I feel a bit bad about making this a thread topic as it is clearly quite something to win the Women's Prize for fiction with your first novel.
And I am not meaning or wanting in any way to make this a personal attack.
But surely calling this trans treatment isn't right? Or have I got it wrong?
Van der Wouden revealed in her acceptance speech that she is intersex. “I was a girl until I turned 13, and then as I hit puberty all that was supposed to happen did not quite happen, or if it did happen it happened too much,” she said. “I won’t thrill you too much with the specifics but the long and the short of it is that hormonally I am intersex.”
“This little fact defined my life throughout my teens until I advocated for the healthcare that I needed. In the few precious moments here on stage I am receiving truly the greatest honour of my life as a woman, presenting to you as a woman and accepting this Women’s prize and that is because of every single trans person who’s fought for healthcare, who changed the system, the law, societal standards, themselves. I stand on their shoulders.”
https://www.theguardian.com/books/2025/jun/12/womens-prize-debut-yael-van-der-wouden-the-safekeep-rachel-clarke-the-story-of-a-heart
And this isn't the Guardian twisting her words, because other papers have posted snippets and this seems the fullest.
So my confusion is whether it is true that the treatment for a biological women with DSD has only become (more) available since medical intervention for men who want to transition has become more common.
If she wants to identify as part of the trans and queer community that's her right.
I am just hoping someone with the right medical knowledge can explain what she might be referring to.
Sorry if this is a really ignorant question. 