Sexism? Posters are highlighting a concern about high numbers of men harming children, and how an increase in victim numbers is likely if men are being encouraged to work in environments where there are vulnerable and non verbal children, and you’re disappointed by levels of sexism? Fuck my old boots, what is going on in your head? Why aren’t you disappointed in the high numbers of sex offenders? Who in their right mind gives a shit about sexism when this is going on? If you don’t understand the damage that is done to children who are abused, which ruins lives, then bloody ask. There are enough of us about. Personally, I don’t give a flying fuck about sexism; I’m not willing to sacrifice a child’s life in some experiment in providing dangerous men yet another avenue to access children. I don’t give a shit if it offends them. It’s certainly not going to make them feel the way csa victims feel.
I would rather see increased awareness, training, safeguarding measures, and indeed research into and intervention for men who have these paraphilias to catch and treat them before they harm anyone You can’t treat paedophiles. You might as well try and fix a psychopath. You’d have as much success. Maybe there is the odd one or two that you can convince not to hurt a child. But that doesn’t change their nature. The most you can do is keep them away.
The consensus here is that to be born male is a genetic crime. They are more likely to commit violent or sexual offences. Its biology. They should be treated with suspicion, banned from jobs or situations with access to children, women or girls. Men are increasingly seen as a lesser form of humanity. I think men and boys are starting to realise this, as they listen to women discussing them and their behaviour's. Equality cannot be applied to them, as other members of society must have priority of security and feelings. A tough message for our young men to hear So fucking what? It should be a tough message to hear and they need to hear it. They’re raping women with impunity. They are so unlikely to even be charged that it’s practically legal. They’re killing us at a rate of 2-3 a week. And we’re not supposed to point this out or get angry about it in case their feelings get hurt? Fucking hell. If men and boys were being raped and killed by women at that rate, we’d be tagged and under curfew. Our young men need to hear exactly why women feel like this so they can separate themselves from the men who do this and make it clear that they think these men are monsters who should be excluded from society, rather than Dave down the pub who’s a right laugh, but you wouldn’t leave him alone with any women in your family.
@TempestTost They aren't exclusive categories. Child abuse and rape can happen in all kinds of ways, pornography involving children is a particular way of that happening You’ve had very clear explanations from at least two posters explaining this to you and I don’t know if it’s because you disagree, you’ve got a skull full of coleslaw or you are being purposely obtuse, so please excuse me for being a little more direct than others have been. There is NO SUCH THING as pornography involving children. It is men looking at images of child SA. To even imply that those images are even vaguely connected to what is generally accepted as a consensual activity is offensive and hurtful to victims in the extreme. And anybody who continues to link the two terms after having that explained to them has to be a pretty horrendous person. I would hope you wouldn’t use racist or homophobic slurs after being told how painful they are to hear? I hope you wouldn’t call a rape victim names? This is on a par with those things; it is that offensive. Will you please stop?