agreement that waives your right to bring proceedings against your employer. If you think your employer has acted unlawfully during the redundancy process you should carefully consider whether waiving your right to bring such claims is in your interests and seek further legal advice.

MaternityActionfreeadvice · 22/09/2021 13:12

@theconfused

My husband recently started a job (before we knew about my pregnancy) and he asked his employer to start a little later as he had to take me to hospital (usually arranged with my family but on this occasion we were stuck).

His employer quizzed him on why he didn't disclose this at the interview (not sure if he was meant to discuss with them?)

But anyways he's been told they need "notice" to go to scan appointments (I thought they'd be allowed 2 days off) and that he'd struggle for getting paternity?

Which I thought is due to some qualifying period which obviously he wouldn't meet but not even the scans?

Dear theconfused

Time off to accompany a pregnant woman to antenatal appointments

The amount of time off that an employee or agency worker may take off during working hours to accompany a pregnant woman to antenatal appointments is limited to no more than two occasions lasting no more than six and a half hours each. The BEIS Guidance suggests that this amount of time will cover travelling time, waiting time and attendance at the appointment.

The law provides that the employee or agency worker must comply with certain formalities for applying for time off to accompany a woman to an antenatal appointment, but only if they are requested to by their employer. In that case, the employee will not be entitled to take the time off unless they give the employer a document (which may be in electronic form, such as e-mail) showing:

· That the employee or agency worker has a qualifying relationship with the pregnant woman or expected child.

· That the purpose of taking the time off is to accompany a pregnant woman to an antenatal appointment.

· That the appointment has been made on the advice of a registered doctor, registered midwife or registered nurse.

· The date and time of the appointment.

An employer may refuse an employee or agency worker time off to accompany a woman at an antenatal appointment where it is reasonable for it to do so.

Paternity leave

In order to qualify for paternity leave, the employee must have been continuously employed by their employer for a period of not less than 26 weeks ending with the 15th week before the child's expected week of childbirth (EWC). Unfortunately, your husband will not be entitled to paternity leave/pay unless he has sufficient length of service. Sorry not to be able to give better news.

MaternityActionfreeadvice · 22/09/2021 13:14

@HadABabyAtTheWrongTime

Where I work we get a non-consolidated lump sum, as well as a pay rise, if we meet performance criteria. If you are absent for 37 weeks in one performance year you lose this payment, even if you have always met performance criteria previously. It means people who have babies and take a year off starting in Sept get the payment, but people who take a year off from March don't. It has been queried multiple times with HR, but the response is just that you have to be present for the right number of weeks at the right time. This doesn't seem to tie in with advice about performance rating during maternity leave, is it legal?
Dear HadABabyAtTheWrongTime

Thank you for your query.

Unfortunately the question of whether this policy is lawful is not a straightforward one. There are some arguments that can be made, although the employer may not accept them.

Under section 73(1) of the Equality Act 2010 a woman’s contract is treated as including a ‘maternity equality clause’. Section 74 sets out how and when the clause affects the calculation of a woman’s pay whilst on maternity leave. In particular section 74 states that when a woman returns to work, she should get any pay rise she would have received had she not been on statutory maternity leave. It could be asserted to your employer that you would have received this pay rise had you not taken maternity leave, and you are therefore entitled to it upon your return. However, difficulty may arise if you are asked to prove that you would have met the performance criteria had you not been on leave. It may be worth making the argument to your employer and seeing how they respond.

You could also try to argue that the 37 week absence policy puts female staff at a particular disadvantage in comparison to male staff. This would be indirect discrimination based on sex (section 19 Equality Act), the law does not allow for pregnancy and maternity indirect discrimination claims. The general argument would be that female workers are more likely than male workers to miss out on the pay rise/lump sum under the 37 week absence rule, because of maternity leave taken. I cannot advise on how likely the case would be to succeed in Tribunal, as I only have limited information. Crucially, employers can defend indirect discrimination claims if they can justify the discriminatory policy as being a proportionate means of achieving a legitimate aim. As an initial step, you could assert the argument with your employer to see if they re-consider their policy.

I hope the above assists.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is closed and is no longer accepting replies. Click here to start a new thread.

Swipe left for the next trending thread