Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

The rest is politics - “The Taliban took over the country and it's much safer”

296 replies

HiggledyPiggledy33 · 28/01/2025 11:40

Just outraged at what I’ve just heard in the rest is politics.

They are discussing why aren’t we boycotting Afghanistan, and I can’t believe what Rory is saying.

“For the first time in over 20 years, you can travel safely through the country.”

Well maybe you can Rory, but I don’t think women can - is that fine? Throw half the population under the bus, as long as you’re OK.

“The Taliban have very repressive views on women, but they've also in other ways changed”
oh well that’s ok then.

“We're in a culture now where it really suits a lot of people, particularly on the far right, to emphasise Muslim countries where women are not treated correctly”
Women not being treated correctly is the problem. Once that’s sorted, let’s look at any sensitivity about muslims.

From The Rest Is Politics: Question Time: Assad’s People - Syria, Torture, and Justice, 9 Jan 2025

OP posts:
Thread gallery
6
Ereshkigalangcleg · 29/01/2025 13:07

Won't anyone think of poor Rory? This is the feminist board, where we centre women and girls, not overprivileged podcast wankers who don't give a second thought to some of the most oppressed women on Earth when they crap on about how jolly spiffing it is to travel across Afghanistan 🙄 bla bla echo chamber something something

Ereshkigalangcleg · 29/01/2025 13:08

And now they’re turning a blind eye to the fallout, which is exactly what RS is doing, because the average situation is deemed to be better even if for women it’s immeasurably worse. It’s dismissed with an airy “it’s the bigger picture”, because yet a-fucking-gain women are just collateral damage.

Exactly.

Ereshkigalangcleg · 29/01/2025 13:10

They make the protection of women’s rights part of the terms of handover. But they didn’t, they just walked away knowing full well that the retributions and collapse of rights would begin almost immediately, which is exactly what happened. We all remember those photos of people desperately trying to get themselves and their families on the last flights out.

Yes, JK Rowling, the heinous evil woman, was instrumental in getting female lawyers out of Afghanistan.

GutsyShark · 29/01/2025 13:23

The OP was about what Rory said?

But as I said last night, I shall leave you to your “bla bla echo chamber”. You clearly have a problem understanding not everyone sees the world exactly as you do. Best of luck to you.

SidewaysOtter · 29/01/2025 13:23

Ereshkigalangcleg · 29/01/2025 13:10

They make the protection of women’s rights part of the terms of handover. But they didn’t, they just walked away knowing full well that the retributions and collapse of rights would begin almost immediately, which is exactly what happened. We all remember those photos of people desperately trying to get themselves and their families on the last flights out.

Yes, JK Rowling, the heinous evil woman, was instrumental in getting female lawyers out of Afghanistan.

There is just no end to her terrible behaviour, is there? Utterly reprehensible woman ❤️

Ereshkigalangcleg · 29/01/2025 13:29

The OP was about what Rory said?

Yes, and you've conceded that point now, haven't you? You finally agreed that the criticism of the podcast for not mentioning it was justified. I'll direct ire at pompous overpaid twats in the public eye for whom women's rights don't even register any time I like, thanks.

GutsyShark · 29/01/2025 13:30

Ereshkigalangcleg · 29/01/2025 13:29

The OP was about what Rory said?

Yes, and you've conceded that point now, haven't you? You finally agreed that the criticism of the podcast for not mentioning it was justified. I'll direct ire at pompous overpaid twats in the public eye for whom women's rights don't even register any time I like, thanks.

Good for you dear.

Ereshkigalangcleg · 29/01/2025 13:47

The International Criminal Court have issued arrest warrants for Taliban leaders for entrenching Gender Apartheid

Yes, I thought it was a positive message to send, at least. The normalisation in some quarters is utterly chilling.

JumpingPumpkin · 29/01/2025 13:48

It seems to me that ultimately it's foolish to try to intervene in other countries as it's not sustainable. That doesn't mean that we should ignore atrocities happening to women and not even attempt to put external pressure on them. We definitely shouldn't be playing sports with such countries.

