As I mentioned in my previous posts - there are areas where Islamic doctrines are not compatible with our values as a society and we need to be able to discuss those issues only. Imagine hie had it would be fir example to have a frank discussion about the issues if repeated first cousin marriage with someone who very likely has married first cousins in her family.
Unfortunately my concerns have already come to life - see this article from the Free Speech Union:
The Home Office tried to silence an adviser who raised concerns about Islamism.
Fiyaz Mughal, a government adviser on counter-extremism, wrote in The Telegraph that he was “astonished” the threat of Islamism wasn’t mentioned during the first 90 minutes of a Home Office extremism summit.
The day after publication, a Home Office official contacted him about his media engagement.
Fiyaz has worked with the Home Office on and off for 20 years and is the founder of Tell MAMA, which records anti-Muslim hate incidents across the UK. He quit last year, citing “insidious pressure” not to speak publicly about the dangers of Islamism.
He says that since Labour came to power, focus on Islamism has dropped because it is seen as politically inconvenient, with fears of losing the Muslim vote.
We must not allow politicians to turn a blind eye to the dangers of Islamism for electoral gain. Nor should officials attempt to silence those raising legitimate concerns.
If Labour’s proposed definition of Islamophobia — now repackaged as “anti-Muslim hostility” — goes ahead, it risks silencing discussion of Islamist extremism altogether.