Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Belief that ‘white middle-aged men’ have an ‘unseen advantage’ at work falls under equality laws, tribunal judge rules

82 replies

IwantToRetire · 05/07/2025 01:14

Believing in the notion that white men have an “unseen advantage” because of their gender and race is a legally protected belief, akin to veganism or gender-critical feminism.

The ruling comes in the case of self-proclaimed feminist Misti Kilburn, a senior HR manager suing a global manufacturing company for belief and sex discrimination.

Employment Judge George Alliott said: “It was clear to us, and we find, that [Ms Kilburn] does genuinely believe that white middle-aged men have an inherent advantage, in particular in the workplace, and that women remain disadvantaged, in particular in the workplace.

“We accept that many would subscribe to the view that in the workplace white middle-aged men have an advantage and women are disadvantaged.”

Full article at https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2025/07/04/white-male-privilege-belief-protected-discrimination/

Can also be read at https://archive.is/sJBJk

OP posts:
Ereshkigalangcleg · 07/07/2025 18:20

Thanks Pencils, that clarifies it for me.

Winbacs · 22/02/2026 06:52

I worked at Sensient and left about 5 years ago. At the time the whole HR team (3) showed a hatred towards male employees so I'm not shocked her mannerisms were eventually challenged. There is a difference in having a belief and enacting your own prejudices on the workforce to meet your own agenda.

MarieDeGournay · 22/02/2026 11:30

White middle-aged men have an unseen advantage at work? What a ridiculous idea! How could anybody get that impression?😒

Belief that ‘white middle-aged men’ have an ‘unseen advantage’ at work falls under equality laws, tribunal judge rules
Belief that ‘white middle-aged men’ have an ‘unseen advantage’ at work falls under equality laws, tribunal judge rules
Imnobody4 · 22/02/2026 11:40

Did she actually win the employment tribunal though?
'The ruling comes in the case of self-proclaimed feminist Misti Kilburn, a senior HR manager suing a global manufacturing company for belief and sex discrimination.'

AmaryllisNightAndDay · 22/02/2026 11:57

MarieDeGournay · 22/02/2026 11:30

White middle-aged men have an unseen advantage at work? What a ridiculous idea! How could anybody get that impression?😒

Hey don't say that - if it's just an obvious fact based on evidence then she could have lost her case because it's not a proper "belief"!😂

I also wonder - did the hearing happen and what was the outcome?

onepostwonder · 22/02/2026 17:00

HopingForTheBest25 · 05/07/2025 07:53

What happens when employee A, who thinks white men have an advantage, meets employee B, who thinks white men are discriminated against?
Both can be equally convinced they are right. Who gets to call dibs in the workplace?

Edited

Obviously, employers must equally provide additional work spaces that are no less favourable than the other, when opposing beliefs/realities clash in the workplace.

OP posts:
New posts on this thread. Refresh page