Ereshkigalangcleg · 29/01/2025 13:54

As I understand it they are not even eligible by the rules themselves, as countries have to develop women's cricket to participate, I can't see that happening where women aren't even allowed to have their voices heard in public.

Lalgarh · 29/01/2025 14:08

GutsyShark · 29/01/2025 12:29

This is kind of Rory’s point no? It’s horrific but better than it was before.

It isn't. The Taliban are corrupt but in a different way.

And the Taliban are also continuing to kill people on Pakistan. Remember that idiotic double think that was going on for a while that the Afghan Taliban = heroic anti imperialist insurgents who are totally different from the bad jihadist Pakistani Taliban who 1) shot malala yousafzai in the head 2) launched an attack on a cadet school in Rawalpindi https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-30491435
3) at one stage had Islamabad surrounded after the govt decided to 'let them live by their own laws'. This from 2009

surprise! There is no difference between the Afghan and Pakistani Taliban

Meanwhile, the US government did genuinely try to ignore the Taliban 1st time around. Graveyard of empires and all that. Remember why that changed?

The U.S. was only in Afghanistan to begin with because the proposition that the war was a local phenomenon that could be ignored crashed into the Twin Towers, Pentagon, and a field in Pennsylvania on September 11, 2001.

https://www.kyleorton.com/p/afghanistan-report-by-oved-lobel

Injured student being evacuated

Pakistan Taliban: Peshawar school attack leaves 141 dead

The Pakistan Taliban launch their deadliest attack ever, leaving 132 children and nine adults dead at a school in Peshawar.

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-30491435

RedToothBrush · 29/01/2025 14:19

Governments will do what they think will suit them.

Women are always the collatoral damage in that. Thats why women's right are always the first thing to go in a authoritarian government.

They are the easiest thing to give up to corruption.

Power is hoarded by males. Corrupt males. Who want to punch down on women.

PermanentTemporary · 29/01/2025 14:49

Thank you @AnnaMagnani for your post. Despite giving RS a kicking up thread, I'm sure your post gives a good exposition of what he was getting across.

It is still true I think that he's not 'seeing' women in his mental picture. I'm always shocked by this but it's very common in male descriptions of almost any scenario. I remember coming across Louis MacNeice's description of what a poet should be, and after listing several characteristics he added 'appreciative of women' and given the time and place of his writing, I realised the idea that the hypothetical poet he was thinking of might BE female was literally beyond him to imagine.

Brainstorm23 · 29/01/2025 14:59

I gave up listening when they said the Archbishop of Canterbury had behaved in a dignified manner and Rory compared the new leader of Syria to Gandhi and Mandela

AnnaMagnani · 29/01/2025 15:42

Having read all of the horrific reports about Iwerne, there is no way the Archbishop of Canterbury behaved in a remotely dignified manner.

The boarding school conditioning really runs deep, doesn't it?

Persimmons123 · 29/01/2025 16:20

Please can someone recommend better podcasts with the same political breadth? I was listening to them before, Tried again a few weeks ago but I can’t get past their attitude towards women.

Also, it’s not a blind spot. A blind spot is a spot, if you don’t see so many human beings you are blind.

AzurePanda · 29/01/2025 16:44

@Persimmons123 not quite the same but I do enjoy “Honestly” presented mainly by Bari Weiss. It features a lot of very knowledgeable people and does a good job of representing both sides. It is however US based. I listen to mostly US news podcasts as I just can’t find a UK one I like enough.

AnnaMagnani · 29/01/2025 16:49

I think the Rest is Politics US is better but obvs based around the USA.

Noticeably on the US election night special it was Dominic and Marina who weren't surprised Trump one.

I didn't think I'd be into the Rest is Entertainment but Richard and Marina are great. They had a very sensible episode on Gregg Wallace and being a woman working in the media.

