Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Organisations changing policy since Fridays GLP/EHRC DECISION?

44 replies

SingleSexSpacesInSchools · 17/02/2026 15:49

Two I’ve just learned of, DHL and a pub chain

https://www.reddit.com/r/transgenderUK/comments/1r75xg4/bathroom_ban_in_affect_at_work/

sorry both reddit

https://www.reddit.com/r/transgenderUK/comments/1r70c3y/mtf_couple_told_we_have_to_use_mens_toilets_by/

any others?

OP posts:
IwantToRetire · 17/02/2026 20:20

MarieDeGournay · 17/02/2026 20:14

IwantToRetire More worrying IMO is that Polanski is now saying it would be so easy for the Government to change the EA, why aren't they doing that to protect trans rights. ie advising anyone who will listen to him, that the UK should have an EA that has within in it enshrined that trans rights take precedence over women's rights.

So Polanski and the Greens want to change the EA, and Braverman and Reform want to repeal it completely on day one....

Sometimes I feel I've been transported to an alternative version of the world. Just a few minutes of the news listening to a Trump rant, or some Labour politician with a straight face saying why a u turn isn't a u turn.

I wish I could live that life.

Could I convince my bank that actually I had £1 million pounds and just because they couldn't see it in my account didn't mean that it wasn't true?

Thelnebriati · 17/02/2026 20:25

More worrying IMO is that Polanski is now saying it would be so easy for the Government to change the EA, why aren't they doing that to protect trans rights. ie advising anyone who will listen to him, that the UK should have an EA that has within in it enshrined that trans rights take precedence over women's rights.

Trans women are women in the Schrodinger sense.

Coatsoff42 · 17/02/2026 20:32

Greyskybluesky · 17/02/2026 18:59

I know it's not the point of the thread, but...
I find it baffling when TRAs say things like "a female customer challenged the GF" or "a woman followed her into the toilets". How do they know that person was a woman? Just because she looked like a woman? Is it all based on looks then? Did they ask? Did they check the person's genitals? How do they know how that person identifies?
It all sounds a bit like double standards to me.

I know, whatever that trans book of sad stories was, the one that was full of the stories of cis women and cis men being mean. The poor trans martyrs never asked anyone else for their gender identity and were all making a whole heap of assumptions based on presentation. The persecution complex is strong.

Funny how they can immediately tell the sex and gender of everyone they meet without ever asking but think everyone else is duped.

It is also so nice to hear people assume that trans employees will follow the guidance and not require strict monitoring, the same as the rest of the entire population who know how to respect other people’s privacy.

tropicaltrance · 17/02/2026 20:35

They do tell on themselves.

The one at DHL says "I'm not quiet about being trans" but then claims that using gender neutral facilities "just feels like forcing me to out myself to everyone".

How does that work.

AnSolas · 17/02/2026 20:46

I just love how a toilet provided for another employee is not up to their standard.

(Ignoring the lack of women) If I was going into a clean SS block and then noticed the cleaning crew were not cleaning the only disabled unit I would be asking why. I would not ignore the slip in basic standard allowing the contract supervisor off on why their cleaner is not providing the agreed service.

If the DHL guy is hopping out of work to find a mixed sex block he is likely to find out that DHL have the resources and will have the policy in place to manage him back into abiding by the policy or manage him out.

As contingent liability are year end Financial Statement issues just on ££ it is much cheaper to manage one individual out than open up a contigent liability from half the staff in his location.

SingleSexSpacesInSchools · 17/02/2026 20:59

MarieDeGournay · 17/02/2026 20:14

IwantToRetire More worrying IMO is that Polanski is now saying it would be so easy for the Government to change the EA, why aren't they doing that to protect trans rights. ie advising anyone who will listen to him, that the UK should have an EA that has within in it enshrined that trans rights take precedence over women's rights.

So Polanski and the Greens want to change the EA, and Braverman and Reform want to repeal it completely on day one....

on Polanski that’s just very bad headlines.

he meant the government can change the law subsequently (true)

www.attitude.co.uk/news/zack-polanski-keir-starmer-april-uk-supreme-court-ruling-trans-513465/

OP posts:
TheywontletmehavethenameIwant · 17/02/2026 21:04

If it came to a choice of having 'gender identity' added as a characteristic or scrapping it, I'd choose scrapping it.

highame · 18/02/2026 17:09

FictionalCharacter · 17/02/2026 17:23

Also, the performance of leaving the workplace provides maximum demonstration of victimhood and being made awfully sad.

With a well performed flounce to add to the drama

Imnobody4 · 19/02/2026 14:06

Just seen this. Come on ECHR keep going.
https://x.com/i/status/2024423726499135534

We have concluded our regulatory action on single-sex space policies.
All 19 organisations we contacted in August 2025 have now removed policies that misrepresented the Equality Act 2010: equalityhumanrights.com/media-centre/e…

The Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) has concluded its regulatory action following the review of policies identified through the UK Government's 2024 call for input exercise on single-sex spaces.

In August 2025, the EHRC wrote to 19 organisations identified through this exercise whose policies misrepresented the Equality Act 2010 by wrongly suggesting there is an automatic legal right to access single-sex spaces based on self-identification. These organisations spanned the policing, education and health sectors. All 19 organisations have now removed the policies in question.

EHRC (@EHRC) on X

We have concluded our regulatory action on single-sex space policies. All 19 organisations we contacted in August 2025 have now removed policies that misrepresented the Equality Act 2010: https://t.co/QDgctUG11u

https://x.com/i/status/2024423726499135534

TheywontletmehavethenameIwant · 19/02/2026 14:34

Thanks for the update, I forgot about that, I'm glad they got a result. 🥳

SingleSexSpacesInSchools · 19/02/2026 14:36

Would be great to know who they were...

