Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

The Guardian again; Celebrating double mastectomies, filing it under "health and wellbeing"

55 replies

AstonsGerbil · 19/11/2024 21:42

This just makes me feel sad; with a close family member who died of cancer, a friend who can't breastfeed due to breast cancer and who carries that sadness and pain and a MIL who had a double mastectomy due to aggressive breast cancer and who is in extreme pain with it every day, that these young women have elected to do this to themselves because they worship at the alter of gender ideology is just really depressing.

If these women are truly, truly happy, then I do hope they can cope with the pain they will carry now, but I just can't see why this would be filed under "wellness" and health and wellbeing in the newspaper. The Guardian really have sunk deep into the ideology now. I don't think there's a way back for them.

https://www.theguardian.com/wellness/2024/nov/19/trans-nonbinary-top-surgery-scars

‘My scars aren’t a finish line’: three trans and non-binary people on how top surgery changed their lives

The number of gender-affirming procedures rose in the US, followed by an onslaught of anti-trans laws. For many, the scars can be a symbol of pride and resilience

https://www.theguardian.com/wellness/2024/nov/19/trans-nonbinary-top-surgery-scars

OP posts:
NotAtMyAge · 23/11/2024 14:57

Ereshkigalangcleg · 23/11/2024 11:15

They also produced this jaw dropping piece when the U.K. Guardian had the temerity to produce a balanced article about our own equality law.

amp.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/nov/02/guardian-editorial-response-transgender-rights-uk

"The Guardian in the US is committed to covering this important civil rights fight, but when the time came for us to report on Trump’s attacks, we encountered problems. Some trans people wouldn’t talk to us.
That’s because, days earlier, the Guardian published an editorial that we believe promoted transphobic viewpoints, including some of the same** assertions about gender that US politicians are citing in their push to eliminate trans rights. Guardian journalists in the US had no input in the editorial, which we felt was misplaced and misguided, and nearly all reporters and editors from our New York, Washington DC and California offices wrote to UK editors with our concerns.
The editorial was an attempt to make sense of a growing debate about trans rights in the UK. While focused on the Gender Recognition Act, the editorial and resulting conversations have exposed some of the fundamental divides between American and British feminism and progressive politics – and highlighted for us an alarming intolerance of trans viewpoints in mainstream UK discourse.
The editorial used a UK legal debate about IDs to argue that trans rights “collide” with cis women’s rights; that equality for trans women “could adversely affect other women”; and that allowing trans women to access public spaces threatens cis women’s “safety”. These arguments were met with particular dismay in the US as they echo the position of anti-trans legislators who have pushed overtly transphobic bathroom bills."

Thanks for this. I think I read it when it was first published, but I was very new to the whole issue back then and almost overwhelmed by the amount I was reading. Having reread it and picked up my jaw, I'm left wondering how these journalists are dealing with all the changes that have happened since, including changing attitudes to "gender-affirmative" medicine in more and more countries.

NigellaAwesome · 23/11/2024 22:07

I recently saw for the first time in real life a person who had had her breasts removed in the name of trans ideology. It was on a beach in Italy and the scars were horrific. It was one of the most upsetting and disturbing things to see, that a woman had voluntarily mutilated herself. My lovely DSis died of breast cancer a few months ago, so I found it extremely upsetting.

There then followed the most surreal encounter. Me and DH were in the water, he had been snorkelling. This person was standing at the water's edge, and the beach was not busy. The woman who this person was with swam out to us and asked if she could borrow DH's mask and then told a very unconvincing story about wanting to borrow it to search for her wedding ring which she had dropped in the water, and then pointed at the breastless woman and said this was her husband. She made a couple of half hearted attempts to look at the sea floor, in an area she hadn't even been in, and then gave the mask back. Both me and DH were convinced that there had been no lost ring, and that she contrived to get strangers into conversation to try to validate her and her 'husband'. It was very odd and I felt violated that we were being drawn into their psychodrama.

I find it hugely irresponsible of the Guardian to be promoting the mutilation of women's bodies like this, and I agree with the pp who asked what's next, articles about FGM? I see very little difference in the two practices.

Ereshkigalangcleg · 23/11/2024 22:44

I'm so sorry for the loss of your sister @NigellaAwesome Flowers

The weird validation thing is a thing I think. I remember someone recounting an odd encounter where they were at the next table to a MTF and GF (a woman obviously) - the GF ordered for the MTF just so she could say "she'll have a latte" or whatever it was because otherwise there was no need to use pronouns or validate the "gender".

AstonsGerbil · 24/11/2024 08:36

So sorry for your loss of your sister @NigellaAwesome . 💐

So sorry for your loss of your sister @NigellaAwesome . 💐 I lost my sister to cancer when we were in our 20s, it's just the most awful thing. Not breast cancer, but like I said my friend and my MIL has had breast cancer a number of times, and MIL has had a double mastectomy which causes her a lot of pain. The memories of that time (for me with my sister) and for MIL are very hard.

Edited; post went a bit funny! Sorry for double mention I can't get rid of it

OP posts:
Janie143 · 24/11/2024 09:01

"It’s also a complicated, intense and invasive process that requires navigating a maze of insurance paperwork, and from which it can take years to heal." Years to heal from having to do administrative. FFS

New posts on this thread. Refresh page