Brefugee · 29/01/2025 16:52

GutsyShark · 28/01/2025 18:04

I’ve never been to Afghanistan so I don’t know, was just trying to provide some context to the pile on. I would think someone who has been there before would have more insight than me. As I say I’ve not listened to the episode the OP is referring to.

Well I've never been there either. But I listen to people like WRN Afghanistan, Malala and I know people who used to live there. And they all agree women's lives are so much worse (and getting worser)

So I wouldn't make a comment like that.

Brefugee · 29/01/2025 17:07

Ereshkigalangcleg · 29/01/2025 13:54

As I understand it they are not even eligible by the rules themselves, as countries have to develop women's cricket to participate, I can't see that happening where women aren't even allowed to have their voices heard in public.

The Afghans get something like 17 million dollars a year to develop women's and youth cricket.

Having women's and youth cricket at a national level, even if only in development is a condition of membership of the ICC - a requirement to allow their teams to play in ICC competitions.

The ICC have refused to allow the Afghan women's cricket team (in exile in hiding) membership of the ICC.

Make it make sense

HiggledyPiggledy33 · 29/01/2025 17:38

AnnaMagnani · 29/01/2025 10:33

I can't remember who I heard give this explanation of the Taliban, but it has a lot of sympathy for Rory Stewart's statement. I'd like to say it was Dominic Sandbrook as it has one of his golden rules that what people want is stability and safety.

So here goes:
Before the Taliban took over, Afghanistan had become incredibly corrupt. If you are a family running a small business or a farm, you didn't know from one day to the next if all your money would be stolen and whether you would still be able to feed your family.
Plus your children (male and female) were at risk of being taken off for abuse by the local warlord.

The Taliban have basically put a stop to this. You know the rules to follow, your kids are safe, you can run your shop safely and feed your family.

This is going to be a much higher priority for most Afghans than whether or not their girls can go to school, especially as a lot of Afghans are going to be thrilled that their government is practising the same religious laws that are very important to them.

Do individual families want their women not to have access to medical care? - Almost certainly not. But a lot were so poor that they weren't getting any medical care anyway. Even if they disagree with the Taliban on women they are still pleased about everything else.

So this is not my take on it, but it helped me understand a bit of how a society could be so uncaring about women - we just can't comprehend how bad it was.

I think this is what Rory Stewart means when he says it's better in Afghanistan now - you can travel without worrying you are going to be killed by bandits, people can run their farms or businesses. A lot of people (including a lot of women) are going to take this over worrying they will starve.

I get this and in Afghanistan that’s the difficult choice they have to make.

But the topic of the podcast was whether or not to boycott cricket. The choice here is “show some solidarity with half the population” or “play a game”.

And Rory is arguing to play the game.
I do find it frightening how little women are respected that he could even argue this.

OP posts:
AnnaMagnani · 29/01/2025 17:46

Yes I don't see the importance of men being able to play cricket either.

HiggledyPiggledy33 · 29/01/2025 17:53

GutsyShark · 29/01/2025 13:23

The OP was about what Rory said?

But as I said last night, I shall leave you to your “bla bla echo chamber”. You clearly have a problem understanding not everyone sees the world exactly as you do. Best of luck to you.

I do understand that not everyone sees the world as I do. It frightens me.

Because these are two clearly intelligent men, who have held positions of power and authority, and this glimpse of how they see the world is frightening.

OP posts:
HiggledyPiggledy33 · 29/01/2025 17:56

Persimmons123 · 29/01/2025 16:20

Please can someone recommend better podcasts with the same political breadth? I was listening to them before, Tried again a few weeks ago but I can’t get past their attitude towards women.

Also, it’s not a blind spot. A blind spot is a spot, if you don’t see so many human beings you are blind.

Yes - the breadth of political topics was great.

I’ll check out TRIH recommended here.

OP posts:
Persimmons123 · 29/01/2025 18:00

TRIH is great, but it does not talk about weekly political affairs as much as TRIP. The American version is interesting, can't stand the mansplaining, but I am not only interested in the US.