Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Trans detainees can request officers of a different sex for searches (Scotland)

38 replies

Igneococcus · 25/06/2025 20:21

This might be the most bonkers thing to come out of Scotland yet.
"Transgender detainees undergoing police searches will be allowed to ask for officers of different sexes to frisk their top and bottom halves, under new guidelines."

https://www.thetimes.com/article/ac912fac-0038-4d68-80a9-b3dce4807ca6?shareToken=8d1563cd136a6688bad250e571282b97

Trans detainees can request officers of a different sex for searches

Police Scotland said the advice is for those who have not fully transitioned — officers of different sexes will search different areas of the detainee’s body

https://www.thetimes.com/article/ac912fac-0038-4d68-80a9-b3dce4807ca6?shareToken=8d1563cd136a6688bad250e571282b97

OP posts:
HaveYouActuallyDoneAnyWashingThisWeekMum · 26/06/2025 08:19

Keenovay · 26/06/2025 02:46

I'm picturing that flipbook game I played as a kid where head, torso and legs are all wearing different outfits...👫

😆

Will police officers in Scotland have a say in this or will they have to bow down to the Word of the Special Sacred Caste?

TheOtherRaven · 26/06/2025 08:24

It is a ridiculously complicated situation and often searches of this kind are under time pressure because there's a suspicion of internal drugs and the detainee may be at risk. It is going to tie up a lot of time, effort, people and create a performance and a half, and it's not like we have police standing around idle who can play this game.

It's a half step in a better direction in that it moves away from the fixed belief of based on declared gender and different to rules for all others, and sets in policy that the consent of the officers involved is necessary and cannot be compelled. (I'm sure that will be tested, and that it won't be male officers coming under pressure.)

But I'm reminded of the bit from FWS's comment somewhere about when you decide to make extensive changes to your body for your own reasons you have to take some responsibility for that, and accept there are going to be some difficulties attached to it.

ArabellaScott · 26/06/2025 08:24

TwoLoonsAndASprout · 26/06/2025 07:54

I mean, I think in the NHS one the gender (sex) of the searcher was meant to match the genitals/secondary sex characteristics, but now you mention it I’m not sure it specified.

But it does throw a spanner in the works of the “I am woman and this is my woman penis,” doesn’t it?

I am curious whether these policies are some sort of interesting fudge thrown up because of trying to shoe horn TRA demands into something as (previously) tightly controlled as intimate searching. Do we know what the prison policies are?

Prison policies are a guddle iirc, but also have been 'under review' for ages and ages

ArabellaScott · 26/06/2025 08:29

Tlaloc999 · 26/06/2025 07:54

What is interesting is the ability to ask for a police officer of a particular “biological sex”. A binary male/female.

What if the Police Officer is trans/non binary/ gender fluid etc. I could see a law suit here!

Some years back there was audio recording from the US of a clearly male officer saying he identified as female when searching a female protester. And laughing. Don't know if anyone remembers.

ErrolTheDragon · 26/06/2025 08:34

PlasticAcrobat · 26/06/2025 07:53

It is a bit crazy, but provided we have moved away from the idea that male police officers can search women on the basis of the officer's say-so about his gender, and provided that police officers can refuse to search someone not of their sex, then it seems harmless enough.

The only enraging thing is that there are stories of extraordinarily brutally inappropriate police searches, like that of the schoolgirl whose treatment was probably influenced by racist stereotyping. Those stories make these very gentle and sensitive guidelines for one particular set of people seem incongruous. But perhaps the solution to that is to make sure that ALL people are treated with as much concern as is being set out here.

I’m inclined to agree.

TwoLoonsAndASprout · 26/06/2025 08:45

PlasticAcrobat · 26/06/2025 07:53

It is a bit crazy, but provided we have moved away from the idea that male police officers can search women on the basis of the officer's say-so about his gender, and provided that police officers can refuse to search someone not of their sex, then it seems harmless enough.

The only enraging thing is that there are stories of extraordinarily brutally inappropriate police searches, like that of the schoolgirl whose treatment was probably influenced by racist stereotyping. Those stories make these very gentle and sensitive guidelines for one particular set of people seem incongruous. But perhaps the solution to that is to make sure that ALL people are treated with as much concern as is being set out here.

Having seen the NHS mental health trust policies which date from some years ago now, I would actually be surprised if this was new policy. I would bet it has been like this for some time (at least this bit of it - the wording is so similar to the NHS one).

AnSolas · 26/06/2025 09:00

ArabellaScott · 26/06/2025 08:29

Some years back there was audio recording from the US of a clearly male officer saying he identified as female when searching a female protester. And laughing. Don't know if anyone remembers.

Yep

There were a couple of instances.
There was a video at a protest of an over garment patdown in a public place being recorded by multiple people (likely including his and other officers body cams). A woman in the recording group objected on the basis of the detained being a woman. The male officer was being ironic as TWAW was a theme of the anti-police protests.

And if memory serves it was In a area where ongoing nightly "mainly peaceful protesting" was taking place?

ArabellaScott · 26/06/2025 09:04

Yes, that all sounds about right, AnSolas.

AccidentallyWesAnderson · 26/06/2025 09:15

It’s been in place for a while that people in custody can ask for someone of the same gender to search them, but staff can also refuse.

When it comes to strip searching which is usually led by custody staff and not police officers (though they’d be there in some capacity), I’d imagine that if there was a stand still (e.g. a female member of staff/officer refusing to strip search a trans woman) they would revert to the same practice when a custody refuses a strip search which is their right to do and they’d remain on constant observations.

MassiveWordSalad · 26/06/2025 09:28

BlueLegume · 26/06/2025 08:07

I have asked this a few times on various threads. We seem to be in an age where we are expected-rightly so - be be tolerant of how people present. I am absolutely fine you presenting however it suits as long as you are equally respectful and kind and tolerant to me. Do the job you are paid to do without expecting special privileges.

It seems to me - and I am happy to be corrected-the trans men identifying as women group shout much louder than the trans women identifying as men.

Am I missing something and just not aware of them and their voices?

You noticed it too, did you? It’s what makes the trans rights movement very much appear to be a men’s rights movement. Of course, the (often neuro-diverse) young women who identify as men help to lend their cause legitimacy, but the men don’t really care about them.

GallantKumquat · 26/06/2025 09:45

Presumably a non-trans identifying male could also ask to be searched by the opposite sex. if not I fail to see how this special privilege could be justified. And if that is the case it should have been spelled out in the article as it underlines the absurdity.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page