@ScrollingLeaves
The information uncovered should be more than enough to shut down the network. Compare this to how police deal with drug markets in the dark web. In that case, the enabling and soliciting is part of the criminal responsibility of those who set it up; or how businesses are shut down when they are a front to illegal dealings.
But here, not much happens.
I understand that a) soon enough, someone else would build a similar network and b) there are legal activities, too, and shutting them down would take away the income for other people, too.
Laws need to be adapted and those that exist already need to be properly applied. A lot of topics are covered already, such as the illegal exploitation; I don't think it matters for justice which medium someone used, the method is the same across mediums.
And cases like the husband who spend all the money on OF is a mix of addiction, comparably to gambling, and plain betrayal, and the violence against the family is criminal. Laws already exist to deal with that.
But it shows again how so many aspects are connected and the trope "it has nothing to do with you" is not true again.
About their female, empowering CEO, someone in the article comments:
"In a recent LinkedIn post, Elly Hanson, a clinical psychologist who focuses on preventing sexual abuse, questioned whether a male CEO would “be regularly invited into societal forums to wax lyrical about ‘empowerment,’ ‘authenticity’ and ‘feminism’ without robust challenge and debate? Of course not.”"