OP posts:
SingleSexSpacesInSchools · 19/02/2026 14:42

On a slightly related note, TIM Reddit still thinks Friday was a resounding win for them https://www.reddit.com/r/transgenderUK/comments/1r80rza/did_the_good_law_make_thing_worse/

OP posts:
TheywontletmehavethenameIwant · 19/02/2026 14:51

SingleSexSpacesInSchools · 19/02/2026 14:42

On a slightly related note, TIM Reddit still thinks Friday was a resounding win for them https://www.reddit.com/r/transgenderUK/comments/1r80rza/did_the_good_law_make_thing_worse/

To copy and paste from another thread that's been started

"A letter sent by GLP to Phillipson on the same day demanded that she return the code to the EHRC to be rewritten, on the basis that it was now clearly “wrong about the law”. Nothing in the High Court’s judgment remotely resembled this egregious spin.
Depressingly, at least three MPs immediately went in to bat alongside GLP. It is likely that these backbench interventions will intensify the pressure on Phillipson. Earlier political leadership might have headed off these outcomes. Its absence has created the ideal conditions for this most toxic of the so-called culture wars to escalate."

This why the unhinged think they won because of all the fake news being spread by liars and idiots, plus Phillipson not doing what she should have done 10 months ago.

IwantToRetire · 19/02/2026 17:41

For those not on twitter the link is https://www.equalityhumanrights.com/media-centre/ehrc-concludes-regulatory-action-single-sex-space-policies

They say

The Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) has concluded its regulatory action following the review of policies identified through the UK Government's 2024 call for input exercise on single-sex spaces.

In August 2025, the EHRC wrote to 19 organisations identified through this exercise whose policies misrepresented the Equality Act 2010 by wrongly suggesting there is an automatic legal right to access single-sex spaces based on self-identification. These organisations spanned the policing, education and health sectors. All 19 organisations have now removed the policies in question.

The EHRC's action followed the Supreme Court judgment in For Women Scotland v Scottish Ministers (April 2025), which confirmed that the terms "man", "woman" and "sex" in the Equality Act 2010 refer to biological sex. Trans people continue to be protected from discrimination under the protected characteristic of gender reassignment.

Also as far as I can see they haven't released the names of the organisations they have written.

According to AI:

This action stemmed from a review of 404 policies following a 2024 government call for input, where some policies incorrectly suggested that self-identification, rather than biological sex, provided an automatic right to access single-sex spaces.

Specific Organisations

The EHRC did not release the full list of organisations. However, reports suggest the letters were sent to public sector bodies, including:

  • Healthcare providers.
  • Universities, with University College London (UCL) being mentioned for not updating policies in line with the Supreme Court ruling that "sex" means biological sex.
  • Government departments, such as HMRC regarding intranet guidance.
  • Local authorities, with the City of Edinburgh Council cited in relation to school guidance.

Context

  • Legal Basis: The action followed the April 2025 Supreme Court ruling in For Women Scotland v Scottish Ministers, which clarified that "sex" in the Equality Act 2010 refers to biological sex and that a Gender Recognition Certificate does not change legal sex for single-sex exceptions.
  • Requirements: The organisations were required to confirm the withdrawal of their policies and provide a timeline for revisions.
  • Outcome: By February 19, 2026, the EHRC stated that all 19 organisations had removed the problematic policies.

I hope that despite Labour women trying to make out that the new chair is more reasonable and less confrontational that the EHRC continues this type of pro-active work in relation to the Supreme Court decision.

EHRC acts over non-compliance with single-sex space law

Organisations with policies allowing people to use toilets based on gender self-identification have been instructed to remove or amend them by the Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC).

https://www.christian.org.uk/news/ehrc-acts-over-non-compliance-with-single-sex-space-law/

JustSomeWaferThinHam · 19/02/2026 22:08

I like their planned strategy of boycotting the pub that won’t allow a bloke into the ladies toilets.

SabrinaThwaite · 20/02/2026 21:23

This poor Redditor was complaining that he’s now now longer allowed to use ths women’s, doesn’t want to the use the men’s and the disabled / unisex facilities are too far to walk to when you have a disability.

Cue his buddies telling him to complain to his manager that having to use the disabled loo is … disability discrimination.

www.reddit.com/r/transgenderUK/comments/1r9s6zw/workplace_bathroom/

Bluebootsgreenboots · 21/02/2026 07:48

SabrinaThwaite · 20/02/2026 21:23

This poor Redditor was complaining that he’s now now longer allowed to use ths women’s, doesn’t want to the use the men’s and the disabled / unisex facilities are too far to walk to when you have a disability.

Cue his buddies telling him to complain to his manager that having to use the disabled loo is … disability discrimination.

www.reddit.com/r/transgenderUK/comments/1r9s6zw/workplace_bathroom/

One of the respondents was able to think outside the box and offer advice- they suggested the OP just quit work and go on Universal Credit!

SabrinaThwaite · 21/02/2026 12:31

Bluebootsgreenboots · 21/02/2026 07:48

One of the respondents was able to think outside the box and offer advice- they suggested the OP just quit work and go on Universal Credit!

🤣

PrettyDamnCosmic · 21/02/2026 12:58

One of the respondents was able to think outside the box and offer advice- they suggested the OP just quit work and go on Universal Credit!

& declare themselves bankrupt to get rid of their debts.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page