Dear KittyMcTitty
Thank you for your query.
If there is a genuine redundancy situation and your employer follows a fair procedure in selecting you for redundancy, it may be able to fairly dismiss you for redundancy, despite the adverse implications for you and the fact you are on maternity leave. However, if you believe that this is not a genuine redundancy situation, or your employer has not followed a fair procedure in selecting you for redundancy, or that the decision to select you for redundancy was one which no reasonable employer should have made, then you may have a claim for unfair dismissal and if the redundancy is because of your maternity leave, claims for automatic unfair dismissal and maternity discrimination.
Unfair dismissal rights
As you have been at your employer for over 2 years you have a legal right not to be unfairly dismissed. For a redundancy to be a fair dismissal, it must be a genuine redundancy situation and a fair redundancy process must be followed which includes a fair selection process, proper consultation and consideration of suitable alternative roles.
A genuine redundancy situation would include a situation where your employer has a reduced need for employees to carry out a particular kind of work. Your employer appears to have indicated that it has a reduced need for employees to carry out business development and marketing as a result of their main contract being reduced from September and needing to cut costs. However, in order to establish if this is the case, your employer needs to be clearer as to what part of the contract (and therefore type of work) is being reduced and how this impacts on your role of business development and marketing. I therefore suggest you ask for more details as to the rationale for making your role redundant and specifically, whether it is because of a reduced need for business development and marketing in relation to the client contract or a more general need to cut costs? Your employer must also explain how they intend to carry out the role going forwards. Work can be absorbed into other roles but if all of your work is just moving to the junior member of your team, this would suggest that she should have been put in a selection pool with you (for more information, see below). If your employer cannot provide you with a redundancy rationale that shows a reduced need for employees to carry out a particular kind of work, and you are subsequently made redundant, you could potentially claim unfair dismissal (see below for more information) on the basis that there was no genuine redundancy.
In order for the redundancy to be fair your employer must also consider which employees, who are in similar roles and/or who have overlapping skill sets, should be included in the redundancy selection pool. It is arguable that in your situation, as the junior in your team has been covering your role whilst you are on maternity leave, although more junior, she is in a similar role and has overlapping skills and should be included in the pool. Therefore you should ask your employer why they have not included her in the selection pool.
In order for the redundancy to be fair, your employer must also consult properly with you about the redundancy situation and explore alternatives to avoid redundancy before reaching a final decision on whether it needs to make you redundant. This will usually mean your employer will hold at least 2 meetings with you to discuss the situation in more detail. You should use the meetings as an opportunity to:
• Discuss the basis for your selection, in terms of the selection pool
• Provide your employer with any other information that may influence its final decision.
• Put forward any suggestions to your employer of ways to avoid your redundancy – for example you could suggest that the more junior role is made redundant (although they will probably argue that this is not feasible because of cost)
• Consider any alternative employment positions that may exist – during the consultation period and at any time before your dismissal takes effect, your employer is obliged to consider you for any suitable alternative vacancies that become available in the business or in any associated companies. As an employee on maternity leave, you have the right to be offered any suitable alternative employment first.
• Address any other matters or concerns that you have.
Therefore, during consultation, it would be sensible for you to ask why the junior member of your team was not included in the selection pool given that she has covered your role during maternity leave. However, as your role is being made redundant (and only the junior role will remain), if you do raise this point then you need to be open to the option of taking on the more junior role at a more junior salary and should communicate this to your employer. If your employer is willing to expand the selection pool then in order to determine who is at risk of redundancy, it will have to carry out a fair selection of you and your more junior colleague using fair and objective selection criteria. However, if your employer refuses to do this, without good reason, and you are subsequently made redundant you could potentially have a claim for unfair dismissal on the basis that the selection pool was flawed and therefore the process was unfair.
In order for your redundancy to be fair, your employer must also consider any other suitable alternative roles. As you are on maternity leave, your employer must give you priority for any other suitable roles, above other candidates. If your employer does not do this then you could bring a claim at Tribunal (see below).
Maternity discrimination and automatic unfair dismissal rights
Whilst on maternity leave you have the right not to be discriminated against or treated detrimentally by reason of maternity. In addition, as you are on maternity leave, if you are made redundant because of your maternity leave then you may have a claim for automatic unfair dismissal. For this to be the case you would need to be able to show:
• The only (or principal) reason for your dismissal is redundancy;
• The circumstances constituting a redundancy applied equally to one or more employees who had positions similar to yours; and
· The only (or principal) reason for your selection for redundancy was connected with the fact that you took maternity leave.
Potential next steps
Given that your employer does not appear to have provided you with much information, I suggest you use the period of consultation to ask for more detail about the rationale for the redundancy and why your junior colleague was not included in the selection pool. This will help you to establish if it is a genuine redundancy situation and whether they are following a fair process.
If you are made redundant and you are not satisfied with the answers you have received or the process that your employer has followed you can appeal the redundancy decision - your employer should offer you a right to appeal but if they don’t then you should ask for this opportunity. At an appeal you can challenge the reason given for the redundancy.
Appealing the decision is important if you wish to subsequently bring an employment tribunal claim and it may also encourage the employer to enter into settlement discussions. Settlement is when your employer agrees to pay you an amount of money for entering into a settlement agreement under which you waive your rights to bring employment claims.
Potential Claims
As mentioned above, if you believe that this is not a genuine redundancy situation, or your employer has not followed a fair procedure in selecting you for redundancy, or that the decision to select you for redundancy was one which no reasonable employer should have made, then you may have a claim for unfair dismissal and if the redundancy is because of your maternity leave, claims for automatic unfair dismissal and maternity discrimination. Such claims would be brought at an employment tribunal.
Before bringing a claim for unfair dismissal in the employment tribunal, you would have to contact Acas (the Advisory Conciliation and Arbitration Service) under rules for mandatory early conciliation. Acas is an impartial organisation that will try to resolve any dispute with your employer without the need to bring proceedings in the tribunal. Unfair dismissal claims must usually be brought within three months of the date your employment ends. However, extra time is allowed if you contact Acas to request conciliation.
If you were successful in bringing an unfair dismissal claim then you would be awarded an amount to compensate you for the period of time you are likely to be out of work. This amount is capped at the lesser of one year’s pay or £86,444 for an ordinary unfair dismissal claim. However, a successful automatic unfair dismissal and any discrimination claim is uncapped and you could be awarded more than this, although only if the Tribunal considers you are likely to be out of work for more than a year. In addition, if you could show that your employer’s actions amounted to maternity discrimination then you may also be awarded an amount for injury to feelings (which can be between £900 and £44,000 dependent on the severity of the discrimination).
However, you do not recoup legal costs at Tribunal (although legal costs can be covered under home contents insurance) and it can be an expensive and mentally draining experience so I would encourage you to engage fully in the consultation process and try to get answers to the above questions. If you are still not satisfied, after consultation, then you may wish to seek further legal advice or try to negotiate settlement.
Where to go for more help
More information on where to go for more help can be found at maternityaction.org.uk/advice/dealing-with-problems-at-work/
I hope that is helpful and that it goes well.
@KittyMcTitty
I have been put at risk of redundancy whilst on maternity leave. I work in a small team.
My employer has selected my role (business development and marketing manager) alone as our main contract is being reduced from September although he advised the detail hadn’t been confirmed) I asked for selection criteria as my maternity cover and junior has not been considered at all but was told they no longer require business development which whilst is in my job title isn’t something I have really ever done and I believe my tasks will just be rolled into my junior who is covering me whilst on maternity leave. They obviously need to make a saving but I can’t get real clarity on what tasks are being removed from the contract to make savings.
Where do I stand with this?