Becky’s reaction is so typical of the trans rights movement - thinking the problems they’re dealing with are all about the trans aspect specifically instead of looking at the bigger picture and questioning whether the GP might have had a similar response if the medication was ADHD medication, weight loss drugs, and so on.
Becky went private to circumvent waiting lists (totally fine, their choice) and then demanded that their GP enter into a shared care agreement to move to the cheaper NHS instead. Well that’s not how shared care agreements work, Becky. The doctor has to agree to providing the meds / working with the other provider, as you can’t force a doctor to prescribe treatments against their will on someone else’s recommendation.
Arguing that your wants should trump one of the most basic tenets of the medical profession demonstrates a(nother) profound lack of awareness within the trans community - it’s the NHS, not Selfridges, so the customer can’t always get exactly what they want.
The shared care conundrum is faced by probably thousands of non-trans people for all sorts of treatments and medicines -lots of people have to either negotiate with their GP to work out what might make them comfortable to proceed or to find a new GP in this situation, so this really isn’t just a trans issue.
Everyone who goes private to obtain long-term treatments runs the risk that they might have to pay forever, as an NHS GP has no obligation to take them over - I appreciate that one of the lies young trans people might have been sold is that “once you’re on the meds, your GP has no choice but to fund them”, but shared care agreements aren’t a blackmail tool to force a GP’s arm.